The Rothschild–Hitler connection, Holocaust, and Zionist ‘State of Israel’

Judeo-Nazis don’t want to talk about their history. I will address their history.

Among the greatest myths of the present time blindly swallowed by the ignorant masses is this notion that Hitler genuinely opposed the “international banking elite,” including the nominally “Jewish” Rothschild family. Mainstream liberal narratives portray the Austrian art-reject degenerate as a a right-wing extremist enemy of liberal cosmopolitanism; right-wingers present him as a left-wing socialist enemy of capitalist finance; Zionists paint the Nazis as “anti-Zionist” adversaries of the pro-Zionist banker family. For the bonus cherry-on-top, various neo-Nazis of all people—yes, literal neo-Nazis—persistently deny the Hitler-Rothschild connection.¹

Unfortunately for the deniers, reality begs to differ.

Prologue: Rothschild and Balfour

Before diving into a look at the international banking link to Adolf Hitler, one must first bear in mind an utmost basic comprehension of the Rothschilds’ desired goal. Spoiler: Zionist imperialism.

Remember, the Balfour Declaration was written to a Rothschild—Lord Walter Rothschild, to be precise:²

Dear Lord Rothschild,

I have much pleasure in conveying to you. on behalf of His Majesty's Government, the following declaration of sympathy with Jewish Zionist aspirations which has been submitted to, and approved by, the Cabinet.

His Majesty's Government view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavors to facilitate the achievement of this object, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country.

I should be grateful if you would bring this declaration to the knowledge of the Zionist Federation.

For the record, the fervently reactionary Balfour was a white supremacist and noted antisemite—check out his iconic viewpoints and policies:³

‘We have to face the facts,’ Lord Balfour said. ‘Men are not born equal, the white and black races are not born with equal capacities: they are born with different capacities which education cannot and will not change.’

But Balfour’s troubling views were not limited to Africa. In fact, despite his now iconic support for Zionism, he was not exactly a friend to the Jews. In the late 19th century, pogroms targeting Jews in the Pale of Settlement had led to waves of Jewish flight westward, to England and the United States. This influx of refugees led to an increase in British anti-immigrant racism and outright anti-Semitism — themes not unfamiliar to us today. Support for political action against immigrants grew as the English public demanded immigration control to keep certain immigrants, particularly Jews, out of the country.

That the Rothschilds were favorably treated by him should already constitute a giveaway indicator that the “Jewish”-ness of the family in question is clearly nothing more than a nominal garb. The only Jewish member of the British Cabinet, Edwin Montagu, denounced the Balfour Declaration for its antisemitic dual-loyalty undertones⁴—that the Rothschilds persistently boast⁵ of their foundational role in its consequential manifestation is a telling confession of their own “court Jew” status.

It can be established a clear motive explaining why the Rothschilds propped up Hitler’s regime: create the mass-murderous horror necessary to goad the surviving remainder of Europe’s Jews into submission towards Zionist emigration demands. (remember, the vast majority of European Jews in the 1930s were heavily anti-Zionist) Was this the end result? Precisely so.⁶⁷ In need of inspection now is the lengthy trail of evidence; mind you, this research is neither a light nor quick task.

Exhibit I: the Rothschild-Schacht-Norman cabal

Pt. I: comprisal and structure

As I said in the start, Nazi “socialism” was—contrary to what neo-Marxist liberals and neo-Nazi degenerates will have you to believe—most definitely NOT a legitimate “enemy” of the international bankers’ cabal. The outward animosity furthermore between the British and Nazis conveniently serves to mask the plain historical reality concerning Anglo-Rothschild facilitation of Nazi war crimes.

