Are Zionist ‘Jews’ legitimately Jewish?
The accompaniment of big questions with big answers...
No.
If for whatever reason you only needed the abridged answer, there it is. If the extended explanation is the substance sought after, keep reading in full.
As of publishing, today is the eve of one year since the Isra-Gehenna1 false flag operation on Oct. 7, 2023 (aka “Reichstag 2.0”), immediately following which the imperialist criminal syndicate of the Fourth Reich (what we euphemistically call the “State of Israel”) launched a neverending cascade of unspeakably Holocaustic war crimes on the Palestinians and—more recently—the Lebanese and other Arab civilian populations. In the “Jewish” name have these pseudo-Hebraic neo-Nazi terrorists justified their bottomless depravity, and it is past time to consider whether their self-laying-of-claim to the “Jewishness” holds any factual validity.
Definition of Jews under *biblical* Judaism
For the record, I already addressed a bulk of the theological substance in these postings, and will try to mitigate tedious redundancy in this fourth compilation:
In essence: the true Jehovah/Yahweh2-serving, Eloah3-fearing Jews of the inspired Scriptures are the faithful in Jesus Christ of repenting humility healed by His stripes.4 As to the conclusive weight of evidence based on a plain, sound understanding of the Testaments, let’s examine another dimension to further solidify the case: the Israel/Judah schism and its reunification.
‘Two separate’ houses?
Shortly succeeding the death of King Solomon and the ascension of his son Rehoboam, the latter’s moronic (though divinely preordained5) decision to ignore his old mens’ counsels of lightening the yoke of burden on the Israelites6—and instead multiply yoke and chastisement according to his youthful contemporaries’ advice7—led to the effective political secession of the ten northern tribes from the Davidic monarchy, with only Judah, Benjamin, Simeon,8 and a fraction of the Levitical priesthood remaining loyal.9 The splinter northern region came to be broadly designated the “house of Israel” and the southern kingdom the “Kingdom”/“house” of Judah. Note that both “Israel” and “Judah” here constitute more than one total meaning: “Israel” traditionally referred to the entire bulk of the Hebrews, yet in light of the new regional context—in the phrase “house of Israel”—only pertains to the northern tribes comprising Reuben, Dan, Naphtali, Gad, Asher, Isaachar, Zebulun, Manasseh, Ephraim, and a section of Levi. Meanwhile, “Judah” traditionally was ascribed to the tribe, yet broadly as the “house of Judah” it is defined as the entire southern tribes of Judah, Benjamin, and Simeon, plus the remainder of Levi.
The divine role of Jehovah in bringing about this schism does not—contrary to fringe theories propagated by pseudo-“Jewish” supremacist trendsetters and their mirror neo-Nazi kin10—suggest that the regional split is eternal and carries any implication of a distinct “identity” between “Israel” and “Judah.” The prophet Isaiah spoke of the two regional, politically schismatic kingdoms as “both houses of Israel.”11 Jehovah declared through the prophet Ezekiel (in ch. 37):12
…take thee one stick, and write upon it, For Judah, and for the children of Israel his companions: then take another stick, and write upon it, For Joseph, the stick of Ephraim and for all the house of Israel his companions: and join them one to another into one stick; and they shall become one in thine hand.
…
Thus saith the Lord God; Behold, I will take the stick of Joseph, which is in the hand of Ephraim, and the tribes of Israel his fellows, and will put them with him, even with the stick of Judah, and make them one stick, and they shall be one in mine hand.
Does it get more clear? Yes, indeed:13
Thus saith the Lord God; Behold, I will take the children of Israel from among the heathen, whither they be gone, and will gather them on every side, and bring them into their own land: and I will make them one nation in the land upon the mountains of Israel; and one king shall be king to them all: and they shall be no more two nations, neither shall they be divided into two kingdoms any more at all.
Reunification of Ephraim/Israel and Judah—when?
