The Nazi link to Anglo-Zionist ‘Judeo-Christian’ propaganda

Brace yourself, as this rap sheet is a long one—read into the very end!

“Puff Graham.”¹²³

That was purportedly⁴ the order of media mogul boss William Randolph Hearst to his cronies. And Billy Graham, the staple icon of American evangelicalism, was a decent well-meaning person of outstanding integrity, right? …no. There’s plenty to dissect.

Billy Graham’s Freemasonic connections

First off, the evangelist Graham was most definitely not the sincere warrior for Christ most people imagine him to be. He was a Masonic implant in the Protestant church primarily to shape the hearts and minds of millions of Protestants according to the will of his bosses—how, exactly? The sources will be linked. First and foremost, the time is long overdue for me to briefly summarize the true teachings of Freemasonry.

The Luciferian core of Masonry

33rd-degree Freemason Albert Pike—who authored Morals and Dogma of the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite of Freemasonry and was a chief cofounder of the Ku Klux Klan (by the way)—was demonstrably shown by Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr., among several high-quality researchers to have been a Luciferian occultist; this is the alleged 1889 quote by Pike:⁵

…Lucifer is God, and unfortunately Adonay is also God. For the eternal law is that there is no light without shade, no beauty without ugliness, no white without black, for the absolute can only exist as two Gods....Thus, the doctrine of Satanism is a heresy; and the true and pure philosophical religion is the belief in Lucifer, the equal of Adonay; but Lucifer, God of Light and God of Good, is struggling for humanity against Adonay, the God of Darkness and Evil.

Compare with this excerpt from Morals and Dogma, and pay close attention:⁶

All souls are equal—God is in all, in men, animals, and plants. There are two Gods, one of Good and the other of Evil, each independent, eternal, chief of a distinct Empire; necessarily, and of their very natures, hostile to one another. The Evil God, Satan, is the Genius of matter alone. The God of Good is infinitely his Superior, the True God; while the other is but the chief of all that is the Enemy of God, and must in the end succumb to His Power.

While there is a seeming direct contradiction here in the implied narratives themselves, this can be answered by the fact that the highest levels of Freemasonic occultism “secretly” refer to the exact opposite what they say in public. If you want a comprehensive expose of Freemasonry, this Veith lecture covers the important details:

The Masonry of Graham

Compare what the renowned preacher once said in an interview with (high-ranking Freemason) Robert Schuller:⁷

“Whether they come from the Muslim world or the Buddhist world or the Christian world or the nonbelieving world, they are members of the body of Christ because they’ve been called by God. They may not even know the name of Jesus, but they know in their hearts that they need something that they don’t have and they turn to the only light that they have, and I think that they are saved, and that they are going to be with us in heaven.”
—William F. “Billy” Graham, Jr.

…to a Masonic “qualification” listed in Manly Hall’s The Lost Keys of Masonry (1923):⁸

“The true Mason is not creed-bound. He realizes with the divine illumination of his lodge that as a Mason his religion must be universal: Christ, Buddha, or Mohammed [sic], the name means little, for he recognizes only the light and not the hearer. He worships at every shrine, bows before every altar, whether in temple, mosque, or cathedral, realizing with his truer understanding the oneness of all Spiritual Truth.
—Manly P. Hall

Cathedral? So Freemasons are in the Roman Catholic Church as well, in spite of vitriolic papal anti-Masonic encyclicals? I might address this eventually…

Anyways—Freemasonic organizations themselves can’t (all) decide whether Billy Graham was a Mason, though let’s examine this matter a little closer. Freemasons Community lazily denies any Masonic membership of Graham on the basis… that the Billy Graham Evangelistic Association denied such a connection.⁹ The Esoteric Freemasons, however, provide a different story:¹⁰

Billy Graham is a well-known Christian evangelist and was also one of the most influential Freemasons of his time. He was a member of the Ancient Free and Accepted Masons in the United States. Billy Graham was an active member of the Masonic order for over 40 years, and he used his influence to promote Masonic ideals. He was a strong advocate for the principles of brotherly love, relief, and truth which were core tenets of Freemasonry. As a Mason, he attended numerous meetings and conferences, delivering passionate speeches in support of Masonic principles. Billy Graham’s legacy with the Masonic order should not be forgotten as it has had a lasting impact on many lives.