The enigmatic conspiracy is very difficult (this writer will admit) to comprehend from “scratch” although I will try to explain the entangled web the best I can. There existed a highly entrenched collusion axis between the Bank of England operated by Anglofascist Montagu Norman and the Reichsbank controlled by Hjalmar Schacht, Hitler’s top central banker (who was also by the way a documented Freemason of the Prussian Grand Lodge, according to Denslow’s compilation⁸—see this previous post of mine for additional details on the Nazi-Freemasonic link). The Bank of England was historically interconnected to none other than the court-“Jew” Rothschild family—Alfred Charles de Rothschild was in fact one of the Bank’s previous directors.⁹¹⁰¹¹

Renowned Anglo-American professor Carroll Quigley explained:¹²

The powers of financial capital had another far-reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent private meetings and conferences. The apex of the system was to be the Bank for International Settlements in Basle, Switzerland, a private bank owned and controlled by the world's central banks which were themselves private corporations. Each central bank, in the hands of men like Montagu Norman of the Bank of England, Benjamin Strong of the New York Federal Reserve Bank, Charles Rist of the Bank of France, and Hjalmar Schacht of the Reichsbank, sought to dominate its government by its ability to control Treasury loans, to manipulate foreign exchanges, to influence the level of economic activity in the country, and to influence cooperative politicians by subsequent economic rewards in the business world.

Chief of the central banking units was the Bank for International Settlements (BIS), headquartered in Basel, Switzerland. The BIS, which handled post-WWI reparations payments, was in close contact with the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and J. P. Morgan, the latter of which jointly—with Rothschild of Vienna—saved an Austrian bank in 1929 from liquidation.¹³

Pt. II: Nazis and BIS

Hitlerite plunder of Czechoslovakia was eagerly facilitated by Montagu Norman’s Bank of England giving >£5.6 million of gold to the Führer:¹⁴

When the Nazis marched into Prague in March 1939 they immediately sent armed soldiers to the offices of the National Bank. The Czech directors were ordered, on pain of death, to send two transfer requests.

The first instructed the BIS to transfer 23.1 metric tons of gold from the Czechoslovak BIS account, held at the Bank of England, to the Reichsbank BIS account, also held at Threadneedle Street. The second order instructed the Bank of England to transfer almost 27 metric tons of gold held in the National Bank of Czechoslovakia’s own name to the BIS’s gold account at the Bank of England.

…

Thanks to Norman and the BIS, Nazi Germany had just looted 23.1 tons of gold without a shot being fired. The second transfer order, for the gold held in the National Bank of Czechoslovakia’s own name, did not go through. Sir John Simon, the Chancellor of the Exchequer, had instructed banks to block all Czechoslovak assets.

Remember! Norman’s collaborationist front in London for Nazi interests—the Bank of England—was a longtime Rothschild subsidiary, as mentioned in the previous pt. I. And the BIS, as researcher Adam LeBor notes,¹⁵

…was founded in 1930, in effect by Montagu Norman and his close friend Hjalmar Schacht, the former president of the Reichsbank, known as the father of the Nazi economic miracle. … The BIS is a unique hybrid: a commercial bank protected by international treaty. Its assets can never be seized, even in times of war. It pays no taxes on profits.

And in spite of “protests from the French government,” the BIS in Mar. 1939:¹⁶

…agreed to transfer $8.6 million worth of gold between accounts they believed to be held by the National Bank of Czechoslovakia and the Reichsbank.

The American banker Thomas H. McKittrick “played a crucial role in abetting Hitler’s war” as BIS president; the Basel conglomerate:¹⁷

…was so indispensable to the overall Nazi project that the vice-president of the Reichsbank, Emil Puhl—who was later tried for war crimes—once referred to the BIS as the Reichsbank’s only ‘foreign branch.’ In the closing months of the war, as American GIs fought their way across Europe, McKittrick was arranging deals with Nazi industrialists to guarantee their profits after the Allied victory.

In his autobiography, Schacht explicitly used the phrasing “my Bank for International Settlements...”¹⁸ This of course is no irrelevant coincidence. And the very Anglo-American banking axis situated at BIS headquarters and who employed proxies to invest in the Nazis’ useful chemical manufacturer I.G. Farben (coming up in ex. III) also propped up Deutsche Bank.¹⁹ Onto the final part of ex. I…

Pt. III: Deutsche Bank/Creditanstalt and the Holocaust

That the Deutsche Bank was complicit in the Nazi Holocaust is a historical fact admitted by themselves, per The New York Times:²⁰

Deutsche Bank AG actively aided the expropriation of Jewish businesses and helped Hitler consolidate control over Germany's neighbors between 1933 and 1945.

