First off: it is completely ludicrous to glowingly celebrate the downfall of al-Assad as a victory for Syrians and Palestinians. My friend about two weeks ago expounded upon the main points, and to requote:
The formerly Al-Qaeda, later ISIS, and now rebranded as woke Syrian ‘rebels’ with the name Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) under the leadership of Abu Mohammed al-Julani — whose fighters steadfastly refuse to target the Israelis, get treated in Israeli hospitals, and have already made overtures for friendly relations with the genocidal Israelis — have now conquered Syria, overthrowing Bashar al-Assad, a minority Alawite in a Sunni majority country whose tyrannical rule lasted 24 years.
…
There is a near endless stream of evidence that makes it clear the supposed Syrian ‘rebels’ are for the large part foreign-backed mercenaries doing the bidding of Zionist and Western interests. The undoubted legitimate grievances of the ordinary Syrians have been co-opted by these trigger-happy hired thugs who don’t appear to have the best interests of the Syrian population at heart.
I couldn’t wholeheartedly concur more with the emboldened excerpt. (by the way: since “everyone” already knows the affiliated Al-Qaeda/ISIS statuses of the “Syrian rebels,” I therefore for sake of space will broadly gloss over repeating any mention this in the main body of this Stack) Let’s also consider a few other factors…
I: Putinist geopolitical games
The official government Russia since 1881 has coordinated umbrella controlled clashes as a puppeteered subsidiary of the British political establishment itself managed directly by the “New World Order” cabal insiders:
Pt. I: Syrian airspace
Russia, the longtime military patron of Assad interests, controls the Syrian airspace, and therefore Israeli interception/sabotage operations conducted in that region necessitate a premise of Kremlin-granted leeway. Constituting an “open secret”:1
…[is] that Moscow, an ally of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, allows Israel to conduct air strikes against both the Syrian army and Iranian militias operating in the country.
The truth is, Russia never activates its air defense systems against Israeli jets. Such passivity is believed to be part of a wider deal between the two countries.
After the Kremlin started its military adventure in Syria in 2015, it reached an agreement with the Jewish state: Israel reportedly pledged to guarantee the safety of Russian citizens and military installations in Syria during its strikes on Iranian militias and Syrian military targets. In return, Moscow promised not to use its weapons to repel Israeli attacks.
In the viewpoint of Iran and Syria cir. two years ago, Putin was:2
…an unreliable ally and partner. In 2010 Moscow refused to sell S-300 air defense systems to Tehran, bending to pressure from the United States and Israel. In 2019, Russia again rejected an Iranian request to buy S-400 systems, concerned that the sale would stoke more tension in the Middle East.
Meir Ben-Shabbat, a former national security adviser to the Fourth Reich, said:3
…Russia shares Israel’s view that Iran is a ‘destabilizing force in the Middle East.’ He also stressed that Moscow’s position on Iran is closer to Israel’s than what is revealed in public.
Russia’s passive position regarding Israeli air strikes in Syria clearly demonstrates that the Kremlin is not willing to harm its relations with Israel for the sake of its alliance with Syria and a potential strategic partnership with Iran.
Russia just earlier from that “passively” enabled (Na)tional (Zi)onist bombing of Syria, balking out of intervention against the hexagramic terrorists:4
Putin-supplied warplanes:5
…were only one part of the equation that saved the Assad government, whose depleted military ranks were filled by Iranian ground forces and allied militias.
‘The entire Russian intervention in Syria hinged on Iran doing all the heavy lifting’…
…as Russia developed its own assets in Syria, strengthening control over its warm-water naval base in Tartus and deploying S-400 missile systems to challenge NATO, Iran embedded itself with an eye towards using the country as a launching pad against its arch-rival Israel.
Getting the picture? Syria’s defense against Nazisraeli aggression was primarily supplemented from Iranian—not Russian—assistance. Read between those lines! Russian minimalist assurance of Assad’s (then-)protection was out of its own vested interest of geopolitically manipulating the Middle East…
…which certainly renders this flashback nowhere near surprising:678
The plot only strangely thickens in a very bizarre direction (I will later address the question of whether Assad is a coadjutor):9
Pt. II: Moscow/Tel Aviv intelligence collusion axis—is there anything new under the sun?
