Debunking the Judeonazis’ notorious ‘but the Mufti’ argument/pivot
Spoiler: al-Husseini was a puppet of the *Zionist* agenda.
Anyone boasting the incredible dishonor of debating a devoted Hasbarapologist has probably run into this cancerously whataboutist talking point sooner or later:
“Haavara did happen… bUt the Zionists only were trying to save Jews from Nazism, while the Palestinian leader Haj Amin al-Husseini was Hitler’s Mufti trying to kill Jews, proving that the Palestinians are the real Nazis and the Nazis were anti-Zionist!1!11!!1” —Judeo-Nazis
FYI (and keep reading into the very end): it is indeed of a truth it is that Amin al-Husseini was the highly antisemitic Grand Mufti of Jerusalem and that he openly collaborated with the Nazis in support of the Holocaust. This however fails to prove hastily scrambled Zionist conclusions that 1/2) the Mufti was any legitimate “anti-Zionist,” nor that 2/2) the Nazis were likewise in any legitimate sense “anti-Zionist.” To the contrary: the Mufti’s background and Nazi-colluding actions will demonstrably prove that he was all along a set-up stooge of the Zionist agenda.
Ex. I: Anglo-Freemasonic controllers
Pt. I: British Zionists create the Mufti
Nothing beyond even semi-idiocy is necessitated to understand that Zionist imperialism was the incarnated political creation of the British (aka Anglo-Masonic) stringpullers exhibited in the Balfour Declaration (written to a Rothschild, by the way1). The British Freemasonic military/intelligence axis operates as a chief outlet for the Jesuit Order’s directives, carrying out their boss’s Zionist agenda.
In strident accordance with the Jesuit/Hegelian motto of dialectical manipulation, the Anglo-Freemasonic/Zionist cabal have continuously run “both” sides: the antisemitic agitator “with little Islamic theological training”2—Amin al-Husseini—was appointed Grand Mufti by none other than the British imperialists who installed al-Husseini and Vladimir Jabotinsky as figurehead “heroistic” proxies respectively leading the British-controlled Islamist movement and British-controlled Revisionist Zionist movement in a controlled clash, effectively sidelining into practical oblivion any meaningful grassroots Palestinian resistance to Anglo-Zionist imperialism.3 Mufti al-Husseini, was, after all:
…promoted by Sir Ronald Storrs, the British Governor General and an aide to Sir Herbert Samuel, the British High Commissioner for Palestine. In 1921 al-Husseini had already been installed as president of the Supreme Muslim Council, a British- sponsored association of hand-picked Muslim religious leaders. The next year, Sir Ronald Storrs rigged the ‘elections’ for the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem in favor of al-Husseini.
Yep, you read that right: the future Nazi collaborator al-Husseini was not even accepted by his Muslim contemporaries, contrary to the incredibly lousy Zionist fearmongering of Palestinian Muslims as blanket “antisemitic Mufti acolytes”—the Muslim High Council of Jerusalem in its 1921 vote INITIALLY REJECTED al-Husseini and he was only propelled into a “Palestinian” leadership position by Angloimperialist demand.4 The British masterminds, simply put:5
…controlled the leaders of the Arab nationalist movements, which they created and funded. They owned Haj Amin al-Husseini, a young radical, whom they chose as Mufti of Jerusalem. They funded his religious network and social organizations, and to give him status among all of the Islamic faith, they created the post of Grand Mufti for him.
When in 1920 Amin al-Husseini was sentenced to ten years of prison for antisemitic incitement of the Nebi Musa riots, the British (Anglo-Zionists) pardoned him.6 To more or less restate what I already said right above: the following year (1921) was when al-Husseini was appointed—by Herbert Samuel—Grand Mufti of Jerusalem despite outright losing the election for that position,7 which should already prove a telling sign of just how vital an asset the Anglo-Zionist controllers considered him. The British “for some years” openly regarded him a reliable ally.8
Pt. II: MI6 contacts?
The “British-Nazi animosity” of WWII was a dialectically hatched public theater—if you recall from my Rothschild-Hitler link analysis (see cit. I at the bottom of this article), heading the (Rothschild-backed/controlled) Bank of England was Montagu Norman, who facilitated Nazi looting of Czech gold. I don’t know the full rap sheet of details ATM, though the relevant corollary is this: Nazi Mufti al-Husseini’s outward “anti-British” alliance with Nazi-Fascism constituted nothing more beyond a public illusion, and behind the scenes remained the Angloimperialists’ useful tool.
