Just watched and bookmarked -- thank you a massive ton, Michael. That <4 min. analysis just shed a massive amount of light: it most definitely explains why Zionists can with the most arrogant impunity peddle the "but Hamas doesn't care about Palestinians" narrative -- because the truth's conjunction is with the reality that the Zionists ordered Hamas to do their bidding and therefore have the advance knowledge.
“This is called Hegelian dialectic. Two seemingly opposing sides—“thesis” and “antithesis”—are clashed and ultimately reconciled at some point by a “synthesis.”
This is what Zizek usually does. Mashing up of two completely opposite ideas to advance his ideas or agenda.
Ah yes, I heard of Zizek a bit -- apparently he elicited a deal of left-wing flak for suggesting the long-term "benefits" of a Trump presidency in that it would provoke an eventual leftward swing, if I recall correctly. Of course, wouldn't his ideological model fit into Icke's "problem-reaction-solution" rather than "classical" Hegelian dialectic?
Exactly. I am never sure what he is about. He doesn’t have a model that clearly fits into either the “thesis-antithesis-synthesis” or “problem-reaction-solution”. To me he seems to be a grifter, who will ride onto anything that’s trending. I read his “Violence” and I have literal notes like “what???” or “are you serious?”. He is a genius nonetheless in evoking strong emotions by saying polar opinions.
Well, the reason I'm suggesting Zizek's views fit into Icke's IRS model is because -- if I'm summarizing correctly -- he essentially said that voting in Trump (problem) will lead to an eventual greater leftist swing (reaction) to accomplish hard-left ends (solution). Anyways, I have not (yet, as of typing) seen his content on "Violence." Thanks for mentioning, A M.
You may find this video and transcript quite interesting I think. Less than 4 minutes long:
https://www.memri.org/tv/kuwaiti-researcher-aisha-rshed-iran-arm-of-zionist-freemasonry-hamas-created-by-israeli-mossad
Just watched and bookmarked -- thank you a massive ton, Michael. That <4 min. analysis just shed a massive amount of light: it most definitely explains why Zionists can with the most arrogant impunity peddle the "but Hamas doesn't care about Palestinians" narrative -- because the truth's conjunction is with the reality that the Zionists ordered Hamas to do their bidding and therefore have the advance knowledge.
On a somewhat different note:
“This is called Hegelian dialectic. Two seemingly opposing sides—“thesis” and “antithesis”—are clashed and ultimately reconciled at some point by a “synthesis.”
This is what Zizek usually does. Mashing up of two completely opposite ideas to advance his ideas or agenda.
Ah yes, I heard of Zizek a bit -- apparently he elicited a deal of left-wing flak for suggesting the long-term "benefits" of a Trump presidency in that it would provoke an eventual leftward swing, if I recall correctly. Of course, wouldn't his ideological model fit into Icke's "problem-reaction-solution" rather than "classical" Hegelian dialectic?
Exactly. I am never sure what he is about. He doesn’t have a model that clearly fits into either the “thesis-antithesis-synthesis” or “problem-reaction-solution”. To me he seems to be a grifter, who will ride onto anything that’s trending. I read his “Violence” and I have literal notes like “what???” or “are you serious?”. He is a genius nonetheless in evoking strong emotions by saying polar opinions.
Well, the reason I'm suggesting Zizek's views fit into Icke's IRS model is because -- if I'm summarizing correctly -- he essentially said that voting in Trump (problem) will lead to an eventual greater leftist swing (reaction) to accomplish hard-left ends (solution). Anyways, I have not (yet, as of typing) seen his content on "Violence." Thanks for mentioning, A M.