Thanks for the summary, SDBR. My next post in this series will indeed touch on the "right wing" of the Jesuit/Maltese dialectic (though Opus Dei is a matter I need to conduct additional research on) -- need to finish up another project ATM, and should subsequently proceed to speedrunning this expose compilation for the remainder of this week.
I see where you're coming from, though please bear in mind that the outward religious garb of "Catholicism" is only the "exoteric" watered-down, compromised ideology given by the Vatican insiders to the "masses." At the insider level, the Vatican/Jesuit/Maltese power are at the highest Satanic rankings imaginable. Remember that the true subject of veneration in Catholicism is "St. John" -- to the everyday Catholic, this is presented as John the Baptist or John the Apostle/Evangelist, but the insider initiates all know that this is only a facade to mask the true identity: Janus. And Janus in turn is a facade for the devil, because the two heads of Janus correspond to the "dialectical"/"dualist" sides of the dragon: Satan as the "dark" side and Lucifer as the "light" side.
So it's ultimately silly to debate over whether AOC is a "real" Catholic, because the vast majority of hundreds of millions of Catholics don't even understand what they believe, unfortunately -- if they knew what the Vatican knows, they wouldn't be Catholics, but they are hid from the truth and their sincerity is abused so their spiritually-coerced almsgiving helps fund the Vatican power structure.
Remember, Codex Vaticanus -- one of the main Alexandrian texts used as the basis for modern Bible translations -- was/is at the heart of the Vatican library and omits from it the Pastoral Epistles. Of course, the outward garb of Catholicism accepts the canonicity of those three Pauline letters, albeit the watered-down Vulgate/Douay version which i.e. modifies "latter times" to "last times" in I Tim. 4:1. Remember that Marcion's Gnostic canon also omitted the Pastorals -- at the insider Vatican level, they completely reject the Pastorals, but to the outside is presented a watered-down version so the masses don't get *too* suspicious.
The Catholic Church is a community of faith. Those who deny any dogma of the faith are outside the Church. AOC denies all the core beliefs of the Catholic Church. She’s no more a Catholic than I am a member of NARAL. It’s not complicated.
Yes, well-meaning, sincere Catholics who seek after God first and foremost are a community of faith, and I greatly respect them.
That said, Catholicism in its mainstream outward form is only a facade hiding an inner occult agenda as most modern religious systems are. The sincerity of the masses are maliciously abused by the higher initiates -- using priests, cardinals, and bishops as proxies -- to spiritually enslave the laity.
First off, the origins of Catholicism were founded on a negation of apostolic Christianity's Jewish foundation. The Quartodeciman dispute in the 2nd century is key proof of this: the apostolic bastion in East Minor led by Polycarp and Polycrates affirmed -- as direct disciples/students with links to the Apostles themselves -- that the 1st-century primitive Christians kept the Jewish feast days in an antitypical manner, namely Passover on Nisan 14 in the matza-and-grape juice ceremony annually (NOT weekly!). This apostolic tradition as taught by Jesus Christ in the Last Supper as His "blood of the new testament" (Mark 14:24, Matt. 26:28, Luk. 22:20) was rejected by the Roman pontiff Victor I who instead demanded Christians venerate the pagan Feast of Ishtar (Easter) instead. In fact, it was for this reason that the Gregorian calendar was invented by the Vatican -- where as Nisan 14 could fall on any day of the week, the papal calendar was manipulated to align the syncretist "Christian Easter" into always falling on a Sunday.
Also, the only alleged "2nd-century" document which supports papal teachings are the Epistles of Ignatius which were proven to be 3rd-century papal forgeries. The real Ignatius could in no wise have commanded Asia Minor Christians to "all follow the bishop even as Jesus Christ the Father" (Epistle to the Smyrneans, ch. VIII), because if that was the mainstream thinking of the Asia Minor Christians in the EARLY 2nd century, why did Polycrates in the MID-2nd century defy the Roman bishop's command to abandon Quartodecimanism?
You also have the Catholic veneration of the "Queen of Heaven," a phrase found in the Book of Jeremiah identifiable as a pagan idol the Hebrews were condemned by Jehovah from bowing down to. The list goes on and on...
Nice skewering of AOC. Few deserve it more, and you're right about Massie and Tlaib.
I don't get the Jesuit references, though. I don't think the reason any of those congresscritters support Israel due to any Jesuit background, but to sheer grift on the one hand, and foolish imperialist dreams on the other. As for Hitler, he used the Jesuits' methods, not their ideology. It was not as if he took Christianity seriously.
