Anglosubversive/Zionazi fictitious lies about ‘Gog and Magog’ (and broader geopolitical implications)

Another past-overdue posting...

[some recent while ago, I came to a realization about one of the likely intents/purposes of the “Christian Zionism” false view of biblical prophecy, and at the end of this article the dots will be (almost) fully connected on the matter]

Prologue: overview

For those of you already having read my previous published entries on the substance of disproving pseudochristian Zionazis’ fake theology, you probably already by now understand the central refuting tenet—Mosaic Judaism/“antitypical” Christianity’s core is a fundamentally egalitarian message of God’s beuatiful love pointing to the apostolic Christians circumcised in the heart—out of every ethnicity, kin, and tongue with no inherent respect of persons—as the true comprisal of God’s chosen “Israel” in polar contrast to right-wing, racist concepts of any particular ethnicity constituting God’s preferred over all else. If you missed them? Here they are:

Debunking the Zionazi abuse of ‘I will bless those who bless you’

Debunking Zionazi abuse of ‘Amalek’

Conclusive proof that Zionazism is a blasphemous perversion of Judaism

Are Zionist ‘Jews’ legitimately Jewish?

Anyways, this proper supersessionist¹ (←see this reference if you’re relatively new and/or the “complex” terminology is flying over your head) approach to biblical prophecy is once again centrally crucial to not only comprehending why the “Christian” Zionists’ cultically bloodthirsty fantasy is bogus from an unadulterated biblical standpoint, but also the true meaning of the much-quotemined Ezekiel 38-39 section on a fractional minority nowadays appears to grasp via a proper lens.

The theological flaw of ‘Christian Zionism’—debunking a case exhibit of lies

Confessions from the horse’s mouth shall boldly speak for themselves. Arguably the most influential “Christian” Zionist donor to the America/Fourth Reich criminal syndicate is none other than theocratic right-wing white supremacist² John Hagee, the leading director of the conglomerate religiopolitical lobbying abomination “Christians United for Israel” (CUFI). They are, naturally, vociferously opposed to supersessionism/“replacement theology” for running diametrically contrary to their own Futurist/dispensationalist view of “end times” prophecy:³

Pitiful indeed that a group so quick to boast their (supposed) Christian character this miserably failed to understand, let alone remember (either complete idiots or naked liars—who knows?) what the Bible says on the Old and New Covenants. The Epistle to the Hebrews couldn’t be more clear-cut:⁴

For IF that first covenant had been faultless, then should no place have been sought for the second. For finding fault with them, he saith, [Behold, the days come, saith the Lord, when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah: not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day when I took them by the hand to lead them out of the land of Egypt; because they continued not in my covenant, and I regarded them not, saith the Lord. For this is the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those days, saith the Lord; I will put my laws into their mind, and write them in their hearts: and I will be to them a God, and they shall be to me a people: and they shall not teach every man his neighbour, and every man his brother, saying, Know the Lord: for all shall know me, from the least to the greatest. For I will be merciful to their unrighteousness, and their sins and their iniquities will I remember no more.]⁵ In that he saith, A new covenant, he hath made the first old. Now that which decayeth and waxeth old is ready to vanish away.

Take note: 1) the first (Old/Mosaic) Covenant would have remained had no fault existed in the covenant between Jehovah and the (literal) children of Israel; 2) the fault was found on the side of the Jews;⁶ 3) as a result, the transgressions necessitated God’s ordaining of a future new covenant with the houses of Israel and Judah (by the way, at the time Jeremiah declared this prophecy, the northern/southern regional split long materialized and the “house of Israel”/“Ephraim” were already lost into Assyrian captivity⁷); and 4) the establishment of the New Covenant necessitates the vanishing of the Mosaic/Old Covenant into total obsoletion.

IOWs, modern dispensationalists/“Christian Zionists” are utterly 100% outright dead-wrong about the notion of the Old/Mosaic Covenant persisting to this day to a supposed preservation of literalized ethnic “Jews” as God’s “chosen [master race] people.” And the New Covenant is of course of the shed blood of Jesus Christ,⁸ the spotless Lamb of God by whose stripes His faithful adherents are healed from sin.⁹ (side note: you may be wondering how the New Covenant could be made with the “house of Israel”/Ephraim when they faced never-to-return Assyrian captivity in 722 B.C.—I answered this question, FYI, in “Are Zionist ‘Jews’ legitimately Jewish?”)

