Anglosubversion’s recurring motifs: parallels between the Bolshevik and ‘Syrian’ revolutions

Are you historically literate?

[credit and shout-out appreciation to my outstanding friends

Carina Malatesta

for patiently informing me about Syria in the past months and

Arabi Souri

for nudging me to read Syria News—may God look out after you in your respective day-to-day individual lives]

Introductory prologue

I challenge anyone who refuses to accept the repeatedly substantiated motif “there is nothing new under the sun”¹ to study the historical record with a critically thinking mind. Our modern generation of Dunning-Kruger reprobates who imagine themselves enlightened intellectual bastions of innovation, who swallow the most nakedly conspicuous lies, and who denigrate authentic researchers as “conspiracy theorists,” will have you believe that “events just randomly happen” and that “intentions” trump receipt trails of documented financial/intelligence records.

Contrary to modern perceptions of how liberalized a civilizational steward of dignity and altruistic protector of the downtrodden humanity supposedly has attained the status of in our 21st century, the uncomfortable truth is this: our contemporary generation is no better than the ancient Assyrians at their worst. The majority of humanity today aren’t more compassionate, more civilized, more moral, more intellectually driven, more self-aware, nor more intrinsically decent than we so often paint ourselves to be. We only imagine ourselves to have ascended to a new level of moral enlightenment our ancestors could not attain, all the while our daily values and behavior prove we are all the worse because of our culpability at gaslighting fellow human beings and ourselves so crudely in lack of repentance.

The driving mechanisms behind our modern generation’s grotesquely reprobate cycles of unrepentant self-gaslighting lies are false dualist narratives of reality i.e.:

• “left-wing = good, right-wing = bad”

• “Cultural Marxists bad, therefore right-wing culture wars good”

• “West = bad, therefore Putin = good”

• “Zionism is bad and therefore you can’t criticize China or you’re a Western toadie”

• “Hamas is a genuine resistance movement against Zionism and you must support Hamas if you support Palestinians”

Notice a pattern of perennial lunacy here?

All propagators of false Janus double-headed dualist constructs rely on a core premise that whichever mass movement is painted as the “good side” must be automatically presumed without question to have risen out of nowhere particularly of tangible identification, who always has “sincere intentions,” and must be received as the messianic Caesarist savior the masses are expected to obey the ideological dictates of without question. Anyone pointing out the two heads belong to the same creature is deemed a “conspiracy theorist,” and genuine researchers are maliciously slandered a la association fallacy as supposedly the equivalent of actual bad-faith bigots.

Take the story of Bolshevik terror: almost anyone criticizing Lenin’s Red Terror bands as the product of a conspiracy will be led down a controlled opposition pipeline of internet sensationalism brainwashed to believe nonsensical scapegoat-factory-produced lies blaming “Judeo-Bolshevism,” and genuine researchers exposing Wall Street’s factually documented role in facilitating Bolshevism will be falsely slandered by liberal neo-Marxists as “pushing antisemitic canards” even when they are not. (for instance, a Communist once falsely insinuated I was pushing “Nazi propaganda” and refused to retract his malicious lies against me)

Or the case study of Syria, because the Bolshevik coup d'état by Lenin/Trotsky against Alexander Kerensky’s Provisional Government and the salafi jihadist coup d'état against Bashar al-Assad’s Syrian government bear too many uncanny similarities to impulsively dismiss. A well-rounded analysis is in order.

I: Anglo-American financiers

Both the Bolshevik coup against Kerensky and jihadist terror operation against Assad were furnished top to bottom by financial and military elites of American and Britain. The lopsided circumstances of both events, separated by a century, are strikingly parallel in functional nature: color revolution units are thoroughly abetted by deep-seatedly cynical Anglo-American interests and “used” as proxies to carry out their geopolitical bidding of overthrowing legitimate governments.

Lenin and Trotsky’s NY-London-Berlin intel comrades

The details were already explained by me back here, but I will repeat for relevance sake anyhow: Leon Trotsky was assured safe travels from America to Russia to foment the October Revolution jointly alongside Vladimir Lenin, whose return from exile was assured by Jesuit-Germanic diplomacy working in tandem with British Young Turks vassal-of-interest Alexander Helphand-Parvus.

Without Anglo-American help, the October Revolution would not have transpired to the successful overthrow of Kerensky’s government—Trotsky was the vital organizer who led both the Nov. 7, 1917 coup and the Red Army’s successful usurpation of Russia in the ensuing civil war. (cf.) During his time of American exile, Trotsky and his family lived in comfortable splendor well beyond what his disclosed income totals could afford, and when departing New York for Petrograd on Mar. 25, 1917,² left with a whopping $10,000 whose source information was swept under the rug.³ On Mar. 5, 1917, Trotsky raised a resolution in the New York County Socialist Party in opposition to American workers supporting entry into WWI that was raging at the time.⁴ That he managed to depart American exile and board a ship headed to Petrograd, Russia, was made possible by his American passport President Woodrow Wilson bestowed alongside a British transit visa and Russian entry permit;⁵⁶ the ship en route stopped at Halifax, Canada, where an officer of the British Directorate of Military Intelligence, Sec. 5 (MI5), detained Trotsky and his family at an internment center due to his brazen revolutionary activities and anti-Allied stance.⁷⁸