…

While there is no evidence that Graham was ever a Freemason, there are some connections between the two organizations.

First, both organizations have similar principles and goals. Both believe in freedom, justice, and respect for all people regardless of their station in life.

…

Second, Billy Graham has spoken highly of Freemasonry on several occasions throughout his life.

…

Third, many prominent Masons have been involved in Billy Graham’s ministry over the years. These include former Presidents Gerald Ford and George H.W. Bush, as well as prominent business leaders such as J.P Morgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon and Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates.

Jim Duke Perspective notes:¹¹

According to Billy Graham and His Friends, by Cathy Burns. a past director of the Billy Graham Evangelistic Association (BGEA), William M. Watson, was a Freemason [p177]. Another director, David M. McConnell, was also a Freemason [Ibid]. The co-chairman of the Billy Graham Crusade Advisory Committee for the St. Louis Crusade in 1973, Arthur Lee Malory, was a 32nd degree Mason [Ibid]. Billy Graham calls Brooks Hays ‘my old Christian friend’ and an adviser, yet Hays was a Mason [p58]. For the 1992 Portland, Oregon Billy Graham Crusade only Shriner clowns were allowed to perform [p177]. To become a Shriner, a person must first be a 32nd degree Mason.

The Masonic book The Clergy and the Craft was published in 1970 by a Freemason, Rev. Forrest D. Haggard, which clearly reveals Dr. Billy Graham’s approval of the Masonic youth organization DeMolay.

There is also a deeper, serious allegation of Graham’s complicit guilt in Satanic ritual abuse, though I know even less on that matter and this subsection is long enough as is.

The Hearst-Graham connection’s legacy

Nazi-Fascist sympathies of the tycoon

For the record, William Randolph Hearst was one of those “old” Progressives in the early 20th century who initiated a career under a left-wing populist reputation and eventually aligned openly with “reactionary” political forces. His superficial vocal distaste for Nazi antisemitism in 1934 was considerably overshadowed by his awed extolling for a particular Austrian liberal arts reject:¹²

“My impressions of Chancellor Hitler are that he is a very intense man, concentrated on his idea of German unity. He is an extraordinary organizer. Germany is organized to an astonishing extent behind Hitler and his ideas of German unity. That seems to me to be the dominant idea, and other policies of the administration seem to be unimportant to the movement in comparison.
…
I do not think Hitler is a war threat to Europe. I do not think he has anything to be a war threat with. I believe he is organizing Germany to prevent disorder and discouragement. I think he is trying to resist encroachment by hostile nations and domination by foreign powers. That is what his supporters say.”

—William Randolph Hearst on Adolf Hitler, Sep. 1934

Hearst, a lifelong anti-“Asiatic” advocate of militarized Anglocentric¹³ imperialism along white supremacist grounds (shaped by fear of the “white” race facing destruction at the hands of so-called “savage” ones), was a documented business dealer with the Third Reich, hiring Nazi and Italian Fascist leaders to write articles for his press.¹⁴ His American readership base, numbered anywhere from 15¹⁵ to 30¹⁶ million, were urged to oppose American militarized anti-Nazi intervention. The reactionary tycoon’s previous 1934 record certainly speaks for itself:¹⁷¹⁸

Hearst’s Zionism

If the sources cited in this narrative collation are correct, then the conclusion is clear that Hearst became an outspoken Zionist before (“fully”?) abandoning Nazi-Fascist sympathies. The Jerusalem Post asserts:¹⁹

After Kristallnacht, Hearst began advocating creation of ‘a homeland for dispossessed or persecuted Jews.’ When news of the mass murder of Europe's Jews began reaching the United States in 1941-1942, the Hearst newspaper chain gave it prominent coverage—by contrast with newspapers such as The New York Times, which routinely confined it to the back pages. In 1943, Hearst served as an honorary chairman of the Emergency Conference to Save the Jewish People of Europe, which was organized by the activist Bergson Group to demonstrate that rescue was possible—in contrast to the Roosevelt administration's claim that the only way to rescue the Jews was to win the war. When the Bergson group in late 1943 initiated a congressional resolution urging FDR to create a government agency to rescue Jewish refugees, Hearst directed his newspaper chain to promote the resolution and he personally authored signed editorials endorsing it.