Moving on—that CUFI propaganda PDF also claims:

Once again, a naked lie—I thoroughly exposed this matter in “The Nazi link to Anglo-Zionist ‘Judeo-Christian’ propaganda,” and to summarily restate, the reality was the polar opposite. Nazi “Positive Christianity” REJECTED supersessionism because the fundamental premise of “replacement theology” is that Christians are the true embodiment of Jews/Israel. Nazism’s total rejection Judaism contributed therefore to a bitter hatred towards traditional supersessionist views of theology and portrayed “Positive Christianity” through a Hellenistically pagan/occultic/Gnostic lens selectively purging all “Hebraisms” from their Nazi “Bibles.”¹⁰

CUFI’s audacious impunity in that one PDF alone doesn’t end yet:

It’s sure ironic to glowingly quote/co-opt Dietrich Bonhoeffer’s heroism as supposedly prototypical of CUFI’s pseudo-“philosemitic” Zionazism when Bonhoeffer himself was an outspoken supersessionist—even Zionist JVL admits:¹¹

Bonhoeffer’s defense of the Jews, however, was based on Christian supersessionism — the Christian belief that Christianity had superseded Judaism as the new chosen people of God. Despite his outspoken defense of victims of Nazi persecution, Bonhoeffer still maintained, on a religious level, that the ‘Jewish question’ would ultimately be solved through Jewish conversion to Christianity. The Church strongly advocated this view, as did the ecumenical movements most responsible for aiding Jewish refugees fleeing Nazism.

Ah yes, and this canard for the pentatrillionth time:

These laughably fake “Christians” either never read the full New Testament or boast an almost-unique level of shamelessness to lie through their teeth. The Apostle Paul in his letter to the Galatians explicitly clarified what Gen. 12:3 actually meant:¹²

Know ye therefore that they which are of faith, the same are the children of Abraham. And the scripture, foreseeing that God would justify the heathen through faith, preached before the gospel unto Abraham, saying, In thee shall all nations be blessed. So then THEY WHICH BE OF FAITH are blessed with faithful Abraham.

What faith, exactly? Keep reading in the same Galatians chapter:¹³

But the scripture hath concluded all under sin, that the promise by faith of Jesus Christ might be given to them that believe. But before faith came, we were kept under the law, shut up unto the faith which should afterwards be revealed. Wherefore the law was our schoolmaster to bring us unto Christ, that we might be justified by faith. But after that faith is come, we are no longer under a schoolmaster. For ye are all the children of God by faith in Christ Jesus.

Note first and foremost that Paul’s clarifying exposition applies the subject of Gen. 12:3 to “the heathen,” IOWs the Gentiles, so this alone disproves any factual basis to attribute the promise of that (quotemined) Genesis passage to literal ethnic “Jews.”

How Zionazis misinterpret Ezek. 38-39

The aweing apocalyptic prophecy declared by the prophet in that climactic section of the Book of Ezekiel (before the final quarter of the 48-chapter-long book (ch. 40-48) about the Temple scene) entails a number of entities, mainly Israel and their following primary enemies: Gog/the land of Magog, (as chief prince of) Meshech and Tubal, Gomer, Togarmah, Persia, Ethiopia/Cush, and Libya/Put.¹⁴

Israel, Gog, Persia, and Togarmah

According to the neo-Santa Claus “dispensationalist” fairy tail of pseudochristian Zionazis, this united “Gentile” attack on Israel is fulfilled in the “end times” scene when a reconstituted, literal “State of Israel” is attacked by Russia, Iran, and Turkey respectively as Gog/Magog, Persia, and Togarmah, along with their anti-Western allies. Due to Hamas’s (alleged) Russian ties in the wake of Oct. 7, 2023, the escalation of Middle East bloodshed centered on the Fourth Reich was rabidly harped over last year as culminating into a “fulfillment of Bible prophecy” whereby a united Russian/Iranian-backed attack on the “State of Israel” would boil over into Armageddon.

Since you already know by now that—according to the valid supersessionist lens of biblical prophecy—the true “Israel” in New Testament “antitype” comprises the apostolic Christians and NOT literalized ethnic “Jews” as a “race”—obviously the modern State of Israel is not the “Israel” of Ezekiel 38-39. Therefore as the subsequent logical corollary, there is simply zero reason to believe that the literal(ized) enemies of the Fourth Reich constitute any of the Gentile nations in that Ezekiel prophecy.

