65 Comments
User's avatar
Paul Healey's avatar

Here’s my crude analysis, which I take it, has a lot in common with yours: left-right ideological divisions serve the elitists establishment of private interests. It finances one side against the other to protect and drive the direction of their puppet governments. The hegemony of their corporate sovereignty could not exist without their unethical and deregulated markets. They are essential to profit from the theft and destruction of other Nations essential resources. Hence the growth in inequality, injustice, war, terror, disease, climate disasters and authoritarian governments. Their game is a negative-sum one, as it will, unless defeated, result in ecocide. Note the willing silence and censorship by the msm of democratic rights diverse interests, which is the foundation of Republic Sovereignty. RS is opposed to the oligarchs Machiavellian interest in Corporate Sovereignty. CS is the basis of Empires that protects their plutocracy and preserves their totalitarian world order.

Expand full comment
Emmanuel Goldstein's avatar

Absolutely concurred, Paul; glad to see we're on the same page.

Expand full comment
Jan Bushi Strelok's avatar

As a Yugoslav communist go for it brother. Neither do those Bolsheviks neither does anyone on left-wing side understand needed criticism in any wing. Full support 🪽

Expand full comment
Emmanuel Goldstein's avatar

Thank you a massive ton, Andrijan; glad to see some of us can arrive from various distant perspectives with a common yearning to understand reality's deeper secrets with an open mind and common revulsion against the reactionary cabal.

Expand full comment
Jan Bushi Strelok's avatar

Pirate parties are amusing to me as they don't differentiate themselves neither in the left neither right-wing sectors, however, sadly they lack any ideological impact as they've been stuck completely in digital rights.

No problem Emmanuel, I find it difficult sometimes to read about communism being criticised on your writings, however as a communist I swallow it and get more and more informed which is what matters at the end the most. And Yugoslav communists were criticised back in the times for being reformists, so I guess I'm one as well - going beyond left/right terminologies. All the best and looking forward to your reads!

Expand full comment
The counter-intuitive 🐿️'s avatar

"blabbering blatherskite " Pure gold! Please expand on that ...

Expand full comment
Emmanuel Goldstein's avatar

Oh, that's a reference to the DuckTales (preferably 1987, not the 2017 mediocre "reboot" that turned the characters ugly) TV show as hyperlinked. "Blabbering blatherskite" is just a fancy word salad way to say "gibberish." I put that in there as a nice humorous reference in case anyone might get it. :)

Expand full comment
Lucas Nascario's avatar

I have no idea what to make of this comment.

Expand full comment
Emmanuel Goldstein's avatar

Since that sneaked-in semi-humor I put in refers to a TV show, I guess not everyone gets it. Ah, well, maybe I'm just one of the few people left who remembers and appreciates the old 1987 series... speaking of which, there are at least two episodes in DuckTales (1987) which almost serve as an interesting "revelation of the method" paralleling how actual NWO conspiracies work. Stay tuned...

Expand full comment
Lucas Nascario's avatar

"the “right” typically possesses the correct methodological approach (a.k.a. a “conspiratorial” mentality) to examining the global power structure, yet all too often lacks a “fuller” level of sympathy and bolder speaking-up for the downtrodden across the world"

Very few of them, actually. It's an illusion. Most Republicans, are actually JUST like leftists, in that they need to be told exactly what to think, and exactly HOW to think, by their preferred media sources and cultural circles. The difference between the liberal, college hippy, and the old guy with an American flag or US army tattoo, is just the government's greatest illusion, ever. Now don't get me wrong, the righties *are* more intelligent, independent, practically skilled, and have a lot more common sense - but is that really saying much when they're only being compared to libtards - and not actual intelligent people?

Dare to disagree? Ha! Then just look at Eargate! That whole thing couldn't have been staged much worse, yet Republicans COMPLETELY failed to question it because they're uncritical, low-info, very tribal, and literally WORSHIP Trump. "Those Demoncrats are trying to kill my hero!"

Gullibility level: Pretty much the same as leftists, honestly.