Unfortunately, JP especially in this instance is more interested in peddling partisan propaganda than assessing the full truth. It’s absolutely true that in the immediate aftermath of Kristallnacht, Hearst was a vocal proponent of Zionism, at the time suggesting the transformation of German colonies in Africa to a permanent “Jewish homeland.”²⁰ However, another biographer notes that Hearst already began supporting Zionism in 1937,²¹ one year before Kristallnacht. And it’s well-documented that Hearst broadly aligned with right-wing fascistic “isolationists” into 1940²²—he persistently maintained an “America First”²³ tone of “neutrality” following Nazi aggression into Czechoslovakia (Apr. 30, 1939); Denmark and Norway (Mar. 1940); Holland, Belgium, and Luxembourg (May 1940); and France (June 1940).²⁴

So the JP article’s ultimately implied narrative is misleading: Hearst’s Zionism was not necessarily antithetical to, nor did it stem purely from his supposed “abandonment” from, Nazi-Fascist sympathies. The clear fact of the matter is that Anglo-Masonic/Illuminist insiders—whom Hearst was amongst²⁵—are historically notorious for both-siding Hegelian games and easily swinging their influenced base of support from one end to the other to fulfill the pernicious, clandestine agendas planned by their ever-more-pernicious and clandestine bosses.

Now, as to Hearst’s support for Jewish emigration to colonized African territories, Jewish Frontier noted in late 1938:²⁶

…the British government feels that the Jews have so excellently demonstrated their talents as pioneers in Palestine that they may be trusted to give a good account of themselves even in the darkness of African jungles. Capital, of course, will be provided by American Jewry, as the refugees will be plucked clean by the Nazis before setting sail for their new havens. This scheme has an enthusiastic supporter in the person of William Randolph Hearst, who is willing to give the Jews not only Tanganyika but all the former German colonies, as well as the Belgian Congo and the Portugese [sic] African possessions. This collection of territories the Jews would develop into one of the ‘great nations of the earth’ to the benefit of the world at large. Mr. Hearst thinks very unkindly of a Jewish homeland in Lower California, a stretch of land much closer to San Simeon than East Africa. Lower California, according to the noted publisher, is a nasty, arid place whereas African jungles teem with possibilities for ‘those harrassed [sic] Jewish people.’

Graham’s Zionist apparatus

The esteemed Baptist minister’s fervent lifelong solidarity with the Fourth Reich did not fail to reap the criminal Judeo-Lebensraum regime’s vocal gratitude—then-Foreign Minister Golda Meir “brought and gave to Graham a Bible in which she had written: ‘Billy Graham, a friend of Israel [emphasis added].’”²⁷ Graham also stated to reporters at King David Hotel:²⁸

I want to thank you for being the nation through which Jesus was brought to this earth in the divine plan of God. And I want to thank you as one who has given my life to a Jew, who, living upon this earth, claimed to be God.

Take careful note that Graham’s implicit argument rests on the premise of the 1948-onwards “State of Israel” as a reconstitution of the ancient Judean nation; my previous posts debunking the theological abuses of Zionazism have already exposed the vital flaw of this reasoning. Anyways, as yet another glowing biographer couldn’t have made more clear:²⁹

…Dr. Graham was one of the first people, at least in America, to start to turn Evangelicals toward a favorable view of Israel. Billy Graham, who was Mr. Evangelical for the world and the Jewish community, was very friendly toward the nation of Israel. Later, as Evangelicalism embraced a more political role, championed by such figures as the Moral Majority's Jerry Falwell, the Christian Coalition's Ralph Reed, and the Southern Baptist Convention's Paige Patterson, it gave rise to the Christian Zionism of Pastor John Hagee. But I attribute the American evangelical movement's turn toward support of Israel to the favorable place that Billy Graham gave the Jewish people. This was very similar to what Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. achieved in terms of the stance of the African-American community toward Israel, noting that there's an inherent closeness theologically and spiritually with Israel.

I'm not sure whether the Christian Zionism of the late nineteenth century would have emerged if Billy Graham had been anti-Israel, or anti-Jewish. He was pro-Israel in a deeply spiritual way, choosing not to get involved in the strong political activism that characterized Christian Zionism. But he opened the door for that next generation of Evangelicals to adopt a passionate embrace of the Jewish nation.