‘Rosh’?

A few translations for Ezekiel 38:2 read:

…the prince of Rosh, Meshech, and Tubal…

This entirely different (and linguistically fringe) phrasing—for context—isn’t even rendered in the majority of modern translations! The KJV phrasing simply identifies Gog as “the chief prince of Meshech and Tubal” with zero third mention of a “Rosh” entity. Very obviously, the fringe insertion of “Rosh” is intended to “directly” insinuate a linguistic connection to Russia and thereby validate the false “Christian Zionist” view that Russia is the Gog/Magog of Ezekiel 38-39.

As explained in this brilliant Biblical Hebrew/Masoretic Text analysis:¹⁵

‘ראשׁ (rô'sh)’ is translated as ‘chief,’ ‘head,’ or ‘top’ in dozens of places in all translations. It denotes the most important or highest position (‘chief’ or ‘top’ in regards to status, and ‘head’ in regards to anatomy). One might be tempted to translate the word as ‘Rosh’ in order to strengthen the prophecy concerning Russia, as suggested by the mention of Meshech and Tubal; however, the most plain and honest translation seems to be ‘chief prince’ since the subject matter of the passage concerns Gog, a chief commander of a coalition of invading nations. If God intended to refer to Russia, it may be doubtful that he would have transliterated the name using a common word for ‘chief’ in a context where ‘chief’ is the fitting meaning.

Misc. side note

FYI—the identified time frame here of the fulfillment taking place in the end times at the Second Coming of Jesus Christ—as a “stopped clock”—is nonetheless correct. Alternative false viewpoints of Ezek. 38-39—despite rightfully identifying flaws of the dispensationalist viewpoint—are wont to promote the view that the “Gog and Magog” prophecy will be fulfilled in Final Judgment at the lake of fire, which creates an impossibly contracting corollary: seeing the destruction of Gog/Magog, and their conglomerate swarm of God’s enemies leaves behind bones¹⁶ and dead flesh,¹⁷ how can this event transpire in the Final Judgment’s lake of fire which burns the wicked into ashes and therefore obviously leaves behind no remaining bones and flesh?

The true meaning of Ezek. 38-39 explained

Especially for my fellow Christians, here’s the exciting part. (if I’m one day proven wrong on any part of this, I will stand corrected—that said, it is with very high certainty after months of prayerful studying and deliberation that the large bulk/substance of this exposition should be properly collated via using Scripture to clarify and expound upon Scripture)

So who is Gog, then?

Associated with the “land of Magog,” Gog is identified—to restate—as the “chief prince of Meshech and Tubal.”¹⁸ While nowhere in the Bible explicitly provides elaboration on this same “Gog” directly by name (the “Gog” of I Chron. 5 is completely unrelated and separate), Meshech and Tubal are, however, mentioned with clarity. Both in the ancient literal context were Japhethite Gentile nations descending from two of Noah’s grandsons of the same name.¹⁹ During this long Old Testament era, Meshech almost certainly was geographically situated to the north of the land of Israel. ← This detail is crucial!

“…Gomer, and all his bands; the house of Togarmah of the north quarters, and all his bands: and many people with thee.” —Ezek. 38:6

Gomer and Togarmah, like Meshech and Tubal, were Gentile nations to the geographic north of literal Israel in OT times.

“Therefore, son of man, prophesy and say unto Gog, Thus saith the Lord God; In that day when my people of Israel dwelleth safely, shalt thou not know it? And thou shalt come from thy place out of the NORTH parts, thou, and many people with thee, all of them riding upon horses, a great company, and a mighty army: and thou shalt come up against my people of Israel, as a cloud to cover the land; it shall be in the latter days, and I will bring thee against my land, that the heathen may know me, when I shall be sanctified in thee, O Gog, before their eyes.” —Ezek. 38:14-16

IOWs, Gog—along with Meshech, Tubal, Gomer, and Togarmah—are identified in literalized OT type as geographically to the literal north of the land of Israel. It is now apparent who Gog is—the very same “king of the north” of Daniel 11; compare:

…thou [Gog] shalt come up against my people of Israel… (Ezek. 38:16)

…to:

He [the king of the north] shall enter also into the glorious land [Israel]… (Dan. 11:41)

Yes, Ezekiel 38-39 and Daniel 11:40-45 take place in the exact same “end times.”

