Indisputable proof that Al-Qaeda in Syria a.k.a. al-Nusra/‘HTS’ were ALWAYS Zionist stooges

Comprehensively extensive compilation.

Prologue: empirical rebranding duplicity [For Dummies]

Syria’s occupiers since Dec. 8, 2024, a ragtag collection of rebranded al-Qaeda freedom-fighting blazing revolutionaries (that is, if you believe the CIA are champions of human rights) who liberated the Levant from the horrors of Assadist secular pluralism and restored the country into a shining virtuous example of balkanization and sectarian death squad rampages, are truly… something.

Extraneous sardonic antics aside, it is important to recollect history (especially modern history, even if older events are difficult and more time-consuming to grasp) with clarity. The so-called “Syrian government” in its current occupied form is a corpse of its Ancien Régime structure now hijacked by an alien spirit into a monstrously hybrid Zionist-Frankenstein creature of perdition that should never have existed. While all mainstream media refer to the Jewlani regime as “Syria,” “Syrian government,” “Damascus,” “Syrian army,” “Syrian forces” et al.—the same common descriptors of the actual Syrian nation under Assad’s rule prior to 12/8/24—any sensible observer would understand that such duplicitous whitewashing and generalizing of the current Zionist/al-Qaeda “HTS” cesspool is fundamentally a cynical propaganda rebranding campaign reflective of synarchist machinery: the hated old “regime” is destroyed by a color revolution, but far from its structural tenets dissolved, its material functionality is hijacked and repurposed for its utility to elevate the syncretic herald of perdition that took over. The media doesn’t even refer to the Jewlani regime universally as “HTS” anymore, instead legitimizing it as the “Syrian transitional government” or “caretaker government” as an extra generalizing euphemism for a rebranded-ISIS vortex of takfiri filth, its occupational presence in Damascus imperially anointed with the blessing as a finally-approved “good Syria” since the bad meanie raytzcheam tyrant Assad is out for good.

And just like that, the rebranding campaign is complete for the outer idiot human masses a.k.a. the catechumen! The concept of Syria and Levant has now been perceptually distorted and spun into being automatically equivocated with the triple red-starred abomination of superficially “Islamic” and so-called “moderate” takfiri al-Qaeda Salafist/Wahhabi death squads passed off under the banner of “Sunni Islam.”

Let’s consider a brief overview of the history of Jewlanism, shall we not?

1. origins—Abu Mohammed al-Jewlani begins his modern career of Zionist-serving terrorism in the 2000s as a foreign national intruding into Iraq to join Al-Qaeda in Iraq (AQI) in its terrorist operations (AQI then morphed into the so-called “Islamic State of Iraq” or “ISI”)

2. magnifying west—after his release from U.S. detention, Jewlani contributes to the formation of Jabhat al-Nusra (or “al-Nusra Front”) as the Syrian branch of ISIS, a rebrand of AQI-ISI

3. intra-takfiri rift—it turned out al-Qaeda and ISIS couldn’t agree on who’s the “real”¹²³ ultimate Salafi-jihadist supreme terrorist cesspool to lead the glorious campaign for overthrowing Assad, as al-Nusra “split” from ISIS and were consolidated into Ayman al-Zawahiri’s al-Qaeda⁴ camp⁵ in rivalry against Baghdadi (though al-Nusra tore off the mask and demonstrated that its “opposition” to ISIS was only an internal takfiri sibling rivalry, because in 2014 they formed a united front with ISIS along the Syria-Lebanon border as their behinds were embarrassingly handed to them by Hezbollah⁶)

4. name rebrand—Jabhat al-Nusra renames itself “Jabhat Fateh al-Sham”

5. name rebrand + merger—“Jabhat Fateh al-Sham” merges with four other al-Qaeda offshoots into “Hay’at Tahrir al-Sham” (HTS) and since 2019 (the year of the Idlib Agreement) quietly is anointed as the Anglo-American-favored (cf. Kit Klarenberg’s important articles here and here exposing MI6 years-long cultivation of HTS military-intelligence apparatuses) anti-Assad “opposition” umbrella all the while sharing a rank-and-file and organizationally tight-knit overlap with the overtly al-Qaeda/Zawahiri-affiliated loyalist holdout Hurras al-Din continuing into the overthrow of Assad

6. identity “dissolution” and ultimate rebrand—the “HTS” official identity is morphed simply into “New Syria” as Jewlani control over Damascus is internationally legitimized as the embodiment of “Syria”

Make no mistake: the Salafi-jihadist, Wahhabi, un-Islamic takfiri ideology never changed, rather its extent of overt emphasis has fluctuated depending on its temporal utility at any particular moment. The rebranded-HTS “New Syria” under the auspices of a superficially “diversity-friendly” Jewlani regime is not some “genuine” reform away from its al-Nusra roots, but rather its ultimate intended trajectory from the standpoint of Parvusian narrative inversion and multi-layered duplicity for its maximized raw utility to obtain legitimized power.

Let us therefore not forget what a certain hexagramic pedophile Nazi cabal (hint! it’s commonly referred to as the “State of Israel”) did to push “Ahmed al-Sharaa” and his al-Nusra terrorist lackeys across the finish line.