It was well-known to Anglo-American military-security figures that Trotsky and the five Socialist revolutionary activists with him on the ship were “sympathetic” to Germany in then-ongoing World War I; a naval control officer at the time observing the half dozen men to “quite likely… be a great hindrance to the [Provisional] Govt. in Russia just at present.”⁹ A series of exchanges between MI6 and New York officials revealed a notable extent of Anglo-American sympathy for Trotsky, calling for the release of him, his family, and the five other Socialist associates out of Halifax internment to continue their travels—one of those vital “comrades” securing his liberation was Canada’s deputy postmaster general, Dr. Robert Miller Coulter, listed in Antony C. Sutton’s Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution (1974) as “a liberal, a Freemason, and an Odd Fellow.”¹⁰ A Canadian lieutenant colonel deemed by Sutton “a man of integrity,” John Bayne MacLean, observed that Trotsky was more German than Russian, represented Germany’s interests as a nominal Russian, and liberated from Halifax “at the request of the British Embassy at Washington... [which] acted on the request of the U.S. State Department, who were acting for someone else.”¹¹ MacLean’s findings in addition implicated Trotsky as a potential agent of the German General Staff, notorious for its budding WWI-era liaison with Vladimir Lenin.¹²

Meanwhile in Germany, ministerial conservative officials in the General Staff formulated a plan of action with Alexander Parvus—an Anglo-Jesuit-Hapsburg intelligence tool¹³ and Young Turks collaborator with future Revisionist Zionist forefather Vladimir Jabotinsky in the Committee of Union and Progress¹⁴¹⁵—to catapult Lenin’s Bolshevik nexus in the face of Kerensky to topple the Provisional Government, thereby removing Russia out of the WWI scene where it had still been fighting Germany under Kerensky’s direction. Amends were made to the Jesuit-trained¹⁶ Vatican-German conservative diplomat Carl-Ludwig Diego von Bergen, who “agreed to transport not only Lenin but the majority of his Bolshevik associates.”¹⁷

Germany secured the final domino in its totality to collapse Alexander Kerensky’s Provisional Government, and Anglo-America stood by watching the scene while doing nothing to assist Kerensky—the British government warned their citizens residing in Russia at least six weeks before the October Revolution to promptly leave the country, and the American Department of State held advance knowledge of Bolshevik preparations for a coup d'état against Kerensky.¹⁸ The rest is history—the Communists took over Russia and signed the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk with Imperial Germany pulling Russian military out of World War I.

CIA-MI6 axis funded salafi terror against Assad

Just as Anglo-American intelligence heads in the previous century armed revolutionary proxies to overthrow Kerensky for outliving his usefulness, so too did they bankroll in our generation a band of revolutionary “rebels” in a proxy war aiming to remove Assad from power in Syria. And just as Anglo-American oligarchs dominating some of the most prestigious financial, industrial, and government positions held advanced knowledge about Bolshevik plans to undermine Russia and funded their revolutionary objectives anyways, so too did Anglo-American oligarchs in our generation knew in advance a band of al-Qaeda/DAESH “rebels” dominated a terrorist-insurrectionist conspiracy to overthrow the pluralist, secular governance of Bashar al-Assad and supported al-Qaeda savages anyways. Jake Sullivan, the national Director of Policy Planning and Deputy Chief of Staff to Hillary Clinton in the Obama bin Biden I Administration and National Security Adviser to Obama bin Biden III (2021-25), told his then-boss Clinton in Feb. 2012, “[Al-Qaeda] is on our side in Syria.”¹⁹

Active complicity on the part of Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) heads in financing the machinery of jihadist revolution is well-known—

Aaron Maté

notes that Operation “Timber Sycamore”:

…proved to be ‘one of the costliest covert action programs in the history of the C.I.A.,’ the New York Times reported in 2017. Leaked NSA documents revealed a budget of nearly $1 billion per year, or around $1 of every $15 in CIA spending. The CIA armed and trained nearly 10,000 insurgents, spending ‘roughly $100,000 per year for every anti-Assad rebel who has gone through the program,’ [emphasis added] U.S. officials told the Washington Post in 2015. Two years later, one U.S. official estimated that CIA-funded militias ‘may have killed or wounded 100,000 Syrian soldiers and their allies.’

As my friend

The Dissident

pointed out over here, U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) insider documents reveal deep-seated intel awareness that Iraq’s Al-Qaeda branch (a.k.a. AQI—“Al-Qaeda in Iraq”) and adjacent/parallel branches of the Muslim Brotherhood salafi jihadist terrorism network were “the major forces driving the [anti-Assad] insurgency in Syria”:

Observed also by

Kit Klarenberg

in “How CIA and MI6 Created ISIS” (← absolute must-read) is that alongside the CIA’s Timber Sycamore program:

…Britain concurrently ran secret programs costing millions to train opposition paramilitaries in the art of killing, while providing medical assistance to wounded jihadists. London also donated multiple ambulances, purchased from Qatar, to armed groups in the country.