…

By 1938, when the expropriation of Jewish-owned property and businesses became public policy, the bank had assisted in the forced transfer of 330 companies from Jewish to Aryan ownership.

DB also funded the Auschwitz death camp:²¹

Historians combing through Deutsche Bank AG archives have found evidence that the biggest German bank helped finance construction of the Auschwitz death camp.

…the bank's archivists had found detailed loan records to construction companies that built facilities for ‘Waffen-SS Auschwitz,’ the camp's security police. They also found records of loans by Deutsche Bank to companies for the construction of the IG Farben chemicals plant adjacent to Auschwitz.

Deutsche Bank managed to acquire in 1942 the Creditanstalt, “the largest Austrian bank.”²² An institutional subsidiary “dominated by the house of Rothschild,”²³ the Creditanstalt is of quite an absolutely shocking history:²⁴

It was founded in 1855, and had a major capital participation of the Rothschild family, so that it was often held to be a ‘Rothschild bank.’

On a completely irrelevant side note, Deutsche Bank also has connections to Mar-a-Lago’s emperor-king of Orange Bolshevism.²⁵ Whether Trump-Hitler equivocations deserve plausible credence perhaps will make for an intriguing future analysis. For now, let us move on to the second exhibit…

Exhibit II: Rothschilds under Nazism

Pt. I: the ‘ransom’ case of Baron Louis de Rothschild

Around mid-June 1938, Baron Louis de Rothschild—apparently already detained by the Nazi regime—was offered for release if a ten million dollar ransom was paid.²⁶²⁷ It was reported on May 12 of the following year:²⁸

Baron Louis Rothschild, a prisoner of the Gestapo [secret police] in Vienna since April, 1938, was released this morning and left by plane for Zurich, Switzerland, early this afternoon.

Let’s take a brief gander at the details…

The ransom details were entirely secret? What a sheer funny coincidence—if the Nazis viewed the Rothschilds as tied to the Marxist Communists²⁹ they vociferously were fighting,³⁰ why even release Baron Louis Rothschild instead of simply betraying agreement terms and killing him (as they infamously did to the Polish and Soviets they negotiated “nonaggression pacts” with)? Unless, of course, perhaps it was the Rothschild side of the agreement who employed the leverage and the Nazis needed the extra money that badly…

A wee bit of speculative theory: the ransom payment was preplanned Rothschild financing of the Nazi regime—the detention and ransomed release was staged to create a dramatic false pretense of animosity between the Rothschild and Hitlerite camps while (ultimately) achieving the exactly polar opposite goal—bankers’ funding of the Third Reich. Also, just to note, the ultimate ransom payment (of $20-21 million) was double the initial demand of $10 million.³¹³²³³

Well, well, apparently Hitler’s so-called “opposition” to those “International Jewish Bankers” just couldn’t prevent his sparing of a Rothschild scion of all people. A show of family loyalty priorities, you wonder? We shall touch on that at the very end of this rap sheet documentation…

Pt. II: the only ‘Rothschild’ murdered in the Holocaust

Every single member of the Rothschild family by blood escaped the Holocaust as the European Jewish population was slaughtered by the millions. There was only one member of the family exterminated: Philippe de Rothschild’s wife Elisabeth (Lili). The details are too gruesome to requote here yet nonetheless well-documented.³⁴

Perhaps this analysis will shed some meaningful light:³⁵

The Rothschilds began in Germany and maintained a presence there until the days of Hitler. Seeing the handwriting on the wall they relocated. Mayer Rothschild had ordered his sons to marry only their first cousins. As it turns out all the Rothschilds were able to escape the Nazi death camps except one, Elisabeth de Rothschild, who died in the Ravensbrück concentration camp. She also just happened to be, the only case of disobeying Mayer's command to marry within the Rothschild bloodline. She was only a Rothschild through marriage as she had been born a Catholic.