The king of the north, type and antitype

Do not forget: the “literal” aspects of the Old Covenant-era “type” only serve as analogical arrows pointing to the spiritual/symbol New Covenant-era “antitype.”

In literal “type” back in the Old Testament centuries, the king of the north represented various Gentile/pagan nations to the north of Israel which brutally mistreated and repressed the Israelites. The characteristic attribute of the king of the north is “right-wing” theocratic compulsion of false worship passed off as true worship: remember now that Daniel 8 and 11 provide a parallel description of the transpired events during the “type” phase of biblical prophetic history; compare:

…he magnified himself even to the prince of the host, and by him the daily [sacrifice] was taken away, and the place of the sanctuary was cast down. (Dan. 8:11)

…to:

…they shall pollute the sanctuary of strength, and shall take away the daily [sacrifice], and they shall place the abomination that maketh desolate. (Dan. 11:31)

Anyways, as a necessary caveat to clarify: in Daniel 11, (practically) everything up into verse 39 pertains to the historical framework long fulfilled cir. two millennia ago. Meanwhile, Dan. 11:40-45 suddenly shifts to the “time of the end” (end times).

In ch. 8, this repressing entity is identified as the “little horn” stemming out of divided Greece; in ch. 11 as the “king of the north.” This prophecy was—spoiler—fulfilled during the Intertestamental Era when Seleucid king Antiochus IV Epiphanes invaded Judea and brutally subjected the Jews to forced pagan worship, desecrating the Temple. In antitype, the “king of the north” (side note: it is synonymous especially in antitype with “Antichrist”) of Daniel 11 is Pagan and Papal Rome (as a necessary side note FYI, I have absolutely nothing against everyday decent Catholics); the pagan incarnation of Rome simply appropriated and adopted the Seleucids’ Hellenstic philosophy into its own cultural and societal orientation. (this is why “the beast” of Rev. 13—aka the Roman Empire—was “like unto a leopard”²⁰—the leopard in Daniel’s vision of the four beasts represented Greece²¹).

Now, let’s work backwards real quick to connect the remaining dots for the identification of the king of the north in “type”: in the Apostle Peter’s First Epistle, his penultimate statement was:²²

The church that is at Babylon, elected together with you, saluteth you; and so doth Marcus my son.

Peter could not have been referring to literal Babylon, long extinguished by the Medo-Persians as described in Daniel 5. Rather, “Babylon” here is very clearly an antitypical reference to Rome. Since Rome is the antitypical king of the north, this connection provides the critical link identifying literal Babylon in type also as an incarnation of the king of the north. Remember, in literal geographical terms, Babylon in the OT era was actually to the east of Israel, yet was described as arising out of the north by the prophet Jeremiah’s oracles.²³ Obviously this face-value “discrepancy” only further highlights a clear identification of Babylon as as northern empire as it pertains to prophetic relevance.

The prophet Isaiah declared this oracle against the “virgin daughter of the Chaldeans,” the religious component of Babylon:²⁴

Therefore hear now this, thou that art given to pleasures, that dwellest carelessly, that sayest in thine heart, I am, and none else beside me; I shall not sit as a widow, neither shall I know the loss of children: but these two things shall come to thee in a moment in one day, the loss of children, and widowhood: they shall come upon thee in their perfection for the multitude of thy sorceries, and for the great abundance of thine enchantments.

This passage is quoted in Revelation 17-18’s prophecy against the end-times “Whore of Babylon,” aka the Papacy/Vatican City at the heart of modern Rome:²⁵

How much she [the Whore of Babylon] hath glorified herself, and lived deliciously, so much torment and sorrow give her: for she saith in her heart, I sit a queen, and am no widow, and shall see no sorrow. Therefore shall her plagues come in one day, death, and mourning, and famine; and she shall be utterly burned with fire: for strong is the Lord God who judgeth her.