No.10 Anyways, folks, this here is the real Russian collusion: the Kremlin has conspired on behalf of Judeonazi/Zionist interests, consistently keeping the “Axis of Resistance” trapped in a cyclical dead-end run.
Here is the historical precedent: the Soviet Union since the 1940s has been observed as a persistent protector of Zionist interests, even after publicly shifting into virulent “anti-Zionism.” The Jewish American author Jack Bernstein asserts:11
Zionists had built up a large amount of arms which they had purchased from the U.S. and communist countries and had illegally smuggled into the area. The Arabs were defeated and in the process, Israel conquered more Palestinian territory.
To verify: Bernstein is 100% correct that the Zionist paramilitaries purchased weapons from Communist entities—Stalin in 1947-48 furnished “equipment, thousands of small arms, ammunition, and a number of Messerschmitt fighter planes” to the “socialist” Labor’s Haganah terrorists via East Bloc satellite regime Czechoslovakia.12 David Ben-Gurion boasted that the Communists—who sold $22 million worth of weapons—were to be primarily attributed for Zionist victories against Arab military in 1948.13
The Communists also—according to Bernstein—in the Six-Day War:14
…resorted to trickery: Soviet diplomats in Egypt told President Nasser to threaten war but not attack. Then Soviet diplomats told Israel’s leaders to threaten war and then go ahead and attack. This act of treachery enabled Israel to attack while Egypt was ‘off-guard’ and destroy Egypt’s military capacity in 6 days.
Furthermore:15
It has been the goal of Israel’s leaders to take over all the land between the Nile and Euphrates Rivers. Besides the Sinai and Gaza Strip which Israel intended to take from Egypt during the war, they desired the West Bank which was part of Jordan, and the Golan Heights which was part of Syria. So during the 1967 War, Israel resorted to trickery.
Israel had the technical equipment to intercept radio messages and change these messages (boil them) and then send them on to their destination. During the war, Israel intercepted messages from Egypt to Jordan and Syria and changed the messages, tricking Jordan and Syria into entering the war. The Arab countries were defeated and Israel took a big step toward its goal of conquest by occupying the Golan Heights and the West Bank as well as the Sinai and Gaza Strip.
Oh wait, you mean the same Golan Heights the Fourth Reich recently has16 been17 sending18 Kabbalistically unkosher Judeonazi settler sus domesticus into now that Assad is gone and Syria is suffering a Western/Zionist/Türkiye-induced power vacuum? What an (un)funny coincidence! Bernstein also alleges a Soviet-Zionist pact (cir. late 1940s-early 50s) implicating Josef Stalin, his Soviet lackey Lazar Kaganovich, and (racist Labor Zionist wench) Golda Meir:19
In viewing the 1973 War, most people and it seems most Arabs are of the impression that since Soviet Russia sold equipment to Egypt and other Arab countries, the Soviets were in support of the Arabs in the 1973 War. This is a false impression. To understand that this is the result of more deceit on the part of Israel and the Soviet Union, you must be aware of the Golda Meir-Stalin/Kaganovich Pact.
…
Representing Israel, Ambassador Golda Meir, a Bolshevik Jewess, met with two representatives of the Soviet Union: Kaganovich, a Bolshevik Jew and Stalin who had married a Bolshevik Jewess. They made a secret agreement — a pact.
What was this apparent pact? The author summarizes:20
ISRAEL’S PART OF THE PACT WAS:
Israel would not allow any Western country, especially the U.S. to build military bases on Israeli territory.
Israel would allow an official communist party to function freely in Israel.
Israel would not make any agreement to solve the Palestinian problem.
Israel would influence world Jewry, especially in the U.S. to have Western Powers adopt a policy of favoring Israel over the Arabs.
Israel was to continue its Marxist economic policies and prevent any free-enterprise tendencies.
SOVIET UNION’S PART OF THE PACT WAS:
The Soviets would institute a pro-Arab policy solely as a camouflage for its true intentions which was to furnish aid to the Arabs, but never enough to enable the Arabs to destroy Israel.
The Soviets would open the gates of Soviet satellite countries to Jewish immigration to Israel. Should this be insufficient, Soviet Russia then would open its own gates to immigration.
The Soviets would absolutely guarantee the security of Israel.