Exhibit III: criminal perfidies of the Anglo-Rothschild-Warburg syndicate

Pt. I: Warburg and Farben

Associates of the Warburg family in 1906 founded the American Jewish Committee (AJC), the ADL’s older, slightly more mild cousin. Warburgs were (and likely still are) of the same club as the Rothschilds,³⁶ both “politically loyal to the British crown.”³⁷ Whatever outward “Warburg agenda” there exists, it essentially constitutes the manifested dictates of an inner Anglo-Rothschild agenda.

This is highly crucial to understand in the context of the B’nai B’rith/ADL/AJC response to the Nazi regime. That grouping constituted the American propaganda arm of the bourgeois, assimilationist, right-wing sellout, court-“Jew” establishment loyally situated in Britain. Anyways, that is for pt. II of this exhibit. We must first comprehend the financial side of Warburg treachery.

Rothschild-trained³⁸ banker Max M. Warburg, “up until 1937”:³⁹

…was the leading stockholder of IG Farben. …

Max Warburg had brokered the Harriman-Bush takeover of German companies, and their subsequent staffing by Nazis. The Warburg family's Kuhn Loeb bank in New York had earlier launched the Harriman family's railroad fortune, with capital from the British monarchy. In the 1930s, Kuhn Loeb was selling new bonds in New York for Hitler and Schacht, to replace, at a lower interest rate, the German public and private bonds held by Americans. Max Warburg meanwhile served as Schacht's deputy at the German central bank.

Anglo-American historian Antony C. Sutton’s Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler (1976) corroborates this link—both Max and his brother Paul M. Warburg (a founder of the Federal Reserve, by the way) were Farbenists, the latter residing on the American I.G.’s subsidiary.⁴⁰ Out of I.G. Farben’s earliest pioneers, only Max Warburg evaded criminal charges in the aftermath of WWII.⁴¹ Paul for the record died in 1932, although what (sadly for him) failed to dissipate unnoticed in a 1943 Senate hearing was a shady link to Farben collaborator General Aniline, which:⁴²

…held a substantial block of the stock of I. G. Chemie. In 1940 it owned 84,900 shares of common stock out of 250,000 shares outstanding.

The management of General Aniline has always been dominated by I. G. or former I. G. officials. Hermann Schmitz served as president from 1929 to 1936, when he was succeeded by his brother, Dietrich A. Schmitz, a naturalized American citizen, who occupied the presidential office until the fall of 1941. Hermann Schmitz was chairman of the board of directors from 1936 to 1939. The original board of directors of General Aniline contained 14 persons, of which 9 were or had been members of the board of I. G. Farben (Hermann Schmitz, Carl Bosch, Max Ilgner, Fritz ter Meer, and Wilfred Greif), or had been previously employed by I. G. Farben in Germany or as representative in this country (Walter Duisberg, Adolph Kuttroff, W. H. vom Rath, Herman Metz). A tenth, W. E. Weiss, through Sterling Products, had been under contract to I. G. for some time. The remaining four members were representative American citizens: C. E. Mitchell, chairman of the board of National City Bank; Edsel B. Ford, now president of the Ford Motor Co.; W. C. Teagle, now chairman of the board of Standard Oil of New Jersey; and Paul Warburg, chairman of the board of Bank of Manhattan Co.

Remember, the Holocaust could not have claimed the death toll it did had Farben not existed in the picture. “Quality observers,” wrote Sutton:⁴³

…have argued that Germany could not have gone to war in 1939 without I. G. Farben. Between 1927 and the beginning of World War II, I.G. Farben doubled in size, an expansion made possible in great part by American technical assistance and by American bond issues, such as the one for $30 million offered by National City Bank.

…

One of the more horrifying aspects of I.G. Farben's cartel was the invention, production, and distribution of the Zyklon B gas, used in Nazi concentration camps. Zyklon B was pure Prussic acid, a lethal poison produced by I.G. Farben Feverkusen and sold from the Bayer sales office through Degesch, an independent license holder. Sales of Zyklon B amounted to almost three-quarters of Degesch business; enough gas to kill 200 million humans was produced and sold by I.G. Farben.

IOWs, Nazi “Jews” helped Nazis kill Jews.