Hello, OB, glad to see you around, and I get where your inquiries come from.
First off, the entire global power structure points upward to the Jesuit/Maltese occultists at the top -- all those fronts operate as gateways to the highest secrets of the "Catholic" Roman hierarchy. As to U.S. politicians, yes, I agree with your point (only) in the basic sense that the Jesuit-Zionist connection here isn't "direct," though the chain of manipulation/control does stem from Jesuit orders --> Anglo-Masonic circles --> Zionist leaders --> AIPAC --> U.S. politicians in this or some likewise manner, from my knowledge/intuition of examining NWO patterns. Zionism is an Anglo-Jesuit operation to accomplish the purpose of driving a wedge between Jew and Arab until both are desperate enough to bow down to the Papal Caesar and agree to hand over Jerusalem to the Vatican (or something along those lines of accomplishing a "neo"-Templar global control agenda).
Hitler was Jesuit-influenced and controlled. The Third Reich's outward "animosity" towards Jesuits was highly superficial when their ideology came directly from Jesuit ideologues -- German Jesuits (Georg M.?) Pachtler and Hermann Muckermann laid the eugenic groundwork for Nazi racialism, for example. (Leo H. Lehmann, "Behind the Dictators," ch. I -- https://archive.org/details/LeoHerbertLehmanBehindTheDictators/page/n7/mode/2up?view=theater) As to Hitler "not taking Christianity seriously," that's 100% true, but you need to understand the full story -- Jesuitism is not Christianity. Hitler outwardly presented himself as a Catholic "Christian," and at the insider level was a rabid neo-Teutonic occultist. And the Third Reich constituted the incarnation of the Vatican/Jesuit goal of recreating the Holy Roman Empire of the Germanic Nation as laid out by Jesuit Superior General Ledochowski; I recommend reading Edmond Paris's brilliant analysis starting at sec. V, ch. II: https://archive.org/details/secret-history-of-the-jesuits-1983-edmund-paris/Secret%20History%20of%20the%20Jesuits%20%281983%29-Edmund%20Paris/page/123/mode/2up
This is going to be a very interesting series. Great idea!
Thank you, Michael -- appreciate your support!
Don't expect any. Corrective moral/ theological actions from the six Supremes who are members of the esteemed lay organization, Opus Dei.
This order was founded in Spain by the Lawyer/Priest. Jose Maria Escriva, Francisco Franco's chief legal and spiritual advisor.
Thanks for the summary, SDBR. My next post in this series will indeed touch on the "right wing" of the Jesuit/Maltese dialectic (though Opus Dei is a matter I need to conduct additional research on) -- need to finish up another project ATM, and should subsequently proceed to speedrunning this expose compilation for the remainder of this week.
I am sceptical. You need to provide in context video clips and in context, evidenced quotes…
AOC is not a Catholic.
I see where you're coming from, though please bear in mind that the outward religious garb of "Catholicism" is only the "exoteric" watered-down, compromised ideology given by the Vatican insiders to the "masses." At the insider level, the Vatican/Jesuit/Maltese power are at the highest Satanic rankings imaginable. Remember that the true subject of veneration in Catholicism is "St. John" -- to the everyday Catholic, this is presented as John the Baptist or John the Apostle/Evangelist, but the insider initiates all know that this is only a facade to mask the true identity: Janus. And Janus in turn is a facade for the devil, because the two heads of Janus correspond to the "dialectical"/"dualist" sides of the dragon: Satan as the "dark" side and Lucifer as the "light" side.
So it's ultimately silly to debate over whether AOC is a "real" Catholic, because the vast majority of hundreds of millions of Catholics don't even understand what they believe, unfortunately -- if they knew what the Vatican knows, they wouldn't be Catholics, but they are hid from the truth and their sincerity is abused so their spiritually-coerced almsgiving helps fund the Vatican power structure.
Remember, Codex Vaticanus -- one of the main Alexandrian texts used as the basis for modern Bible translations -- was/is at the heart of the Vatican library and omits from it the Pastoral Epistles. Of course, the outward garb of Catholicism accepts the canonicity of those three Pauline letters, albeit the watered-down Vulgate/Douay version which i.e. modifies "latter times" to "last times" in I Tim. 4:1. Remember that Marcion's Gnostic canon also omitted the Pastorals -- at the insider Vatican level, they completely reject the Pastorals, but to the outside is presented a watered-down version so the masses don't get *too* suspicious.
The Catholic Church is a community of faith. Those who deny any dogma of the faith are outside the Church. AOC denies all the core beliefs of the Catholic Church. She’s no more a Catholic than I am a member of NARAL. It’s not complicated.