The American Jewish Committee (AJC)³⁰ in 1969 was told by Graham that he:³¹

…had discussed Israel many times with President Nixon, and that the president was ‘extremely sympathetic’ toward Israel and was ‘indeed more sympathetic to Israel than he was one year ago.’ The Six-Day War and Jewish-Christian dialogue had a demonstrable effect on Graham's pro-Israel activism. And his interventions on behalf of Israel indeed had an effect on American foreign policy.

Let us now finally piece the full picture of this lengthy section (before proceeding to the next incriminating point): Anglo-Illuminist magnate William Randolph Hearst, a reactionary, incredibly racist chief business colluder with Hitler and his Nazis who so happened to (early-on) endorse Jewish emigration to a de facto segregated territory of their own, ordered his media companies to fuel the rise of then-non-notable speaker Billy Graham, who so happened to be a high Masonic initiate and (as widely attributed) is singlehandedly responsible for turning the hearts of American Protestant masses towards the fanatical endorsement of “Christian Zionist” ideology.

As starch thickens liquid, so does the plot when continued facts keep arriving…

Dulles, Nazism, and ‘Judeo-Christian’

Don’t forget: Graham’s ideological crusades—which eventually (and inevitably) invoked the “Judeo-Christian” talking point³²—skyrocketed in the 1950s amidst the Eisenhower Administration’s notably massive propagation of the conjoined syncretic terminology.³³ The president himself ceased using the term in 1954 only on the basis that it wasn’t ecumenical enough—instead of limiting an ecumenical alliance to merely Jews and Christians, the rallying (Hegelian) cry of “the religious world against the Communist world” must be inclusive towards i.e. Muslims and Buddhists likewise! (remind you somewhat of that Manly Hall quote shown earlier?)

Although Ike held little-to-no direct ties to Nazis—as far as I’m aware of (do correct me if I’m wrong)—the same isn’t true of his Administration’s diplomacy lackeys, the Dulles brothers. The same John Foster Dulles—who maintained a lifelong commitment of supporting the brownshirted ideology of a notoriously-mustached Austrian painter reject³⁴—also (interestingly enough) in 1956:³⁵

…told a B'nai B'rith group that ‘the Judeo-Christian conception of the spiritual nature of man’ had infused Western civilization with ‘individual resourcefulness and a sense of mission and of adventure in the world.’ Two years later, preaching at the Washington Cathedral, Dulles struck a more somber tone. Communism, he warned, portended ‘a dark age’ that would ‘erase the great humanitarian gains slowly and painfully won over the centuries by our Judeo-Christian civilization.’

Now, you may wonder, why would an American Nazi extol such overtures to a Jewish fraternal organization? This, of course, isn’t difficult to understand when you remember that both Dulles and B’nai B’rith—first and foremost—are of Freemasonic background³⁶ (almost in certainty mutually of the Scottish Rite). And second, because B’nai B’rith was of the same Hitlerite fold as the broader Dulles/Skull and Bones/Anglo-Masonic cabal, all working in tandem during the 1930s to ensure that any meaningful action against Nazi Germany be sabotaged:³⁷

John Foster Dulles, the chief international attorney for the Nazis, was a delegate to the World Council [of Churches] founding conference, in his capacity as head of the International Department of the American ecumenical group, the Federal, later National, Council of Churches.

This, then, was the leadership of the peace movement of the 1930s the peace-with-Hitler movement. This message was spread through the churches and their youth groups by Dulles-style Christians. It was spread by coercion through the Jewish community, against the boycott of Nazi Germany, by Dulles-style Jews such as the Sulzbergers, the owners of the New York Times, who ran the B'Nai B'Rith and the American Jewish Committee.

As I’ve almost certainly touched on before (possibly not in-depth just yet), the right-wing assimilationist B’nai B’rith/ADL/American Jewish Committee (AJC) syndicate opposed the AJCongress/NSANL-organized boycott against Nazi Germany in 1933.³⁸ Now, you’re possibly wondering, what’s the World Council of Churches (WCC) doing in the middle of a Nazi collaboration conspiracy? This may be the subject of a separate posting, though I will state in the very meantime that the ecumenical-syncretist core of “Judeo-Christian” fits squarely into the ecumenical agenda of the WCC. And the full ecumenist ties to Nazism might very well surprise most.