As for your assessments in whole, though, I totally agree with you! Just wanted to make it clear that neither side is particularly versed in common sense.

Expand full comment
Emmanuel Goldstein's avatar

Yeah, in terms of Republicans/self-described "conservatives" *broadly*, you're right. For simplicity and abridgment sake, I wanted to shorten down this post a bit in terms of length, so the "left" and "right" I'm talking about in the context of his posting's intended audience are those among my subscriber base since, well, it's you guys who get the notification to check out this post.

Though yes, I can't agree more: my aging Republican "boomer" neighbor across the street is a complete shill for whatever Fox News/Newsmax tells him; I tried explaining to him that Trump is part of the conspiracy, and he angrily lashed out because "the Democrats ruined everything and Trump will fix things!!"

Thanks as always, Lucas; just wanted to mention, your other comments from last week are appreciated; just earlier on the Sabbath I took a moment to read the Book of John and Jer. 3, and now should be relatively back on course at the spiritual journey. A Rothschild with both common sense and integrity is somewhat of a rarity. :)

Expand full comment
Lucas Nascario's avatar

I told someone similar to your neighbor (this was online) that Trump was part of the conspiracy, and this guy got all emotional and said that he hoped I was "on a watchlist." As you would imagine, I told him that I probably *am* on a watchlist, and that it hasn't shut me up at all, lol.

Expand full comment
Emmanuel Goldstein's avatar

Gotta love how some of those specially devoted tangerine cult venerators hypocritically seek the same policies imposed on critics that they themselves fearmonger about being persecuted by. XD

Expand full comment
Lucas Nascario's avatar

Bingo. "Fix government... with more government!" "Fix tyranny... with 'good' tyranny!" "Lock up, or censor anyone that disagrees with me!" Always been like that on both sides, but honesly, the left is a bit misrepresented by the media and internet, because in real life, a lot of libertarians (most of whom know voting is useless) actually claim to lean left, yet understand the government isn't there to make anyone's lives any better.

Expand full comment
Emmanuel Goldstein's avatar

Wow, you couldn't have summarized it better. Personally I must admit, I'm utterly disappointed that right-wing echo chambers would shamelessly out themselves as such hypocritical cretins and dismiss all legitimate criticism as "anti-American commie leftist globalist Cultural Marxist gay tranny homosexual pro-abort Biden Kamala shilling" or whatever. Utter lunacy!

Expand full comment
Lucas Nascario's avatar

"A Rothschild with both common sense and integrity is somewhat if a rarity." 😂 😆

LOL! 🤣

In all seriousness, good to hear you didn't block me (not that you would!) or write me off, like everyone else pretty much does. In hindsight I thought my comments last week would if anything be off-putting since, after all, I do tend to have an abrasive, bold, and off-putting approach to witnessing to people.

Expand full comment
Emmanuel Goldstein's avatar

Whew, glad my humor isn't completely broken. :)

Nah, I'll be willing to consider constructive criticism. Besides, last week I was in a real fix in terms of my spiritual condition, perpetually depressed and inefficient, so if anything your exhortation was almost like a God-send.

Though I know what you mean in broader terms; we live in an age where gossip reigns, and where due process at the basic social fabric of society was long thrown under the bus so people are quick to presume/judge and slow to admit their own faults. It's *almost as if* the devil and his followers really hate the Bible and want to propagate the inverse of what the inspired Scripture says:

"Wherefore, my beloved brethren, let every man be swift to hear, slow to speak, slow to wrath: for the wrath of man worketh not the righteousness of God." (James 1:19-20)

And in all fairness, I know I myself come off "abrasive, bold, and off-putting" all too often when dealing with critics. :)

Expand full comment
Ernie Boxall's avatar

I will never understand how Americans, a people who went into a hostile environment with nothing more than their human spirit for adventure and survival can be so easily lead by the nose before a myth of a God who, according to all the stories in the story book, must qualify as the universes most horrific genocidal maniac.