Take note: the northern “house of Israel” was broadly synonymous during its heyday of schismatic regional existence as “Ephraim,”14 in turn associated with Joseph.15
Isaiah prophesied that in the day of the “root of Jesse” (Jesus Christ):16
…the Lord shall set his hand again the second time to recover the remnant of his people, which shall be left, from Assyria, and from Egypt, and from Pathros, and from Cush, and from Elam, and from Shinar, and from Hamath, and from the islands of the sea. And he shall set up an ensign for the nations, and shall assemble the outcasts of Israel, and gather together the dispersed of Judah from the four corners of the earth. The envy also of Ephraim shall depart, and the adversaries of Judah shall be cut off: Ephraim shall not envy Judah, and Judah shall not vex Ephraim.
Obviously the fulfillment could not have been met prior to the 1st century. Yet by the time of the prophet Jeremiah, centuries well before Christ came incarnate in the flesh, the “whole seed of Ephraim” was already cast out.17 There is no contradiction here—remember what I stated in the earlier postings about type/antitype in the progression the Old to New Covenant? Let’s remember that the New Covenant/Testament spoken of by the Lord Jesus Christ in the Last Supper18 was long prophesied by Jeremiah (and quoted in the Epistle to the Hebrews).19 The New Covenant was likewise prophesied by Ezekiel in the exact same section speaking of the future reconciliation between the houses of Israel and Judah:20
Moreover I will make a covenant of peace with them; it shall be an everlasting covenant with them: and I will place them, and multiply them, and will set my sanctuary in the midst of them for evermore.
(the “I” here, of course, is none other than Adonai Yahweh (“the Lord God”)21—IOWs, Jesus Christ) So then, it is established that the reunification of the house of Israel (aka “Ephraim”/“Joseph”) and the house of Judah was to meet its fulfillment in the time of Jesus Christ in the 1st century.
‘Antitypical’ Ephraim
The northern tribes—aka the “house of Israel”—were conquered into Assyrian captivity for their progressively worsening apostasy against Jehovah, therefore serving as a broad symbol for apostasy.
Solving the riddle necessitates a look at the prophet Osee (Hosea) and his oracles:22
The beginning of the word of the LORD by Hosea. And the LORD said to Hosea, Go, take unto thee a wife of whoredoms and children of whoredoms: for the land hath committed great whoredom, departing from the LORD. So he went and took Gomer the daughter of Diblaim; which conceived, and bare him a son. And the LORD said unto him, Call his name Jezreel; for yet a little while, and I will avenge the blood of Jezreel upon the house of Jehu, and will cause to cease the kingdom of the house of Israel. And it shall come to pass at that day, that I will break the bow of Israel, in the valley of Jezreel.
Compare with Isaiah’s prophecy:23
…within threescore and five years shall Ephraim be broken, that it be not a people.
When Gomer bore Hosea’s daughter, God commanded the prophet:24
Call her name Loruhamah: for I will no more have mercy upon the house of Israel; but I will utterly take them away. But I will have mercy upon the house of Judah, and will save them by the LORD their God, and will not save them by bow, nor by sword, nor by battle, by horses, nor by horsemen.
Finally, a second son:25
Then said God, Call his name Loammi: for ye are not my people, and I will not be your God. Yet the number of the children of Israel shall be as the sand of the sea, which cannot be measured nor numbered; and it shall come to pass, that in the place where it was said unto them, Ye are not my people, there it shall be said unto them, Ye are the sons of the living God. Then shall the children of Judah and the children of Israel be gathered together, and appoint themselves one head, and they shall come up out of the land: for great shall be the day of Jezreel.
For the record. Hos. ch. 1-3 forms a literary chiasmus; consider the near-parallel correspondence in the conclusion of ch. 2:26
And I will sow her unto me in the earth; and I will have mercy upon her that had not obtained mercy; and I will say to them which were not my people, Thou art my people; and they shall say, Thou art my God.
