5 Comments
User's avatar
Lucas Nascario's avatar

I remember John MacArthur going on Shapiro, and shilling the we must protect Israel thing. It's crazy how widespread this Zionist manipulation of scriptural-/false-teaching is , but thankfully I noticed people are starting to wake up to it because of how heavy-handed it's become!

Expand full comment
Emmanuel Goldstein's avatar

Oh yeah, I remember hearing a bit about that as well. Gotta love how both the "Jewish" Zionists and "Christian" Zionists each think they're using the other as useful idiot tools for their "own" agenda when both are useful idiot tools unknowingly serving the Jesuits' bidding. If the consequences weren't so murderous it'd almost be downright hilarious.

Expand full comment
Imon A List's avatar

I attended both MacArthurs church and Jack Hibbs church. Through the grace of God as a new Christian I left when all the Israel stuff came up. There is a youtube video of Jack Hibbs saying "If Israels enemies aren't your enemies you aren't a Christian." Thats when I knew it was time to leave. Unofrtunatly the sheep stay.

Expand full comment
Emmanuel Goldstein's avatar

Yeah, unfortunately some sheep insist on following false shepherds.

"For if after they have escaped the pollutions of the world through the knowledge of the Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ, they are again entangled therein, and overcome, the latter end is worse with them than the beginning. For it had been better for them not to have known the way of righteousness, than, after they have known it, to turn from the holy commandment delivered unto them. But it is happened unto them according to the true proverb, The dog is turned to his own vomit again; and the sow that was washed to her wallowing in the mire." (II Pet. 2:20-22)

The thing most so-called "Christians" don't understand is that just because you share the same doctrinal worldview as what some good-faith individual generations ago also believed doesn't mean you're at the same spiritual level. God looks at the heart and how much light each individual has proportional to how much of the light they live up to. (cf. Lk. 12:47-48; Rom. 2:12-16)

Let's say Person 1 had to fix mistakes in A, B, and C. Despite initially hesitant to believe the problems had to be addressed, he humbles his heart, acknowledges there are errors, and in his lifetime manages to fix A and B but doesn't get to C, so his end conclusion is that A and B were in error and are fixed, while C is fine as it is, genuinely unaware by the time he passes that C still needs repair. Person 2 generations later inherits this conclusion -- A and B were problematic and resolved, but C is fine and needs no repair whatsoever. Person 2 denies that C is problematic and still needs to be addressed.

Are Person 1 and Person 2 at the same level of fulfilling their moral responsibilities? Obviously not -- just because their end conclusions are the same doesn't mean they are of equal moral responsibility. Person 1 humbled himself from thinking there are no problems into searching and fixing 2/3 of the errors, simply running out of time to fix the remaining third. Person 2 meanwhile, having received this 2/3 partial state, refuses to proceed further and finish the task into completion.

Expand full comment
Ivan M. Paton's avatar

This post is fascinating.

And if you read this post, and your quotes and references, by framing 'God' as the ancient Babylon religion of worshiping the emperor as the God-Emperor, (Rex Deus), then we see an ihteresting progression of gods - it is the title not the one god.

Babylon's God-Emperor was Abraham's God that told him to go and take the land of Canaan from the local inhabitants, and to start a new nation, which was a colony of Babylon.

Later when the Israelite king got too uppity and started defying his God-Emperor in Babylon, which is what history tells us he did, then the Babylon God-Emperor attacked destroyed the second temple, and took them back to Babylon for retraining!!!

Persia, a completely different religious system and empire, attacked Babylon and killed the God-Emperor-King, and under their Bill of Rights (the first one in history) they freed the Israelites and paid for their rebuilding of the temple. In the same event the priests of Babylon fled to Pergamum, which was a colony of Babylon and followed the same religion of God-Kings. The Babylonian emperorship Pontifex Maximus moved to Pergamum.

The last king willed it to Rome in 133 BCE on the proviso the Romans worship their emperor of God.

No Romans took it up until Caius of Marius claimed the title as he claimed descent from the goddess Venus, known as Ishtar in Babylon, Innana in Sumer, the Annunaki giant Queen of Heaven. 48 BCE Caius Julius Caesar became the Babylonian Pontifex Maximus, and carried the title to Rome and Rome became the new Babylon, and thus the kingdom of Judea became a vassal colony of Rome.

The Jewish rebellions against both Rome and the Jewish elites were the impetus for Paul, who was Saul of Taurus a Roman Empire agent - to warn the Jews that they were betraying their God-Emperor of Rome. They continued the defiance and the rest is history.

The Jews were, and always have been, a colony of the Babylonian God-Emperors - and they work for the Roman Emperor to this day - the Pontifex Maximus, known as the Bishop of Rome, the pope. Babylon.

The "God" of Abraham, the Israelites, the kingdom of Judea, and the Jews, is and always has been the God-Emperor of Babylon.

Expand full comment