Reichstag 2.0: The pernicious Israeli false flag operation behind Oct. 7

Cui bono?

Following the Japanese Fascist attack against Pearl Harbor, isolationist right-wing muckrakers published allegations of intentional inaction by the Democratic presidential administration of 32nd president Franklin D. Roosevelt, contending fervently that he allowed the brutal massacre to occur to exploit it as a pretext for bringing the U.S. to war. Whether it’s Pearl Harbor,¹ Reichstag,² or 9/11,³ these are just fringe conspiracy theories not worth contemplating an iota upon, right? …

Before I address Oct. 7 itself, it’s necessary to briefly summarize the “problem-reaction-solution” explanation model as promulgated by David Icke.⁴ As the man himself essentially summarizes,⁵ the New World Order powermongers create false flag operations in the “opposite direction” (relative to the direction they actually seek to pursue) blamed on convenient scapegoats, and exploit the “problem” as an excuse to enact their proposed counter-measure (the “reaction”), which in turn creates the “solution.” In the case of the Reichstag Fire, the PRS explanation would be that the Nazis themselves set the fire on purpose (which was blamed on the Communists)—“problem”—to justify their subsequent vicious “anti-Communist” repressions—“reaction”—to achieve their preplanned objective of consolidated authoritarian rule—“solution.” Remember this simple explanatory model.

Exhibit 1: Israeli intelligence failure

It is a well-documented fact that Israeli intelligence severely turned a blind eye to threat reports leading up to Oct. 7. The New York Times reported just less than two months following the attack:⁶

Israeli officials obtained Hamas’s battle plan for the Oct. 7 terrorist attack more than a year before it happened, documents, emails and interviews show. But Israeli military and intelligence officials dismissed the plan as aspirational, considering it too difficult for Hamas to carry out.

The approximately 40-page document, which the Israeli authorities code-named “Jericho Wall,” outlined, point by point, exactly the kind of devastating invasion that led to the deaths of about 1,200 people.

…

Hamas followed the blueprint with shocking precision.

…

The document circulated widely among Israeli military and intelligence leaders, but experts determined that an attack of that scale and ambition was beyond Hamas’s capabilities, according to documents and officials. It is unclear whether Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu or other top political leaders saw the document, as well.

Then there’s the scrutiny over those ridiculous IDF “blunders” contributing to the high death toll of civilian and military Israeli casualties in the immediate counter-attack.⁷ But—not withstanding who killed those Israelis—more slain Israel citizens means more right-wing racist propaganda frenzy advocating the genocide of Arabs.

Exhibit 2: Israeli far right ignores hostages

One mother of a killed Israeli soldier blamed the IDF for her son’s death:⁸

The mother of a now-dead Israeli soldier captured by Hamas militants on October 7 says it was the Israeli military, not Palestinian resistance fighters, who killed her son. In a recently-published post on Facebook, Israeli mother Maayan Sherman wrote that her son Ron was “indeed murdered – not by Hamas,” but in circumstances more akin to “Auschwitz and the showers.”

The killing of her son, she wrote, was caused “not from accidental gunfire, nor from crossfire, but from premeditated murder – bombing with poison gas.”

…

Israel has refused to divulge further information regarding the circumstances of the deaths, stating in a press release that “it cannot be denied nor confirmed that they were killed due to strangulation, suffocation, poisoning, or as the result of an IDF [Israeli Defense Forces] attack or Hamas operation.” But Sherman’s mother says all the evidence indicates the Israeli government deliberately killed her son.

“Oh yes, they also found that he had several crushed fingers, apparently due to his desperate attempts to escape the poison grave that the IDF dug for him when he tried to breathe fresh air, but only breathed IDF poison,” the grieving mother continued.

Also notable was that the most fanatically bloodthirsty rightists of the Knesset—Otzma Yehudit⁹—were lashed by none other than the hostage families themselves for clearly lacking any priority of rescuing the abducted Israeli victims:¹⁰

Representatives of the hostages' families clashed with Otzma Yehudit MKs during a National Security Committee meeting on Monday on legislating the death penalty for terrorists. During the meeting, the representatives begged National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir not to advance the bill being pushed by his Otzma Yehudit party because they said the timing could endanger the hostages.