Speaking of medical assistance, guess who else was abetting the “moderate rebel” wokeified-al-Qaeda coup against Assad?²⁰²¹²²

Also strongly recommend checking out this most recent oustanding Stack by Kit:

How MI6 Helped HTS Seize Syria

II: Zionist geopolitics advanced

The outgrowth of the “Syrian”—as in the Bolshevik—coup effectuated a long-term advancement of Zionist colonialism furthering the setup of “Zionist Jews” as the elevated “sacrificial lamb” gathered into Occupied Palestine to be prepared for an en masse two-thirds liquidation (once the 100 days of Assyrian-substitute-king fun are over) all for the lopsided appeasement of “Christian” Zionist apocalyptic bloodlust. More on this dynamic explained over here. Cf. also this column and this too debunking the British Freemasonic “Christian Zionist” distortion of Zech. 13:8-9.

Bolshevik revolutionism creates the Third Aliyah

[mostly copied from my previous gargantuan compilation here to save time]

The Marxist Poale Zion (“Workers of Zion”) faction of Zionism—modeled after the Anglo-Zubatovist controlled-opposition “Police-Socialist” recruiting brand of legal economism²³—simultaneously backed Zionist nationalism and sought Comintern recognition.²⁴ Among the Third Aliyah emigrants from Russia, “a good number” believed in the October Revolution,²⁵ and the “socialist” Marxist-Zionist Gdud HaAvoda (“Labor Legion”) comprised youngsters aged 18-22 (notice a pattern?) who held “an admiration and an enthusiasm” for the Bolshevik Revolution.²⁶

Much of the Third Aliyah (1919-23) migrants to Palestine were in fact of a revolutionary,²⁷ Marxist/Communist orientation²⁸—the same “Jewish” participants of anti-Czarist causes in Russia brought the “[Communist/Bolshevist] political ideologies and operating methods [of Eastern Europe]” into the creeping-colonialist settlements of Palestine.²⁹ That Aliyah period itself also constituted a direct outgrowth of the Bolshevik Revolution,³⁰ which created the vital conditions for a massive Jewish emigre flock thanks to altercating destabilization of the Russian Empire between ultraconservative White Terror and Bolshevist Red Terror episodes of bloodshed “fulfilling” the “self-fulfilling” “prophecy” long advanced by Zionist agitators that “Jews cannot find safety unless they move to Palestine.” (those same Zionists hold a notorious track record of plainly admitting their ready willingness to support anti-Jewish hatred to goad Jews into moving out of their home countries)

Also worth noting is that the supposedly “anti-Zionist” Lenin, unlike his successors, clearly did not bother actually restraining the emigration of Soviet Jews to Palestine. Whatever nominal antipathy against the reactionary bourgeois trappings of Zionism he held, it was pathetically scant even out of his polemical tract contents,³¹ and despite laughing off Marxist-Zionist syncretism³² did not institute any policy substantially inhibiting the Zionist movement’s growth. Ber Borochov, one of (Bolshevist) Labor Zionism’s chief pioneers, was both a Lenin protege³³ and Poale Zion mouthpiece at the 1905 Seventh Zionist Congress demanding Eretz-Israel (“land of Israel”) as the only arrival territory for Zionist immigration.³⁴ Poale operated in the USSR all the way into 1928,³⁵ and ultimately merged into the broader imperialist veneer of Anglo-Zionist objectives.

Syria’s balkanization expands Zionist Lebensraum

Need I say more?³⁶

And as Anglo-Zionist elevated Lenin instituted a no-interference-with-Zionism quiet policy tolerating Zionist Bolshevist “Jews,” even more so is Anglo-Zionist elevated Abu Mohammad “Ahmed al-Sharaa” al-Julani (or “al-Nazijewlani”) appeasing the Nazi “Jews” of the Fourth Reich:³⁷

Mind you, there is a caveat of difference here between the archetype and sequel which only goes to demonstrate how grotesquely treasonous the present salafi-jihadi “Syrian” occupiers of Syria are: in the case of Lenin and Poale Zion, the Marxist Zionists were flauntingly proud supporters of the October Revolution and its undergirding revolutionary maximalist tenets, and Lenin’s translated return of “support” was technically indirect rather than direct—meanwhile, the Nazi “Jews” (for basic simplicity sake, you can remove the hyphen and shorten it to just “nazijew” and use that as a clarifying tautology for “Zionist” these days) in 2025 are constantly³⁸ bombing³⁹ Syria and the HTS “rulers” from Damascus are bending over backwards to appease Judeo-SS terrorists.

And many nutjobs in the “pro-Palestine” cause (i.e. C. J. Werle-Manhole as I covered here) were heaping oceans of extolling praise for the Zionist-owned “Syrian” salafists in Dec. 2024 as if HTS were for Palestinian solidarity. You cannot make this up!

