Most appreciated, Amaterasu; it's these droplets of mutual friendship and thoughtful regard for the Stack articles I spend hours upon hours researching/writing making a pivotal difference -- alongside my faith in Jehovah that as of yet remains a bit wobbly -- keeping my spirit afloat in the continuing midst of everyday depression, social isolation, anxiety, self-hatred, nutritional insecurity, eroded mental patience, and irritation towards IRL charlatans (who over and over refuse to believe my attestations and/or outright justify the miserable woes inflicted upon me). You, Ivan M. Paton, The Straight Juice, Michael Ginsburg, Carina Malatesta, The Dissident, and Silvia Taranto are among the most trustworthy friends here on Substack I have to converse with.
Just an aside, and I may have mentioned, I have no religion. Was raised with lots of love and Ethics, but no religion. My spirit stays afloat through determination and vision of what We can co-create.
But whatever We have to get Us aiming for the best, We are doing that!
I would subscribe to those Others - already do for Ginsberg - but as I recall, on a couple, I have to pay to sub, or pay to comment, or pay to get all the publications… And I ache when I cannot read or comment, so I just don’t sub.
As You know, I have zero, zip, nada in money beyond barely affording food. Homeless and all. So…..
Yes, indeed, us splintered, feeble minority of researchers are here to shed light on suppressed facts and share it!
Don't worry, aside from TSJ's older Stack postings locked behind paywalls, none of the other aforementioned accounts/publications lock their articles behind paywalls (I know Dissident at one point closed a comment section only to paid subscribers, but that was completely understandable given the level of obnoxiously repeat-Zionist trolling rampant):
Yes, ditto, I tend to balk from subscribing to publications locking too much of their material behind paywalls -- The Straight Juice is the main exception because of how all-encompassing his knowledgeable foresight is. Generally, I limit my subscriptions towards super-popular publications who don't subscribe/follow back, and instead subscribe (back) plentifully to some faithful long-time subscribers even if they are of little prominence.
Incredible research, thank you for pulling this together. I knew about a few of these examples but it's really powerful to see them all laid out together like this.
"“left” and “right” constitute the modern Hegelian “thesis” and “antithesis” to achieve a singular agenda" - this is really the crux of things. I have been thinking more and more of this phenomenon where right-wing extremism is finding different creative ways to a) veil itself into a liberal/leftist garb and try to reach left-leaning audiences through literal subterfuge or b) smear actual left-leaning entities as 'secretly Nazi', 'covertly right wing' or whatever. It's by far the most interesting part of their overall strategy, which on the whole is very blunt and unsubtle, so this is additionally fascinating. I am not aware of the left ever pulling those types of tricks. In general the left seems a lot more naïve in how it approaches political discourse. (By the left I mean actual left-leaning people, not the US democratic party which really isn't very leftist at all, in fact they are pulling the same types of tricks as the extreme right, trying to masquerade as 'the left' while in truth being center right at best).
Exceedingly glad to hear my compilation is well-received, Lidija. And concurred: right now there indeed is an "alt-right" effort to in infiltrate the pro-Palestine movement which ostensibly serves Zionazi ends of smearing human rights activists by association-fallaciously linking them to neo-Nazis. As to establishment pseudo-leftists like the ADL, I am relatively certain they have a hand in this infiltration scheme.
Absolutely agreed -- the real trick is recognizing the "core" substance of Zionazi propaganda to avoid accidentally propagating it from the "other side." For example, when they abuse Old Testament passages on Amalek to justify war crimes, don't fall into the trap of blaming the Hebrew Bible itself for Judeo-Nazism. A pattern I notice now and then is that too much of the pro-Palestine movement can get easily baited into believing the "root" lies behind Zionist propaganda.
For sure. But what do we make of, like, the Rabbis who are claiming it's ok for Jewish soldiers to rape non-Jewish women during war because 'they have the right to satisfy their urges' etc etc? Like of course no religion at its core is about promoting rape, as such. But on the other hand most religions do tend to carry some of these problematic messages that can then be taken out of context to push problematic viewpoints. Like, I feel both of those need to be called out. While, of course, remembering the old adage that 'the devil can quote the bible to suit his own purpose'
In those cases, the extremist (and probably ultra-Kabbalistic) rabbis are pushing the exact same narrative as neo-Nazis, aka the false notion that "Talmudic law justifies Jewish supremacy." Hopefully you now see the general pattern of how Zionazis and neo-Nazis "dialectically" push the same core lies from "opposite" ends?
…to speak out or protest against jewish NAZIS committing GENOCIDE is NOT “anti-semitism” …FUCK HAMAS and FUCK NAZI netanyahu !!! …neither are represent their people
Thank You!!!
Yessir, delighted to hear you find this compilation of value, Amaterasu. Last summer I spent quite the time digging up these troves of buried facts.
Well done!!! Worthy work, indeed!