I: systematic IDF/al-Nusra collusion

[The Israelis] are supporting the rebels in Syria. It’s very clear. Because whenever we make advances in some place, they make an attack in order to undermine the army. It’s very clear. That’s why some in Syria joke: ‘How can you say that al Qaeda doesn’t have an air force? They have the Israeli air force.’ —President Bashar al-Assad (Jan. 20, 2015)⁷

The Judeonazi regime long claimed to maintain neutrality with regards to the dirty war against Syria—that assertion was always false.⁸ Per 2013-14 reports submitted by workers from the United Nations Disengagement Observer Force (UNDOF) stationed in the Zionist-occupied Golan Heights to the UN Security Council, the IDF maintained persistent contact with extremist Islamists from al-Nusra Front and ISIS. In contrast to Israeli claims of only treating civilians:⁹

…reports claimed that earlier last month members of Israel's Druze minority protested the hospitalisation of wounded Syrian fighters from the al-Qaeda-linked al-Nusra Front in Israel.

When confronted with the report’s implications of scandalous IDF collaboration with al-Qaeda and ISIS, Israeli PR offered an ambiguous non-denial whitewash response constituting a soft admission: “In the past two years the Israel Defence Forces have been engaged in humanitarian, life-saving aid to wounded Syrians, irrespective of their identity.”¹⁰ Their euphemistic framing, “irrespective of their identity,” is an acknowledgement of the brutal truth: the Fourth Reich was lending material assistance to Salafi-jihadist radical mass-murderous terrorists.

IDF bolstering and overt undergirding of al-Nusra/ISIS extremists was not limited purely to field hospital resuscitation of wounded jihadist militants, but extended also to active military operational resource and intelligence sharing:¹¹

The UN report also laid out instances where in Israeli army was seen interacting with armed rebels. In one incident, the report claimed that the IDF gave some boxes to the Syrian armed rebels.

It turned out that “Assadist conspiracy theory” was simply farsighted early coverage—of a reality wholly inconvenient for Western-Zionist narrative propaganda utility—the UN only caught up on documenting a tad bit later. Ha’aretz noted at the time:¹²

The Syrian ambassador to the UN complained of widespread cooperation between Israel and Syrian rebels, not only treatment of the wounded but also other aid.

Israel at first asserted the injured were civilians reaching the border of their own initiative and without prior coordination because they could not obtain suitable treatment in Syria. Later, as the numbers increased, Israel said it was coordinating with civilians but not opposition groups. However, the reports reveal direct contact between the IDF and armed opposition members.

According to a report from December 3, 2013, a person wounded on September 15 ‘was taken by armed members of the opposition across the ceasefire line, where he was transferred to a civilian ambulance escorted by an IDF vehicle.’ Moreover, from November 9 to 19 the ‘UNDOF observed at least 10 wounded persons being transferred by armed members of the opposition from the Bravo side across the ceasefire line to IDF.’

Further reports indicated similar incidents. However, cooperation between the IDF and Syrian rebels that was revealed in UN observer reports does not just include transferring the wounded. Observers remarked in the report distributed on June 10 that they identified IDF soldiers on the Israeli side handing over two boxes to armed Syrian opposition members on the Syrian side.

The last report distributed to Security Council members, on December 1, described another meeting between IDF soldiers and Syrian opposition members that two UN representatives witnessed on October 27 some three kilometers east of Moshav Yonatan. The observers said they saw two IDF soldiers on the eastern side of the border fence opening the gate and letting two people enter Israel. The report, contrary to previous ones, did not note that the two exiting Syria were injured or why they entered Israel.

This specific event is of particular interest in light of what happened on the Syrian side of the border in the exact same region. According to the report, UN observers stated that tents were set up about 300 meters from the Israeli position for some 70 families of Syrian deserters. The Syrian army sent a letter of complaint to UNDOF in September, claiming this tent camp was a base for ‘armed terrorists’ crossing the border into Israel. The Syrians also warned that if the UN would not evacuate the tent camp, the Syrian army would view it as a legitimate target.

Even The Jerusalem Post admitted that Syrian allegations of a Zionist conspiracy were validated after all:¹³

The Syrian ambassador to the UN has long complained of a Zionist conspiracy working with the Syrian rebels to overthrow President Bashar Assad.

Now, a report from the UN Disengagement Observer Force (UNDOF) reveals that Israel has been working closely with Syrian rebels in the Golan Heights and have kept close contact over the past 18 months. The report was submitted to the UN Security Council at the beginning of the month.

The documents show that Israel has been doing more than simply treating wounded Syrian civilians in hospitals. This and a few past reports have described transfer of unspecified supplies from Israel to the Syrian rebels, and sightings of IDF soldiers meeting with the Syrian opposition east of the green zone, as well as incidents when Israeli soldiers opened up the fence to allow Syrians through who did not appear to be injured.

At one point, a small tent city was erected around 300 meters away from the Israeli sector for about 70 families of Syrian deserters, the report said.

Here are additional details from the UNDOF reports, observed back in Dec. 2014:¹⁴

In the most recent report, from December 1, UNDOF stated that it observed soldiers from the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) allowing two individuals to pass from the ‘Bravo’ line – the Syrian side – to the ‘Alpha’ line on the Israeli side. It added, ‘UNDOF sporadically observed armed members of the opposition interacting with IDF across the ceasefire line in the vicinity of United Nations position 85.’

Position 85 is located about 15 miles south of Quneitra and away from any Israeli population centers. It appears to have been a key crossing point for wounded Syrians seeking treatment in Israel. According to the eight previous UNDOF reports, covering the past two years, Syrian rebels often were the ones to hand over the wounded and receive them after treatment.

For example, the June 10, 2014 report details 59 incidents at Position 85 during which UNDOF ‘observed armed members of the opposition transferring 89 wounded persons from the Bravo side across the ceasefire line to IDF and IDF on the Alpha side handing over 19 treated and 2 deceased individuals to the armed members of the opposition on the Bravo side.’