Note that there is a masculine and feminine element—this is not to be ambiguously lumped together, as the former is associated with the political/civic aspect²⁶ and the latter with the religious/priestly.²⁷ Anyways, note that this Isaiah description is also quoted in Zephaniah’s oracle against Assyria:²⁸

And he will stretch out his hand against the north, and destroy Assyria; and will make Nineveh a desolation, and dry like a wilderness. And flocks shall lie down in the midst of her, all the beasts of the nations: both the cormorant and the bittern shall lodge in the upper lintels of it; their voice shall sing in the windows; desolation shall be in the thresholds; for he shall uncover the cedar work. This is the rejoicing city that dwelt carelessly, that said in her heart, I am, and there is none beside me: how is she become a desolation, a place for beasts to lie down in! every one that passeth by her shall hiss, and wag his hand.

Long story short: Assyria, Meshech/Tubal, Babylon, and Seleucid Greece were all prototypical shadows—as the king of the north in OT “type”—for the Roman Empire (primarily its papal incarnation) as king of the north in NT “antitype.”

The southern nations—Egypt, Ethiopia, and Libya

First and foremost, it’s important to remember that just as “Ephraim” in the Israel/Judah schism context broadly referred to the entire ten northern tribes of the “house of Israel,”²⁹ likewise do “Assyria” and “Egypt” more or less (almost certainly) “generically” refer to respectively the larger northern and southern kingdoms and not in an exclusive context to those literal nations themselves alone.³⁰

This identification is important, because “Egypt” is mentioned in Dan. 11:40-45 but not Ezek. 38-39, yet Ethiopia/Cush and Libya/Put are referenced in both. All three nations in ancient OT times were to the literal geographic south of Israel, Egypt a stronghold allied with Cush and Put.

The characteristic attribute of the king of the south is “left-wing” atheistic denial of the true God. When Moses and Aaron spoke in the name of Jehovah demanding Pharaoh free the Israelites, the pagan monarch’s response was:³¹

Who is the LORD, that I should obey his voice to let Israel go? I know not the LORD, neither will I let Israel go.

In antitype, the king of the south is not (at least to my knowledge) so much identified with a fixed nation/stronghold, rather a continuing set of politically secularist/atheistic ideologies constituting the Hegelian “antithesis” to the king of north as “thesis.” There is an extensively prophetic history dealing with Rev. ch. 11 on this dialecticalism analysis, but that’s not for today seeing this post is already long enough as is and I’d rather not veer too excessively off-topic.

Anyways, note that in Dan. 11 (here, the “time of the end”/end times scenario in v. 40-45), the king of the south is narratively described as being violently/ruthlessly subjected into the will of the king of the north:³²

And at the time of the end shall the king of the south push at him: and the king of the north shall come against him like a whirlwind, with chariots, and with horsemen, and with many ships; and he shall enter into the countries, and shall overflow and pass over.

…

He shall stretch forth his hand also upon the countries: and the land of Egypt shall not escape. But he shall have power over the treasures of gold and of silver, and over all the precious things of Egypt: and the Libyans and the Ethiopians shall be at his steps.

Meanwhile, in Ezekiel 38, the southern nations are portrayed as in alliance:³³

…and I will turn thee back, and put hooks into thy jaws, and I will bring thee forth, and all thine army, horses and horsemen, all of them clothed with all sorts of armour, even a great company with bucklers and shields, all of them handling swords: Persia, Ethiopia, and Libya with them; all of them with shield and helmet…

There of course is no contradiction despite these two descriptions prophetically referring to the same end-times scenario. The king of the south first in Dan. 11:40-43 is subjected into the total bidding of the king of the north, and then in Ezek. 38:5 is part of the united northern/southern conglomerate Hegelian “synthesis.”

Egypt’s absence from direct mention in Ezek. 38-39 of course is then relatively superficial in of itself since its “regional” subsidiaries Ethiopia and Libya are listed.

The end times northern-southern ‘synthesis’ summarized

To reiterate—broadly in ideological terms as it pertains to the antitypical scenario of the end times, the king of the north represents “right-wing theocracism” (Orange Bolshevist “Christian Nationalism,” anyone?) and the king of the south represents left-wing political secularism/atheism.