American who watched in horror as 1300 citizens died in two buildings bend the knee to the mass murderer who drowned every man, woman, child, animal and insect living on the Earth apart from one kiss ass family. (I wonder where this God bloke was when the Twin Towers came down. I wonder why this God bloke didn't turn the fireman's head like he did the PRESIDENT'S apparently. I'm looking forward to the time when men and women take responsibility for their own actions without the blanket of this supposed thing of forgiveness...through fear.

Expand full comment
Lucas Nascario's avatar

Also, don't associate Americanism with Christianity. Flag-wavers are what I would call "church-going pagans."

Expand full comment
Emmanuel Goldstein's avatar

Agreed; the Pledge of Allegiance for one is socialist agitprop invented by Freemason Francis Bellamy, so it's a bit hilarious watching right-wingers shill for a collectivist near-commie manifesto they imagine constitutes "conservatism." XD

Expand full comment
Lucas Nascario's avatar

Right?! A lot of things Conservatives stand for have always smelled like quasi-, if not outright communist-collectivist policies.

Heck, it [mostly] wasn't young, snot-nosed liberals, who voted for the Patriot Act. Also, "Back the Blue" is another example; why would we collectively 'support' police - unconditionally, lol? They just do whatever they're told, they work for whoever is in power. Why "support" them to such a capacity as to make a slogan out of it, lol?

Also, isnt it funny how Conservatives love our constitution, not thinking it a bit obsolete, yet don't even follow it themselves? Where are the coalitions, or "well-regulated militias"? I don't see any... The time for us to form coalitions is long overdue, and never going to happen.

Main takeaway: "Conservatives" only understand that brave people fought to death, for whatever freedoms we currently have; but they don't understand that if they want freedom to be a thing in the present/future, they themselves need to be fearless, and willing to give up their *own* lives.

In other words... They're a bunch of wimps, pretending to be tough.

Expand full comment
Lucas Nascario's avatar

The Devil rules the World; God allows those genocides you speak of. God doesn't tell us exactly why, but he has given us plenty of clues, e.g. free will. Satan is obviously the evil one here, yet no one seems to be complaining about him. 🤔 I get that we hold God to the utmost standard, because he's supposed to be perfect, but our tiny mind cannot know what "perfect" really is.

By the way, I'm not shifting blame off people to Satan/demons - it's still our fault when we sin. But most people don't recognize their own sins, and that's what separates God's people, from people who belong to Satan/the world.

Especially if you don't believe in "sin" in the first place, that's easily one of the worst case scenarios! So my question to you is, what does sin mean to you? Are you one of those atheists who think sin is merely an arbitrary concept? That's very important before I can move on to other points.

Expand full comment
Emmanuel Goldstein's avatar

On the first part, Rothschild (lol 😃), I think I've come to a solid understanding of the reason why: back in Genesis, God set a mark upon Cain as a gesture of mercy to give him extra time to repent. The fundamental standard of justice is, "Whoso sheddeth man's blood, by man shall his blood be shed: for in the image of God made he man." (Gen. 9:6) If Cain was held to this standard, he would've never been able to pass down a lineage, much as he denied Abel a lineage. God, who wants ALL men to come to repentance and salvation (I Tim. 2:4; cf. Jn. 3:16-17), therefore to make sure that there is an "equity" of preserved life for both the good and wicked, therefore had to lower the temporary standards for the wicked and give them temporal power. The law is not made for the righteous, but rather for the wicked. (I Tim. 1:9-11)

In the line of Cain, the sevenfold avenging mark set upon Cain was self-declared by Lamech into a "seventy times sevenfold" system out of sheer wickedness. (Gen. 4:24) Take note here on the numbers... in Jesus's ministry, Peter asks the Lord if he must forgive up to seven times, and Jesus's answer was, "not seven times, but SEVENTY TIMES SEVEN times." (Matt. 18:21-22, Geneva translation) Why didn't Jesus say "infinitely"? Because "seventy times seven" represents the maximum leeway of probation for the wicked, and once that symbolic "amount" is up, the wicked temporal power on the planet will be destroyed. IOWs, there's no need to forgive more than "seventy times seven" times because the wicked will not be able to transgress in their criminal activity past that symbolic "amount" in their granted lifetime. That is also clearly why the final probation for the Jewish nation is given in Daniel as seventy prophetic weeks, aka 70x7 prophetic days. (Dan. 9:24)

Expand full comment
Lucas Nascario's avatar

That indeed makes sense, great observation!