At least some of those being treated are wounded fighters. In the spring of 2013, for example, after the permanent representative of Syria wrote to the UN secretary-general and the president of the Security Council about the reported transfer of injured Syrians to Israeli hospitals, the liaison officer of Israel ‘informed UNDOF that IDF had provided emergency medical treatment to 20 armed members of the opposition.’

It appears that the coordination may have other purposes as well. The June 2014 report notes ‘on one occasion, UNDOF observed IDF on the Alpha side handing over two boxes to armed members of the opposition on the Bravo side.’

When asked whether the Israeli military disputed UNDOF’s reports of direct contact between the IDF and Syrian rebels and shown the relevant excerpts, an IDF spokesman said the military didn’t have any comment on the UN’s observations.

Quneitra, after all, was where Zionist-Nusra collaboration originated, after Jabhat al-Nusra seized the border crossing in Aug. 2014, according to General Rami al-Hassan of Assad’s Syrian Arab Army (SAA); additionally, he added, “Israel provided [al-Nusra] with cover under pretext of ‘shooting back’, hindering the Syrian Air Force and bringing down one of our planes.”¹⁵

In Oct. 2014, FSA/al-Nusra jihadists invaded and captured Daraa with Zionist preemptive facilitation—a government-owned aerial reconnaisance station in Tal al-Hara had faced bombing a month prior by the nazijews; one anti-Assad activist in the “opposition” admitted this bombshell to Al-Monitor:¹⁶

The battle to capture Quneitra on Sept. 27 was preceded by coordination and communications between Abu Dardaa, a leader of Jabhat al-Nusra, and the Israeli army to pave the way for the attack. And according to an FSA commander who partly participated in this battle, the Israeli army provided Abu Dardaa with maps of the border area and the Syrian army’s strategic posts in the southern area.

Although al-Qaeda so-called “rebel” factions were eager to claim—without any proof whatsoever—that they were supposedly undermined by a (nonexistent) Israeli “collusion”¹⁷ with Assad and Hezbollah (and you thought your fever dreams were schizophrenically, beyond-imaginably removed from reality?) in various stints to portray themselves as anti-Zionist, they tore off the mask in 2015:¹⁸

Another great irony is how those very same anti-Assad Jewlani/AQS-bootlicking jeniuses persistently accuse Bashar al-Assad of “secretly colluding” with the Israelis due to his inability to recapture the Golan Heights from Zionist occupation, all the while the anti-Assad “Syrian opposition” (for instance, its figurehead Kamal al-Labawani) publicly flaunted their willingness to accept Zionist occupation over the Golan in return for money and military backing against Bashar al-Assad:¹⁹

Press TV in Mar. 2015 reportedly obtained images proving vis-a-vis coordination between IDF soldiers and Salafi-jihadist militants in the Golan Heights:²⁰

Not only did the Israelis indiscriminately treat al-Qaeda militants in their field hospitals, but those militants—including members of Jabhat al-Nusra and other al-Qaeda splinters belonging to the same violent takfiri/Wahhabi ideology—upon restoration of their physical health were sent back across the border to continue their (un)holy war against Syria, “something that would never happen with captured Hamas or Hezbollah fighters.”²¹

II: Zionism, FSA, and al-Nusra

The Anglo-Zionists were touted frequently as pumping up “moderate rebel” factions within the so-called “Free Syrian Army” (FSA) as a counterweight on the anti-Assad side against ISIS/al-Nusra extremists. However, even while rivalry between the “official” factions’ leaderships from the top-down standpoint may have existed over clout (the alleged ideological disparity was of course exaggerated as the supposed reason for the infighting), FSA militants at the corporeal rank-and-file level easily exchanged affiliations over to al-Nusra. This meant that no matter how outwardly secular-seeming FSA was glitter-coated under the auspices of, its entire functional existence only pipelined a neverending wet dream of strengthening al-Qaeda and ISIS factions, who absorbed FSA members by massive hordes.

In that era, Anglo-American propaganda promoted the preposterous lie that endless support for “moderate rebels” was the vital counterweight to repelling Salafi-jihadist growth, and that Assad’s bombing of the mass-murderous insurrectionist “opposition” was reflective of an alleged plot to “Islamize the revolution to discredit its original legitimacy,” even though funding for “moderate rebel” FSA sub-groups was what contributed to the al-Nusra Salafi-jihadist explosion to begin with. (the “Assad intentionally radialized the opposition to discredit it” argument has, in any case, been thoroughly proven to be utter baseless hogwash²²)

The Guardian reported in Jul. 2012:²³

Almost every rebel brigade has adopted a Sunni religious name with rhetoric exalting jihad and martyrdom, even when the brigades are run by secular commanders and manned by fighters who barely pray.

‘Religion is a major rallying force in this revolution – look at Ara’our [a rabid sectarian preacher], he is hysterical and we don’t like him but he offers unquestionable support to the fighters and they need it,’ the activist said later.

Another FSA commander in Deir el-Zour city explained the role of religion in the uprising: ‘Religion is the best way to impose discipline. Even if the fighter is not religious he can’t disobey a religious order in battle.’

Another article the subsequent year pointed out:²⁴

…FSA commanders say that entire units have gone over to al-Nusra while others have lost a quarter or more of their strength to them recently.

‘Fighters feel proud to join al-Nusra because that means power and influence,’ said Abu Ahmed, a former teacher from Deir Hafer who now commands an FSA brigade in the countryside near Aleppo. ‘Al-Nusra fighters rarely withdraw for shortage of ammunition or fighters and they leave their target only after liberating it,’ he added. ‘They compete to carry out martyrdom [suicide] operations.’

