Judeonazism-excusing American est. ‘liberals’ are right-wing extremists: proof

Allow us to recap the intrinsically agreed definitions of “left” and “right,” shall we?

It must be both candidly and humbly admitted by this author—a self-ascribed “realist conservative”—that my years-long perception of the political spectrum was of a rather semi-cultic shill mentality at least partially until I came across historian Leo H. Lehmann’s semi-decent¹ overview of the Jesuit Order’s authoritarian reactionism and the pillars of “left-wing” resistance as obstacles to autocratic fascism. The past half year of time spent on Substack has ever-taught me the invaluable lesson that the time is overdue for “leftist” anti-imperialists and social “conservative” moralists to bury any hatchets of distrust, cease denigrating one another with pointless slurs i.e. “conspiracy theorist,” and realize that the singular global neofascist cabal—which operates Zionism as a chief of its vital subsidiaries—constitutes the source of humanity’s woeful pangs.

Left and right: ‘brief’ overview

Last I checked, the historically attributed connotation of “rightism”—at least in the European context where the “political spectrum” paradigm arose—is a mentality of justifying hierarchical authoritarianism and defending the elites’ “right” to exert undue, disproportionate influence over society. “Leftism” by contrast constitutes populist, “lower-class” dissidence from this reactionary extremism, advocating instead a “radical” vision of egalitarian, decent treatment for the laboring “serfs.” Three primary points of emphasis here:

1. Traditional realist conservatism ≠ reactionary right-wing extremism. The American Revolution leader Alexander Hamilton spearheaded the fight against British (Anglo-Masonic) empiricism, yet was far from “left-wing”—he enacted the American System of intrinsically meritocratic programs to allow any and all (colorblind, regardless of race/ethnicity) to thrive by their own produced virtuous fruits to incentivize industrialist buildup of the then-young United States. The (neo-)Herodian/European brand of right-wing extremism²—in stark contrast—emphasizes institutional power for the oligarchic benefit of the elite to the cold disregard of its produced sufferings burdened upon the “masses.”

2. Neither, on the slight converse, is cynical co-opting of socialist tenets unique to the Nazi-Fascist “far right”: Marxist Bolshevism/Communism is likewise provably a reactionary tool of employing radical “leftist” rhetoric—in an Anglo-Jesuit dialectically manipulated environment—to ensure oligarchic enslavement of the “proletariat” as the Champagne Socialist Politburo bureaucrats enjoy their daily six-course meals comfortably reclining inside their tax-subsidized mansions. Tell me in the comment sections, those of you with outright “Marxist” sympathies: is that any ostensibly different from right-wing American oligarchs profiting from “capitalist” enslavement? Are not Politiburo elites a reimaged bourgeoise?

3. “Capitalism” is an excessively ambiguous term: there are two incarnations of completely polar opposite nature, the American System (and its parallel offshoots) represented by Alexander Hamilton, Friedrich List, and Henry C. Carey, and the Anglo-Malthusian brand of “British Liberalism” (IOWs, “classical liberalism”) in its most outward manifestation of “laissez-faire” or “free market” economics. For the record: both the “left” Keynesian school of macroeconomics and “right” “Austrian School” of F. A. Hayek³ are rooted in the exact same tradition of Adam Smith worship.⁴ And the bonus cherry-on-top? That gloriously wonderful “free market” (remember, synonymous with “British Liberalism”) imperialist philosophy of the Anglo-Masonic cabal facilitated the rise of “socialist” Nazi-Fascism, so yes: liberalism created fascism.⁵ The D’Souza/Cancun Cruz “libruls are the real facistz!1!” Jonanists were technically right, albeit for the hilariously wrong reasons…

Therefore, in the context of NWO dialectical manipulation, both its “left” and “right” wing incarnations of the mainstream usage are to be validly understood as nothing beyond the left and right arms of a singular reactionary creature, hence both est. “liberals” and est. “conservatives” representing dialectical propagators of a right-wing extremist agenda. For us remaining minority dissidents: whether we individually consider ourselves “conservative” or “leftist” should not be an inhibiting factor barring constructive dialogue in mutually shared disdain against the global cabal and their Nazi-Fascist puppet thugs.

American Democratic Party-voting ‘liberals’: right-wing reactionaries

Remember, simply because one employs “leftist” narrative does not make them a champion of the poor, oppressed, and downtrodden. Much as Nazi Germany co-opted socialist leftism to feed its racialist agenda and Soviet Bolsheviks co-opted socialist leftism to justify Leninist/Stalinist autocracy, the modern Democratic Party co-opts “socialist” leftistic appeals to rally beguiled leftists behind its warmongering, imperialist, chauvinistic reactionary agenda just as the Orange Bolshevist apparatus of Mar-a-Lago’s Esteemed Caesar—who defended Social Security from the “left”⁶ and more recently superficially castigated corporations⁷ (and whose support base’s majority⁸ advocate Communist Manifesto plank #2 of graduated income taxes, so yes, Orange Bolshevism is Bolshevism after all)—as well swings leftward occasionally.