…

The families' request was ignored by the Otzma Yehudit MKs present at the meeting who argued that the law was necessary but didn't address the issue of the timing. During the meeting, Otzma Yehudit MK Almog Cohen attacked the hostages' families after being confronted by one father whose daughter is being held hostage in Gaza. The father accused the lawmakers of debating the bill only because they "want to kill Arabs" and added "you have killed enough".

Exhibit 3a: Oct. 7 as a perfectly convenient pretext for neofascist right-wing causes

Right at the onset of 2024, The Times of Israel noted:¹¹

Speaking during their parties’ respective faction meetings in the Knesset, National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir and Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich presented the migration of Palestinian civilians as a solution to the long-running conflict and as a prerequisite for securing the stability necessary to allow residents of southern Israel to return to their homes.

The war presents an “opportunity to concentrate on encouraging the migration of the residents of Gaza,” Ben Gvir told reporters and members of his far-right Otzma Yehudit party, calling such a policy “a correct, just, moral and humane solution.”

Long before Oct. 7, the Israeli neo-Revisionist far right already made their agenda clear. Seem oddly akin to… mid-August 2017 Charlottesville? Just take any Nazi chant, replace “the Jews” with “the Arabs”/“the Palestinians,” and that’s another Zionist talking point.

It should, of course, then be no surprise to observe that (in late January of this year) Netanyahu’s right-wing ministers endorsed at a conference (Wannsee 2.0?) the transfer and expulsion of Palestinians from Gaza.¹² To quote:¹³

In front of an impassioned audience of thousands of right-wing activists, 11 government ministers and 15 coalition lawmakers pledged Sunday night to rebuild Jewish Israeli settlements in the heart of the Gaza Strip, with some also encouraging the emigration of the Palestinian population after the war with Hamas is over.

Speaking amid a carnival-like atmosphere at the Jerusalem International Convention Center, Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich, the leader of the ultranationalist Religious Zionism party, extolled the virtues of creating new settlements, declaring: “God willing, we will settle and we will be victorious.”

…

Smotrich and Ben Gvir, together with six coalition MKs, signed what was dubbed the “Covenant of Victory and Renewal of Settlement,” which pledged that the signatories would “grow Jewish settlements full of life” in the Gaza Strip. Alongside them, Communications Minister Shlomo Karhi of Netanyahu’s ruling Likud party also called for building settlements in Gaza and “encouraging voluntary emigration.”

Now sure, Netanyahu himself had criticized the rabid Otzma Yehudit policy as too extreme even for him.¹⁴ With that said, remember the shift in political dynamics in Israel instigated by Oct. 7—the centrists and liberals acquiesced to the right-wing extremists, not the other way around, since the rightists capitalized upon Oct. 7 in bigoted appeals i.e. “we told you the Arabs couldn’t be trusted.” Neo-Revisionism got its ever-so-convenient boon as support for a two-state solution dwindled.¹⁵

Exhibit 3b: settler violence exacerbated

The murderous bloodthirst of right-wing extremism will remain an inevitable staple of humanity’s woes till humanity’s last days, and this is no aberration in the case example of Zionist neofascism. Even while the security of Israel is compromised by reactionary settler terrorism,¹⁶ the IDF and “mainstream” right-wing politicians acquiesce to the ever-increasing demands of settler fanatics even if they wished to intervene and cease the waves of anti-Palestinian (or, to alternatively put it, anti-Semitic, literally) violence.¹⁷ Why? Because the IDF/Likud dare not offend the hard-right settler voter base, and so settlers often attack the IDF in hopes of the Israeli military having no choice but offer them extra goodies as compromise. This is no joke!

Subsequent to Oct. 7 (as reported just less than a month after the attack), the OHCA reported that Israeli settler violence incidents spiked from 3 per day to 7.¹⁸ Fast forward to recent days:¹⁹

By the end of October, it was clear that no one was going to help the villagers of Khirbet Zanuta. A tiny Palestinian community, some 150 people perched on a windswept hill in the West Bank near Hebron, it had long faced threats from the Jewish settlers who had steadily encircled it. But occasional harassment and vandalism, in the days after the Oct. 7 Hamas attack, escalated into beatings and murder threats. The villagers made appeal after appeal to the Israeli police and to the ever-present Israeli military, but their calls for protection went largely unheeded, and the attacks continued with no consequences. So one day the villagers packed what they could, loaded their families into trucks and disappeared.