Yes, well-meaning, sincere Catholics who seek after God first and foremost are a community of faith, and I greatly respect them.
That said, Catholicism in its mainstream outward form is only a facade hiding an inner occult agenda as most modern religious systems are. The sincerity of the masses are maliciously abused by the higher initiates -- using priests, cardinals, and bishops as proxies -- to spiritually enslave the laity.
First off, the origins of Catholicism were founded on a negation of apostolic Christianity's Jewish foundation. The Quartodeciman dispute in the 2nd century is key proof of this: the apostolic bastion in East Minor led by Polycarp and Polycrates affirmed -- as direct disciples/students with links to the Apostles themselves -- that the 1st-century primitive Christians kept the Jewish feast days in an antitypical manner, namely Passover on Nisan 14 in the matza-and-grape juice ceremony annually (NOT weekly!). This apostolic tradition as taught by Jesus Christ in the Last Supper as His "blood of the new testament" (Mark 14:24, Matt. 26:28, Luk. 22:20) was rejected by the Roman pontiff Victor I who instead demanded Christians venerate the pagan Feast of Ishtar (Easter) instead. In fact, it was for this reason that the Gregorian calendar was invented by the Vatican -- where as Nisan 14 could fall on any day of the week, the papal calendar was manipulated to align the syncretist "Christian Easter" into always falling on a Sunday.
Also, the only alleged "2nd-century" document which supports papal teachings are the Epistles of Ignatius which were proven to be 3rd-century papal forgeries. The real Ignatius could in no wise have commanded Asia Minor Christians to "all follow the bishop even as Jesus Christ the Father" (Epistle to the Smyrneans, ch. VIII), because if that was the mainstream thinking of the Asia Minor Christians in the EARLY 2nd century, why did Polycrates in the MID-2nd century defy the Roman bishop's command to abandon Quartodecimanism?
You also have the Catholic veneration of the "Queen of Heaven," a phrase found in the Book of Jeremiah identifiable as a pagan idol the Hebrews were condemned by Jehovah from bowing down to. The list goes on and on...
Nice skewering of AOC. Few deserve it more, and you're right about Massie and Tlaib.
I don't get the Jesuit references, though. I don't think the reason any of those congresscritters support Israel due to any Jesuit background, but to sheer grift on the one hand, and foolish imperialist dreams on the other. As for Hitler, he used the Jesuits' methods, not their ideology. It was not as if he took Christianity seriously.
Hello, OB, glad to see you around, and I get where your inquiries come from.
First off, the entire global power structure points upward to the Jesuit/Maltese occultists at the top -- all those fronts operate as gateways to the highest secrets of the "Catholic" Roman hierarchy. As to U.S. politicians, yes, I agree with your point (only) in the basic sense that the Jesuit-Zionist connection here isn't "direct," though the chain of manipulation/control does stem from Jesuit orders --> Anglo-Masonic circles --> Zionist leaders --> AIPAC --> U.S. politicians in this or some likewise manner, from my knowledge/intuition of examining NWO patterns. Zionism is an Anglo-Jesuit operation to accomplish the purpose of driving a wedge between Jew and Arab until both are desperate enough to bow down to the Papal Caesar and agree to hand over Jerusalem to the Vatican (or something along those lines of accomplishing a "neo"-Templar global control agenda).
Hitler was Jesuit-influenced and controlled. The Third Reich's outward "animosity" towards Jesuits was highly superficial when their ideology came directly from Jesuit ideologues -- German Jesuits (Georg M.?) Pachtler and Hermann Muckermann laid the eugenic groundwork for Nazi racialism, for example. (Leo H. Lehmann, "Behind the Dictators," ch. I -- https://archive.org/details/LeoHerbertLehmanBehindTheDictators/page/n7/mode/2up?view=theater) As to Hitler "not taking Christianity seriously," that's 100% true, but you need to understand the full story -- Jesuitism is not Christianity. Hitler outwardly presented himself as a Catholic "Christian," and at the insider level was a rabid neo-Teutonic occultist. And the Third Reich constituted the incarnation of the Vatican/Jesuit goal of recreating the Holy Roman Empire of the Germanic Nation as laid out by Jesuit Superior General Ledochowski; I recommend reading Edmond Paris's brilliant analysis starting at sec. V, ch. II: https://archive.org/details/secret-history-of-the-jesuits-1983-edmund-paris/Secret%20History%20of%20the%20Jesuits%20%281983%29-Edmund%20Paris/page/123/mode/2up