III: scapegoat manufacturing (overview)

Just as the true architects of Bolshevik terror against Russia—MI6, Morgan-Rockefeller-duPont Wall Street moguls, Scottish Rite Freemasons, Venetian aristocrats, Imperial German reactionaries, and the Jesuit Order—blamed Communism collectively on “the Jews,” so too do the Zionist architects of salafi-jihadist terror against Assad blame “Islamist Muslims” of the anti-Zionist fold ambiguously for the regime change coup installing HTS into power.

In the case of Bolshevism:

1. Wall Street ultraconservative capitalists in coordination with British intel tactically elevate Bolshevik terror against Kerensky’s Socialist Revolutionaries

2. the October coup succeeds as set up by Anglo-American elites

3. aforementioned Anglo-American forces of archreactionary conservatism 180 into publicly vociferous “anti-Communism,” suddenly staging performative outrage over Bolshevik crimes and blaming them on “the Jews,” falsely equivocating Judaism collectively to Bolshevism

Parallel case regarding Syrian jihadists:

1. CIA-MI6-Mossad Zionists and their rubber stamp internet PR unpaid interns cheerlead the “moderate rebel” coup against Bashar al-Assad

2. the Dec. 2024 takeover of Damascus succeeds as set up by Anglo-Zionist elites

3. aforementioned Zionists forces of archreactionary Judeonazism 180 into publicly vociferous “anti-Islamism,” suddenly staging performative outrage over jihadist crimes and blaming them on “Islamists,” “Muslim terror,” “‘Israel’ haters” et al. and falsely equivocating Islam collectively to ISIS-adjacent Wahhabism

(see sec. V for details—but don’t skip sec. IV!)

IV: matrix glitches

A pattern recurs: whenever genuine alliances of unfettered mutual solidarity exist between large-scale entities defying the global Annunaki Imperial Aristocracy (“AIA”—credit to

Ivan M. Paton

for coining this term) international cabal, they are prime targets for destruction and the authentic facts surrounding those alliances and their adversaries’ unholy united fronts are swept under the rug once the destruction is complete. Whether it was the French Third Republic’s Grand Orient Freemasonic government’s alliance with Czarist Russia disrupting Anglo-Vatican-Germanic imperialism or Hezbollah’s military backing of Assad in the midst of Syria’s “civil war” angering both the Anglo-Zionists and Sunni est.’s salafi enablers, the common operational tactics of psychological warfare by which like-minded tyrants of Shinar’s mold operate remains the same.

Franco-Russian rapprochement facts obliterated the ‘GODF-Bolshevism’ trope; Hezbollah intervention shattered Zionist-Turkish-ISIS false narratives

To provide a glimpse of the utmost basic background on Franco-Russia: despite drastically different political circumstances in the 1890s between an officially secular, liberalized, and Freemasonically dominated France and the Czarist, state-Eastern Orthodox, autocratic, conservative Russian Empire, the liberalizing factions of both nations came to a mutual diplomatic agreement upon the shared basis of creating a bulwark keeping Imperial Germany at bay.

What is important to understand here in this article’s context of comparing the Bolshevik and “Syrian” coups separated by the span of a century is that the Franco-Russian Alliance effectively dismantles Anglo-Germanic-Jesuit psyop inversion narratives just as Hezbollah-Assad unity dismantles Zionist lies.

In the case of France, the clerico-reactionary Jesuits who sought to destroy the secular Third Republic and “restore” the nation into its pre-French Revolution status quo ante as the Vatican’s “eldest daughter” harbored intense animus towards the Franco-Russian Alliance and launched propaganda lies from the French side⁴⁰ to deterioriate Third Republic-Czarist relations concurrent to Anglo-Okhrana fifth columnist subversion within the Russian Empire working overtime to sabotage diplomacy from the Russian side.⁴¹ The Jesuit-orchestrated Dreyfus Affair—an episode that almost tore apart the Third Republic when a Jewish French officer was falsely accused of spying on behalf of Germany—not only created additional anti-Jewish invective fueling the Zionist movement, but aimed at strengthening the French clerical extreme right led by Jesuit Stanislas du Lac’s disciple Edouard Drumont (figurehead of the “antisemitic leagues” and of the notoriously anti-Jewish newspaper La Libre Parole) against the predominant GODF (Grand Orient de France) liberal political influence that was pro-Alliance. The Protocols of Zion antisemitic hoax’s dissemination and sensationalism too served vested ends of destroying Franco-Russian unity by tarring its industrial capitalist and liberal-democratic patrons as pawns of a nonexistent “Judeo-Masonic revolutionary conspiracy.”

Especially following the “abrupt” October Revolution, the antisemitic pro-Zionist extreme right in France sensationalized a canard charging Bolshevism as a revolutionary arm of Grand Orient Freemasonry.⁴² This Jesuit-concocted trope is easily debunked by the circumstances of the Franco-Russian Alliance: the GODF-dominated Third Republic held foreign investments in Russia still honored by the Provisional Government after Czar Nicholas II’s abdication, and ultimately it was the Bolsheviks toppling Kerensky who expropriated French assets without compensation to the intense anger of the Grand Orient-controlled Third Republic. The idea that the Grand Orient of France was even chiefly capable of controlling the Bolsheviks is already laughably absurd on its own, but this notion that the GODF orchestrated the Lenin/Trotsky takeover of Russia that ultimately destroyed their own interests is so derangedly far-fetched and insane it merits practically zero serious consideration. The reality was that both the extreme-“right” French Jesuit ultramontanists and extreme-“left” Bolsheviks were mutual enemies of the Franco-Russian Alliance—the Franco-Jesuit extreme-rightist allegation that “Grand Orient Freemasonry created the Bolshevik Revolution” was nothing short of a cynical projection and lying inversion narrative fomented by the Jesuit enemies of Franco-Russia accusing the GODF of orchestrating the very coup and its results their own S.J. hierarchy sought all along.

