The Syrian people reelected Assad in 2021; al-Jewlani meanwhile bans Syrians from voting
Replacing the Lion of Damascus with an al-Qaeda stooge of the nazijewish genocidal complex *maybe* wasn’t a great idea.
[warning: incoming sardonic jabs exceed EPA-recommended limits and may induce autistic symptoms of chronic Tylenol (do NOT click here!); proceed with caution]
Many people, especially in the West (read: befuddled idiots), believed that Bashar al-Assad was the hindrance to Syrian democracy and that a post-Assad Syria would yield freedom-cherishing liberty for the people of Syria. Apart from the superficially innate propensities for sectarian massacres of Christians, Alawites, Shi’a, Druze, Kurds, and non-jihadist Sunnis, what could possibly go wrong?
Recently, the al-Qaeda occupied Syrian capital of Damascus held “elections.” At last, a free and democratic Syria liberated from the horrors of Assadism would give ordinary Syrians a bottom-up voice to chart their self-determination- oh wait, except it didn’t. Instead, Syrian citizens were completely banned from voting:1
Regional electoral committees will select 140 seats out of Syria’s 210-seat parliament, rather than citizens directly voting for members of parliament. The committees have been appointed by the Supreme Election Committee.
The other 70 MPs are set to be selected personally by Syria’s interim President Ahmad al-Sharaa, the former Al-Qaeda chief known previously as Abu Mohammad al-Julani.
Yes, you most definitely read that right! One-thirds of the parliament members are to be autocratically selected by Abu Mohammed al-Jewlani while the remaining two-thirds were picked by so-called “regional electoral committees.” That is of course an utterly meaningless buzzword, as in reality those “committees” comprise ~6,000-7,000 members of 140 “electoral colleges” spanning five dozen districts, hand-picked by a subcommittees in turn hand-picked by eleven members of the “Higher Committee for the Syrian People’s Assembly Elections” (another bogus euphemism!) which was selected by none other than al-Jewlani previously in June of this year.234 Right from the very start, the procedural setup smacked of “[concentrating] power in Sharaa’s hands and lacks representation for the country’s ethnic and religious minorities.”5 The al-Qaeda, humanitarian-bastard “government” claimed this undemocratic power grab was obviously necessary due to the debilitated conditions of sectarian fractures, displacement, and lack of population tracking data, all without acknowledging their chiefly principal responsibility for creating the instability by overthrowing Assad in December of last year to begin with.6 It’s a classic dialectical power grab routine—create a problem and seize upon the effects of that problem one created to justify an additional power grab masked as “democracy” and “freedom” by sanitizing the synarchist chutzpah as a “deeply complicated matter” and other bull-excrement vain excuses. If that pivot fails, deflect even harder and blame the Ancien Régime!
Again, just to reiterate for emphasis sake: the rubbish “Syrian elections” administered under the watch of Zio-HTS consisted of absolutely ZERO VOTING PARTICIPATION BY ORDINARY SYRIAN CITIZENS.78
(The New York Slimes’s reporting of course followed up on an admission of the obvious with an immediate “but evil bad meanie Assad D1cTaT0RsH!P” pivot9)
Considering HTS’s obvious credentials as an ideological product of none other than al-Qaeda (constituting a consolidated rebrand of Jabhat Fateh al-Sham, a rebrand of Jabhat al-Nusra, a longtime al-Qaeda affiliate originally founded as the regional “Syrian” branch of ISIS), it should be no surprise then to see that Jewlani hasn’t exactly lived up to any profession of “diversity-friendly”10 “inclusiveness”11 (apart from accommodating the foreign-national pan-jihadist Judeonazi-funded illegal aliens who helped al-Qaeda/ISIS/HTS slaughter indigenous Syrians).
Back in January of this year, the freedom-championing al-Qaeda leader assured not only an inclusive transitional government but the culmination of “free and fair elections.”12 He spoke less than two months later of a hope for “new history for Syria, where we replace oppression with justice.”13 That is, if one completely brushes aside the massacres of thousands of Alawites and Christians by the ziosalafist jihadi extremists. Then a terrorist attack against a Damascus church erupted, which Jewlani portrayed as a flimsy security lapse in a “condolence” statement never using the word “church” or “Christian” once.14 What purely strange coincidences!
In any case, the fact of the matter here is that the most recent Syrian “elections” entail absolutely zero participation from the everyday Syrian people whatsoever—it’s nothing more than an al-Qaeda’s front’s front’s front organization oligarchically dominated by pseudo-“Islamic” Muslim Brotherhood salafi-jihadis selecting their fellow ideologically adjacent pan-Islamist reactionaries with a few superficial shades of tokenist “diversity.” The Cradle relayed an election observer’s summary that the produced parliament was “overwhelmingly Sunni Muslim and male,”15 “overwhelmingly religious conservatives” (read: pan-jihadist reactionaries),16 as did Reuters confirm the fractionally minuscule representation of minorities—out of the 140 seats, only six went to women contenders and ten total for ethnic minorities that included Kurds, Christians, and Alawites.17 The cycling chaos between al-Qaeda/HTS and the Druze (Sweida) as well as the Kurds (Hasakah, Raqqa) was seized upon as a convenient pretext to exclude those provinces from election inclusion for “security” reasons,18 and Assad supporters were also disenfranchised.19 Even the ethnic minority members who participated at all as candidates were hardly tantamount to universal representation of their “own” communities, i.e. the Druze.20
Additionally, per Associated Press, the bulk of the Syrian people had no clue those phony “elections” were transpiring (since the voters in the rigged parliamentarian selection process were not the millions of Syrian citizens to begin with).21 Free and democratic Syria indeed.