Pt. II: Warburgist AJC opposes the anti-Nazi boycott

When American Jewish Congress (AJCongress)⁴⁴ attorney and legal counsel Jacob Chaitkin facilitated the organization of a formidable economic boycott against Nazi Germany in 1933,⁴⁵ Eric Warburg rush to cousin Frederick, who in turn contacted American Jewish Committee (AJC) head and Sulzberger Cyrus Adler to openly denounce the anti-Nazi boycott.⁴⁶ As accurately summarized:⁴⁷

…the Warburgs demanded that American Jews not ‘agitate’ against the Hitler government, or join the organized boycott. The Warburgs' decision was carried out by the American Jewish Committee and the B'nai B'rith, who opposed the boycott as the Nazi military state grew increasingly powerful.

Let’s examine the exact correspondence between the bourgeois Warburg and Sulzberger colluders—Eric cabled the following to Frederick on March 29:⁴⁸

Today's boycott threats against Jewish firms in Germany will be carried out if atrocities news and unfriendly propaganda in foreign press mass meetings, etc., does not stop immediately. Repeat, therefore, urgent request to use all your influence so that all that ceases. Utmost speed necessary as boycott otherwise starting Saturday morning.

The Sulzberger AJC chief Adler responded with the following after receiving Warburg’s memo:⁴⁹

The American Jewish Committee, of which I am president, has taken no part in protest meetings. No responsible body in America has suggested boycott. We have been and are doing all in our power to allay agitation.

Yes: the Warburgs ordered AJC sabotage of the anti-Nazi boycott at the same time one of their family members—Max—sat on the board of I.G. Farben amidst the chemical company gathering the very supplies later used in the Holocaust to mass-slaughter millions of Jews. So much for the mainstream(ed) notion that AJC antipathy towards the boycott was out of “genuine concerns about Nazi reprisals against German Jewry”—Rothschild Warburgism is perfidy.

[P.S. the anti-Nazi boycott was simultaneously sabotaged by the “socialist” WZO/JA Zionists, though Haavara is not for this post’s discussion—if you would like a trove of detailed history on the 1933 Transfer Agreement, read this]

Epilogue: was Hitler ethnically ‘Jewish’?

You knew this was coming. Long story short: possibly, though not with absolute 100% certainty. There are two separate subsets of this broad speculation: Hitler’s paternal grandmother was impregnated by a Rothschild, or by a Frankenberger. If either are correct, then the conclusion is that Hitler was quarter-“Jewish” by blood.

Rothschild theory

The memoirs of Hitler lackey (who headed Nazi-occupied Poland) Hans Frank:⁵⁰

…claimed that in the late ’30s Hitler showed him a letter from a nephew who threatened to reveal that the führer had Jewish blood.

Frank also claimed that, on Hitler’s orders, he had begun to research the roots of his family and found that his paternal grandmother, Maria Anna Schicklgruber, gave birth to a child while working as a cook at the home of the Frankenbergers – a Jewish family from the Austrian city of Graz.

Fritz Springmeier’s Bloodlines of the Illuminati argues that Alois “was the offspring of the Rothschild’s secret breeding program which impregnated his grandmother.”⁵¹ It was also reported back in 1940:⁵²

Frankenberger theory

Historian Sutton favors this hypothesis over the Rothschild one:⁵³

Thyssen's book I Paid Hitler, published in 1941, was purported to be written by Fritz Thyssen himself, although Thyssen denies authorship. The book claims that funds for Hitler — about one million marks — came mainly from Thyssen himself. I Paid Hitler has other unsupported assertions, for example that Hitler was actually descended from an illegitimate child of the Rothschild family.

This assertion concerning Hitler's illegitimacy is refuted entirely in a more solidly based book by Eugene Davidson, which implicates the Frankenberger family, not the Rothschild family.

If Hitler’s true paternal grandfather was perhaps a Frankenberger rather than Rothschild, then there is the likely irony remaining that he indeed was ethnically quarter-“Jewish.” However, given an immense weight of the “mainstream” biographers i.e. Ian Kershaw strongly disputing this claim, I cannot conclusively say whether either narrative of the two is verifiably sound in factual reality.

Conclusion

At the closing of the day, the debate over Hitler’s genetics is considerably trivial: notwithstanding whether Hitler had “Jewish blood” and specifically if he was a Rothschild by bloodline, he was a stooge of the cabalistic Anglo-Rothschild criminal syndicate at the ultimate behest of their long-term Zionazi agenda.