The Peale link

Norman Vincent Peale undoubtedly deserves greater attention at the present day than his legacy receives. Prepare to feast your eyes on one of Exalted Supreme Mango Caesar’s chiefly influential mentors:³⁹

…a book appeared called The Power Of Positive Thinking. Written by Dr. Norman Vincent Peale and translated into 15 languages, it remained on the New York Times best-seller list for 186 weeks and sold 5 million copies. Donald was only 6 years old at the time and didn’t read the book until much later, but it quickly became important in the large Queens household in which he grew up, and it would play a critical role in his future. His parents, Fred and Mary, felt an immediate affinity for Peale’s teachings. On Sundays, they drove into Manhattan to worship at Marble Collegiate Church, where Peale was the head pastor. Donald and both his sisters were married there, and funeral services for both Fred and Mary took place in the main sanctuary.

‘I still remember [Peale’s] sermons,’ Trump told the Iowa Family Leadership Summit in July. ‘You could listen to him all day long. And when you left the church, you were disappointed it was over. He was the greatest guy.’ A month later, in the same news conference at which Trump tossed out Univision anchor Jorge Ramos, he again referred to Peale as his pastor and said he was “one of the greatest speakers” he’d ever seen.

Peale was also a well-documented Scottish Rite Freemason⁴⁰ of the 33rd degree⁴¹—what a coincidence. (anyways, due to what one may term “Trump Derangement Syndrome,” it’s quite ironic and appreciably convenient that the liberal MSM actually for once exposed a bit of occult/clandestine influence, inadvertently helping expose their own highest bosses’ pernicious agenda⁴²⁴³⁴⁴⁴⁵)

Now, a look at the clergyman’s past—he from 1932-52:⁴⁶

…joined anti-New Deal organizations like the Committee for Constitutional Government, Spiritual Mobilization, and the Christian Freedom Foundation, all of which were backed by J. Howard Pew. Pew and Peale also corresponded semiregularly about politics and publishing, and Peale had other friends in big business. He served on Texas oilman H. L. Hunt's Facts Forum program, and he worked as the editor-in-chief at the conservative-leaning Guideposts magazine.

A liberal muckraker noted that Peale:⁴⁷⁴⁸

…once gave the invocation at a meeting of super ‘patriots’ where Elizabeth Dilling and Edward Lodge Curran were the chief speakers.

Both Dilling and Curran were, for the factual record, patently antisemitic fascists aligned with right-wing “isolationism” before and during WWII. Edward L. Curran was described in his 1974 obituary in The New York Times as:⁴⁹

…a Roman Catholic cleric who for many years had supported causes led by the Rev. Charles E. Coughlin, the Royal Oak, Mich., radio priest; Generalissimo Francisco Franco and the late Senator Joseph R. McCarthy.

Peale’s choice of association with Curran is most definitely notable when taken into account his continued history of “anti-Catholicism”—he was essentially the Burchard of 1960, embarrassing national Republicans by attacking JFK on the basis of the Democratic contender’s Catholic faith. That N. V. Peale would two decades earlier hollow out such an “exception” in documented alliance with “proto-ecumenical” fascists—to the inclusion of right-wing Catholic ultramontanist extremists—should be considered quite revelatory of his earlier sympathies.

And the emperor of positive thinking was an associate of Billy Graham,⁵⁰ who as shown above was almost certainly a high-ranking Masonic insider likewise.

Common origins

Assuming you actually read all of the above (for the record, I try to formulate my typed blocks of text in a semi-humorous readable format), you perhaps are nonetheless left wondering: what direct ideological link is there at all between Nazism and “Judeo-Christian”? Aren’t they diametrically opposed to one another? At the outset, yes, though at their fundamental inner cores, they derive from the same (Marcionite) notion of Judaism and Christianity as separate. The Zionist “Judeo-Christian” elevation of literal “Jews” to the status of “God’s chosen people” (by ethnicity) is a brazen negation of Christianity’s traditional supersessionist tradition established by Jesus Christ and the Apostles in the New Testament. Supersessionism (as the core of apostolic Christianity) asserts that Christianity is the completion of Mosaic Judaism where the long-awaited fulfillments are finally met in Jesus Christ the Messiah.

The very conjoining of “Judeo-” to “Christian” implicitly denies the Judaic foundation of Christianity, hence the so-called “need” to add “Judeo-” as a prefix. “Judeo-Christian” therefore serves as an ostensible denial of the supersessionist biblical link between Judaism and Christianity as an unbroken, consistent continuation from type to antitype, instead positing Judaism as separate from Christianity.