IOWs, in Daniel 11:40-45, the king of the south pushing at the king of the north is fulfilled in the modern (yes, the VERY time we are living in!) est. liberals/“leftists” at the global stage provoking/pushing at the rightists into the culmination of the latter fully and ruthlessly taking over and subjecting the left into a united theocratic agenda (under Jesuit/Maltese directives via their Vatican mouthpiece) persecuting the true faithful Christians who “keep the commandments of God and the faith of Jesus.”³⁴

Remainder collation of Ezek. 38-39 and Revelation

Mountains overthrown

Compare this prophetic declaration in Ezek. 38:³⁵

And it shall come to pass at the same time when Gog shall come against the land of Israel, saith the Lord God, that my fury shall come up in my face. For in my jealousy and in the fire of my wrath have I spoken, Surely in that day there shall be a great shaking in the land of Israel; so that the fishes of the sea, and the fowls of the heaven, and the beasts of the field, and all creeping things that creep upon the earth, and all the men that are upon the face of the earth, shall shake at my presence, and the mountains shall be thrown down, and the steep places shall fall, and every wall shall fall to the ground.

…with the sixth seal of Revelation:³⁶

…And the heaven departed as a scroll when it is rolled together; and every mountain and island were moved out of their places.

Fowls consume flesh of the wicked

And it is very apparent that the prophecy of Ezek. 38-39 transpires at the Second Coming given this blatant description parallel between Ezek. 39:³⁷

Thou shalt fall upon the mountains of Israel, thou, and all thy bands, and the people that is with thee: I will give thee unto the ravenous birds of every sort, and to the beasts of the field to be devoured.

…

And, thou son of man, thus saith the Lord God; Speak unto every feathered fowl, and to every beast of the field, Assemble yourselves, and come; gather yourselves on every side to my sacrifice that I do sacrifice for you, even a great sacrifice upon the mountains of Israel, that ye may eat flesh, and drink blood. Ye shall eat the flesh of the mighty, and drink the blood of the princes of the earth, of rams, of lambs, and of goats, of bullocks, all of them fatlings of Bashan. And ye shall eat fat till ye be full, and drink blood till ye be drunken, of my sacrifice which I have sacrificed for you.

…with Revelation’s direct description of the Second Coming scene:³⁸

And I saw an angel standing in the sun; and he cried with a loud voice, saying to all the fowls that fly in the midst of heaven, Come and gather yourselves together unto the supper of the great God; that ye may eat the flesh of kings, and the flesh of captains, and the flesh of mighty men, and the flesh of horses, and of them that sit on them, and the flesh of all men, both free and bond, both small and great.

…

And the remnant were slain with the sword of him that sat upon the horse, which sword proceeded out of his mouth: and all the fowls were filled with their flesh.

Magog/’the beast’ burned with fire

Remember, Gog—the king of the north/Antichrist—is associated with the land of Magog. This clearly refers to the territory of Papal Rome, aka what was once known as the Holy Roman Empire in the Dark Ages and today is “Europe.” And “the beast” of Revelation 13 is not the little horn/Antichrist alone, but rather the entire conglomerate Roman empire spanning the Roman/European territories.

Just as Ezekiel pronoounced Jehovah’s declaration:³⁹

And I will send a fire on Magog, and among them that dwell carelessly in the isles: and they shall know that I am the Lord.

…so too does Rev. 19 prophesy:⁴⁰

And the beast was taken, and with him the false prophet that wrought miracles before him, with which he deceived them that had received the mark of the beast, and them that worshipped his image. These both were cast alive into a lake of fire burning with brimstone.

What about Rev. 20?

Long story short, the “Gog and Magog” of Rev. 20 just more broadly represents the entire human history of reprobate transgressors and backturners from Jehovah’s righteousness after they are resurrected following the Millennium to face Judgment. Remember, the conglomerate northern/southern end-times war on God’s true spiritual Israel—the apostolic Christian church keeping His commandments and Christ’s faith—represent a total unity of anti-Jehovah unrepentant sinners, almost essentially serving as a “type” for the full history of the unredeemed wicked at Final Judgment.

Conclusion

The “Gog and Magog” prophecy of Ezek. 38-39 indeed pertains to the end times, but absolutely has zero direct relevance to the literal nations of “Israel”/Fourth Reich, Russia, Turkey, Iran, Egypt, etc. The masses of “Christian” Zionists by and large range from a spectrum of embarrassingly sheer ignorance to stonehearted charlatanism.

Epilogue: the reason for ‘Christian Zionist’ prominence in the U.S.?

