An explanatory guide to ‘complex’ terms I use (may update/add accordingly per request)

(in case some of you needed the elaborations)

It was recently brought to my attention by a beloved friend that my arsenal glossary of terminology—as it pertains to identifying dimensional components to the New World Order’s conspiracies—aren’t always understood due to their overall relatively obscure level of usage. This post shall hopefully elaborate into as many of those crucial phrases/corresponding definitions as possible to clarify necessary contexts.

‘Basic’/random terminology (in no consistent order)

• NWO = “New World Order”—in essence, the ruling power and their agenda

• “unified conspiracy”—the summarized encapsulation that all conspiracies stem from a singular source/controller (spoiler: the Jesuits!)

• EIR = Executive Intelligence Review, the chief paper/outlet of Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr.; contains (mostly¹) high-quality exposés of the NWO especially in its Anglo-Masonic (see below “Freemasonry-related” section) dimensions

• “initiated” (or “initiated class”)—IOWs, the consciously knowledgeable “insiders” in a clandestine organization; just about in every instance, this means that the organization/entity in question outwardly presents an innocuous image but at its true heart, hidden from the public, is sinister in nature

• “esoteric”—the “insider” doctrine/teaching/ideology of a cabal/clandestine group which is concealed from average public knowledge

• “exoteric”—antonym for “esoteric”—the fake/sanitized outer garb for the masses is designated as the “exoteric” doctrine; for example the Freemasons’ exoteric covering is that they are a “charity-operating fraternal universal brotherhood”

• “catechumen” (italicizing optional)—the lower ranks within a clandestine organization who are merely the “useful idiots” naively serving the higher orders’ (often seemingly-innocuous) bidding and who only receive the “exoteric” teaching, completely hid from the true “esoteric” doctrines

• “neo-Marxist”—the political/ideological strain encompassing the bulk of Western “modern liberalism” in its social/cultural incarnations and i.e. essentially is tied de facto to the ideology of the Democratic Party

• “Conservative Revolution”—officially (in capitalized) refers to the Conservative Revolutionary movement in 1920s-era Weimar Germany; it is a syncretist co-opting of modernist/radical tactics to attain reactionist ends, and this ideological formula—as heavily documented by LaRouche/EIR—is a recurring pattern in modern reactionism whereby right-wing fronts employ radical/modernist appeals to gain power and accomplish regressive ends

Jesuits/Jesuit-related

The Jesuit Order² is the dominant military order of the Roman Catholic Church (RCC) founded by ultramontanists “St.” Ignatius of Loyola and Francis Xavier. In summary, it is the chief advocate of total Vatican/papal rule over the entire globe, all “heretics” be damned to the pangs of death for the grotesque crime of subscribing to individual liberty of conscience.

For the record, the Jesuits conveniently happen to believe that any Pope who does not subscribe to Jesuitic doctrines are automatically eligible for “disposing,” so it is ultimately the Jesuits who control the Vatican and not the other way around. Because papal authority stems from the decrees of the Pope, the Vatican as we know it is merely the “outer shell” of whatever the Jesuits and their Knights of Malta cohorts demands of the Pope/Vatican/Papacy.

• “Jesuitry”—core Jesuitic characteristics themselves

• “Jesuitism”—ideology/ideologies which advocate Jesuit doctrines

• “Jesuitic”—’nuff said

• “ISL” = International Sunday Law—the ultimate end goal of the Jesuits, enacting a Sunday-rest/worship law at a global level

• “Anglo-Jesuit”—the Jesuit Order technically operates in close/necessary alliance with the British, almost definitely ever since Protestant England proved themselves a formidable power and the Jesuits began to quietly infiltrate into British society and subvert the military power of Britain into a Jesuit front

• “proto-Jesuit”—military/propaganda (especially the latter) incarnations in the RCC and/or the 2nd-4th century proto-“Catholic Church” which served as prototypical precursors for the not-yet-officially-formed Jesuit Order

• “ultramontanism”—the idea that the Pope holds ultra-supreme rule over everything

• “Jesuit right”—the traditional reactionism of Jesuitism in a modern context

• “Jesuit left”—the “left wing” of Jesuitry which operates Marxist, neo-Marxist, liberation theology, and “Christian-Marxist dialogue” fronts