…

Since Smotrich took office, [Maj. Gen. Yehuda] Fox wrote, the effort to clamp down on illegal settlement construction has dwindled “to the point where it has disappeared.” Moreover, Fox said, Smotrich and his allies were thwarting the very measures to enforce the law that the government had promised Israeli courts it would take.

Exhibit 4: the Zionist origin of Hamas

In his Total Onslaught lecture series, Prof. W. J. Veith exposits repeatedly upon the attested Jesuitical control of Masonry as—ostensibly—an effective counter-argument to the mainstream narrative of Jesuitism and Freemasonry being genuine opposites. The basic idea here is that high-ranking interests often only seem to be opposed to their publicly hated archnemesis, yet behind the scenes controls their enemy via agentur, unbeknownst to the general public. In the case study of the French Revolution, Veith argues that the Jesuits used Masonry and the Illuminati—supposed anti-Jesuitist organizations—to propagate radical-leftist secularist ideologies to overthrow the anti-Jesuit Catholic monarchies (along with the anti-Jesuit Dominican Order). To “collate” this with Leo H. Lehmann’s assessment of fascist opposition to Masonry, the subsequent conclusion to draw here is that once liberal Masonic influence accomplished its goal in Europe of purging the monarchies, they were to be liquidated by another Jesuit front—Nazi-Fascism.

Perhaps the (supposed) feud between Israel and Hamas is no different. In the heyday of Yasser Arafat, Israeli officials conducted some interestingly-justified activities:²⁰

[Brig. Gen. Yitzhak] Segev later told a New York Times reporter that he had helped finance the Palestinian Islamist movement as a “counterweight” to the secularists and leftists of the Palestine Liberation Organization and the Fatah party, led by Yasser Arafat (who himself referred to Hamas as “a creature of Israel.”)

“The Israeli government gave me a budget,” the retired brigadier general confessed, “and the military government gives to the mosques.”

“Hamas, to my great regret, is Israel’s creation,” Avner Cohen, a former Israeli religious affairs official who worked in Gaza for more than two decades, told the Wall Street Journal in 2009. Back in the mid-1980s, Cohen even wrote an official report to his superiors warning them not to play divide-and-rule in the Occupied Territories, by backing Palestinian Islamists against Palestinian secularists. “I … suggest focusing our efforts on finding ways to break up this monster before this reality jumps in our face,” he wrote.

And if you thought that was all old news, perhaps it would intrigue the mind to realize that Netanyahu for 14 years was closely collaborative with Hamas and made sure to retain its political power!²¹ When Qatar sent millions of dollars on a monthly basis to prop up the Hamas regime, Netanyahu “not only tolerated those payments, [but] he had encouraged them.”²² The Times of Israel noted one day after the Oct. 7 attack:²³

For years, the various governments led by Benjamin Netanyahu took an approach that divided power between the Gaza Strip and the West Bank — bringing Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas to his knees while making moves that propped up the Hamas terror group. The idea was to prevent Abbas — or anyone else in the Palestinian Authority’s West Bank government — from advancing toward the establishment of a Palestinian state.

Thus, amid this bid to impair Abbas, Hamas was upgraded from a mere terror group to an organization with which Israel held indirect negotiations via Egypt, and one that was allowed to receive infusions of cash from abroad.

…

Most of the time, Israeli policy was to treat the Palestinian Authority as a burden and Hamas as an asset. Far-right MK Bezalel Smotrich, now the finance minister in the hardline government and leader of the Religious Zionism party, said so himself in 2015.

According to various reports, Netanyahu made a similar point at a Likud faction meeting in early 2019, when he was quoted as saying that those who oppose a Palestinian state should support the transfer of funds to Gaza, because maintaining the separation between the Palestinian Authority in the West Bank and Hamas in Gaza would prevent the establishment of a Palestinian state.

Long story short: more rightist Hamas Islamist power → less secular-leftist PLO/Fatah/Abbas influence → increased Palestinian internal schism → divided Palestinians less unified against Israel.

