Your beloved ‘revolution’ is a Sabbatean-Frankist delusion

Reap what you sow.

Every earthly movement fixated on a goal of self-centered power accumulation—whether Marxist or Nazi-Fascist, “zion”-ist or “Islam”-ist, left or right, white or black, red or blue et al.—in its maximized end state always is channeled into this common mentality: that whatever becomes justifiably necessary to achieve its end goal of an imagined earthly utopia headed by its own “revolutionary” vanguard’s battalions, and that the most sinister outcomes brought about by that movement’s very stated foremost enemies must be cynically channeled and navigated for their utility to bring about its own maximalist objectives.

Whenever a movement is purely bent on an idealized vision of material/societal utopia (as if such an outcome is sustainably possible in a wholly sinful and depraved planet, so pitiful fools imagine) that must be achieved no matter what, it blinds itself against any instructive moral reproof that chides its Machiavellian-Faustian shirking of any objective integrity standards. Such a Jesuitical mentality paves the way for the inevitable conclusion held by a revolutionary-maximalist power movement: that the utmost duplicity can be justified by its messianic leaders to simultaneously rally collective fervor through the channeled vitriol against a reviled enemy all the while quietly “supporting” and utilizing the conditions generated by that enemy front to benefit one’s own movement, rather than genuinely attempting to reverse or undo the alterations to societal condition brought about by the enemy.

Mind you, this does not justify a reductionist “conspiracy theory” of simplistically accusing both sides of necessarily vis-a-vis “supporting” each other in the most direct sense of the term, rather that such Machiavellian-Faustian power-maximalist movements all share a common mentality of believing themselves to be capable of most competently and effectively seizing upon a common set of chaotic circumstances to undergird a setup of their own fantasized earthly utopian paradise on earth. Consider these real-life examples:

• in the Nazi false flag orchestration of the Reichstag Fire, agents of the Sturmabteilung (SA) set up Marinus van der Lubbe into being given sole attribution as the perpetrator of arson against the Reichstag building after themselves preparing the clandestine patchwork that made the full burning possible—this does not mean that the Nazi SA literally supported the Communist Party, rather that the Nazis employed a Parvusian tactic of weaponizing a “continuing” image of the Communist Party to their own manufactured advantage rather than outright attempting to rid its existence and memory altogether

• in the Lavon Affair (same structural modus operandi in the Baghdad synagogue bombings), the Fourthreichi Moschutzstaffelad—following in the footsteps of their Teutonic Bolshevist predecessors in the Third Reich—bombed civilian centers in Egypt with the goal of blaming those attacks on the Muslim Brotherhood and Egyptian Communist Party in order to discredit Nasser and justify a retention of British imperialist occupation—this does not mean that in this very specific instance, the Israeli Mossad outright supported the Egyptian Ikhwan and Communist Party, rather that they used the malleable/pliable image of the Muslim Brotherhood and ECP for the utility to serve Israeli geopolitical ends (side note: this false flag attempt was actually for once foiled in time)

• during the Italian Years of Lead, neofascist terror groups directed by the Vatican/SMOM-linked Scottish Rite P-2 Freemasonic Lodge infiltrated left-wing and Communist organizations to dress up as leftists and Communists and carry out false flag attacks that were then attributed to the Italian left—this does not mean that the neofascist terrorists literally supported the Italian leftists or PCI, instead signifying that the P-2-funded neofascists exploited the material existence of the leftists to channel the latter’s publicly malleable image into serving a narrative functionality that benefited neofascist propaganda and neofascist ends

• in the Iraq War cir. 2003-11, both the United States and Iran utilized the conditions generated by each other to prop up their own side’s interests through the common SCIRI-Badr proxy government installed in the de-Ba’athified Baghdad Ministry of Interior (MOI), all the while publicly railing against each other as enemies and security threats

In any case, your “revolution” is a delusion for the following reason: your very expectation—of a guaranteed utopia heralded by the revolutionary vanguard you so dearly champion—is intentionally being amplified and permitted to run through its full course by the cabalistic Nazi International syndicate which controls the world, because they already set up agents to channel, co-opt, and hijack the bendable nature of a revolutionary-maximalist “end justifies the means” mentality in order to steer your beloved revolution in a completely unexpected and unforeseen direction which outwardly they will present and say to you is just necessary 4-D calculus to more efficiently bring about the utopia you envision, when in reality they are steering your movement into a self-sabotaging, dangerous trajectory that will do nothing but pave the conditions rolling out the red carpet to justify the fascist Janus-faced irreversible end power grab: a simultaneous co-optation of the revolutionary movement’s energy and destruction of the movement itself.