Likewise, Hezbollah’s intervention in the Syrian “civil war” on behalf of Assad dismantled Anglo-Zionist and Turkish-Qatari narratives about how “complicated” and “fragmented” the regime change operation was. Once Hassan Nasrallah helped the Syrian government retake salafi-jihadist-occupied territory, the different jihadist “factions” ceased any superficial infighting amongst themselves as the so-called “moderate rebels” united with ISIS in a furious scramble to counter Hezbollah, effectively disproving the Western narrative that “al-Nusra is genuinely opposed to ISIL.”⁴³ The salafi jihadists’ overt kinship⁴⁴ forged with the Nazi “Jews” (Zionists) has proved closer than ever since Hezbollah’s pro-Assad intervention—Israeli weapons in at least 1-2 occasions were found in an ISIS depot seized by Assad’s forces,⁴⁵⁴⁶ indicating Tel Aviv’s weapons somehow, very conveniently, ended up in the hands of DAESH; the “Islamic” State also on one occasion apparently apologized (per Fourth Reich former Defense Minister Moshe Ya’alon) to the Israeli State after launching a rocket attack,⁴⁷⁴⁸⁴⁹ an apology the Israeli State wholeheartedly accepted.⁵⁰ No wonder Assad’s government in 2017 accused the Fourth Reich before the UN Security Council of directly enabling DAESH!⁵¹ (just look at today’s realm also)

And who can forget this?⁵²

Destruction of Czarist Russia precedes downfall of Republican France; Zionist balkanization of Syria as the precursor to liquidating Hezbollah?

In the case of the Franco-Russian Alliance: once the eastern side of the unity was shattered because it was devoured by British-funded Communist revolutionaries who ended the Alliance, it was only a matter of time before the French Third Republic and fraternally associated Grand Orient was later on crushed into oblivion when the Jesuit ultramontanists rode the synarchist/fascist wave to power installing the Vichy regime that eradicated the remaining institutional traces of secular liberalism and promptly banned the Grand Orient lodges.

Likewise, the demise of the Lebanon-Syria unity’s eastern Levantine pillar in Dec. 2024 has instigated nothing but rapidly precipitous⁵³ signals⁵⁴ of demise⁵⁵ for Hezbollah on the western side of the now-gone alliance: Lebanon’s (Zionist-occupied?) government has inched ever closer since then at disarming Hezbollah (as well as Palestinian armed resistance factions in Lebanon)⁵⁶ as nazijew criminal savages openly boast⁵⁷ of its reduction into a puny shadow of what it once constituted under Hassan Nasrallah’s leadership.

The fate of Lebanon’s resistance is yet future, as of typing. If the historical precedents are bound for inevitable repetition by our global order’s machinations, expect any meaningful anti-Zionist stalwart remnants of Lebanon in the Shi’a-Christian undergirding support base of Hezbollah to be eroded one way or another into institutionally marginalized oblivion.

V: narrative inversion

Continuing from where was left off in sec. III: long story short, the same Zionists bootlicking for the same Fourth Reich that bankrolled the Syrian jihadists have rebranded themselves after Dec. 7, 2024, suddenly as the champions of Syrian Alawites and Christians suffering Sunni Islamist HTS persecution. For case examples of nazijew shills staging performative concern-troll feigned sympathies for Syrian victims of HTS, see here and here and here (← see this video and watch at least 25:39-28:09—don’t miss Aaron’s response).

It is of course no different than the Anglo-American-Germanic ultraconservative architects of Bolshevism after Nov. 1917 claiming to champion the cause of persecuted Russian Eastern Orthodox masses hounded by Bolshevik terror despite having in the first place funded those Bolsheviks to usurp Russia.

Anglo-Americans selectively blame Germany; Zionists selectively blame Turkiye

Because it was common knowledge during World War I that Imperial Germany was a lead sponsorer of Bolshevik terrorism, the Anglo-American world found an easy propaganda gig exonerating themselves of criminal complicity by simply exploiting the “German-Bolshevik conspiracy” motif to pander themselves as the foremost enemies of both Berlin and Lenin.

Likewise, cir. HTS takeover of Damascus, Zionist propaganda outlets began co-opting⁵⁸ the fact that Turkiye funded the salafi jihadists to pander themselves suddenly as the “enemies” of those very wahhabi anti-Assadists they propped up for years on end and using the “Turkish-HTS” motif to exonerate themselves.