Such denial (of Judaism’s foundation in Christianity) was also at the rotten heart of Nazism’s Jesuitic⁵¹ “Positive Christianity,” rejecting entirely the Old Testament and every “Hebraism” from the New Testament, going so far as to brazenly “interpolate” their Aryan racialist additions into Nazi “Bible” copies. Contrary to the lies of white supremacist⁵²⁵³ John Hagee’s CUFI which attempt to blame supersessionist “replacement theology” for the origin of Nazism’s perversion of Christianity,⁵⁴ the exact opposite is true: Nazism 100% rejected supersessionism because they hated Judaism and therefore had to seemingly “expunge” the Jewish core of Christianity when co-opting appeals to the (nominally) Christian majority of Germany.⁵⁵

Marcionism of the 2nd century belongs in somewhat of its own subtopic category, though its underlying essence—the undermining, denial, and hostility to the Jewish foundation of Christianity—was revived by German philosopher Immanuel Kant, whose “outstandingly positive reception” “by Nazi and proto-Nazi thinkers” is well-recorded.⁵⁶ The “patriarch of anti-Semitism” Wilhelm Marr (who in fact himself as a hater of Judaism chiefly propagated the term “antisemitism”) was utterly at odds to Christianity’s Hebraic roots to the point of insisting Roman—not Jewish—responsibility for the crucifixion.⁵⁷⁵⁸ Likeminded European antisemitic contemporaries of Marr from the late-19th to early-20th centuries consistently assailed supersessionism—Eugen Dühring lamented of Christianity as a “neo-Hebraism” and said of the (true) Christian: “if he knows himself, [he] cannot be a committed anti-Semite.”⁵⁹

Neo-Kantian philosopher and Nazi supporter Bruno Bauch endorsed Kant’s aversion to the God of the Old Testament, noting Kant’s rejection of “the rejection of Judaism as the stage in God’s salvation plan.”⁶⁰ Nazi propaganda in the religious dimension—to co-opt the churches into the NSDAP’s racial-collectivist Teutonic Bolshevism—merely continued where their Kantian ideological predecessors left off, despising the supersessionist concept of Jesus Christ as the “Jewish Messiah” for the obvious reason that it hindered the (nominally) “Christian” population of Germany from accepting the Nazis’ racial “struggle” against Judaism.⁶¹ Nazi papers screeched in fury at artists who accurately encapsulated the Jewish origins of Jesus,⁶² who by the way was declared by the Hebrew prophet Micah as coming out of Bethlehem.⁶³ And “Bethlehem” in Hebrew means “house of bread”—Christ said, “I am the bread of life,”⁶⁴ confirming Himself as the antitypical fulfillment of the Jewish manna.

“When the Nazis demonstratively burned looted copies of the Old Testament, they did not do so from “supersessionist” motives; they were not “reinforcing” the traditional Christian self-understanding as the new and true Israel. On the contrary, it was an expression of their fierce rejection of the sacred history uniting Jews and Christians under one God.”
—Wojceich Kozyra, “Kant, Anti-Supersessionism, and the Holocaust,” p. 93

The concluding gist

As you have now read (assuming you read the substance above) and seen with your own eyes, the link between neo-Marcionite/Kantian/Nazi “Positive Christianity” and Anglo-Masonic/Zionist “Christian Zionism”/dispensationalist should be crisp-clearer than ever: both stem from the common premise of a separation between Judaism and Christianity, jointly assailing the supersessionist heart of straightforwardly, fundamentally apostolic and biblical doctrine found in the Bible.

Practical policies proved to be no aberration of this ideological kinship—Anglo-American Illuminist tycoon Hearst simultaneously backed Nazis, Zionist emigration, and (subsequent Zionist mouthpiece) Billy Graham; Nazi collaborator Foster Dulles extolled “Judeo-Christian values” to (1933-era Anglo-Hitlerite) B’nai B’rith; Scottish Rite Freemasonic preacher-author Peale, a likeminded contemporary of Graham, tacitly supported right-wing, pro-fascist, anti-New Deal movements in the 1930s-40s.

For those of us who already comprehend the depths of Zionist-Nazi affinity in its “normal” incarnations, should the reality of ideological amicability/shared roots between Zionism’s pseudochristian wing and Nazism (with its (Jesuitic) pseudochristian wing) be really of any shockingly jarring substance?