Obviously, the subject here is the “children of Israel.” Let’s now look at what the Apostles in the 1st century said. Paul to the Romans:27
Even us, whom he hath called, not of the Jews only, but also of the Gentiles? As he saith also in Osee, I will call them my people, which were not my people; and her beloved, which was not beloved. And it shall come to pass, that in the place where it was said unto them, Ye are not my people; there shall they be called the children of the living God.
And Peter in his First Epistle:28
But ye are a chosen generation, a royal priesthood, an holy nation, a peculiar people; that ye should shew forth the praises of him who hath called you out of darkness into his marvellous light; which in time past were not a people, but are now the people of God: which had not obtained mercy, but now have obtained mercy.
Obviously both passages here are explicit quotations of Hosea and are applied in explanatory context to the Christian church in its comprisal of both Jew and Gentile alike. In the New Testament, the Koine Greek world translated “Jew” literally means “Judean” or geographic resident of Judah. IOWs, the Jewish Christians comprised the continued “house of Judah.” This leaves one solid conclusion: the Gentile converts to Christianity constituted the comprisal of Ephraim.
Now, please don’t become mistaken here: Ephraim’s identifiable association with the Gentiles in antitype is NOT because the “heathen” nations held some extent of Ephrathite/Israelite “blood” by ethnicity (stemming from the northern tribes’ assimilation into Assyria). Rather, because literalized type is transferred to spiritual antitype, the broad encapsulation of Ephraim as a symbol for apostasy is embodied in the Gentiles’ wayward backwardness from God, and therefore the Gentiles’ converting to Christianity at the preaching of the gospel during the 1st century represents the reunification of the house of Israel with the house of Judah, the latter being the Judean seat of the “literal” Hebrews as a continually preserved unit (see Hos. 1:7 in the quoted passage above pertaining to Loruhamah).
The fullness of the true Israel
Note that Paul speaks of the spiritually circumcised-in-the-heart—with no distinction between “literal” Jew and Gentile—as spiritual Jews broadly:29
For he is not a Jew, which is one outwardly; neither is that circumcision, which is outward in the flesh: but he is a Jew, which is one inwardly; and circumcision is that of the heart, in the spirit, and not in the letter; whose praise is not of men, but of God.
Now, remember, the reunification of Judah and Ephraim is the rejoining of both houses of Israel. And here, Paul speaks of faithful Jewish and Gentile Christians alike as spiritual “Jews,” aka Judeans. IOWs, there most definitely is no actual difference in “identity” between the “house of Israel” and “house of Judah”—Judah is of the entire spiritual Israel, and the house of Israel were/are Judahites by spirit.
Remember this?30
And I will bless them that bless thee, and curse him that curseth thee: and in thee shall all families of the earth be blessed.
Paul explained to the Galatians:31
Even as Abraham believed God, and it was accounted to him for righteousness. Know ye therefore that they which are of faith, the same are the children of Abraham. And the scripture, foreseeing that God would justify the heathen through faith, preached before the gospel unto Abraham, saying, In thee shall all nations be blessed. So then they which be of faith are blessed with faithful Abraham.
Despite what the leading pseudochristian Zionazis (reactionary, right-wing racist Republicans and their Hagee/CUFI donor patrons) repetitively spout of their Judeo-Goebbels apparatus, the biblical record of God’s impartial egalitarianism is that conspicuously straightforward: the blessings given to Abraham are promised to individuals of faith in Jesus Christ32 who are justified by the faith of Christ Jesus.33 Paul couldn’t have made the distinction more clear-cut:34
That is, They which are the children of the flesh, THESE ARE NOT THE CHILDREN OF GOD: but the children of the promise are counted for the seed.
Notice a similar phrasing between Paul’s letter to the Ephesians and the First Epistle of Peter’s Hosea quotation?35
Wherefore remember, that ye being in time past Gentiles in the flesh, who are called Uncircumcision by that which is called the Circumcision in the flesh made by hands; that at that time ye were without Christ, being aliens from the commonwealth of Israel, and strangers from the covenants of promise, having no hope, and without God in the world: but now in Christ Jesus ye who sometimes were far off are made nigh by the blood of Christ.