Abu Ahmed and others say the FSA has lost fighters to al-Nusra in Aleppo, Hama, Idlib and Deir al-Zor and the Damascus region. Ala’a al-Basha, commander of the Sayyida Aisha brigade, warned the FSA chief of staff, General Salim Idriss, about the issue last month. Basha said 3,000 FSA men have joined al-Nusra in the last few months, mainly because of a lack of weapons and ammunition. FSA fighters in the Banias area were threatening to leave because they did not have the firepower to stop the massacre in Bayda, he said.

In northwestern Syria, FSA pivotally helped al-Nusra seize Idlib in a jihadist united front that began around April 2015:²⁵

A majority of the media coverage of Jaish al-Fateh’s advances across Idlib has focused on the role of al Qaeda affiliate Jabhat al-Nusra over and above the part played by Syrian opposition factions. Admittedly, Jabhat al-Nusra and its close ally Jund al-Aqsa have indeed played a key role in frontline operations in Ariha and previous battles in Idlib city, Jisr al-Shughour, Al-Mastouma and many other Idlib fronts. However, according to interviews with multiple commanders involved in Jaish al-Fateh operations, it has in fact been more expressly Syrian factions that have lent the most combined manpower and led much of the decision making within the operations room. Faylaq al-Sham and Ahrar al-Sham — two groups increasingly close at both leadership and ground level — have been particularly central. Moreover, none of the major victories in Idlib since early-April would have been possible without the crucial rearguard actions of U.S.- and Western-backed FSA units and their externally-supplied artillery shells, mortars and American-manufactured BGM-71 TOW anti-tank missile systems.

…the depth of coordination between Western-backed FSA factions, Islamists, Jabhat al-Nusra and other jihadists has increased markedly in Idlib since April, both due to a natural need for cooperation on the ground, but also thanks to a tacit order to do so from the U.S.- and Saudi-led coordination room in southern Turkey. Having spoken extensively with leading commanders from across the Syrian spectrum in recent weeks, it is clear this cooperation has at least partly been motivated by a desire to ensure victories in Idlib do not become strategic gains for al Qaeda. After all, it has been starkly clear since the summer of 2014 that Idlib in particular represents Jabhat al-Nusra’s most valuable powerbase.

Additional documentation of the FSA/AQ connection can be found here. There is also this story that is of vital relevance.

Zionist sponsorship of Fursan al-Joulan

The primary anti-Assad jihadist “opposition” faction most publicly acknowledged as a partner in collusion with the Israelis was Fursan al-Joulan,²⁶ an FSA offshoot/splinter exposed in a 2017 Wall Street Journal article as a consciously direct beneficiary of undoubted Israeli patronage:²⁷

‘Israel stood by our side in a heroic way,’ said Moatasem al-Golani, spokesman for the rebel group Fursan al-Joulan, or Knights of the Golan. ‘We wouldn’t have survived without Israel’s assistance.’

…

Fursan al-Joulan’s commander, who goes by the nickname Abu Suhayb, says his group gets roughly $5,000 a month from Israel.

…

The office of Israel’s prime minister referred questions to the Israeli military, which didn’t respond to requests for comment on whether it was sending cash to or dealing directly with rebel commanders in the Golan region. It said only that it was ‘committed to securing the borders of Israel and preventing the establishment of terror cells and hostile forces … in addition to providing humanitarian aid to the Syrians living in the area.’

The person familiar with Israel’s assistance confirmed that cash moves across the border but said it goes for humanitarian purposes. However, rebels interviewed said they use the cash to pay fighters’ salaries and to buy weapons and ammunition—something the Israeli military wouldn’t comment on.

…

Fursan al-Joulan, based in Quneitra province, has roughly 400 fighters loosely allied with four other rebel groups on the Golan that also receive Israeli aid, according to the commander Abu Suhayb and other rebels. Some of these other groups are affiliated with the Free Syrian Army or receive other Western funding and weapons.

In total, there are roughly 800 rebel fighters across more than a dozen villages in this area, where thousands of civilians live, fighters said. Many of the rebels and civilians in this area rely on some level of support from Israel, they added.

‘Most people want to cooperate with Israel,’ said a fighter with rebel group Liwaa Ousoud al-Rahman, also fighting on the Golan.

The finer details of Fursan al-Joulan’s relationship with the other Salafi-jihadist terrorists are murky—journalist Richard Silverstein’s analysis asserted that it “undoubtedly has an affiliation with a larger Islamist group like Al Nusra or Al Qaeda,” albeit he had not “been able to determine that yet.”²⁸

Anti-Assadists: Nazisrael’s useful stooges

The very same “rebel” commander—Kamal al-Labwani—who offered to sell out the Golan Heights permanently to the nazijewish state in return for Israeli patronage against Assad appeared to have gotten what he wanted:²⁹

By August 2014, the Times of Israel reported that a FSA commander had ‘collaborated with Israel in return for medical and military support.’ He had entered Israel five times to meet Israeli army officers, during which time he was provided with an Israeli mobile phone, medical support and clothing, 30 Soviet rifles, 10 RPG launchers with 47 rockets, and 48,000 5.56 millimeter bullets.

The following month, al-Labwani turned up in Israel on a 10-day tour. Despite giving lip-service to the cause of Syrian moderates, he criticised the war on IS: ‘Four thousand people have been killed by IS and 400,000 by the regime – who is the bigger terrorist? For me IS is only a small problem, but the Syrian government is a much bigger problem.’ Although al-Labwani and others have been sidelined in the new covert assistance programme to the rebels, their thinking seems to reflect US-Israeli strategy.