• “Nazarene Communism” (or “theistic, Nazarene Communism”)—the aspect of Catholic social teaching which emphasizes communal, collectivist wealth-sharing and de facto serves as the theistic/“Catholic” counterpart to “atheistic” Bolshevism

• “Papal-Caesarism” (hyphen optional)—synonymous with “ultramontanism”

• “Popery” (capitalization preferable)—broadly synonymous with “ultramontanism” and “Papal-Caesarism” though more focused on the Popes themselves

• “Romanism”—refers to the mob-like/totalitarian/authoritarian attributes of Pagan and/or Papal Rome, primarily the latter

• “Papal Rome”—the Roman regime as we know it since the 4th-6th centuries, aka in its pseudo-“Christian” form outwardly as the Roman Catholic Church (RCC)

• Knights of Malta—an even-older Catholic military order which in its modern form is entirely in bed with the Jesuits; in the modern day, the Jesuits outwardly are “leftist” while the Knights of Malta are “rightist”; the KoM are in cahoots with the Anglo-American intelligence units, especially the CIA

• “Maltese nobility”—the family units/bloodlines comprising the Knights of Malta’s chief leadership, i.e. the Bourbon Two-Sicilies, Orsinis, Massimos

(FYI: I have absolutely nothing against ordinary Catholics—I became a Christian in high school thanks to a dear Catholic brother; the condemnations are directed against highly initiated/insider rulers, not everyday well-meaning individuals)

Occultism-related

(yes, Jesuitism at its insider levels is occultism)

• Gnosticism/Gnostic—a cultic set of ideologies which premise on the notion of “transcending into higher understanding” usually through a series of “initiated” ranks and nonsensical circular logic reasoning

• (Gnostic) dualism/docetism—traditionally in reference to the notion that “material world = bad, spiritual world = good” in a form of radical separation—ironically, many early Gnostics took this radical separation to the extent of believing that no actions committed in the material body affected the spiritual realm, and they used this to justify the most grotesque crimes

• Marcionism (see below “Judaism/Christianity-related” section)

• Kabbalism (see below “Zionism/pseudo-‘Jewish’-related” section)

• Templarism—the ideology of the Knights Templar, an outwardly “Catholic” and Eurosupremacist military order known for their (and/or their successors’) brutality against Jews and Muslims

• neo-Templarism—movements/organizations/ideology which attempt to revive the goals of the Knights Templar—the Jesuits and Freemasons fall into this category

• Johannism—attributed as the highly occultic secret esoteric/insider ideology of the Templars; it is this author’s conclusion that Johannism is nothing more than a mask for pure devil-worship in that its veneration of “St. John” is a mask for the worship of the Greco-Roman god Janus, with the two heads of Janus representing nothing more than the devil’s “light” and “dark” sides (yes, literally “yin-yang”—it’s all the same thing) respectively as Lucifer and Satan

Hegelianism/dialecticalism-related

Hegelian dialectic—in the simplest summary—is the notion that forward progress in humanity necessitates the formation of two diametrically opposed entities (whatever they may be at a given time period), the “thesis” and its opposing “antithesis,” and that the clash between them produces mutual negation into the final culmination of a merging “synthesis” neither fully thesis nor antithesis exclusively, but a unified merger satisfying both.

For example, the clash in WWII between Nazi and Jew produced a synthesis: Judeo-Nazism, or what we commonly term “Zionism.” The synthesis of Zion(az)ism adopts the tenets/model of Nazism but replaces “Aryan” with “Jewish” supremacy. Another clash in WWII—between Nazism and Communism—produced the EU as synthesis, merging the pan-European goals of Nazism with Bolshevik internationalism. Seeing the pattern here?