Now, the the “fullness” of spiritual Israel—aka the apostolic Christian church—only gets more fascinating. Peter says also:36
Ye also, as lively stones, are built up a spiritual house, an holy priesthood, to offer up spiritual sacrifices, acceptable to God by Jesus Christ.
Remember the above quotation of I Pet. 2:8-9 which repeated the term “priesthood.” It is most definitely intriguing and of valuable note that the church in broad terms—and not merely one fraction/section—is described in priestly terms, which were traditionally ascribed to the tribe of Levi. Now, remember, out of all the tribes of Israel, Levi was the “oddball”—remember this from the Torah?37
At that time the LORD separated the tribe of Levi, to bear the ark of the covenant of the LORD, to stand before the LORD to minister unto him, and to bless in his name, unto this day. Wherefore Levi hath no part nor inheritance with his brethren; the LORD is his inheritance, according as the LORD thy God promised him.
Recall what you picked up above: the fullness of the Christian church—whereby the Gentiles as the antitypical Ephraim/Joseph/“house of Israel” is grafted into the “house of Judah”—encapsulates all the the “main” tribes of the children of Jacob/Israel since Ephraim encompasses the northern tribes and Judah the southern tribes. With Levi now in the picture, the apostolic Christian church from the 1st century onwards is therefore established as the only, true, and full Israel of God. This is why the Lord Jesus Christ’s brother opened his Epistle with:38
James, a servant of God and of the Lord Jesus Christ, to the twelve tribes which are scattered abroad, greeting.
Remember once again: the northern “house of Israel”/Ephraim/Joseph in “literal” tribal terms was extinct by the time of Jeremiah. James could only be referring to the Christian church as the comprisal of all twelve tribes of Israel: the northern symbolically-Ephrathite Gentile converts and southern Judahite Jewish adherents, both of which also constitute a spiritual priestly/Levitical attribute.
Long story short: the true Israel, from the biblical definition, is 100% definitely NOT represented by the modern hexagramic-Nazi criminal syndicate. Rather, its comprisal are the scattered39 apostolic Christians from all peoples, nations, multitudes, and tongues,40 of repenting41 faith in Jesus Christ42 acknowledging Him as the righteous Lord43 who is the ONLY WAY TO SALVATION,44 and who keep God’s commandments (the Torah) and Christ’s faith.45
Final note: obviously as type shifts to antitype, the “literal” aspect is rendered obsolete and is superseded by the greater spiritual/symbolic meaning. IOWs, the “literal” Jew vs. Gentile difference in the 1st century only served the purpose of the initial reunification of Ephraim and Judah, though afterwards—with all Christians henceforth constituting spiritual “Judeans,” IOWs, the “Judahite” element—the new Ephrathites are each generation’s new converts to Christianity while born-and-raised-from-birth-Christians are the spiritual Judeans/Judahites. Seeing the broad picture?
Talmudic ‘Judaism’—any credence yet to objectively designate Zionist ‘Jews’ Jews?
Introductory summary
For clarification of actual reality, the ascribed authority in purely biblical, Mosaic Judaism is entirely in the divine Eloah alone and His law, not the vain imaginations of men. The prophet Isaiah boldly declared:46
For my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways my ways, saith the LORD. For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways, and my thoughts than your thoughts.
Just look at the Fifth Book of Moses (Deuteronomy):47
Ye shall not add unto the word which I command you, neither shall ye diminish ought from it, that ye may keep the commandments of the LORD your God which I command you.
Mainstream rabbinic “Judaism” violates this rule for the obvious reason that it elevates its man-made mishnaic/Talmudic authority through the lens with which to selectively interpret the Hebrew Bible.
