Latest developments prove America-Iran blows are utterly fake
It’s “Death To America” until it isn’t.
Keeping up with World War III developments is a nuisance, but a necessity to dissect for the sake public awareness lest I be accused of shirking my duty as an independent researcher and newsletter operator of turning a blind eye to analytical insights that need to be said.
Some of you are probably excited for my upcoming article explaining the Judeo-Hitler collusion network in the 1930s in what will be a bombshell, semi-exhaustive expose of the Austrian one-testicled Poland-invading Zionist degenerate Fuhrer’s concious collusive dealings with Zionist Jewish financiers. That post is coming—for the present moment, children, please sit criss-crossed on the abrasive carpet and listen attentively to latest revelations.
After the U.S. bombed Iran under the auspices of scurrying to Adolf Mileikowsky’s rescue, Tehran “retaliated” by bombing an American air base in Qatar. You would be forgiven for frantically worrying of an all-out savage global war, but no need to reduce yourself into a worrywart freak (at least for now): the entire spectacle was prescripted circus theatrics. First off, Iran prior to the strike gave an advance notice to Qatar, allowing them to prepare and brace for incoming missiles:1
Shout-out to my friend(s who run) for highlighting this yesterday:
In fact, as The New York Times noted, 14 missiles were fired by Iran into Qatari territory and 13 were intercepted while one was permitted to strike because it headed in a “non-threatening direction,” according to none other than Mango Caesar:2
(it’s worth pointing out that Qatari sources reported a total of 19 missiles fired3—the discrepancy here may or may not be revealing as scenes unfold in real time)
Publicly, Qatar condemned the Iranian strike;45 privately, Qatari backchannel conduits to both Iran and D.C. confirm the fundamentally larger and narratively inconvenient fact that Trump and Khamenei are two kings sitting at the same table. Remember, Tangerine Troglodyte forbade the Fourth Reich from carrying out an assassination of the Ayatollah as reported over a week ago.6
Almost paradoxically, the Iranian strike upon the Qatari-situated American air base has only fueled calls for de-escalation so Mango Caesar can pump himself as the peacemaker he isn’t7—cf. ’s recent Note:
Washington Examiner pointed out that Iran for theatrically symbolic purposes found it necessary to stage the barest pretense of military reprisal conducted to provoke the least escalation possible—despite the presence of about ten thousand soldiers stationed at the targeted Al Udeid Air Base, zero casualties were reported.8
WION observed:9
The missile launch did not take Washington by surprise. A senior White House official told CNN, ‘We knew they’d retaliate. They had a similar response after Soleimani.’ The US military had moved unsheltered aircraft from the Al Udeid base days before the attack, according to satellite imagery taken on 19 June.
…
With no casualties, intercepted missiles, and prior coordination, Iran’s strike seemed more of a ‘face-saving’ move than a fierce retaliation. It allowed Tehran to respond publicly to the US airstrikes while keeping the door open for de-escalation.
And lo and behold: Qatar has been revealed as the central medium brokering the recently announced “Israel-Iran ceasefire”—per Newsweek:10
President Donald Trump coordinated with Qatari leadership to secure the ceasefire agreement he announced Monday between Iran and Israel following a retaliatory Iranian missile strike on America's largest military base in the Middle East, according to a diplomat briefed on the development.
‘The deal was coordinated at the highest level by the President and Vice President and the Qatari Emir and Prime Minister directly,’ the diplomat told Newsweek.
Israel’s government has yet to publicly comment on the development. A senior Iranian official told Reuters that Tehran had agreed to the U.S.-proposed ceasefire.
I’m just going to let these headlines speak for themselves—the referenced articles are linked in the footnotes, so read the finer details for yourself if you possess the additional free time and interest:111213141516
Jun. 23, 2025, “Iran informed Qatar in advance of strikes on US bases,” Reuters.