• Hegelianist—a propagator of Hegelian schematic tenets in practical terms

• PRS = “problem-reaction-solution”—it’s the term used by David Icke to describe the process where the NWO conspirators create an artificially manufactured “problem” to incite the backlash “reaction” out of which culminates the preplanned “solution”; FYI this technically is not fully “dialectical” in explanatory model because of the “lopsided” nature in that the “problem” is entirely negated to the culmination of the “reaction,” whereas in Hegelian dialectic the traditional explanation is that both thesis and antithesis are mutually negated (at least if I recall correctly)

• Jesuit dialectic—in real life, practically all dialectical manipulation schemes fall into this category some way or another since the Jesuits are the chief rulers of the planet and therefore operate all mainstream institutions as puppets

• “dialectical cycling”—a term I invented/use to describe “narrative” scenarios where two seemingly opposite sides reinforce the exact same narrative; for additional clarification, see:³

  Neo-Nazis are Zionist-controlled puppets

  When pro-Palestine voices unwittingly peddle Zionazi propaganda

Freemasonry-related

As mentioned above, Freemasonry (or simply “Masonry”⁴) and Jesuitry are both movements with an esoteric/occult core and constitute outgrowths from the Knights Templar. The inner core of Freemasonic teachings are nothing more than a “backdoor gateway” to the same fold of insider Jesuit esotericism, though outwardly is presented as a form of “fraternal brotherhood” in “the Craft.”

• “33rd-degree Freemason”: the honorary and highest initiation level—at this point, the initiates are conscious Satanic/occult insiders

• “Anglo-Masonic”—for at least the past 1-2 centuries, just about all Freemasonry is centrally controlled from the outwardly ruling British power⁵ (in turn Jesuit-managed, of course), and “Anglo-Masonic” is a broadly fitting description of all “British” operations in the modern context

• Jesuit-Freemasonic dialectic—to clarify a bit further, the Jesuits use Freemasonic outlets to accomplish their ends, often by employing the (“leftist”) Freemasonic entities as “back” fronts (IOWs, controlled secretly outside standard public knowledge) somewhat as PRS “problem” ultimately to raise their own “front” fronts (the connection/sponsoring being blatant and out in the open) as (“rightist”) Jesuit movements vowing overthrow of the Freemasonic entity to accomplish the semi-PRS “solution” (ultimately a mix of PRS and Hegelianism, though the PRS explanation is easier for explanation sake)

• Scottish Rite Freemasonry—the primary branch of Anglo-Masonry constituting the bulk of Masonic operations nowadays, especially in tandem with the Anglo-American intelligence axis

• “Pike-Mazzini Letter”—an 1871 letter from 33rd-degree Freemason to Italian Illuminist revolutionary Giuseppe Mazzini whose contents are disputed and long alleged to contain a “Three World Wars” conspiracy which eerily parallels reality

[slightly less-used terms (so far) ↓]

• Grand Orient Freemasonry—possibly older than Scottish Rite (correct me if I’m wrong), mostly associated with the radicalist/“leftist”/French Revolution spirit in Europe and outwardly (at least historically) advocated liberalized tolerance

• “Old Prussian” Freemasonry—the traditionally reactionary, antisemitic, right-wing branch of German Freemasonry in contrast to the nation’s (historically) liberal “Humanitarian” lodges; the Old Prussians were Nazi supporters:

• Piazza del Gesu (“Piazza of Jesus”)—the right-wing, pro-Vatican, aristocratic branch of Italian Freemasonry which supported Mussolini’s ascension to power even while Italy’s liberal Grand Orient was ruthlessly suppressed by the blackshirt Fascists

• Propaganda Due/“P2” (or “P-2”)—the de facto revival of Italy’s Propaganda Massonica Freemasonic lodge into its post-WWII neofascist incarnation—P2 was essentially a government within a government with high-ranking members from the Christian Democratic and Socialist parties of Italy, and operated outwardly “anti-Communist” terrorist operations in a long-term conspiracy to violently subvert the nation into a Fascist hegemony (P2, just like the “Piazza of Jesus” Freemasons, were linked to the Vatican)

Judaism/Christianity-related

• “type”-“antitype”—this refers respectively to a precursor/shadow and its larger fulfillment, for example the literal Passover lamb in the Mosaic Covenant serving as a type for Jesus Christ the Lamb of God as antitype

• supersessionism—the traditional and completely biblical view in Christianity that the “literal”/sacrificial aspects of Judaism were only shadows pointing to the fulfillment in Christianity; often pejoratively referred to by Zionazis as “replacement theology” as a frequently derogative snarl word⁶

• “king of the north”⁷—in biblical type, this carried a literal connotation to the pagan Gentile kingdoms to the north of the land of Israel, aka Assyria, Meshech, Babylon, and Seleucid Greece, while in antitype it is Pagan and Papal Rome; in the modern day it encompasses broadly the “right-wing” theocratic ideology associated with “Romanist” authoritarianism, i.e. that of “Christian Nationalism” here in the U.S.; the king of the north is defined by theistically supremacist, compulsive false worship passed off as true worship