In addition, the Zionist and Soviet intelligence reportedly exchanged reports (per Bernstein).21 Although I individually have not found extensive validations directly proving a deep-seated, outright Soviet-Zionist pact, the fact remains that Soviet false reports to Nasser in the Six-Day War utterly sabotaged Arab resistance to Zionist-Nazi imperialism. Is modern Russia’s manipulation of Syria a copy-pasted blueprint of its old Soviet duplicity against Egypt?
Pt. III: contemporary Kremlin apparatus inconsistencies
Moscow for whatever reason could not make up its mind: Putin in mid-Oct. 2023 rightfully likened Judeonazi terrorism to Nazi war crimes against Russia during World War II,22 yet a month later his Minister of Foreign Affairs Sergey Lavrov pushed a polar opposite and completely bogus equivocation:232425
Asked in an interview with Rossiya 24 if the attacks of October 7 were a false flag to give Israel a pretext to build a canal from the Red Sea to the Mediterranean, Lavrov dismisses the suggestion.
‘By the way, Netanyahu said he wants to destroy Hamas, that sounds like demilitarization. And he said extremism in the Strip must be eliminated. Sounds like denazification,’ Lavrov says according to a live translation, referencing the two goals of Russia’s so-called ‘special operation’ in Ukraine. (TToI)
…
Lavrov further recalled that Netanyahu had held two phone conversations with Russian President Vladimir Putin and that the Israelis had helped Moscow evacuate Russian citizens from Gaza.
‘Therefore, we need to be very careful about our common history with Israel and, above all, the history of the fight against Nazism. This is the main thing that unites us historically,’ Lavrov said. (RT)
Did you catch that? Lavrov likened the Fourth Reich’s sham witchhunt against “Hamas” to “denazification,” regurgitating a broadly standard pants-on-fire Zionist slander/dehumanization against the Palestinian people.
II: cui bono? (spoiler: Anglo-Zionist criminals)
How about we let the Judeo-Holocaustic syndicate speak for itself…26272829303132
Also:33
Need I say more here?
III: Assad—betrayed or betrayer?
Putin a mere 1-2 days ago admitted this much:34
Putin played down the damage to Moscow from the fall of Assad, saying its military intervention in Syria since 2015 had helped prevent the country from becoming a ‘terrorist enclave’.
He said Israel was the ‘main beneficiary’ of the current situation.
This is factually correct—at the same time, that this statement came forth out of Putin’s mouth constitutes a “boastful” mark of pure cynicism; Moscow in effect stated the quiet part out loud, that a) the downfall of the Assad dynasty and its policies did NOT constitute a setback for Russian geopolitical interests, and that b) the primary beneficiaries of the abrupt power vacuum are the Zionazis.
Recall all those screenshots in sec. I, pt. I, substantially confirming the Russo-Zionist alliance? Whether Assad indefinitely remained in or not clearly did not impact whether Putin accomplished his clandestine agenda for Syria, because to the global insiders the ends justify the means.
Pt. I: Russo-Kabbalistic convergence
The fanatically Kabbalistic, arch-Zionist organization Chabad-Lubavitch has been noted for its joint liaisons35 with both Orange Bolshevism’s Mango Caesar and Russia’s Peter the Great36 Comsymp37 Caesar. Putin’s incredibly close and mutually amicable ties with leading Chabad Zionist activists is well-documented, the Russian president exalting:38
…[Chabad propagator Berel] Lazar a member of Russia’s prestigious Merit to the Fatherland order, the country’s highest civilian decoration and one that is rarely conferred on people who were not born in Russia. (Lazar became a Russian citizen in 2000.)
In Jan. 2023, a Russian national security adviser who criticized Chabad as a neopagan supremacist cult was abruptly fired on Putin’s orders.39
Pt. II: Assadism ‘briefly’ examined
Lyndon LaRouche’s Executive Intelligence Review argues that the reign of Bashar al-Assad’s father Hafez constituted a byproduct of French imperialism in the Middle East, tracing back to Hafez’s own father Sulayman.40 In an earlier 1990 allegation, EIR alleged Hafez al-Assad’s directly complicity (alongside George H. W. Bush and the “State of Israel”) in the slaughter of Syrian Christians by the hundreds:41
Since on Oct. 13 the Syrian armies in Lebanon began to smash the Christian resistance there, led by the constitution ally elected head of government, Gen. Michel Aoun, the troops of Syrian dictator Hafez al-Assad have killed at least 700 Christians with the blessings of President Bush, whose new-found friend and anti-Iraq ally Assad is.