Farnaz Fassihi, Adam Rasgon, Eric Schmitt, Michael Levenson (Jun. 23, 2025), “Trump Says ‘Time for Peace’ After Iran Gives Warning Before Firing on U.S. Base,” The New York Times.
David Rising (Jun. 23, 2025), “Qatar says one of 19 missiles fired by Iran impacted the base but caused no casualties,” Associated Press.
Jun. 24, 2025, “Qatar condemns Iran missile strike, Arab leaders avoid backing Tehran,” Firstpost.
Keith Johnson (Jun. 23, 2025), “Iran Launches Reprisal Attack on U.S. Base in Qatar,” Foreign Policy.
Barak Ravid (Jun. 15, 2025), “Trump ruled out Israeli assassination of Iran's Supreme Leader, U.S. officials say,” Axios.
Megan Messerly, Nahal Toosi, Joe Gould (Jun. 23, 2025), “Trump signals deescalation in response to Iranian strike on US air base in Qatar,” Politico.
Mike Brest (Jun. 23, 2025), “Iran attack on Qatar air base was designed as an ‘off-ramp’ to conflict with US,” Washington Examiner.
Prapti Upadhayay (Jun. 24, 2025), “Was Iran’s missile attack on US bases in Qatar just for show? A face-saving move meant for de-escalation,” WION.
Anna Commander, Gabe Whisnant, Tom O’Connor (Jun. 23, 2025), “Trump Coordinated With Qatar on Iran-Israel Ceasefire: Source,” Newsweek.
Isaac Schor (Jun. 23, 2025), “Iranians Reportedly Coordinated Missile Attack on American Base So the Trump Administration Knew It Was Coming: ‘Nobody Was Surprised,’” Mediaite.
Sharon Zhang (Jun. 23, 2025), “Trump Thanks Iran for Giving Advance Notice of Strikes on US Air Base in Qatar,” Truthout.
Brady Knox (Jun. 23, 2025), “Trump thanks Iran for early notice in retaliatory strikes and hopes for ‘no further hate,’” Washington Examiner.
Diana Glebova (Jun. 23, 2025), “Trump confirms ‘early notice’ of ‘very weak response’ by Iran on US base in Qatar,” New York Post.
Jennifer Bowers Bahney (Jun. 23, 2025), “Shocking claim accuses Trump of helping stage Iran retaliation: ‘Coordinated,’” Raw Story.
Jun. 24, 2025, “Why did Iran give prior warning about the attack on US air base in Qatar?” Firstpost.
We are all actors in a play whose script we didn't write, whose purpose we don't understand, whose ending has already been determined by forces beyond our comprehension. The only question remaining is whether we continue to play our assigned roles or find the courage to step outside the theater entirely.
But stepping outside requires first recognizing that we're inside—and that recognition, as our afternoon had demonstrated, may be the most difficult performance of all.
G.K. Chesterton
Beaconsfield, January 2025
https://open.substack.com/pub/grubstreetinexile/p/the-nato-sycophancy-and-the-circle?r=l1oox&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&showWelcomeOnShare=false
Everything that is damaged during bombing raids has already been paid for by the taxpayer, so it does no harm if something is occasionally destroyed and needs to be replaced. That's how you make money in the arms industry. Politicians are generous with other people's money.
Most of it was only produced on stockpile and for the military parade anyway. Because strikes and counter-strikes would make the missions absurd.
The only exception is when weapons are used against civilians who are not expected to retaliate. See the Gaza Strip.
There the bombs serve the purpose of a gigantic wrecking ball. And even the rubble will be used to make money, because in order to make the area colonizable later, gigantic amounts of rubble, contaminated with chemicals from the bombs and full of human remains, have to be excavated and transported away. Some companies will be paid handsomely for this, because no one can live on a terrain so contaminated with toxic residues. It is to be hoped that close attention will be paid to where the earth of Gaza is taken, and hopefully forensic experts will already be waiting there, because the aim here is to secure evidence of a gigantic crime.