At the closing of World War II, after all, efforts to indict al-Husseini for war crimes were stifled by the British who ensured his safeguarded protection—London’s useful Egyptian proxy King Farouk granted political asylum to the Mufti, who subsequently in 1946 worked yet against for the British!9 Sources indicated:10
…that [al-Husseini] was employed by the Arab News Agency, an MI6 front established in Cairo to spread British propaganda in the region.
Ex. II: Angloimperialist precedent reinforced
One subset of the Zionist propaganda is pointing out that al-Husseini’s close (Arab) associates translated Hitler’s Mein Kampf (apparently ghostwritten by right-wing Jesuit operative Bernhard Stempfle anyways) into Arabic. While this is technically true, it yet again in no wise validates the Zionist narrative of a monolithic “Arab-Nazi affinity against Zionism.” Avi Shlaim explains:
…antisemitism is a European malady. Antisemitism grew in Europe, and from Europe it was exported to the Middle East. And one proof of that claim is that there was no antisemitic literature in Arabic. So when antisemitism took off in Iraq after the First World War, antisemitic literature had to be translated from European languages to Arabic, literature like Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf.
To clarify: “Arab antisemitism” didn’t exist until British colonialists started installing their dear Zionist puppet regime, resulting in the conflation between Judaism and Zionism producing an artificially manufactured schism between Arab and Jew. That the antisemitic Mufti al-Husseini promoted the translation of Mein Kampf into Arabic is simply another piece of evidence that he subscribed to the decades-long pattern of the (Zionist) Angloimperialist controllers, working on behalf of the Anglo-Jesuit agenda of splitting nations/entities into clashing “thesis” and “antithesis.”
Also worth noting is that Nazi ideology from its inception viewed Arabs as racially “inferior,”11 so any “Arab-Nazi collaboration” was nothing more than a lopsided Nazi manipulation of Arab populations. More on this in the next case exhibit…
Ex. III: Evian’s consequences, Zionist intentions
Pt. I: Zionists sabotage Jewish rescue efforts
It is easy at face value for the uneducated naïveté individual—who knows little of the Zionists’ true history—to assume that anyone who crudely opposed the rescue of European Jews out of Nazi-Fascism in the late 1930s stood in blanket opposition to the Zionist goal of “rescuing Jews into Palestine.” We shall therefore let the Zionist leaders speak for themselves:1213
“Palestine cannot absorb the Jews of Europe. We want only the best of Jewish youth to come to us. We want only people of education to enter Palestine for the purpose of increasing its culture. The other Jews will have to stay where they are and face whatever fate awaits them. These millions of Jews are dust on the wheels of history and may have to be blown away. We don't want them pouring into Palestine. We don't want our Tel Aviv to become another low-grade ghetto. —Chaim Weizmann (1937)
“If I knew that it was possible to save all the children of Germany by transporting them to England, and only half by transferring them to the Land of Israel, I would choose the latter, for before us lies not only the numbers of these children but the historical reckoning of the people of Israel.” —David Ben-Gurion (Dec. 1938)
You read that right—in the case admission of Weizmann, the self-admitted Zionist intention all along was a clear-cut antipathy to the thought of all Jews rescued into Palestine, rather exhibiting at best a callous indifference to the scenario of Holocaustically mass-murderous wipeout which ultimately took place.
In the Evian Conference of 1938, both Weizmann and Ben-Gurion—key liaisons of Anglo-Zionism—intensely opposed any efforts to rescue European Jews from Nazi Germany into Britain or the United States:14
As Germany drifted in the 1930s toward Kristallnacht and the Nuremberg laws, the danger to Jews grew more and more apparent. In other countries, Jewish organizations, and non-Jewish organizations as well, urged their governments to give Jews refuge in their territory. One might have expected Zionist organizations to take up this demand on Western governments. But the Zionist movement did just the opposite. It discouraged Jewish migration to Western countries. Instead, it worked to channel European Jews to Palestine to the exclusion of other destinations. The Zionist movement took this stance on the basis of the principle that the only way to protect Jews in the long run was to gain territory for a Jewish state. The Zionist Organization regarded the dispersal of Jews to various countries that might accept them as a serious threat to its goals. For the Zionists, Palestine had to be the only destination for emigrating Jews.