For the first time, the Syrian Air Force was allowed to bomb Aoun’s headquarters. This proves that the U.S. and Israel gave Assad the nod; previously, the Israelis had demanded the Syrians be prevented from deploying their air power in the area.
Henry Kissinger’s recorded liaison with Hafez spanned:42
…two decades, and he was instrumental, with Israeli intelligence, in the November 1970 coup that made Assad the strongman of Syria. In his memoirs, The White House Years, Kissinger praised the Syrian dictator to the skies: ‘Less visionary than Sadat, [Assad] nevertheless gave Syria unprecedented stability and, against the background of the turbulent history of his people, emerged as a leader of courage and relative moderation.’
As to whether Bashar al-Assad’s policies reflected the attributed imperialist proxy workings of his father, I must candidly admit don’t quite know at the very moment—given Bashar’s intense slandering in the Anglo-Zionist Western media during the Syrian Civil War over highly publicized allegations of chemical weapons attacks (likely framed in CIA-manufactured false flag operations—read this by my friend ), one may be easily tempted to surmise his (relative) innocence and integrity in light of the Western globalists’ precedent of vociferously assailing select scapegoats i.e. Saddam Hussein. Assad most certainly has for years steadfastly resisted Western/Zionist-backed Islamist fifth-columnist intrusion in Syria, pushing back against the very Al-Qaeda factions State Department liberal pantywaist Jake Sullivan said “is on our side in Syria.”43
Most notably relevant on this issue of Bashar al-Assad’s sincerity (or lack of?) are the recent “revelations” purportedly exposing a vast network of “Assad-operated torture cells.” If Assad indeed was direct complicit in grotesque war crimes to such gargantuan extents, then almost certainly he is a clandestine insider, since the entire point of the Western/Zionist conspiracy is the provocation of Syrian anti-Assad sentiment exacerbated until the nation is exasperatingly desperate enough to support anyone “liberating” them from Assad (if Assad intentionally rendered the task easier for them, then per basic logic of preplanned problem-reaction-solution there remains slim doubt he was a coadjutor the entire time), even blindly believing a fifth column of ISIS/Al-Qaeda terrorists backed by the Zionist syndicate of all groups will secure their “liberation”/“freedom.”44
“While they promise them liberty, they themselves are the servants of corruption: for of whom a man is overcome, of the same is he brought in bondage.” —II Peter 2:19
Oh, and it looks like Assad at the present time is entirely entrenched into the Russian military establishment45 and (reportedly) transferred a posh lifestyle into his recent Moscow “asylum” residency.46 Remember the rap sheet earlier in this posting listing the receipts of Kremlin-Zionist entente?
Conclusion (TL;DR)
Notwithstanding elements of Bashar al-Assad’s reign presenting a bulwark of anti-imperialist resistance against Western fascists, it is clear that his governance over Syria was stringpulled/manipulated by his Russian sponsors… the same ones who colluded with Zionazi supremacist interests.
The Western/Zionist military/intelligence axis funded ISIS/Al-Qaeda “Syrian rebel” terrorism against Assad to provoke a bloodshed-ridden civil war rife with CIA/MI6-manufactured false flags fabricating the guilt on Assad’s side to exacerbate the seeds of Syrian discontent against his regime; then the ISIS/Al-Qaeda fifth column “overthrows” Assad to glowing praises sung by a brainwashed, manipulated Syrian population under the (false) impression of liberation. Therefore by endorsing the “rebel” Islamists, the duped Syrian population are ostensibly (and moronically) blinding themselves in the clear sight of the Anglo-Zionists who deployed those same “rebel” terrorists as puppets to do the Western globalists’ “dirty work.”
Sudden collapse of the Assad regime and its resulting power vacuum, coupled with the misguided backing of Western-funded Islamist umbrella subsidiaries, couldn’t have better served Judeo-Lebensraum expansionist aims now that Syria’s de facto governance is in no clear position to resist Zionazism. The pseudo-Zion, Jesuit-Kabbalistic “State of Israel” therefore is completing its intended role in the grand problem-reaction-solution (PRS) framework paving towards an eventual neo-Templar restoration of the Latin Kingdom of Jerusalem to complete the NWO into its final, “absolutist” despotism.