In the same month, Israeli journalist Ehud Ya’ari, who once assisted Shlomo Gazit as coordinator of government activities in the Territories, reported the existence of an ‘undeclared truce’ between Israel and al-Qaeda factions in Syria, whose ‘cadres prefer loose, ad hoc cooperation with other rebel factions, including those with ties to Israel.’ Consequently, Ya’ari affirms that Israel will not attempt to ‘disrupt military strength’ of al-Qaeda affiliates for now. ‘Some rebel groups maintain constant contact with the IDF, including frequent secret meetings reportedly held in Tiberias,’ Ya’ari added, emphasizing that they are, however, the ‘moderate’ variety. He admitted that Israel has supplied them ‘a modest amount of weapons,’ including ‘rocket-propelled grenade launchers’.

Proof that HTS was always a Zionist beneficiary

It might be temptingly easy for scoffers to insist that HTS, as a rebranded merger from al-Nusra, is not the same as its predecessor incarnation and that the “HTS” which overthrew Assad later in Dec. 2024 is not directly associated with the Israelis as a provable Zionist stooge.

Please allow ourselves, however, to observe the timing! The merger of Jabhat al-Nusra (at that point having already renamed itself “Jabhat Fateh al-Sham” for PR reasons³⁰) and four other Salafi-jihadist entities into “Hay’at Tahrir al-Sham” took place on January 28, 2017. A few months later, in April of that year (right after a Gladio-style false flag chemical incident in Idlib blamed on Assad’s government), Fourth Reich prime minister Benjamin Mileikowsky vowed to continue Israeli medical treatment of “wounded Syrians,”³¹³² a code word euphemism for the Salafi-jihadists and their collaborationist support base of extremist takfiris situated within Golan vicinity along the “buffer zone.” Take note: this was after “HTS” was already established as the very same Salafi-jihadist merger entity which the Israelis after 12/8/24 suddenly cried duplicitous crocodile tears over to pretend to worry over as “jihadist threats.”

A July 2017 report from the Middle East Review of International Affairs noted that a leader from Fursan al-Joulan (yes, the FSA splinter/offshoot faction overtly given weapons and $5,000/month by the Israelis) admitted openly to the treatment of HTS terrorists in Israeli hospitals:³³

Interviewees still referred to this group as Jabhat al-Nusra, an al-Qa’ida-affiliated predecessor to Hay’at Tahrir al-Sham. Considering that most of Hay’at Tahrir al-Sham’s assets are in the northwest of the country, the continued reference to Jabhat al-Nusra is quite understandable. There is little difference in manpower composition or size between Hay’at Tahrir al-Sham in Jubatha al-Khashab and Jabhat al-Nusra. On the wider Quneitra level, Hay’at Tahrir al-Sham’s most significant presence is in the area of the old, ruined Quneitra city. Abu Muhammad says that Hay’at Tahrir al-Sham wounded have also received treatment in Israel (Conversation, June 19, 2017).

III: Zionist usage of the ‘Druze Card’

Introductory explanation

For a year now, long after Syria was destroyed on Dec. 8, 2024, the Druze population of southern Syria have—out of panicked desperation amidst massacres from Al-Qaeda in Syria (AQS) death squads—turned to the genocidal Zionists and begged them for protection. Yet those same genocidal Zionists in the first place catapulted AQS a.k.a. “HTS” into power. So what is the full story here?

See, dialectical geopolitical manipulation always follows this recurring theme: when the true Ancien Régime obstacle to balkanization is still standing, the Zionist-Masonic elites cannot unleash the fullest dialectical acceleration of chaos that finishes burning down the entire building into the penultimate ashes for the phoenix to rise out of. In southern Syria, the Anglo-Zionist agenda all along was to set up a condition of balkanized death squad anarchy between the so-called “Sunni” and “Druze” canton protectorates whereby the Zionists would play the “peripheral alliance” card and instrumentalize the Druze to pander themselves the enemies of the Salafi-jihadists and hasten the “Zionist Jews vs. Arab-Islamic world” image for the preplanned Sabbatean-Frankist “WWIII” pseudo-Armageddon.

However, that was impossible when Bashar al-Assad was still in power, because in order for the Israelis to even plausibly pump this image of themselves as defending the Druze against a jihadist terror threat, they needed the jihadists to come into power in Damascus in the first place. This meant that from the grotesquely distorted Anglo-Zionist standpoint, they needed to intentionally, with deliberation, support and elevate the Salafi-jihadists into power and facilitate the balkanizing conditions so that the ultra-Zionist Fourth Reich could rush in on the side of the Druze as faux “saviors” claiming to fight against the jihadist extremists. This pretense was wholly impossible to sustain in the mid-2010s because back then the Zionists were diametrically focused on Assad as their existential problem to destroy, and therefore were aligned with the Salafi-jihadists against Ba’athist Syria.

Often times, one might hear Zionist claims of championing the Kurdish and Druze causes, professing the dire need to “protect them from jihadist terrorists.” While the premise—of those ethnic groups and sects needing protection from existential jihadist threats—is technically true, the problem here is that the Zionists are cynical hypocrites when they in utter duplicity claim to oppose the Salafi-jihadists in light of the fact that their nazijewish Fourth Reich pedophile syndicate had deliberately elevated the Salafi-jihadists into power to begin with.