Judeo-Nazi Weizmann’s demanded policy was “all or nothing”—either the Jewish population of Europe was rescued to Palestine alone or left to die:15
Weizmann said that Palestine must be the destination for emigrants leaving Europe. ‘Our position today has become so acutely critical,’ said Weizmann with reference to the Jews of Europe, ‘we must demand a permanent solution to our problem. That solution can be found only in Palestine — the national home of a homeless people.’ For Weizmann, the immigration of displaced Jews into Western countries was no solution.
Likeminded wheezeface Ben-Gurion was more concerned with maintained political bolsters for Zionism than rescuing Jews out of a Nazistically consumed Europe:16
Ben Gurion feared that resettling Jews outside Palestine would erode support for Zionism among world Jewry. In a December 17, 1938 letter to the Zionist Executive, Ben Gurion wrote, ‘If Jews will have to choose between the refugees, saving Jews from concentration camps, and assisting a national museum in Palestine, mercy will have the upper hand and the whole energy of the people will be channeled into saving Jews from various countries.’ In that eventuality, Ben Gurion wrote, ‘Zionism will be struck off the agenda.’
Western governments found it all too comforting that their intrinsically coldhearted indifference was “validated” by the Zionists’ concurrent steadfast opposition to the emigration of Jews towards non-Palestine destinations:17
To be sure, the Western governments were not anxious to take in large numbers of Jews, even as the clouds of genocide were gathering in Germany. But the Zionist movement contributed to the reluctance of the Western governments. In upholding strict immigration quotas [barring Jewish refugees], those governments could take comfort in the fact that their policy was approved by the Zionists.
Pt. II: Mufti-Nazi collaboration—cui bono?
Nothing could have better and more conveniently facilitated the Zionists’ long-term objectives than the Holocaust. Only a pogrom so horrendously mass-murderous in horrifying extent as the Holocaust proved strong enough a straw to break the camel’s back and convince Europe’s surviving Jews the “need” of their “own state” as the only protection from antisemitism:18
This mass killing would have a profound impact on Zionist diplomacy. The Zionist argument that Jews could be protected only by having their own space gained resonance. The logic of that argument could more readily be grasped by those to whom Zionist diplomats appealed for support. The resolve of the Zionists themselves to carry out their project was reaffirmed, even as many Zionists were among those killed. Within world Jewry, Zionism had remained a minority view before the war, but now it commanded the support of most Jews.
Jewish American historian Lenni Brenner confirms this fact in his own research and compilation—with a bit of statistical data:19
Zionism was little more than an off-stage noise in the America of the ’30s.
…
All of this changed with the Holocaust. A nationalist wave consumed the Jewish community, terrorized out of their wits by the enormity of Hitler’s crime. Ninety percent supported the creation of Israel, which they saw as sort of the silver lining on the clouds, after the Nazi storm.
Simply put, it is a well-documented sobering fact of reality that the State of Israel’s 1948 establishment necessitated the mass murder of millions of Jews in the Holocaust.20 No wonder the Jewish activist Tony Greenstein has correctly observed modern “Israel” as the incarnation of “Hitler’s bastard offspring.”21 (shoutout to my friend Mark Taylor for repeatedly reminding me to check out Greenstein—thanks!)
It is clear then that when the Mufti Haj Amin al-Husseini promoted and assisted the Nazi Holocaust of Europe’s Jews, he was ultimately working to the end benefit of the Zionist agenda as intended by his Jesuit/Anglo-Freemasonic controllers from the start. Al-Husseini’s chum22 Eichmann—who deported Hungary’s (anti-Zionist) Jewish population to their slaughter—was a self-admitted Zionist:23
Anny Stern was one of the lucky ones. In 1939, after months of hassle with the Nazi bureaucracy, the occupying German Army at her heels, she fled Czechoslovakia with her young son and emigrated to Palestine. At the time of Anny's departure, Nazi policy encouraged emigration.
‘Are you a Zionist?’ Adolph [sic] Eichmann, Hitler's specialist on Jewish affairs, asked her.
‘Jawohl [yes, indeed],’ she replied.
‘Good,’ he [Eichmann] said, ‘I am a Zionist, too. I want every Jew to leave for Palestine.’