Anyways, sure, let’s just assume for the time being here that “Talmudic Judaism” can (supposedly) be seen as a legitimate strain of Judaism. Does the broad definition of Jews as a religion thereby allow the honest labeling of Zionazi “Jews” as Jews?
Nope!
Even the man-ordained, non-biblical Talmud does not go that blasphemously off-the-rails loony-insane as to legitimize Zionist premises by any means. Here are the Talmudic “Three Oaths” copy-pasted straight from the Sefaria website:48
The Gemara asks: And how does Rabbi Zeira explain the repetition of this oath in these verses? The Gemara explains: That verse is necessary for that which was taught by Rabbi Yosei, son of Rabbi Ḥanina, who said: Why are these three oaths (Song of Songs 2:7, 3:5, 8:4) needed?
1) One, so that the Jews should not ascend to Eretz Yisrael as a wall, but little by little.
2) And another one, that the Holy One, Blessed be He, adjured the Jews that they should not rebel against the rule of the nations of the world.
3) And the last one is that the Holy One, Blessed be He, adjured the nations of the world that they should not subjugate the Jews excessively.
This passage is a major headache for Zionazis, so they of course downplay its significance as of mere “metaphorical” value.
Jews—race or religion?
Well, well, well, since it’s clear that neither true biblical Mosaic Judaism nor even “Talmudic Judaism” can encompass Zionists into the scope of Jewry, the only last straw is “race”—since the residents of the Fourth Reich clearly are the ethnic descendants of (religious) Jews, this automatically makes them “Jewish,” right?
EIR researchers up summed the matter well:49
The founder of Zionism in its modern, British-sponsored form is not Theodor Herzl, but a certain Moses Hess. Hess converted Friedrich Engels to communism, and wrote parts of Marx’s German Ideology. In 1861, Hess will write Rome and Jerusalem, which attacks Moses Mendelssohn for the idea that Judaism is a religion and a culture. For Hess, Judaism is a race in Mazzini’s blood-and-soil sense, and therefore must have a homeland.
Remember, the Nazis defined Jews as a “race” as opposed to a religion.50 So too did the Zionists to the extent of an ideological convergence:51
Hannah Arendt reported that circulation of the Zionist weekly paper Die Jüdisher Rundschau increased from five to seven thousand to nearly forty-thousand, and Zionist fund-raising operations received three times as much income in 1935-36 as they did in 1931-32. At this point in time, the Nazis tolerated the Zionists and the two parties even agreed on certain points. Klaus Polkehn writes, ‘the fascists as well as the Zionists believed in unscientific racial theories, and both met on the same ground in their beliefs in such mystical generalizations as “national character (Volkstum)” and “race,” both were chauvinistic and inclined towards “racial exclusiveness.”’
…
To the Nazis, the Zionists were ‘the “decent” Jews since they too thought in “national” terms.’
The conservative Jewish diplomat and historian Alfred M. Lilienthal put it candidly:52
There is no reputable anthropologist who will not agree that Jewish racialism is as much poppycock as Aryan racialism. As far back as December 1938, the American Anthropological Association, at its annual conference in New York, condemned Aryanism as a fallacy and stated that both, ‘Aryan’ and ‘Semitic,’ were linguistic terms without any racial significance. Race involves the inheritance of specific physical features by large groups of mankind, such as hair texture, head form, color of eyes and skin, stature, the shape of the nose, etc. Hitler, Weizmann, cartoonists and other creators of ‘Jewish’ prototypes notwithstanding, there is no Jewish or Semitic race.
The complete myth of a “Jewish race”:53
…flows from the fact that the words Hebrew, Israelite, Jew, Judaism, and the Jewish people have been used synonymously to suggest a historic continuity. But this is a misuse. These words refer to different groups of people with varying ways of life in different periods in history. Hebrew is a term correctly applied to the period from the beginning of Biblical history to the settling in Canaan. Israelite refers correctly to the members of the twelve tribes of Israel. The name Yehudi or Jew is used in the Old Testament to designate members of the tribe of Judah, descendants of the fourth son of Jacob, as well as to denote citizens of the Kingdom of Judah, particularly at the time of Jeremiah’ and under the Persian occupation.* Centuries later, the same word came to be applied to anyone, no matter of what origin, whose religion was Judaism.