As one brilliant observer couldn’t have better summarized:⁹

“The most radical revolutionary will become a conservative the day after the revolution.”
—Hannah Arendt (Sep. 12, 1970)

The modern Democratic Party of the United States is no deviation—despite perpetually railing against Trump’s tax cuts for the rich, they upon taking power advocate SALT deductions paving the way for… tax cuts for the rich.¹⁰ Their bootlicking defense of Zionazism of course epitomizes this right-wing reactionary cynicism/trickery as the hallmark of establishment Ku Klux Kamala/Holocaust Harris politics: any significant dissidence from their donor-ensured (remember, modern Judeo-Nazi Holocausticists contribute half of their donations to the Democrats¹¹) Zionist backing is repressed in an anti-democratic right-wing fashion despite simultaneously claiming to champion “democracy.” Remember this?¹²

Not to mention that the Vegetocratic/Ku Klux Kamalist “Administration” has participated in the right-wing¹³ slander of pro-Palestine protests:¹⁴

Shut down funding for the Nazi Occupation Government? Nope!¹⁵

American liberals: providing such considerately warmhearted compassion for Starbucks-binge-drinking suburban young wenches (I’ve most definitely seen them over and over and over in my generation) seeking a post-whoredom “right” to slaughter their children, but not the Gazan women raped by IOF neo-Nazis; professed sympathy for Americans suffering from (Bidenflated) food insecurity, but not the Gazan children starving to death; avowed solidarity with American “POCs” harassed by the white supremacist/alt-right Loser Cabal, but not the Palestinian people tortured to death in unspeakably grotesque horrors by constant (Na)tional (Zi)onist terrorism. Getting the picture here? If you’re an Arab resident of the Middle East and not a privileged Westerner, your life means nothing to the “compassionate liberals” and they could care less if a right-wing hexagramic Nazi terrorist legion slaughters your whole family tomorrow, because their privilege trumps your dignity.

Oh, if you dare point this out at their convention, you get stifled, mocked, and assaulted by the wonderfully compassionate “liberal” hordes:

Conclusion

Can it get any more clear than this?¹⁶

As I explained here (yes indeed, the thumbnail is a dumpster fire picture!):

Assessing the Mango Caesar/Ku Klux Kamala debate

…in summary: notwithstanding superficial disagreement over social issues i.e. abortion that proceed essentially nowhere in practice, both the Orange Bolshevists and Exalted Cyclops of the Ku Klux Kamala agree: more right-wing warmongering imperialist funding for the Fourth Reich, “China bad, America greatest nation ever,” etc. etc. To the sheer extent of Holocaust Harris swinging right—even red-baiting against Russian “Communism” to plead for the (historically right-wing fascist/Zionist) Polish vote—and Trump swinging left (courting labor union votes), how different are they, really? As my outstanding friend

RigbyRigbyson

points out:

As much as I almost hate to say this: America is plunging into a final fervor of Orange Bolshevism, and the est. neo-Marxist, Democrat-voting “liberals” will reap whatever impending judgment faces them: if not soon, then certainly at their highly deserved obliteration a *bit* later with their mother whore, who:¹⁷

…shall be as stubble; the fire shall burn them; they shall not deliver themselves from the power of the flame: there shall not be a coal to warm at, nor fire to sit before it.

Do children of perdition nothing less than the perdition they seed? “Be not deceived; God is not mocked: for whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap.” (Gal. 6:7)

1. Will type up a lengthy book review of Behind the Dictators (1942) sometime…

2. See p. 41 of EIR, vol. X, no. X:

…the term ‘conservative’ *as used by fascists* does not mean industrial-capitalist reaction against socialism. ‘Conservative’ means a hatred of the modern industrial nation-state, and a commitment to return to something like the feudal forms of society existing in Europe prior to the 15th-century Golden Renaissance.

3. Von Hayek was apparently a useful Jesuit coadjutor. LaRouche—on a parallel note—asserted he was a Fabianist.

4. See this 2018 EIR explanation.

5. Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr. (Mar. 21, 2003), “How Liberalism Created Fascism,” Executive Intelligence Review, vol. XXX, no. XI, pp. 4-5.

6. Julia Johnson (Jan. 11, 2024), “Trump warns seniors of ‘threat’ of Nikki Haley Social Security plan in new ad,” Washington Examiner.

7. Dareh Gregorian (Oct. 10, 2024), “Trump says big companies have 'raped our country' in economic speech,” NBC News.

8. Suzanne Blake (Feb. 28, 2024), “Republicans Want to Tax Big Corporations,” Newsweek.

9. “Hannah Arendt,” Wikiquote.

10. Emily Cochrane, Alan Rappeport (Nov. 2, 2021), “Democrats Push for Agreement on Tax Deduction That Benefits the Rich,” The New York Times.

11. Jeremy Sharon (Sep. 27, 2016), “US Jews contribute half of all donations to the Democratic Party,” The Jerusalem Post.

12. Sarah Lehr (Aug. 20, 2024), “Democrats ask Wisconsin Supreme Court to boot Green Party from ballot,” Wisconsin Public Radio.

13. Remember, it is the obnoxious American mainstream “conservatives” who long peddle the silly canard that “leftists are the real antisemites.”

14. Jacqueline Howard (Apr. 22, 2024), “Columbia University: White House condemns antisemitism at college protests,” BBC News.

15. Doina Chiacu, Trevor Hannicutt (Aug. 8, 2024), “Harris didn't agree to discuss Israel arms embargo, aide says,” Reuters.

16. Jack Shafer (May 4, 2021), “How Democrats Learned to Love the Cheneys,” Politico.

17. Isa. 47:14.