Eichmann’s highly telling criminal admissions are well-preserved to the embarrassingly red-faced chagrin of modern Judeo-Nazi censormongers:24
Eichmann identified with the Zionists on some level, saying ‘there was a very strong similarity between our attitudes in the SS and the viewpoint of these immensely idealistic Zionist leaders.’ He recalled having told Dr. Rudolf Kastner, a representative of the Zionist movement, ‘We, too, are idealists and we, too, had to sacrifice our own blood before we came to power.’
As my friend Nuno M-Nouri carefully notes in this analysis worth your time reading:
[Eichmann collaborator Resző] Kastner's duties became intertwined with those of the SS. In addition to its Extermination Department and Looting Department, the Nazi SS established a Rescue Department headed by Kastner. Hungarian Jews were most prominently anti-Zionist.
Oh, side note: this very Zionist/Nazi looting and deportation to the slaughter of the Hungarian Jews was what a certain George Soros participated in.25 Anyways: when the Nazis assured Mufti al-Husseini that the Eastern European Jews would face en masse murder instead of emigration to Palestine,26 this was a decimation of the anti-Zionist bastion of Jewry by mass-killing the very same millions Weizmann said “are dust on the wheels of history and may have to be blown away.” (remember the above cited quote in pt. I of this exhibit?)
Pt. III: the conspiracy explained
The full picture is actually very simple to summarize: to the outside world, the Mufti-Nazi conspiracy was superficially and falsely presented in duplicity as “anti-Zionism” in that seemingly the Nazis helped al-Husseini-led (and so-called) “Palestinian nationalist” extremists by killing Jews so they could not emigrate to Palestine. Yet remember, this was only the “exoteric” garb of propaganda to deceive the masses and dupe gullible Arab audiences into Nazi collaborationism.
In reality, the “esoteric”/true agenda all along was that the Zionist/Nazi agenda to eliminate assimilationist/anti-Zionist Jewish prominence from Europe, planned and carried out the Holocaust to destroy the Jewish population’s anti-Zionist majority and thereby goad the surviving remainder after WWII into acquiescing towards Zionist emigration demands as the “only way to escape antisemitism.” The (British-controlled) Mufti Haj Amin al-Husseini facilitated this Zionist/Nazi agenda by assisting in the Nazis’ mass-slaughter of Europe’s Jews in the Second World War, all funded and/or propped up in highly coordinated collaboration by the Jesuit Order, their Anglo-Freemasonic/Rothschild financial syndicate, and the(ir) Soviet Communists.
And, of course, since Amin al-Husseini’s pro-Nazi collaborationist assistance and support for the Holocaust mass murder of Jews was outwardly presented (in utter superficiality) as “pro-Palestinian nationalism,” it gives perfect “fuel to the fire” for Zionist propaganda to in the long-run slander and discredit legitimate Palestinian nationalist resistance to Zionism via association fallacy. Nothing plotted by the New World Order cabal is by sheer chance.
Side note: if you are unfamiliar with terms I use such as “exoteric”/“esoteric,” this “glossary” I created two weeks ago should be of explanatory help:
Ex. IV: post-WWII Anglo-Zionist protection
In 1945, Zionist military located al-Husseini, “yet” higher orders (apparently from future Israeli prime minister Moshe Sharett) commanded the soldiers to spare the Nazi Mufti’s life.27 The provided pretext of course was “let’s not turn him into a martyr,” but hopefully you especially by this point aren’t one of those people believing outward Zionazi propaganda at face value.
Al-Husseini’s lifelong Zionist-ensured protection from assassination includes his immediate post-WWII settlement in Cairo, Egypt, thanks directly to “Anglo-American intelligence circles” (yes, despite his outward “anti-British” era of Nazi-Fascist kinship, ultimately the British came to the Mufti’s rescue yet again), resuming “collaboration with [Otto] Skorzeny, François Genoud, and SS structures throughout the Arab world.”28 Skorzeny—remember—was a Nazi SS member who became a Mo(SS)ad stooge for the “State of Israel.”29 Birds of a feather flock together, do they not?
Epilogue: was al-Husseini representative of Palestinians en masse?