The Khazar argument
Lilienthal’s expositions continue:54
…[King] Bulan came to choose Judaism for himself and the people of Khazaria in the seventh century A. D., and thereafter the Khazars (sometimes spelled Chazars and Khozars) lived according to Judaic laws. Under the rule of Obadiah, Judaism gained further strength in Khazaria. Synagogues and schools were built to give instruction in the Bible and the Talmud.
…
Khazar traders brought not only silks and carpets of Persia and the Near East but also their Judaic faith to the banks of the Vistula and the Volga.
He writes of Khazarian ancestry of the European “Jewish” community as a:55
…historical fact. Jewish historians and religious text books acknowledge the fact, though the propagandists of Jewish nationalism belittle it as pro-Arab propaganda.
Now, given the broad argument I already highlighted above, the Khazar argument as a refutation of Zionist propaganda serves a very narrow, limited scope: it is only useful to counter solely Zionist claims of land ownership when the Zionazis propagate racial/ethnic-lineage arguments, and objectively in of itself serves little meaningful use since the Zionazi laying of claim to the identity of “Jews” is already solidly disproved along religious/biblical grounds.
Violated Torah/Mitzvot rules
“For whosoever shall keep the whole law, and yet offend in one point, he is guilty of all.”
—James 2:10
[highly incomplete list]
“I am the LORD thy God, which have brought thee out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage. Thou shalt have no other gods before me.” —First Commandment56
Zionazism is a cabalistic57 false god in of itself—it presumptuously and blasphemously assumes the divine authority to restore Israel as a nation
“Thou shalt not take the name of the LORD thy God in vain; for the LORD will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain.” —Third Commandment58
…do I need to explain this one?
“Remember the sabbath day, to keep it holy. Six days shalt thou labour, and do all thy work: but the seventh day is the sabbath of the LORD thy God: in it thou shalt not do any work, thou, nor thy son, nor thy daughter, thy manservant, nor thy maidservant, nor thy cattle, nor thy stranger that is within thy gates: for in six days the LORD made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is, and rested the seventh day: wherefore the LORD blessed the sabbath day, and hallowed it.” —Fourth Commandment59
[the Fourth Reich never committed a war crime on a Sabbath day ever]
“Honour thy father and thy mother: that thy days may be long upon the land which the LORD thy God giveth thee.” —Fifth Commandment60
instead of honoring the legacy of their parents who perished in the Holocaust, Zionist “Jews” adopt the ideology of the very kapos who colluded with the Nazi murderers of their parents all the while exploiting their parents’ sufferings to justify a Holocaust against another group of people
“Thou shalt not kill.” —Sixth Commandment61
“Thou shalt not commit adultery.” —Seventh Commandment62
the Anal Desecration Leagues (ADLs) and NOG r*pists missed the memo
“Thou shalt not steal.” —Eighth Commandment63
“Nakba”
“Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbour.” —Ninth Commandment64
there is no practical starting point attempting to document Nazisraeli lies
“Thou shalt not covet thy neighbour's house, thou shalt not covet thy neighbour's wife, nor his manservant, nor his maidservant, nor his ox, nor his ass, nor any thing that is thy neighbour's.” —Tenth Commandment65
Judeo-Lebensraum, anyone?66
“Thou shalt not follow a multitude to do evil;”67
oh:68
This posting’s been excessively long, and I have other things to do. Wrap-up time…
Conclusion
Pour all the dried salt from hypersaline right-wing Zionazi crocodile tears to your liking on a brownshirt pig and proceed to don a yarmulke on its head—calling it kosher doesn’t change what’s intrinsically unholy into holy any more than marketing barf as multivitamin transforms vomit into a magic health pill. Little children aren’t stupid enough to think a bag of Sour Patch amounts to fresh fruit, yet “educated grown-ups” confuse neo-Nazi “synagogues” of Satan for actual Judaism.