Most appreciated, Amaterasu; it's these droplets of mutual friendship and thoughtful regard for the Stack articles I spend hours upon hours researching/writing making a pivotal difference -- alongside my faith in Jehovah that as of yet remains a bit wobbly -- keeping my spirit afloat in the continuing midst of everyday depression, social isolation, anxiety, self-hatred, nutritional insecurity, eroded mental patience, and irritation towards IRL charlatans (who over and over refuse to believe my attestations and/or outright justify the miserable woes inflicted upon me). You, Ivan M. Paton, The Straight Juice, Michael Ginsburg, Carina Malatesta, The Dissident, and Silvia Taranto are among the most trustworthy friends here on Substack I have to converse with.
I am honored.
Just an aside, and I may have mentioned, I have no religion. Was raised with lots of love and Ethics, but no religion. My spirit stays afloat through determination and vision of what We can co-create.
But whatever We have to get Us aiming for the best, We are doing that!
I would subscribe to those Others - already do for Ginsberg - but as I recall, on a couple, I have to pay to sub, or pay to comment, or pay to get all the publications… And I ache when I cannot read or comment, so I just don’t sub.
As You know, I have zero, zip, nada in money beyond barely affording food. Homeless and all. So…..
Yes, indeed, us splintered, feeble minority of researchers are here to shed light on suppressed facts and share it!
Don't worry, aside from TSJ's older Stack postings locked behind paywalls, none of the other aforementioned accounts/publications lock their articles behind paywalls (I know Dissident at one point closed a comment section only to paid subscribers, but that was completely understandable given the level of obnoxiously repeat-Zionist trolling rampant):
- https://substack.com/@thestraightjuice
- https://substack.com/@ivanmpaton
- https://substack.com/@the307
- https://substack.com/@carinamalatesta
- https://substack.com/@silviatarantoelsayed
Oh yes, and Arabi Souri is also a fantastic voice:
- https://substack.com/@syrian
Yes, ditto, I tend to balk from subscribing to publications locking too much of their material behind paywalls -- The Straight Juice is the main exception because of how all-encompassing his knowledgeable foresight is. Generally, I limit my subscriptions towards super-popular publications who don't subscribe/follow back, and instead subscribe (back) plentifully to some faithful long-time subscribers even if they are of little prominence.
Thanks! I will check Them out!
Incredible research, thank you for pulling this together. I knew about a few of these examples but it's really powerful to see them all laid out together like this.
"“left” and “right” constitute the modern Hegelian “thesis” and “antithesis” to achieve a singular agenda" - this is really the crux of things. I have been thinking more and more of this phenomenon where right-wing extremism is finding different creative ways to a) veil itself into a liberal/leftist garb and try to reach left-leaning audiences through literal subterfuge or b) smear actual left-leaning entities as 'secretly Nazi', 'covertly right wing' or whatever. It's by far the most interesting part of their overall strategy, which on the whole is very blunt and unsubtle, so this is additionally fascinating. I am not aware of the left ever pulling those types of tricks. In general the left seems a lot more naïve in how it approaches political discourse. (By the left I mean actual left-leaning people, not the US democratic party which really isn't very leftist at all, in fact they are pulling the same types of tricks as the extreme right, trying to masquerade as 'the left' while in truth being center right at best).
Exceedingly glad to hear my compilation is well-received, Lidija. And concurred: right now there indeed is an "alt-right" effort to in infiltrate the pro-Palestine movement which ostensibly serves Zionazi ends of smearing human rights activists by association-fallaciously linking them to neo-Nazis. As to establishment pseudo-leftists like the ADL, I am relatively certain they have a hand in this infiltration scheme.
Makes sense. I guess we have to get good at spotting them and calling them out.
Absolutely agreed -- the real trick is recognizing the "core" substance of Zionazi propaganda to avoid accidentally propagating it from the "other side." For example, when they abuse Old Testament passages on Amalek to justify war crimes, don't fall into the trap of blaming the Hebrew Bible itself for Judeo-Nazism. A pattern I notice now and then is that too much of the pro-Palestine movement can get easily baited into believing the "root" lies behind Zionist propaganda.
For sure. But what do we make of, like, the Rabbis who are claiming it's ok for Jewish soldiers to rape non-Jewish women during war because 'they have the right to satisfy their urges' etc etc? Like of course no religion at its core is about promoting rape, as such. But on the other hand most religions do tend to carry some of these problematic messages that can then be taken out of context to push problematic viewpoints. Like, I feel both of those need to be called out. While, of course, remembering the old adage that 'the devil can quote the bible to suit his own purpose'
In those cases, the extremist (and probably ultra-Kabbalistic) rabbis are pushing the exact same narrative as neo-Nazis, aka the false notion that "Talmudic law justifies Jewish supremacy." Hopefully you now see the general pattern of how Zionazis and neo-Nazis "dialectically" push the same core lies from "opposite" ends?
oh yeah. It's pretty fascinating in a gruesome way.
…to speak out or protest against jewish NAZIS committing GENOCIDE is NOT “anti-semitism” …FUCK HAMAS and FUCK NAZI netanyahu !!! …neither are represent their people
Thank you, Sean -- much appreciated!