Turkish hacks spuriously charge ‘Assad-Israel collusion’

As if Turkiye sponsoring mass-murderous savagery against the Syrian people for the cynical purpose of deposing Bashar al-Assad wasn’t bad enough, their propaganda arms boasted the chutzpah to spread a calumnious inversion of reality claiming that Assad’s successful flight Russia was somehow the effectuated result of “selling out military secrets to Israel.” I dismantled that claim over here:

Syria revisited: addressing Anglo-Türkish charges of ‘Assad-Zionist collusion’

Similarly, the Kerensky government and/or its supporters after being toppled by the Bolsheviks faced baseless attacks that they “clandestinely” facilitated the Bolshevik coup of Nov. 7, 1917. Namely, the “Jacob Schiff funded Bolshevism” trope—in actuality, Schiff was a supporter of the Provisional Government and overtly hostile to the Bolsheviks, as Prof. Sutton noted.⁵⁹

Conclusion

1. a conspiracy by Lenin and Trotsky to overthrow Kerensky was greenlit and facilitated by Anglo-American intel; a conspiracy by Sunni Islamist salafists to overthrow Assad was greenlit and facilitated by Anglo-American intel

2. Bolsheviks were nominally Russian, if at all, and took over Russia to subsequently slaughter patriotic Russians; “Syrian” jihadi “rebels” were nominally Syrian, if at all, and took over Syria to subsequently slaughter patriotic Syrians

3. Anglo-Zionist funded Communist revolutionaries took over Petrograd and pulled Russia out of a military conflict with Germany; Anglo-Zionist funded salafi jihadist revolutionaries took over Damascus and pulled Syria out of a military conflict with the Zionist-Sunni axis

4. the reactionary conservative Anglo-American architects of regime change against Kerensky were motivated at their core by “Christian” Zionist dispensationalist theological garbage; the reactionary conservative Anglo-American architects of regime change against Assad are motivated at their core by “Christian” Zionist dispensationalist theological garbage

5. Communism is a Zionist creation (← shout-out credit to my beloved friend

   Sarah E. Lawton
   for candidly saying this verbatim before I did); Wahhabi “Islam”-ism is a Zionist creation (and yes: Nazism is also a Zionist creation⁶⁰)

6. Bolshevik usurpation of Petrograd opened Russia to unprecedented foreign interference; HTS usurpation of Damascus opened Syria to unprecedented foreign interference

7. the October Revolution secured Zionist interests; the “Syrian” “Revolution” secured Zionist interests

8. Bolsheviks nominally claimed occasionally to be “anti-Zionist” but devoted far greater energy suppressing the Jewish anti-Zionist General Labor Bund while giving Zionists a free pass for years on end in times of expedience; salafi jihadists in Syria nominally claim occasionally to be “anti-Zionist” but devote far greater energy suppressing the anti-Zionist Axis of Resistance while giving Zionists a free pass for years on end when expedient

9. Lenin’s Bolsheviks taking power in Russia instituted a no-attack-on-Zionism policy and granted Bolshevist Zionists the privilege to expand their imperialist project without opposition; FSA-ISIS-HTS salafi jihadists taking power in Syria instituted a no-attack-on-Zionism policy and granted Nazi Zionists⁶¹ the privilege to expand their imperialist project without opposition

10. Anglo-American conservative bankrollers of Bolshevism cherry-picked the nominal “Jewish” orientation of Bolsheviks to wrongfully scapegoat Jews en masse for Communist crimes; Anglo-American conservative bankrollers of Syrian jihadism cherry-pick the nominal “Islamic” orientation of takfiri death squads to wrongfully scapegoat Muslim anti-Zionists en masse for HTS crimes

11. the Franco-Russian Alliance’s enemies from both French right-wing Jesuits and “Russian” left-wing Bolsheviks proved the fraudulent nature of the Jesuits’ myth that “GODF created the October Revolution” and demonstrated the unholy kinship between Jesuits and Communists; the Hezbollah-Assad alliance’s enemies from both Zionists and Sunni ISIS-adjacent Islamists leading into a unity between Israeli State and “infighting” splinters of the Islamic State proved the fraudulent nature of the Western propaganda narrative that “Israel is opposed to ISIS” or that “the ‘moderate’ rebels are anti-ISIS”

12. Anglo-America alongside Germany funded Bolshevism against Kerensky, and then technically-correctly but hypocritically and selectively blamed Germany for the Bolshevik coup of Nov. 7, 1917; the Fourth Reich alongside Turkiye funded salafi jihadists against Assad, and then technically-correctly but hypocritically and selectively blamed Turkiye for the HTS coup of Dec. 8, 2024

13. Anglo-American-Germanic-Jesuit reactionaries after funding Bolsheviks to terrorize Russia pretended to suddenly be sympathetic to Bolshevist-persecuted Eastern Orthodox Christians under the auspices of “anti-Communism”; Zionist reactionaries after funding al-Qaeda jihadists to terrorize Syria pretended to suddenly be sympathetic to HTS-persecuted Syrian Alawites and Christians under the auspices of “anti-Islamism”

14. Kerensky’s supporter Jacob Schiff, who sought to secure the Provisional Government’s stability, was falsely accused of funding the very Bolsheviks who overthrew the Kerenskyites he supported; Assad was falsely accused of colluding with the very Zionists who funded salafists overthrowing his government

15. the destruction of Czarist Russia destroyed the Franco-Russian Alliance and anteceded the eventual demise of republican France’s GODF in WWII; the destruction of Assadist Syria destroyed the Lebanon-Syria alliance and so far is looking like it will antecede the eventual demise of Hezbollah in WWIII(?)