• “king of the south”⁸—in biblical type, it was the literal nations of Egypt, Ethiopia, and Libya to the south of Israel, and especially the case of Egypt whose Pharaoh enslaved generations of Israelites in Exodus; in antitype, the “left-wing secularist” political power specially exemplified during the French Revolution by the Grand Orient Freemasonic/Jacobin power (Jesuit-controlled by the king of the north, though that’s a semi-complicated study/analysis when paired with theological discourse)⁹; the king of the south is defined broadly by “atheistic” denial of the true God

• “Gog and Magog”—reference to the principal enemies of Jehovah’s people in Ezek. ch. 38-39; commonly abused by “Christian Zionist” dispensationalists to push bogus Russophobic fearmongering and cultically mindless Zionazistic shilling masked as “biblical prophecy”

• “dispensationalism”—broadly synonymous with “Christian Zionism,” aka the utterly false teaching that the “end times” apocalyptic scenario revolves around a literal “nation of Israel” (not that the Anglo-Masonic puppet regime referred to as the “State of Israel” is in any legitimate sense the reconstitution of ancient Judea); FYI, dispensationalism necessitates a negation/denial of supersessionism

• Marcionism—in official definition, a Gnostic/dualist heresy in the 2nd century within Christianity which denied all Jewish roots of the faith and blasphemously posited that Jesus was anti-Jehovah; its founder, Marcion of Sinope, produced a mutilated pseudo-canon consisting only of Paul’s “main” ten Epistles (removed of its Hebraisms/Judeocentric passages, of course) plus an edited Gospel of Luke (if I recall correctly)—Marcionism denies supersessionism by insisting Christ did not fulfill the Jewish law but came to negate Judaism entirely

• “Marcionite”/“neo-Marcionism”—more broadly in reference to movements which co-opt/appropriate Christianity while denying its Jewish foundation; Nazism’s “Positive Christianity” is an example of a “neo-Marcionite” ideology

• Ebionism—the polar opposite heresy of Marcionism, instead pushing “Judaizing” backwards literalism within the Christian church along Pharisaic/rabbinic-esque lines of “Jewish supremacy,” insisting Gentile converts be circumcised in the flesh, etc.; the Ebionites only relied on the Epistle to the Hebrews and the Gospel of Matthew and/or lost “Gospel of the Hebrews” as their canon, completely rejecting Paul the Apostle—Ebionism denies supersessionism by insinuating the Jewish types in the Old Testament were not fulfilled/completed by Christ and instead are to be understood in a backwards, pseudo-“literalized” context

• “neo-Ebionite”—broadly referential to heretical/false movements in Christianity which attempt to legitimize Pharisaic/backwards/“Judaizing” tendencies; the neo-Nazi-associated “Christian Identity” white supremacist cult (also Black Hebrew Israelites) are a prime examples

Zionism/pseudo-‘Jewish’-related

• “Zionazi”—okay… do I need to explain this one?

• “Judeo-Nazi”—complete ditto

• Kabbalistic/cabalistic/qabalistic—a form of occultism which takes an outer guise of “receiving” secret knowledge in masking itself as Judaism, yet is nothing more than a Gnostic cult—cabalism to some extent permeates almost the entirety of modern “Judaism” (with few exceptions), whether Zionist or non-Zionist, Orthodox or Reformed, etc.; Kabbalism co-opts and appropriates Judaism just as Nazism co-opts socialism

• “Anglo-Rothschild”—the Rothschild banking family are nothing more than the financial-managerial subsidiary of the Anglo-Jesuit cabal

• “hexagramic”—obviously in reference to the so-called “Star of David,” and I’ll simply add here that the hexagram has zero connection to the Hebrew Bible (nor the New Testament) and is an ancient pagan symbol of Baal

• ADL = Anti-Defamation League—hopefully I don’t need to clarify further

• B’nai B’rith—Anglo-Masonic traditional parent organization of the ADL

• AJC = American Jewish Committee—the ADL’s older cousin and of essentially the exact same ideological mold