As many of you are familiar, Zionists love to peddle “collective guilt” tropes against Palestinians. If we are to consistently apply the core tenets of this “logic,” then by the same absurd reasoning it can be equally argued Chaim Weizmann’s treacherous betrayal of European Jews was representative of all Jewish people, and therefore the millions of Jewish Holocaust victims actually betrayed themselves. Really, do we need to head into this dangerous pretext at all?
Of course, we don’t need to—even the obnoxious right-wing Zionist mouthpiece Benny Morris of all people admitted that Palestine during WWII broadly supported Allied military campaigns against Nazi-Fascism.
Verdict
Amin Al-Husseini was a fifth-columnist puppet planted into the Palestinian nationalist movement’s core by the (Jesuit-controlled) Anglo-Freemasonic/Zionist intelligence complex for the perniciously crafted purpose of sabotaging Palestinian nationalism. Everything al-Husseini did was to the end benefit of the Zionist agenda, and his lifelong protection by the NWO controllers indicates nothing less than the strong likelihood of him serving as a conscious insider who lied through his teeth all along amidst in duplicity his preaching an outward garb of “anti-Zionism.”
Aspiring to be conscientiously attentive and sound observers, therefore, we must reach the conclusive summary that only to whose clearly foreseen end benefit was attained to such successful precision can their ascribed role of stringpulling be attributed.
Jeffrey Steinberg (Feb. 17, 2006), “Our Sordid Love Affair With London’s Muslim Brotherhood,” Executive Intelligence Review, vol. XXXIII, no. VII, p. 49.
Hussein Askary (Jan. 23, 2009), “British Deception Responsible for Palestinian Bloodshed Today,” Executive Intelligence Review, vol. XXXVI, no. III, p. 32.
Lionel I. Casper (2003), “The Rape of Palestine and the Struggle for Jerusalem,” p. 39.
Steven P. Meyer (Jan. 23, 2009), “How British Imperialists Created the Fascist Jabotinsky,” Executive Intelligence Review, vol. XXXVI, no. III, p. 36.
J. E. Thomas (Sep. 17, 2023), “The Grandest Larceny: The Foundation of Israel,” ch. V.
Ibid.
Ibid.
Mark Curtis (2010), “Secret Affairs: Britain’s Collusion with Radical Islam,” ch. I.
Ibid.
Martin Gilbert (2010), “In Ishmael’s House: A History of Jews in Muslim Lands,” p. 175.
Ben Hecht (1954), “A Child of the Century,” p. 531.
“David Ben-Gurion,” Wikiquote.
John Quigley (Jan. 5, 2016), “The International Diplomacy of Israel's Founders: Deception at the United Nations in the Quest for Palestine,” p. 39.
Ibid, p. 40.
Ibid.
Ibid, p. 41.
Ibid, p. 42.
Lenni Brenner (2002), “51 Documents: Zionist Collaboration With the Nazis,” p. 324.
Tomer Kleinman (Mar. 2002), “Did the Holocaust Play a Role in the Establishment of the State of Israel?” University of California, Santa Barbara.
“Tony Greenstein,” Wikiquote.
Isaac Jack Lévy, Rosemary Lévy Zumwalt (Oct. 13, 2020), “The Sephardim in the Holocaust: A Forgotten People,” p. 201.
Lore Dickstein (Nov. 17, 1996), “Hell’s Own Cookbook,” The New York Times.
J. R. Hammond (Aug. 24, 2009), “The Rejection of Palestinian Self-Determination,” p. 27.
Scott Thompson (Dec. 17, 1993), “ADL favorite Soros helped Nazis loot Jews,” Executive Intelligence Review, vol. XX, no. XLIX, p. 12.
Jack Fischel (1996), “The Holocaust,” pp. 76-77.
Tsilla Hershco (Mar. 2006), “The Grand Mufti of Jerusalem in France: Story of An Evasion,” Controversies, no. I, p. 261.
Michael Liebig (Apr. 16, 2004), “Terror's Legacy: Schacht, Skorzeny, Allen Dulles,” Executive Intelligence Review, vol. XXXI, no. XV, p. 47.
Dan Raviv, Yossi Melman (Mar. 27, 2016), “The Nazi Who Became a Mossad Hitman,” Forward.
This is well researched, thank you. I can’t help but liken it what the British did in India with Hindus and Muslims. People lived side by side for centuries before the manipulation and division sowed. It’s quite an evil skill.
Great article and not surprising as Zionism obviously feeds off the hatred it creates.