As I almost touched on in my second-to-last post (as of typing):

Anglosubversion and the Garfield Assassination, pt. II: the many incarnate shadows of Benedict Arnold

…the American president and Russian Czar were both assassinated in 1881, reinforcing the Anglo-Masonic agenda of sabotaging industrialist-nationalist multilateral alliances which threatened the stranglehold of reactionary British empricism. Nothing would have been more hateful to the Anglo-Jesuits’ aims of NWO single-party fascist rule than for a united America-Russia alliance in bold defiance against the Jesuit/Anglo-Masonic cabal.

As Anglo-American historian Antony C. Sutton explains here:

…Wall Street (a longtime Anglo-Masonic financial subsidiary, by the way) funded the Bolshevik Revolution to enslave Russia under a “captive market” unable to industrially develop into a mighty independent nation. And, of course, the threat of Bolshevism transformed Russia into America’s foremost feared/despised menace for the large part of the 20th century, keeping the two superpowers divided and conquered into “thesis” and “antithesis” all to the delight of Anglo-Jesuitry.

When the Soviet Union collapsed, there went the excuse of anti-Communist fearmongering as the primary basis for continued Russophobia. The gradual shift of Russia under “Putinism” into almost a Hegelian synthesis between right-wing/reactionary Czarist autocracy and (neo-)Soviet collectivism makes for an interesting case study of its own possibly sometime later (if I have the time), though for the sake of this discussion is notable that it drove the entire Western est. “left” into an ever-frenzied hatred of Russia especially on the basis of differing social/cultural policies.

Maintaining the Western “rightist” hatred of Russia is where “Christian Zionism” comes in—by propagating the (false) view that the Antichrist forces were centrally situated in Russia, the gullible “Christian conservative” masses here in the United States are goaded at the religious level into equal levels of senselessly fanatical Russophobia. The NWO agenda operates entirely on the premised necessity of dialectical clash and mutual negation, therefore requiring that America and Russia operate as opposing superpowers funding the global thesis/antithesis rubbing-up. Given the almost certainly Anglo-Masonic origins of “dispensationalist”/“Christian Zionist” view that “Gog = Russia,” you shall ultimately decide for yourself whether this is all conspiratorial tinfoilhat poppycock or not!

1. An explanatory guide to ‘complex’ terms I use (may update/add accordingly per request)

2. Claire Hansen (Feb. 15, 2023), “Controversial Pastor Opens Nikki Haley’s First Presidential Campaign Rally,” U.S. News.

3. Jun. 2020, “The Dangerous Doctrine of Replacement Theology,” Christians United for Israel.

4. Heb. 8:7-13.

5. [verbatim quotation of Jer. 31:31-34]

6. Com: Lev. 26.

7. Jer. 7:15.

8. Heb. 12:24.

9. Isa. 53:5, I Pet. 2:21-25.

10. Wojceich Kozyra (Jan. 2022), “Kant, Anti-Supersessionism, and the Holocaust,” Eidos: A Journay for Philosophy of Culture, vol. VI, no. I, pp. 81-93.

11. “Dietrich Bonhoeffer,” Jewish Virtual Library.

12. Gal. 3:7-9.

13. Gal. 3:22-26.

14. Ezek. 38:1-6.

15. “‘Chief prince’ or ‘Prince of Rosh’ in Ezekiel 38:2?” KJV Today.

16. Ezek. 39:15.

17. Ezek. 39:17-20.

18. Ezek. 38:1-3.

19. Gen. 10:2, I Chron. 1:5.

20. Rev. 13:2.

21. Dan. 7:6 (com. “four heads” of 7:6 to the four horn outgrowths of Dan. 8:8-9 and 11:4).

22. I Pet. 5:13.

23. Jer. 1:13-15, 4:6-8, 6:22-23.

24. Isa. 47:8-9.

25. Rev. 18:7-8.

26. See Dan. 2:31-33, 7:19-27.

27. Isa. 47:1.

28. Zeph. 2:13-15.

29. Ezek. 37:15-19.

30. Com. Isa. 19.

31. Ex. 5:2.

32. Dan. 11:40, 42-43.

33. Ezek. 38:4-5.

34. Rev. 12:17.

35. Ezek. 38:18-20.

36. Rev. 6:14.

37. Ezek. 39:4, 17-19.

38. Rev. 19:17-18, 21.

39. Ezek. 39:6.

40. Rev. 19:20.