• AJCongress = American Jewish Congress—not to be confused with the American Jewish Committee; historically in the 1930s, the AJCongress was of an apparent renegade “liberal Zionist” orientation and by and large (likely) did not endorse supremacist anti-Arab aggression; the AJCongress also organized the 1933 anti-Nazi boycott opposed by the British-controlled B’nai B’rith/AJC; however, AJCongress leader Stephen S. Wise was a Zionist “insider” who deliberately suppressed knowledge of the Holocaust in the early 1940s

Fascism/Nazism-related

(yes, I know, Zionism is technically a subset of Nazi-Fascism)

• Thule Society/“Thulists”—the occultic, Freemasonic secret society which was ostensibly the precursor to the Nazi Party; they were, by the way, Kabbalistic:

  The ‘Jewish’-supremacist origin of Nazism, pt. 2: Kabbalah and Thule

• “Ariosophic”—the religious backbone, root, and component of Nazism’s “Aryan”-supremacist racism

• “Teutonic”—much as the Jesuits fantasizingly model themselves after Templarism, the Nazis attempted to model their own movement after the ancient Germanic “Teuton” and/or “Teutonic Knights” military orders

• “neo-Teutonic”—technically and objectively speaking, the Nazis are more accurately summarized as “neo-Teutonic” rather than “Teutonic”

• “Ukrofascist”/“Ukronazi”—Ukrainian Nazi-Fascist ideology and its adherents, most notably the Azov Battalion

Terms to *avoid* using (and watch out for)

• “Judaic-Masonic”/“Judeo-Masonic”—falsely implies that Freemasonry is “Jewish-controlled” and is an old Jesuitic/Nazi propaganda narrative to falsely scapegoat Judaism for Masonic apparatus

• “Judeo-Bolshevik”/“Jewish Communist”¹⁰—highly age-old right-wing antisemitic/Nazi canard which blames Judaism for Marxism/Bolshevism; once again, it constitutes a chief example of Jesuitic deflection/projection/propaganda

• “crypto-Jewish Jesuit”/“Jesuit Jews”—completely absurd and ultra-fringe narrative insinuating the Jesuits were “secretly Jewish” and/or that “the Jews infiltrated the Jesuit Order”; this argument is patently false because none of the Jesuit Order’s founders had any documented Jewish roots, and the Jesuits outright banned ethnic descendants of Jews from entry into the Order

1. LaRouche/EIR does have its flaws; I shall explain this in a soon-to-come separate posting. :)

2. Their “official” name is the “Society of Jesus” (“S.J.”), though came to be called “Jesuits” since the very (lowercased) term “jesuit” as a common noun traditionally was ascribed broadly to those who (mis)appropriated the name of Jesus Christ.

3. Alright, alright, I’ll re-summarize here anyways for your convenience’s sake if your browser already contains too many dozen tabs open and your swap/page file is ready to explode: let’s say, for instance, that you have a Zionist saying “Zionism represents the interests of all Jewish people,” leading to a neo-Nazi antisemite saying “Zionism is a Jewish-controlled hegemony,” etc. etc.—in this case, both the Zionist and neo-Nazi are arguing from two sides of the same coin, aka that their arguments both premise on the common notion that “Zionism is equivalent to Jewry.” Getting the idea?

4. Of course, “mason” as a lowercase common noun historically could simply refer to a worker of stone/brick. In this case, capitalized “Masonry” is synonymous with Freemasonry as an official entity.

5. Anton Chaitkin (Mar. 26, 1994), “The British Empire Wants You To Be Stupid,” Lyndon LaRouche Archive.

6. Don’t give any serious heed whatsoever to modern right-wing propaganda claiming supersessionism is “antisemitic”—supersessionism’s fundamental core is the Old and New Testament premise that no person is justified nor of given preferable treatment in the sight of God by their ethnicity, but that only in Jesus Christ the Lord and Messiah can a person be redeemed from sin. It is anti-supersessionist dispensationalism which is racist in that it claims “Jews” are specially preferred by God because of their ethnicity.

7. See the Book of Daniel, ch. 11. (com. Ezek. 38:15)

8. Again, refer to Daniel 11.

9. Com. Rev. 11.

10. IMO “Jewish Communist” in certain contexts does accurately summarize a point in succinct simplicity, though requires a bit of caution; (almost) always avoid “directly” using the phrase “Judeo-Bolshevism,” however.