“Gehenna” = “hell.” Need I clarify further?
Commonly translated as “the LORD.”
Literally, “God.”
Isa. 53:5, I Pet. 2:24.
I Kings 12:15.
I Kings 11:29-31, 12:6-9.
I Kings 12:10-14.
Traditionally the tribe of Simeon is listed in the “Ten” Lost Tribes, yet its situated location in the “Judahite” southern region naturally begs the question of how it was ever “lost” into Assyrian captivity that impacted the north.
I Kings 12:16-21.
Both the Judeosupremacist/Zionist “Messianic Jewish”/“Hebrew Christian” and white supremacist/neo-Nazi “Christian Identity” cults subscribe to “two-house theology.” The latter in fact view European “stock” as racially superior because they are the purported descendants of the Ten Lost Tribes. You did read that right: that neo-Ebionite racialist group’s white supremacy is their “Jewish” supremacy.
Isa. 8:13-14.
Ezek. 37:15-19.
Ezek. 37:21-22.
See Isa. 7:17: “…from the day that Ephraim departed from Judah…”—obviously it was not only the tribe of Ephraim which split from the Judahite Davidic rule, hence “Ephraim” here is representative of the broad northern region.
Hos. 5:3-5.
Isa. 11:11-13.
Jer. 7:15.
Mk. 14:24, Matt. 26:28, Lk. 22:20.
Jer. 31:31-34, Heb. 8:8-13.
Ezek. 37:26.
Ezek. 37:21.
Hos. 1:2-5.
Isa. 7:8.
Hos. 1:6-7.
Hos. 1:9-11.
Hos. 2:23.
Rom. 9:24-26.
I Pet. 2:9-10.
Rom. 2:28-29.
Gen. 12:2.
Gal. 3:6-9.
Gal. 3:26.
Gal. 2:16, 3:22.
Rom. 9:7.
Eph. 2:11-13.
I Pet. 2:5.
Deut. 10:8-9.
Jas. 1:1.
I Pet. 1:1.
Rev. 7:9-10.
Mark 1:14-15.
Eph. 1:1.
Rom. 10:9.
Acts. 4:10-12.
Rev. 12:17.
Isa. 55:8-9.
Deut. 4:2.
“Ketubot 111a:4,” Sefaria.
Anton Chaitkin (Apr. 15, 1994), “America’s ‘Young America’ movement: slaveholders and the B'nai B'rith,” Executive Intelligence Review, vol. XXI, no. XVI, p. 28.
Alfred M. Lilienthal (1953), “What Price Israel?” ch. XII, p. 213.
Tamar Wolofsky, “The Unlikely Entente: Collaborations Between Zionism and National Socialism before the Second World War,” pp. 64-65.
Lilienthal (1953), pp. 213-14.
Ibid, p. 216.
Ibid, p. 221-22.
Ibid.
Ex. 20:2-4.
Joseph Brewda (Nov. 2, 1990), “The cult origins of the fundamentalists behind the ‘Temple Mount’ plot,” Executive Intelligence Review, vol. XVII, no. XLII, p. 36.
Ex. 20:7.
Ex. 20:8-11.
Ex. 20:12.
Ex. 20:13.
Ex. 20:14.
Ex. 20:15.
Ex. 20:16.
Ex. 20:17.
Sep. 30, 2024, “Israel: Settler group advertises new properties in southern Lebanon,” Middle East Eye.
Ex. 23:2a.
Aug. 18, 2024, “Majority of Israeli Jews believe prison rape suspects shouldn't face criminal charges,” Middle East Eye.
Excellent article; appreciate the research very much. Thank you.
It doesn’t MATTER what we ARE, it matters what we DO.