Oh, in addition:

1. foreign-meddling regime change against Russia is falsely labeled a “civil war”; foreign-meddling regime change against Syria is falsely⁶² labeled a “civil war”

2. the Vatican was quick and enthusiastic to open diplomatic relations with Soviet “Russia” after Anglo-Zionist owned Bolsheviks installed an occupation regime terrorizing Russian people;⁶³ the Vatican was quick and enthusiastic to open diplomatic relations with jihadist “Syria” after Anglo-Zionist owned HTS installed an occupation regime terrorizing Syrian people

Disclaimer: accepting any of the above stated facts assessed by me is correlated to a 700% increased likelihood of facing denigration as a “conspiracy theorist” by liberals, Communists, neo-Marxists, and Zionists. (if you went above and beyond glitching the matrix,⁶⁴ expect neo-Nazi jeniuses to use the word “Jew” as an insult against you)

Epilogue

A small fraction of people fragmented in comprisal throughout the globe will listen to the truth, but most of humanity has unfortunately chosen the route of reprobate stubbornness clinging onto endless lies soothing their confirmation biases. Whether few or “many” (at least by Substack standards) take with critically evaluating cogitations my analytical compilation here, I don’t know (as of typing before this article is published), but what remains certain is that those intent on believing Shinar’s circus of psyops into the grim end of sealed perdition are on record of having “received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved,”⁶⁵ validating without a doubt the 1st-century statement made one night to a Jewish ruler “that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil.”⁶⁶

“WE WOULD HAVE HEALED BABYLON, BUT SHE IS NOT HEALED: forsake her, and let us go every one into his own country: for her judgment reacheth unto heaven, and is lifted up even to the skies.” —Jeremiah 51:9

1. Ecc. 1:9b.

2. Benjamin Isitt (2010), “From Victoria to Vladivostok: Canada's Siberian Expedition, 1917-19,” ch. I, p. 20.

3. Antony C. Sutton (1974), “Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution: The Remarkable True Story of the American Capitalists Who Financed the Russian Communists,” ch. II, pp. 21-23.

4. Ibid., p. 24.

5. Ibid., p. 25.

6. Jennings C. Wise (Jan. 1, 1938), “Woodrow Wilson: Disciple of Revolution,” ch. LIV, p. 647.

7. Isitt (2010), loc. cit.

8. Bruce Nesbitt (May 9, 2017), “Conversations with Trotsky: Earle Birney and the Radical 1930s,” ch. I.

9. Sutton (1974), op. cit., p. 28.

10. Ibid., pp. 28-31.

11. Ibid., pp. 31-33.

12. Ibid., p. 34.

13. Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr. (1980), “What Every Conservative Should Know About Communism,” ch. IV.

14. Muriel Mirak-Weissbach (2009), “Through the Wall of Fire: Armenia-Iraq-Palestine, from Wrath to Reconciliation,” ch. I.

15. York Norman (Jul, 29, 2021), “Celal Nuri: Young Turk Modernizer and Muslim Nationalist,” p. 6.

16. Robert Payne (1964), “The Life and Death of Lenin,” sec. III, ch. II, pp. 286-87.

17. Michael Occleshaw (2006), “Dances in Deep Shadows: Britain’s Clandestine War in Russia, 1917-20,” p. 6.

18. Sutton (1974), op. cit., pp. 44-45.

19. Jake Sullivan (Feb. 12, 2012), “Hillary Clinton Email Archive—SPOT REPORT 02/12/II,” WikiLeaks.

20. Mar. 13, 2015, “Report: Israel treating al-Qaida fighters wounded in Syria civil war,” The Jerusalem Post.

21. Raphael Ahren (Jun. 29, 2015), “Israel acknowledges it is helping Syrian rebel fighters,” The Times of Israel.

22. VICE News (Dec. 18, 2014), “The Israeli Hospital Admitting Syrian Fighters: The War Next Door (Part 2),” YouTube.

23. Marjorie Mazel Hecht (Aug. 16, 2002), “Sergei Zubatov’s ‘Police Socialism’ in Russia, and the Creation of Zionism,” Executive Intelligence Review, vol. XXIX, no. XXXI, p. 41.

24. Sondra M. Rubinstein (Sep. 5, 2019), “The Communist Movement In Palestine And Israel, 1919–1984,” pp. 55-56.

25. Ibid., p. 108.

26. Ibid., pp. 193-94.

27. Benjamin Nathans, Kenneth B. Moss, Taro Tsurumi (Jan. 4, 2022), “From Europe's East to the Middle East: Israel's Russian and Polish Lineages,” p. 118.

28. Eliezer Schweid (2024), “A History of Modern Jewish Religious Philosophy, Vol. V: Creating New Jewish Centers. The Visionaries of First Fulfillment in the Land of Israel,” ch. III, p. 95.