(psst… I plan on soon exposing Putin as a moral fraud and Jesuit coadjutor)
Nikola Mikovic (Jan. 3, 2022), “Why Russia turns a blind eye when Israel bombs Syria,” Asia Times.
Ibid.
Ibid.
Sean Mathews (Dec. 31, 2021), “Russia ‘tolerates’ Israeli strikes in Syria, but has little appetite to restrain Iran,” Middle East Eye.
Ibid.
Oct. 15, 2015, “Russia sets up ‘hotline’ with Israel to avoid Syria clashes,” Middle East Eye.
Oct. 15, 2015, “Russia-Israel ‘hotline’ to prevent aerial clashes in Syria,” The Times of Israel.
Dan Williams (Oct. 22, 2015), “Israel quiet over 'hotline' with Russia on Syria,” Reuters.
Patrick Hilsman (Jul. 16, 2019), “How Israeli-Designed Drones Became Russia’s Eyes in the Sky for Defending Bashar al-Assad,” The Intercept.
Ecc. 1:9b.
Jack Bernstein (1984), “The Life of an American Jew in Racist Marxist Israel,” p. 17.
Bruce D. Porter (Sep. 28, 1984), “The USSR in Third World Conflicts: Soviet Arms and Diplomacy in Local Wars 1945-1980,” p. 14.
Rob Geist Pinfold, Joel Peters (2024), “Routledge Handbook on Israel's Foreign Relations,” ch. VII.
Bernstein (1984), p. 18.
Ibid.
Mark Moran (Dec. 15, 2024), “Israel approves plan to expand Golan Heights settlements,” United Press International.
Dec. 18, 2024, “In Israeli-annexed Golan’s ‘Trump Heights’, settlers ready for expansion,” AFP News.
Ghaith Alsayed and Hussein Malla (Dec. 19, 2024), “Syrian villagers near the Golan Heights say Israeli forces are banning them from their fields,” Associated Press.
Bernstein (1984), p. 22.
Ibid., p. 23.
Ibid.
Oct. 13, 2023, “Gaza is Leningrad: Putin Likens Israeli Behavior to Brutal Nazi Siege in WWII,” The Palestine Chronicle.
Dec. 28, 2023, “Objectives of Israel’s and Russia’s Wars ‘nearly Identical’ – Did Lavrov Shift Position on Gaza?” The Palestine Chronicle.
Dec. 28, 2023, “Lavrov: Netanyahu does not dare speak against Russia, Gaza war like Ukraine invasion,” The Times of Israel.
Dec. 28, 2023, “Israel pursuing similar goals to Russia – Lavrov,” Russia Today.
Elizabeth Tsurkov (Sep. 6, 2018), “Inside Israel’s Secret Program to Back Syrian Rebels,” Foreign Policy.
Judah Ari Gross (Jan. 14, 2019), “IDF chief finally acknowledges that Israel supplied weapons to Syrian rebels,” The Times of Israel.
Geopolitical Economy Report (Dec. 4, 2024), “Extremist ‘rebels’ in Syria say they ‘love Israel’. USA tries to weaken Middle East Resistance Axis,” YouTube.
Dec. 8, 2024, “Netanyahu Celebrates Assad Regime Collapse: ‘Historic Day,’” Newsweek.
Freddie Clayton (Dec. 10, 2024), “Israel strikes and advances into Syrian territory after Assad’s overthrow, fueling alarm,” NBC News.
Mick Krever (Dec. 11, 2024), “Israel strikes Syria 480 times and seizes territory as Netanyahu pledges to change face of the Middle East,” CNN.
Thomas Helm (Dec. 18, 2024), “Netanyahu says Israel to stay in Syrian territory for foreseeable future,” The National.
Imtiaz Tyab (Dec. 16, 2024), “Israeli strikes destroy Syria’s weapons of war as ousted Assad laments country's fall into ‘hands of terrorism,’” CBS News.
Dec. 19, 2024, “Putin denies Russian defeat in Syria, says Israel is the main winner,” Reuters.
Ben Schreckinger (Apr. 9, 2017), “The Happy-Go-Lucky Jewish Group That Connects Trump and Putin,” Politico.