Expand full comment
Ernie Boxall's avatar

Sin. The greatest sin I ever saw as a child was four christian bastards standing on a street corner on a Sunday morning telling us young kids that we'd sinned. I told them to fukk off. The next greatest sin was when I saw Israel attacked by Arab bastards in 1973, I volunteered to go over and join the fight because my Jewish girlfriend had gone out the week before. I saw how close Israel came to being destroyed and why the people must continue to fight. I saw the bastards at the UN do nothing. That's sin. I saw the way these "families

of God" , fukking, sinning bastards, christians treated two of my three wonderful daughters (and why they both reverted to Islam) . Those christian bastards are what I call sin.

Expand full comment
Lucas Nascario's avatar

"I saw the bastards at the UN do nothing. That's sin" Welcome to reality 😄

Expand full comment
Ernie Boxall's avatar

Jeg er? So what?

Expand full comment
Ernie Boxall's avatar

Exactly. Jesus is a made up name. Just As Jerusalem is a made up name. Have you read history books? Have you noticed how people who write history books argue over whose Impression of history is MORE ACCURATE than someone else's account of the ACTUAL story? Now, I can accurately presume that your answer will be another dig at an old man. That just means I have lived through more history than you have...Ive lived through stories that writers have lied about. I was there. You weren't. You just read about it. I didn't live through this God bloke stealing another man's rib and making it into a woman.

Now, this man had, I would have thought been in this garden absolutely alone for many years (that would send a man crazy to start with) but then one morning he wakes up ready for another day alone and WOW what the hell is this next to me?????

Expand full comment
Emmanuel Goldstein's avatar

Et tu?

Expand full comment
Ernie Boxall's avatar

Bloke

Expand full comment
Ernie Boxall's avatar

Jesus not a white man? I saw a book in a book shop that definitely showed this bloke being white. I know that whenever I went reluctantly into a church for a wedding there was a white dude on a cross. Now, when I was in Israel I never saw an natural born man or woman who was white. Quite a shock I thought sarcastically.

Expand full comment
Emmanuel Goldstein's avatar

Thank you for demonstrating your level of knowledge on the issue.

1. Various subcultural depictions depict Christ as looking similar to their ethnicity, so just because one book portrays His earthly skin tone as white does not prove He is white in terms of "European" ethnicity. (Jesus is of Jewish ethnicity from the area known from the 2nd century till today as Palestine)

2. Individual church depictions of Jesus aren't necessarily any more reliable.

3. The modern "State of Israel" has nothing to do with ancient Israel and its Ashkenazi population are likely of Khazarian ancestry with little-to-no Judean ethnic roots. The hexagramic/(Na)tional (zi)onist Fourth Reich is, after all, a culturally white supremacist colonialist occupation regime.

Expand full comment
Ernie Boxall's avatar

You see my level of knowledge demands that I do not accept the mere book accounts of actions that happened, apparently, millions or even billions of years ago. I know Jesus didn't exist because scholars told me that the letter J is unknown in the language of the time. Now, my elderly wisdom told me that if names can be edited or simply made up, the stories are probably edited and made up. That's elderly wisdom see.

Expand full comment
Emmanuel Goldstein's avatar

This argument of yours revolving around the letter "J" makes zero sense and proves you obviously did not give serious thought into the study. "Jesus" is simply an English rendition of the name "Iesvs" from the Koine Greek, and Iesus is in turn translated from the Hebrew "Yehoshua."

But go on, keep embarrassing yourself if you insist, "Ernie."

Expand full comment