29. Derek Penslar, Eran Kaplan, David Sorkin (Dec. 2011), “The Origins of Israel, 1882–1948: A Documentary History,” p. 16.

30. Anita Shapira (1992), “Land and Power: The Zionist Resort to Force, 1881-1948,” pt. II, ch. IV.

31. B. Morozov (1999), “Documents on Soviet Jewish Emigration,” p. 12.

32. Lawrence J. Epstein (1989), “A Treasury of Jewish Anecdotes,” p. 41.

33. Ibid.

34. “Ber Borochov,” Jewish Virtual Library.

35. Philip Mendes (2014), “Jews and the Left: The Rise and Fall of a Political Alliance,” p. 217.

36. Alisha Rahaman Sarker (Dec. 16, 2024), “Israel launches ‘most violent’ strikes on Syrian coast as it vows to double settler numbers in Golan Heights,” The Independent.

37. Timour Azhari and Suleiman Al-Khalidi (May 27, 2025), “Exclusive: Syria and Israel in direct talks focused on security, sources say,” Reuters.

38. Nader Durgham (Feb. 26, 2025), “Israel bombs Syria following days of threats against new rulers,” Middle East Eye.

39. Emanuel Fabian (Mar. 11, 2025), “Israel strikes former Assad regime bases in southern Syria,” The Times of Israel.

40. Steven G. Marks (2003), “How Russia Shaped the Modern World: From Art to Anti-Semitism, Ballet to Bolshevism,” pp. 157-58.

41. Pasquale de Marco (May 9, 2025), “The Unseen Hand: Russian Intelligence in France,” ch. 5, secs. 3-4, pp. 76-79.

42. D. H. Joseph (Jan. 1919), “Amalek At Home,” The Jewish Forum, vol. II, no. I, p. 1,063.

43. Josh Wood (Jun. 10, 2015), “Hizbollah declares war on ISIL,” The National.

44. Ariel Ben Solomon (Feb. 12, 2015), “Syrian rebels call on Israel to bomb Hezbollah-Iran-Syria positions,” The Jerusalem Post.

45. Anna Ahronheim (Oct. 17, 2017), “Syrian army claims to find Israeli-made weapons in IS hideouts,” The Jerusalem Post.

46. Jul. 18, 2018, “Israel weapons found in Daesh arms depot,” Middle East Monitor.

47. Judah Ari Gross (Apr. 24, 2017), “Ex-defense minister says IS ‘apologized’ to Israel for November clash,” The Times of Israel.

48. Tom O’Connor (Apr. 27, 2017), “ISIS Fighters Regret Attacking Israel And Have 'Apologized', Former Defense Minister Says,” Newsweek.

49. Chloe Farand (Aug. 28, 2017), “Isis fighters ‘attacked Israel Defense Forces unit, then apologised' claims former commander,” The Independent.

50. May 4, 2017, “Israeli Defense Minister: Israel Forgives ISIS For Attack Following Apology,” MintPress News.

51. Anna Ahronheim (Apr. 13, 2017), “Syrian representative to the UN: Israel has directly supported ISIS,” The Jerusalem Post.

52. Dec. 2, 2024, “Syria rebels appear to credit Israeli strikes on Hezbollah with aiding shock advance,” The Times of Israel.

53. Yasmine Abou Zaher (Mar. 4, 2025), “A ‘New’ Lebanon: How Recent Elections Have Diminished Hezbollah’s Influence,” Politics Society at New York University.

54. Laila Bassam, Tom Perry and Maya Gebeily (Apr. 10, 2025), “Exclusive: Facing calls to disarm, Hezbollah ready to discuss weapons if Israel withdraws, senior official says,” Reuters.

55. Laila Bassam and Emilie Madi (May 23, 2025), “Hezbollah seeks boost in Lebanon vote as disarmament calls grow,” Reuters.

56. Vivian Yee (May 23, 2025), “Lebanon Moves to Disarm Palestinian Groups, a Test Run for Hezbollah,” The New York Times.

57. Josh Hasten (Apr. 7, 2025), “‘Nobody is afraid of Hezbollah anymore,’” Jewish News Syndicate.

58. Uzay Bulut (Dec. 5, 2024), “Turkey unleashes jihadist terror on Syria,” Jewish News Syndicate.

59. Sutton (1974), op. cit., p. 197.

60. Aug. 7, 1978, “The Anti-Defamation League: Britain’s Zionist Gestapo,” Executive Intelligence Review, vol. V, no. XXX, p. 1.

61. Yes, I am fully aware: “Nazi Zionist” is a needlessly redundant tautology.

62. Arabi Souri (Oct. 10, 2019), “‘Syrian Civil War’: British Terrorists, US Troops, and Western Hostages!” Syria News.

63. Avro Manhattan (1983), “The Vatican Billions: Two Thousand Years of Wealth Accumulation from St. Peter to the Space Age,” pp. 124-25.

64. Cf. my account profile picture (as of typing, at least).

65. II Thess. 2:8-10.

66. Jn. 3:19.