Say, where’s that so-called “pro-Palestine” community speaking out against the Zionist-created al-Qaeda occupation regime in Damascus not only appeasing the nazijewish Fourth Reich but also trampling on Syrians? That’s right, they’re resoundingly crickets, because the cabal’s script beckons them to ignore Syria. You see, the so-called “mujahideen” (whether it’s the Muslim Brotherhood manifesting as “Hamas” in Gaza or “HTS” in Syria or “Taliban” in Afghanistan, in any case all Zionist-created) are such illuminated grandiose vanguards of the universe that they can do absolutely no wrong whatsoever and no one in the anti-Zionist community is allowed to criticize them, just as all skepticism of Nazi Jews must be censored in the mainstream sphere of discourse lest poor snowflake bubbles are poked at.
In a nutshell: an al-Qaeda terrorist group funded by Nazi-“Israel” morphs into a syncretistic rebrand whose militant comprisal are 25-30% foreign nationals (a.k.a. illegal migrants), which then illegally goes about a coup d’etat overthrowing the Syrian nation before quickly handing new lucrative administrative positions to its foreign jihadists given Syrian citizenship while native Syrian residents are harassed, pillaged, and slaughtered, and this new al-Qaeda freedom-championing “new and free Syrian” government holds farcical elections through an oligarchical process to co-opt the image of “democracy” for the validation of its own pan-jihadist interests.
Lest you are palpably deceived into believing there existed a “Syrian Revolution” in the century we are living in.
Sep. 15, 2025, “Parliamentary elections begin in Syria with citizens barred from voting,” The Cradle.
Oct. 5, 2025, “Syria selects members of first post-Assad parliament,” RTÉ News and Current Affairs.
Raya Jalabi (Oct. 5, 2025), “Syria chooses first post-Assad parliament,” Financial Times.
David Gritten (Oct. 7, 2025), “Syria acknowledges ‘shortcomings’ in number of seats won by women at election,” BBC News.
May 10, 2025, “Syria holds first parliamentary elections since Assad’s ouster in contested process,” France 24.
Taylor Luck (Sep. 16, 2025), “Syria holds elections without a popular vote. Why Syrians are still hopeful.” The Christian Science Monitor.
Oct. 4, 2025, “How Syria’s post-Assad election works and who can vote,” The New Arab.
Charlotte Gall (Oct. 6, 2025), “Syria Chooses a Parliament of Revolutionaries,” The New York Times.
Aug. 7, 2025, “Nearly 10,000 killed in Syria since ‘diversity-friendly jihadists’ seized power: Report,” The Cradle.
Jan. 31, 2025, “Syrian interim president vows to form inclusive government,” Deutsche Welle.
Jan. 30, 2025, “Al-Sharaa promises transition to peace, sets political steps to come,” Al-Shafaq.
David Gritten (Mar. 13, 2025), “Syria leader signs temporary constitution for five-year transition,” BBC News.
Jun. 24, 2025, “Syrian Christian leader blames Sharaa government for deadly church attack,” The New Arab.
Oct. 6, 2025, “New Syrian parliament ‘overwhlemingly Sunni, male’ following controlled vote,” The Cradle.
Khaled Yacoub Oweis (Oct. 6, 2025), “Syrian election results ‘ensure Al Shara’s grip on power,’” The National.
Oct. 6, 2025, “First results for Syria’s new parliament show low share for minorities, women,” Reuters.
Jennifer Holleis (Aug. 28, 2025), “Syria’s Druze, Kurds criticize exclusion from upcoming vote,” Deutsche Welle.
Oct. 6, 2025, “New Syrian Parliament Takes Shape as Local Bodies Appoint Legislators Under Post-Assad Interim Constitution,” Foundation for the Defense of Democracies.
Oct. 6, 2025, “Minorities had hoped to break into Syria’s new political order in the weekend vote but few succeeded,” The Seattle Times.
Abby Sewell (Oct. 4, 2025), “Many Syrians are unaware of the first parliamentary election since Assad’s fall,” Associated Press.
Indeed, the "votes" don't matter, what matters is who counts them. It's all a farce to give "legitimacy" to Their machinations. I will persist in calling for a withdrawal of consent and protecting One anOther from bullies, whether in costumes or not.
The GentleOne’s Solution (article): https://amaterasusolar.substack.com/p/the-gentleones-solution
Creating Controversy (article): https://amaterasusolar.substack.com/p/creating-controversy