1. David Poling (1977), “Why Billy Graham?” pp. 15-16.

2. Thomas P. Johnston (Mar. 12, 2003), “Examining Billy Graham's Theology of Evangelism,” p. 13.

3. Juan Williams (2016), “We the People: The Modern-Day Figures Who Have Reshaped and Affirmed the Founding Fathers' Vision of America,” p. 181.

4. Patricia Cornwell (Aug. 1996), “Ruth, A Portrait: The Story of Ruth Bell Graham,” pp. 105-6.

5. Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr. (Mar. 5, 1993), “How Gen. Albert Pike proved himself a Ku Klux Klan criminal,” Executive Intelligence Review, vol. XX, no. X, p. 67.

6. Albert Pike, “Morals and Dogma of the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite of Freemasonry,” p. 565.

7. Johnston (2003), p. 295.

8. Manly P. Hall (1923), “The Lost Keys Of Freemasonry,” ch. V, pp. 94-95.

9. “Billy Graham: Freemason Or Not?” Freemasons Community.

10. “Billy Graham Freemason,” Esoteric Freemasons.

11. Jim Duke (Feb. 26, 2018), “The Untold Story Behind Billy Graham,” Jim Duke Perspective.

12. Sep. 30, 1934, “Hearst Voices Mild Disapproval of Hitler’s Attitude Toward Jews,” Jewish Telegraphic Agency.

13. Brian Lantz (Nov. 23, 1982), “Bohemian Grove, Jack London, and the cultishness of California's politics,” Executive Intelligence Review, vol. IX, no. XLV, p. 56.

14. K. S. Olmstead (2022), “The Newspaper Axis: Six Press Barons who Enabled Hitler,” p. 5.

15. J. J. Murphy, “Clerical Fascism in the United States,” The Converted Catholic Magazine, p. 38.

16. “The Newspaper Axis,” p. 166.

17. Aug. 23, 1934, “HEARST IS QUOTED AS HAILING NAZI VOTE; Called the Result 'Unanimous Expression of Popular Will,' Hanfstaengl Declares.” The New York Times.

18. Aug. 26, 1934, “Hitler’s Aide Affirms Hearst Praised Nazis,” Jewish Telegraphic Agency.

19. Rafael Medoff (Apr. 22, 2009), “Hearst and the Holocaust,” The Jerusalem Post.

20. Nov. 20, 1938, “HEARST URGES GIVING EX-COLONIES TO JEWS; Would Convert Old German Lands in Africa Into Homeland,” The New York Times.

21. David Nasaw (2000), “The Chief: The Life of William Randolph Hearst,” ch. XXXVI, p. 579.

22. As a necessary caveat, yes, I know: the Anglo-American elites lied about their pretext for entry into WWII. The point here is that Hearst’s opposition to American involvement in WWII eerily appears to have stemmed from his longtime reactionary, fascistic viewpoints.

23. For the record, “America First” was a term invented by—as the right-wing D’Souza/Cruz Jonanmongers would put it—“racist-KKK-Progressive-liberal-leftist” Woodrow Wilson. And both the Ku Klux Klan and rank-and-file Communists were associated with that slogan. Since your average right-winger probably swallows the “KKK = Democrat” mantra, be sure to ask them why they are throwing support to a socialist-Communist-KKK-liberal-leftist-racist-Democrat-Progressive ideology the next time you hear them push “America First.”

24. Ben Procter (2007), “William Randolph Hearst: The Later Years, 1911-1951,” pp. 223-25.

25. James Whisler, “The Mystics, The Masons and Dallas Theological Seminary,” Historicist.com.

26. Dec. 1938, “Mirage in the Jungle,” Jewish Frontier, vol. V, no. XII, p. 3.

27. David Aikman (2007), “Billy Graham: His Life and Influence,” p. 105.

28. Ibid, p. 106.

29. Steve Posner (2013), “Chicken Soup for the Soul: Billy Graham & Me: 101 Inspiring Personal Stories from Presidents, Pastors, Performers, and Other People Who Know Him Well,” ch. XXXI.

30. A pivotally complicit organization in the 1933 reactionary Anglo-Fascist sabotage of that year’s anti-Nazi boycott, by the way.