That the Austrian degenerate either was or was not a kin by “blood” makes no difference in the face of historical reality implicating him as a kin by common spirit of global manipulation and Holocaustic mass murder. Persisting as a reality is that the shameless Rothschild legacy of unrepentant bloodshed was manifested in their Nazi puppets then and their conglomerate Zionazi military-financial collusion axis today.

1. As you can guess, they don’t like to acknowledge the (highly factually substantiated) Judeo-Nazi connection for… obvious reasons. May as well add that to the list of reasons I will keep pointing out the “Jewish”-Nazi link all the more. :)

2. Arthur J. Balfour (Nov. 2, 2017), “Balfour Declaration: Text of the Declaration,” Jewish Virtual Library.

3. Yousef Munayyer (Nov. 1, 2017), “It’s time to admit that Arthur Balfour was a white supremacist — and an anti-Semite, too,” The Forward.

4. Gilbert Achcar (Nov. 2, 2017), “Zionism, anti-semitism, and the Balfour Declaration,” Open Democracy.

5. Lord Rothschild (Nov. 15, 2017), “A family that helped build a new nation,” The Jewish Chronicle.

6. Lenni Brenner (2002), “51 Documents: Zionist Collaboration With the Nazis,” p. 324.

7. Tomer Kleinman (Mar. 2002), “Did the Holocaust Play a Role in the Establishment of the State of Israel?” University of South Carolina Beaufort.

8. William R. Denslow (1957), “10,000 Famous Freemasons, Vol. IV: Q to Z.”

9. Jules Ayers (1905), “A Century of Finance, 1804 to 1904: The London House of Rothschild,” p. 107.

10. United States House Committee on Banking and Currency (1913). “Money Trust Investigation: Investigation of Financial and Monetary Conditions in the United States Under House Resolutions Nos. 429 and 504 Before a Subcommittee of the Committee on Banking and Currency,” pt. XXIX, p. 2,222.

11. John Maynard Keynes (1971), “The Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes,” vol. I, p. XX.

12. Jeffrey Steinberg (May 30, 2003), “Synarchism: The Fascist Roots Of the Wolfowitz Cabal,” Executive Intelligence Review, vol. XXX, no. XXI.

13. Murray N. Rothbard (Aug. 30, 2002), “History of Money and Banking in the United States: The Colonial Era to World War II,” pt. IV, pp. 426-27.

14. Adam LeBor (Jul. 31, 2013), “Never mind the Czech gold the Nazis stole...” The Telegraph.

15. Ibid.

16. Janet Stobart (Jul. 31, 2013), “Bank of England facilitated transfer of gold looted by Nazis,” Los Angeles Times.

17. Adam LeBor (Aug. 30, 2013), “Meet the American Banker Who Helped Hitler Loot Jewish Gold—While Spying for the OSS,” Tablet Magazine.

18. Horace Greeley Hjalmar Schacht (1955), “My First Sixty-Six Years: the Autobiography of Hjalmar Schacht,” ch. XXXII, p. 251.

19. Adam LeBor (May 23, 2013), “Tower of Basel: The Shadowy History of the Secret Bank that Runs the World,” p. 17.

20. Brandon Mitchener (Feb. 22, 1995), “Deutsche Bank Admits It Helped Hitler: Confronting a Dark Past,” The New York Times.

21. John Schmid (Feb. 5, 1999), “Deutsche Bank Linked To Auschwitz Funding,” The New York Times.

22. Harold James (2001), “The Nazi Dictatorship and the Deutsche Bank,” p. 115.

23. Barry Eichengreen, Andreas Kakridis (Nov. 2023), “The Spread of the Modern Central Bank and Global Cooperation: 1919-1939,” p. 126.

24. James (2001), p. 116.

25. David Enrich (Feb. 4, 2020), “The Money Behind Trump’s Money,” The New York Times.

26. Jun. 17, 1938, “NAZIS ASK RANSOM FOR A ROTHSCHILD; Have Set $10,000,000 as Price for Freeing Baron Louis, London Paper Reports KIN ABROAD APPROACHED Settlement in Connection With Failure of Vienna Bank He Headed Is Held Illegal Nazis Confident of Payment,” The New York Times.