Patrick Smith (Jun. 10, 2022), “Putin compares himself to Peter the Great in fight to expand Russia,” NBC News.
Jenni Fink (Feb. 21, 2022), “Putin Invokes Soviet Heroes Lenin, Stalin, Says Russia ‘Created’ Ukraine,” Newsweek.
Cnaan Lipshiz (Jun. 5, 2015), “Why Russian Chief Rabbi Stands by Vladimir Putin,” Forward.
Jan. 21, 2023, “Putin fires top official who described Chabad as a supremacist cult,” The Times of Israel.
Joseph Brewda, Linda de Hoyos (Nov. 8, 1996), “The Anglo-French patrons of Syria’s Hafez al-Assad, II: French Imperial Roots—The Alawite sect’s service to France,” Executive Intelligence Review, vol. XXIII, no. XLV, p. 25.
Nora Hamerman and Thierry Lalevée (Nov. 2, 1990), “U.S. lets Assad slaughter Christians in Lebanon,” Executive Intelligence Review, vol. XVII, no. XLII, p. 38.
Scott Thompson (Nov. 16, 1990), “Kissinger’s record: war and terrorism,” Executive Intelligence Review, vol. XVII, vol. XLIV, p. 39.
Jake J. Sullivan, “SPOT REPORT 02/12/II,” WikiLeaks.
Dec. 8, 2024, “Opposition fighters declare Syria’s Damascus ‘liberated’, al-Assad ousted,” Al Jazeera.
Andrew Osborn, Maxim Rodionov (Dec. 8, 2024), “Syria’s Assad is in Moscow after deal on military bases, says Russian state media,” Reuters.
Dec. 9, 2024, “Assad Family’s New Life in Moscow: From Syrian Palaces to Russian Luxury,” CEO Today Magazine.
Hafez Al Assad and Bush were not friends that is humorous considering Syria has been under attack by US since Eisenhower. Hafez did however think Bush would be fair when it came to reining in Israel. US hates communism more than anything of course because they are fascist and they were terrified of Syrian populism under Assad.
https://youtu.be/AGi9ad8mruc
I am a great admirer of both Hafez Al Assad and Bashar as you know so I disagree with the propaganda being overwhelming heaped onto their characters to defame them. However, that is what US does even though it is the number one terrorist nation in the world, defame others as they kill with impunity. US has a straw boss figure head perceived as their president. Anyone can plainly see this when they claim a walking corpse as the commander in chief for the last four years. Now the US is being diplomatic with a takfir terrorist stronghold they empowered in Syria and calling it a democracy, just like their terrorist proxy Israel.
As far as Bashar we do not even know if he is truly alive so acting like he was the Shah of Iran who made off with billions of Iran's finances is uncalled for. He lived like any ordinary person contrary to the propaganda.
Regardless I appreciate the insight into Putin. I have always felt that Russia coming to the aid of Syria was a double edged sword. Yes, they helped Syria but it was Soleimani who defeated ISIS. Putin left terrorist strongholds in Syria instead of finishing the job in 2018 with the complicity of snowflake Rouhani from Iran. It was just a matter of time before they were used against the Syrian people. Syria was never allowed to defend herself from Israel after Russia stepped in. In Ukraine he did not finish the job in 2014 and left the Donbass to be slaughtered by Nazis for the next 8 years. I am not one of these people that think Putin is a 3d chess player. Russia has always stated that Oct 7th was a terrorist attack not the prison break it actually was. Who killed Raisi? Why is no one answering that and instead covering it up?
Erdogan is also a Zionist tool who has some kind of hold over Russia as they compete for the Caucasus. I do not quite understand the relationship. I do know I can not tolerate Erdogan who is an actual terrorist with big dreams of fame.
https://armenianweekly.com/2020/10/08/russian-colonel-zhilin-this-is-erdogans-war-against-russia-for-the-caucasus/
It’s well known Putin and Netanyahu are on personally amicable terms . In the broader Neo Templar context - Israel is able to serve the interests of the western elites AND the interests of the Slavic Christian interests of the holy land .
How long the Jews will be allowed to dominate once their primary role of bridge head into Muslim lands is achieved is anyone’s guess .
The Reconquest of the Middle East is in full swing now.