31. Jason M. Olson (2018), “America's Road to Jerusalem: The Impact of the Six-Day War on Protestant Politics,” p. 125.

32. K. Healan Gaston (Nov. 13, 2019), “Imagining Judeo-Christian America: Religion, Secularism, and the Redefinition of Democracy,” ch. VII, p. 207.

33. Ibid, p. 176.

34. Glen Yeadon, John Hawkins (Jan. 1, 2014), “The Nazi Hydra In America: How America's Right Wing Politicians Are Plunging The Country Into A Fascist Police State,” pp. 79-89.

35. Ibid, p. 190.

36. Lelliĭ P. Zamoĭskiĭ (1989), “Behind the Facade of the Masonic Temple,” pp. 21-22.

37. Anton Chaitkin (1998), “Treason in America: From Aaron Burr to Averell Harriman,” pt. III, ch. XIX, pp. 560-62.

38. Anton Chaitkin (Apr. 26, 1996), “The ADL faction in American history,” Executive Intelligence Review, vol. XXIII, no. XVIII, p. 43.

39. Gwenda Blair (Oct. 6, 2015), “How Norman Vincent Peale Taught Donald Trump to Worship Himself,” Politico.

40. Norman Vincent Peale, “What Freemasonry Means To Me,” Euclid Lodge No. 158.

41. Feb. 2007, “Norman Vincent Peale — “The Power of Positive Thinking’,” The Alberta Freemason, vol. LXXII, no. II, p. 2.

42. Christopher Lane (Jul. 13, 2017), “The True Mission of Donald Trump’s Pastor,” The Daily Beast.

43. Jade Scipioni (Jul. 10, 2020), “How this 1950s self-help guru shaped Donald Trump’s attitude toward life and business,” CNBC.

44. Ron Elving (Jul. 24, 2020), “Norman Vincent Peale Was A Conservative Hero Known Well Beyond His Era,” NPR.

45. Chris Lehmann (Aug. 13, 2024), “The True Source of Trump’s Delusions: The Gospel of Positive Thinking,” The Nation.

46. Darren E. Grem (2016), “The Blessings of Business: How Corporations Shaped Conservative Christianity,” p. 196.

47. Carol V. R. George (1993), “God's Salesman: Norman Vincent Peale and the Power of Positive Thinking,” p. 170.

48. Christopher Lane (2016), “Surge of Piety: Norman Vincent Peale and the Remaking of American Religious Life,” p. 63.

49. Feb. 16, 1974, “Edward Curran, Right-Wing Priest,” The New York Times.

50. Peter Steinfels (Oct. 31, 1992), “Beliefs,” The New York Times.

51. Leo H. Lehmann (1942), “Behind The Dictators: A Factual Analysis of the Relationship of Nazi-Fascism and Roman Catholicism,” ch. IV.

52. Lz Granderston (Jan. 21, 2023), “Who will be evangelicals’ new kingmaker?” Los Angeles Times.

53. Sharon Zhang (Nov. 14, 2023), “Schumer Slammed for Speaking at Pro-Israel Rally Along Antisemite John Hagee,” Truthout.

54. “The Dangerous Doctrine of Replacement Theology,” Christians United for Israel.

55. Wojceich Kozyra (Jan. 2022), “Kant, Anti-Supersessionism, and the Holocaust,” Eidos: A Journay for Philosophy of Culture, vol. VI, no. I, p. 80.

56. Ibid, pp. 81-83..

57. Ibid, pp. 87-88.

58. Now, at face value, the reasoning here appears contradictory, though remember that the prophets of the Hebrew Bible were “types” of Jesus Christ (in type/antitype context)—just as the Jews killed their own prophets, so too did they to their own Messiah. (see Matt. 23:34-36, I Thess. 2:14-16) The distantiation of Judean responsibility for the crucifixion thereby distantiates the emphasis of Christ’s crucifixion as the culmination of the Jewish rejection of their earthly prophets into a final rejection of the Prophet (of Deut. 18), none other than the Son of God.

59. Kozyra (2022), p. 88.

60. Ibid, p. 89.

61. Ibid, p. 90.

62. Jan. 26, 1937, “Nazi Paper Hits Portrayal of Christ with Jewish Features,” Jewish Telegraphic Agency.

63. Mic. 5:2-4, Matt. 2:5-6.

64. Jn. 6:35, 51.