This is always the dilemma and produced quagmire of contradictions for the Anglo-Zionist-Masonic ruling cabal: the Ancien Régime is their true and actual enemy they seek to destroy (be it the late Ottoman Empire, the late USSR, Gaddafi’s Libya, Saddam’s Iraq, or Assad’s Syria) because it is a direct liability to their goals. They seek to destroy the Ancien Régime in order to elevate their dialectical manufactured enemy into power—whereas the former is an actual enemy directly undercutting their aims, the latter is set up to be the artificially manufactured “opposition” in the sense that it ultimately, in its duplicitous form of “opposition,” is part and parcel in facilitating as vital utility the Anglo-Zionist-Masonic end objective. Therefore, when the Ancien Régime is still standing, the cabal must simultaneously in material terms help their soon-to-be “enemy” ascend into power to the demise of the Ancien Régime, but they cannot allow this fact to be too conspicuous or else it would jeopardize their later rebrand game (a.k.a. after the Ancien Régime ultimately is toppled) when they will profess a la “we always were at war with Eastasia.”

Empirical Janus’s machinery: southern Syrian edition (cir. 2014–17)

After the completed destruction of Syria on Dec. 8, 2024, the nazijewish liars and deceivers went about a narrative rebranding campaign to restore their “peripheral alliance” façade and suddenly claim to uphold the Syrian minorities as championed allies against AQS-HTS jihadist terrorists, no longer finding it expedient anymore to openly whitewash/trivialize their overt systematic kinship with al-Nusra/HTS in ambiguously mum or otherwise muffled discomfort as they previously did.

But the 2010s were a different story, because back then the Nazi Jews had to simultaneously claim outwardly to champion the Druze and protect them in the Golan border region, all the while walk a thin PR wire as their Fourth Reich was propping up the very al-Nusra/ISIS terrorists who were an undoubted existential threat all along to the Druze. Let’s first review the documented record, and then arrive at a sound analytical conclusion to make sense of the multi-layered smokescreen fog.

Back in the mid-2010s, the Syrian Druze population were at the time still too acutely aware, too discernible, too intelligence to blindly assume Israeli overtures toward them were sincere. Foreign Policy noted in Jun. 2015:³⁴

The drums of war have now reached the gates of Sweida province in southern Syria, home to the country’s largest Druze population. With a coalition of opposition fighters led by al-Nusra Front approaching from the west and the Islamic State from the east, this minority group is struggling to survive, as it risks becoming a pawn in the geopolitical game being played by the region’s most powerful actors.

One of those actors is Israel. For the last couple of weeks, some Israeli Druze close to the government have led a media campaign to push the country to intervene to protect the Druze. But the majority of the Syrian Druze see this as part of a bigger plan by Israel to use them to create a buffer zone along its northern border and view their intentions with suspicion.

This critical 2015 article documents the tragic fate of what happened to the Druze collaborators with the anti-Assad “rebels”/“opposition”:³⁵

When the conflict began, a rebel Druze group called the Sultan Pasha al-Atrash Battalion emerged in Sweida. The group helped dozens of fighters from Liwa Fajr al-Islam, an Islamist group based in the neighboring Deraa province, to infiltrate villages in the southern province, according to activists in the area. But the group’s fighters were soon captured by al-Nusra Front fighters in Deraa and sentenced to death, opposition reports stated. Though mediation efforts secured the release of some of the captives, the group was soon dismantled. Since the start of the uprising, hundreds of Druze in Syria’s south have been kidnapped, some killed, and others still missing as opposition groups continue to gain control in the area, according to Sweida residents and media reports.

‘Even Druze who do support the opposition groups know there are limits,’ said Talal al-Atrash, a political activist from Sweida. ‘They don’t trust the opposition. They don’t trust the rebels, the [jihadis], al Qaeda, and the countries that have been supporting them.’

‘They saw what happened to the Druze in Idlib, and they saw what happened to the Druze rebels in Deraa. They saw how thousands of civilians from Deraa fled to Sweida, and what happened to the Druze civilians that were abducted and killed in Deraa,’ he said. ‘They saw … what happened to the so-called “liberated areas” that were ethnically and religiously cleansed and are ruled by sharia courts.’

Assad was by contrast understood as a protector, even if imperfect or paternalistic, at least among the patriotic Syrian Druze:³⁶

The relationship between the Syrian government and the Druze remains complicated. At the start of Syria’s civil war, the traditionally nationalist Druze refused to take an active stance against the government, instead preferring the protection of a strong state over a loose collective of secular opposition groups with a now-apparent limited shelf life. Thousands of Druze serve in the Syrian army, and reportedly 3,000 Druze have died fighting for the government, according to members of the opposition. Yet as the crisis dragged on and the government enforced army conscription across the country, many Druze refused, resulting in arrests and limited confrontations in Sweida.

…

…as the opposition advances on Sweida — first with the capture of the Brigade 52 base, a government military base, and then with the heavy attacks on al-Thaaleh air base, located less than five miles outside the city — hundreds if not thousands of Druze have joined forces with local pro-government militias, such as the National Defense Forces and the Syrian Social Nationalist Party, to prevent further advances by opposition groups.

Furthermore, a number of the Bedouin tribes outside Sweida — with which the Druze have a historically antagonistic relationship — have recently begun helping groups like the Islamic State.

Osama Abu Dikar, a Sweida-based journalist and editor in chief of Al Haqiqa newspaper, said the regional players have made a conscious decision to force the Druze to take a side, despite the community’s efforts to stay out of the conflict.

‘It is not a coincidence these events are happening right now,’ he said. ‘For four years, no one ever mentioned the Druze, and now suddenly they are in the spotlight.’