The concluding razor of Occam

Prof. Veith noted in Clash of Minds:²⁴

“…there are voices that are going up that are saying that this is the false flag, because their security in Israel is so magnificent—that they boasted that they can see a cockroach crossing the fence—let alone an invasion as has taken place right now.”
—Walter J. Veith, Oct. 19, 2023

The simple, logical conclusion is albeit a harsh one for the average feeble mind: the Israeli far-right had a preplanned agenda of pushing aggressive settlement policies to ethnically cleanse Palestinians from their land; to some extent of complicity—whether passively refusing to stop, or outright coordinating—as it pertains to the Oct. 7 attack, it served as the perfect “problem” for the Israeli neo-Revisionist despots to scapegoat on Palestinians en masse to justify their murderous “reaction” with the long-term goal of accomplishing their final “solution” (yes, you read that right) of ethnically cleansing Palestine as they intended from the very start.

1. James Perloff (Dec. 7, 2023), “Pearl Harbor: Hawaii Was Surprised; FDR Was Not,” The New American.

2. Philip Oltermann (Feb. 26, 2023), “‘Blind chance’ or plot? Exhumation may help solve puzzle of 1933 Reichstag blaze,” The Guardian.

3. Christian Stöcker (Sep. 6, 2011), “The Politician Turned Conspiracy Theorist,” Der Spiegel.

4. Notwithstanding certain of Icke’s fringe views, his “PRS” theory remains relevant and intriguing in the evaluation of world events.

5. Michal Eduard (Oct. 10, 2018), “David Icke Problem Reaction Solution,” YouTube.

6. Ronen Bergman, Adam Goldman (Dec. 1, 2023), “Israel had a blueprint for the Oct. 7 attacks a year ago. Officials dismissed it.” The New York Times.

7. Oct. 22, 2023, “A growing number of reports indicate Israeli forces responsible for Israeli civilian and military deaths following October 7 attack,” Mondoweiss.

8. Wyatt Reed, Max Blumenthal (Jan. 18, 2024), “Israeli army gassed my son ‘like Auschwitz,’ mother of slain Israeli soldier says,” The Grayzone.

9. Literally, “Jewish Power.”

10. Ariella Marsden (Nov. 20, 2023), “Terrorist death penalty debate risks hostages, families charge Otzma Yehudit,” The Jerusalem Post.

11. Sam Sokol (Jan. 1, 2024), “Far-right ministers call to ‘resettle’ Gaza’s Palestinians, build settlements in Strip,” The Times of Israel.

12. Nir Hasson (Jan. 29, 2024), “'The People of Israel Will Settle Gaza': Netanyahu's Ministers at Far-right Conference Endorse Expulsion of Palestinians,” Haaretz.

13. Jeremy Sharon (Jan. 29, 2024), “Cabinet members call to resettle Gaza, encourage Gazans to leave, at jubilant conference,” The Times of Israel.

14. Ibid.

15. Benedict Vigers (Dec. 22, 2023), “Life in Israel After Oct. 7 in 5 Charts,” Gallup.

16. Alex Lederman (Oct. 27, 2023), “Settler Violence in the West Bank Undermines Israel’s Security,” TIME Magazine.

17. Emanuel Fabian (Jun. 26, 2023), “Can’t or won’t? IDF fails to prevent settler attacks, and that’s unlikely to change,” The Times of Israel.

18. Nov. 1, 2023, “Rise in intimidation, settler violence in the West Bank, warns OCHA,” UN News.

19. Ronen Bergman, Mark Mazzetti (May 16, 2024), “The Unpunished: How Extremists Took Over Israel,” The New York Times.

20. Medhi Hasan, Dina Sayedahmed (Feb. 19, 2018), “Blowback: How Israel Went From Helping Create Hamas to Bombing It,” The Intercept.

21. Adam Raz (Oct. 20, 2023), “A Brief History of the Netanyahu-Hamas Alliance,” Haaretz.

22. Mark Mazzetti, Ronen Bergman (Dec. 10, 2023), “‘Buying Quiet’: Inside the Israeli Plan That Propped Up Hamas,” The New York Times.

23. Tal Schneider (Oct. 8, 2023), “For years, Netanyahu propped up Hamas. Now it’s blown up in our faces,” The Times of Israel.

24. Clash of Minds (Oct. 19, 2023), “175 WUP Walter Veith & Martin Smith - Israel And Hamas, Zionists vs Islam Holy War? or Jesuit Plan?” YouTube.