27. Jun. 19, 1938, “$10,000,000 Ransom Reported Demanded for Rothschild; Others of Family Held,” Jewish Telegraphic Agency.

28. May 13, 1939, “Louis Rothschild Freed by Nazis After 13 Months an Vienna Prison; Ransom Terms for Banker Are Kept Secret --He Will Sue the German Government to Regain Confiscated Fortune, Friends Say,” The New York Times.

29. Jul. 8, 1937, “ROTHSCHILD LINKED TO MARX BY NAZIS; German Historian Terms the Two 'Brothers in Blood and in Spirit',” The New York Times.

30. Of course, plenty of the Communist-Nazi animosity was farcical if analyzed from the party leadership aspect. This is for another time though.

31. Jan. 16, 1955, “Baron Louis de Rothschild Dies; Freed by Nazis for $21. Million; Former Vienna Banker Held Prisoner in '38- 39 During Ransom Negotiations,” The New York Times.

32. Jan. 17, 1955, “Baron Louis De Rothschild Dead: Paid $21,000,000 Ransom to Nazis,” Jewish Telegraphic Agency.

33. Apr. 28, 1960, “Rothschild Family Seeks to Recover Part of Ransom Paid to Hitler,” Jewish Telegraphic Agency.

34. Anne Sebba (Jul. 14, 2016), “Les Parisiennes: How the Women of Paris Lived, Loved, and Died Under Nazi Occupation,” p. 269.

35. Donald G. Lett, “Phoenix Rising: The Rise and Fall of the American Republic,” p. 150.

36. Jeffrey Steinberg (Mar. 14, 1978), “The Trilateral Commission: One Year Later,” Executive Intelligence Review, vol. X, no. V, pp. 1-6.

37. Anton Chaitkin (Aug. 25, 2000), “Dubya's Grandpa and Great-Granddad Helped Put Adolf Hitler into Power,” Executive Intelligence Review, vol. XXXII, no. III.

38. Vivian F. Zoakos (Nov. 2, 1982), “Profile of Central Europe’s oligarchy: the Wittgenstein family,” Executive Intelligence Review, vol. IX, no. XLII, p. 47.

39. Ibid.

40. Antony C. Sutton (Dec. 31, 1976), “Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler,” ch. II.

41. Ibid.

42. Charles D. Pack (Mar. 30, 1943), “The Dyestuffs Cartel,” United States Senate Committee on Military Affairs, ex. no. CXXXVI, pt. V, p. 531.

43. Sutton (1976), ch. II.

44. In the historical context of the 1930s, the liberal, populist Amerian Jewish Congress (AJCongress) is NOT to be confused with the right-wing establishmentarian American Jewish Committee (AJC).

45. Arthur G. Murphy (Jun. 22, 1990), “Must men lie? ADL founder gives his version of history,” Executive Intelligence Review, vol. XVII, no. XXVI, p. 22.

46. Deanna Spingola (2014), “The Ruling Elite: Death, Destruction, and Domination,” p. 182.

47. Antony C. Sutton, Howard Altman, Kris Millegan, Ralph Bunch, Anton Chaitkin, Webster G. Tarpley (2003), “Fleshing Out Skull & Bones: Investigations Into America's Most Powerful Secret Society,” p. 275.

48. Moshe Raphael Gottlieb, “American Anti-Nazi Resistance, 1933-1941: An Historical Analysis,” ch. V, pp. 42-43.

49. Ibid.

50. Ofer Aderet (May 2, 2022), “The bountiful conspiracies about Hitler’s Jewish blood,” Haaretz (via Forward).

51. Fritz Springmeier (2019), “Bloodlines of the Illuminati, Vol. II,” p. 48.

52. Apr. 28, 1940, “Hitler’s Grandfather Was A Jew: Secret Dossier Now Claimed To Be Reason For Nazi Hate,” The Sunday Mail Magazine, p. 12.

53. Sutton (1976), ch. VII.