According to Aymenn al-Tamimi, an analyst focused on the Syrian uprising and its various players, any opposition move now made on Sweida will unite all the Druze. ‘One can talk about Druze resistance and [the] conscription of Druze into the Syrian army, but regardless of how they view the regime, for them this [move into Sweida] is an issue of terrorism and has to be fought off,’ he said. ‘The rebels’ goal is to get the Druze to abandon regime control in their region, but that won’t be successful. [The Druze] are terrified, especially after Idlib, of what would happen to them if the rebels took over.’

And the Israelis? Back in Jun. 2015, the IOF refused to send in military support directly helping the Druze fight off al-Nusra and ISIS terrorists,³⁷ all for the same reason that the U.S. never sent direct military support to help the Kurdish separatists when the SDF fought directly with Turkey.

Unlike their duplicitous turnaround theatrics a decade later, when the nazijews vowed to wage a hardline defense of the Druze against HTS and bombed their own Damascus-installed AQS stooges in the name of protecting the Druze, they could not bother providing the Druze sufficient assistance in 2015 against the same Salafi-jihadist existential threat back then.

The FP article fitting concludes:³⁸

‘The Druze are aware that Tel Aviv is supporting the so-called ‘moderate’ [jihadis], including al Qaeda’s [al-Nusra Front],’ said Atrash. ‘The Israelis are playing a double game; they are helping the [jihadis] that are threatening the Druze, while offering the Druze protection.’

‘It is no secret to anyone that Israel’s old dream is to secure a buffer zone that would guarantee its security in the long run.’

The Israelis’ shamelessly duplicitous modus operandi was understood in 2015 and magically forgotten ten years later, after the Syrian Druze cheered on the ouster of their last and only plausible defender and faced the consequential fruits of the very anti-Assad result they demanded. Back in 2015, the nazijewish criminals openly admitted their direct connection to al-Qaeda as they scrambled to explain how they were trying to “protect” the Druze (a.k.a. use them for a so-called buffer zone)—and mind you, this is from none other than The Times of Israel:³⁹

During a briefing with Israel’s diplomatic correspondents at the IDF’s headquarters in Tel Aviv, Ya’alon said that Israel’s ongoing humanitarian assistance to Syrian rebel fighters, a source of growing conflict between Israel and its own Druze population, safeguards the minority population in Syria.

‘We’ve assisted [the jihadists] under two conditions,’ Ya’alon said of the Israeli medical aid to the Syrian rebels, some of whom are presumably fighting with al-Qaeda affiliate al-Nusra Front to topple Syrian President Bashar Assad. ‘That they don’t get too close to the border, and that they don’t touch the Druze.’

There you go! It was none other than the horse’s mouth—the Fourth Reich’s very own defense minister—admitting what “Assad regime apologists” were saying all along: that the Israelis were directly cooperating with and supporting the Salafi-jihadist takfiri extremists. When squared with the fuller picture of what the Druze understood and testified at the time, it couldn’t be more obvious what the nazijewish regime was up to: they eagerly pumped in money, resources, and arms to enable the al-Nusra/al-Qaeda Salafi-jihadists for their utility of perpetually weakening Assad and the Syrian nation, while simultaneously having to manage the liability of relinquishing their leverage over the Druze along the Golan/Quneitra “buffer zone.”

For the genocidal nazijewish savages of Tel Aviv, they desperately needed to dissuade al-Nusra from attacking the Druze not as if the nazijews held any genuine concern for Druze human lives, but because it undermined the “peripheral alliance” outward-facing image of the nazijews and exposed them for what they always were: terrorist-enabling Parvusian enablers of ISIS/al-Qaeda mass-murderous destruction against ethnic minorities. And so, in order to maintain their raison d’être in the Golan and make sure its Druze population wouldn’t unequivocally side with Assad over the nazijews, the Fourth Reich government admitted the obvious part out loud along the lines of, “yes, we are in communication with the jihadi extremists whom we supported all along, but hey, at least we politely asked them not to harm specifically the Druze!”⁴⁰⁴¹

Genocidal nazijews punished Syrian Druze for busting a Zionist-Nusra transit

In at least one point, the local Druze, fed up with the IDF rushing to assist the very jihadist terrorists slaughtering their own people, assaulted an Israeli ambulance carrying a wounded terrorist, killing one and injuring another.⁴² The Israeli reaction? Genocidal nazijewish figurehead Benjamin Netanyahu a.k.a. Mileikowsky furiously rushed to denounce the incident as a “lynching” and vowed to prosecute the Druze mob involved.⁴³⁴⁴

A gag order was imposed on the details of the investigations, because why would the nazijews after all want the public knowing too much about the background context of their own criminality?⁴⁵

Genocidal nazijews persecuted Druze activists for exposing Zionist-Nusra collaboration

The genocidal nazijewish Zionist savages never cared about objectively supporting the Druze—they only wanted the Druze to be sacrificial goats as instrumentalized tools bleeding and dying on behalf of the Fourth Reich “Greater Israel” raison d’être.⁴⁶ From the Zionist standpoint, because it was necessary to manufacture a “pure” binary of “Zionist-aligned Druze vs. jihadists,” any Druze alliance with Assad posed an existential threat to the Anglo-Zionist-Masonic balkanization agenda.

Unlike later in the 2020s when they foolishly clamored for the demise of Bashar al-Assad, the Druze back in the height of the dirty war against Syria were not stupid and para-universally ill-informed. MintPress News reported:⁴⁷

Meanwhile, ‘everyone’ in Hader, a Golan Heights village, believes that Israel ‘tacitly’ supports Jabhat al-Nusra, Channel 4 News reported in May, quoting one villager as calling Nusra jihadists Western and Israeli “proxies.”

When Druze activist Sudki al-Makt set out to expose Israeli collaboration with Jabhat al-Nusra by gathering unauthorized intelligence through a young 19-year-old Druze soldier in the IOF, he was arrested by the IOF for espionage and sentenced to 14 years in prison in 2017 amidst a hunger strike.⁴⁸⁴⁹

His crime? Being a “spy” for posting his recorded videos, along with comments, to Facebook and YouTube exposing Israeli coordination with jihadists.⁵⁰ Take careful note: al-Makt was charged with “assisting an enemy during wartime” because he was alleged to have plotted to share intelligence on Israeli operations with the Syrian Assadist government.⁵¹ This right here is the slam-dunk proof of the very reality denied by Jewlanists: Nazisrael all along considered Assad to be its enemy.

Al-Makt was apparently also arrested by the IOF during 2018 and sentenced to house arrest (along with a fine of 5,000 shekels) for vocally protesting an Israeli football match next to his house:⁵²

‘Israel does not have the right to organise Israeli football league matches in this stadium which is on occupied Syrian territory,’ he told Golan crowds.

The crowds supported him in his position and prevented the teams from entering the stadium to play the match.

‘Playing this match in this particular stadium would mean that Al Golan Heights are Israeli land and Israel has the right to annex it,’ he added. ‘This is absolutely not the case and the Golan Heights is purely Syrian occupied territory over which Israel does not have any right,’ he said.

This is the kind of Druze whose remembrance is thrown into the memory hole ever since Dec. 8, 2024, a patriotic Syrian who went out of his way to stand for his country against Zionism and Wahhabism. When he was released from Fourthreichi prison early in Jan. 2020, residents of the Mas’ade village in the Golan Heights visibly welcomed al-Makt’s return.⁵³

Pro-Assad and anti-Assad Syrian Druze concurred in 2015: Zionist occupiers must go!

Worldcrunch noted in July of that year:⁵⁴

Though many Druze communities in Israel have urged the country to intervene on behalf of their brethren in Syria, Druze living in the 70% of the Golan Heights under Israeli occupation largely reject Israeli support. Speaking to Syria Deeply, Golan residents said locals are split down the middle towards the regime of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad: some are still loyal to Assad while others support the four-year uprising against him.

But they tend to agree in their opposition to Israel’s occupation of the territory and potential involvement in the Syrian war, according to Yasser Khanger, a Majdal Shams-based poet and activist. He says many locals accuse Israel of ‘trying to exploit’ the ongoing civil war in order to strengthen its grip on the Golan.

‘We see that Israel is using Syrian suffering to promote the idea that it is a humane country,’ Khanger told Syria Deeply. ‘In the Golan, we all oppose any alliance with Israel under any conditions. Israel cannot be concerned with the well-being of Syrian Druze while it occupies part of that group and supports the groups that slaughter Druze.’

ISIS: Israeli State?

Not only were al-Nusra and the al-Qaeda-absorbed “moderate rebels” operating in the vicinity of the Golan Heights, but ISIS was present also. Even when situated at close proximity to the Fourth Reich along the Golan border, no direct fighting emerged between “Israel” and DAESH, as if the two quietly agreed to a nonaggression pact.⁵⁵ According to openDemocracy:⁵⁶

Israel has during the Syria civil war authorised airstrikes in Syria multiple times. These airstrikes however have aimed not at ISIS, nor al-Nusra or other Sunni jihadist groups. These strikes have overwhelmingly been targeted at the assets of Shia-affiliated groups, predominantly Hezbollah.

IV: Moschutzstaffelad/Jabhat al-Nusra assassination of scientist Aziz Azbar

From the very start, Israeli coordination and collusion with al-Qaeda “rebels” almost certainly entailed intelligence-sharing—Foreign Policy’s mid-2014 article that sanitized the anti-Assad jihadist factions Nazisrael cultivated ties with as “moderate rebels” nonetheless stated that one of the bridges was:⁵⁷

…potentially extracting a valuable vein of intelligence on the activities of President Bashar al-Assad’s army as well as extremist opposition forces within Syria.

Per Press TV in Jan. 2015:⁵⁸

Citing reports on Syrian opposition websites, the Haaretz newspaper said that the [anti-Assad] militants operating in the Golan Heights ‘provide ongoing intelligence information to Israel, and also receive help from the latter in the form of weapons and military training.’

It was noted above in sec. I that intelligence sharing and direct coordination between the Zionist regime and Jabhat al-Nusra has been corroborated by internal “Syrian opposition” admissions re. the Oct. 2014 al-Qaeda takeover of Tal al-Hara in Daraa Governorate.

Aug. 4, 2018: yet another murderous Zionist plot against Syria unfolded

On that day, Syrian scientist Aziz Azbar was killed from the blast of an explosion device planted inside his car in the city of Masyaf, situated in Hama Governorate. Azbar was, according to The Washington Post, a research director at the Scientific Studies and Research Center in Syria, a longtime target of Mossad attacks.⁵⁹

Syrian accusations of Mossad orchestration behind the assassination of Azbar were corroborated by an independent Middle Eastern intelligence confirmation relayed to The New York Times:⁶⁰

In this case, the accusations were well founded: The Mossad had been tracking Mr. Asbar for a long time, according to the Middle Eastern intelligence official.

The Israelis believed that Mr. Asbar led the secret unit known as Sector 4 at the Syrian Scientific Studies and Research Center. He was said to have free access to the presidential palace in Damascus and had been collaborating with Maj. Gen. Qassim Suleimani, commander of Iran’s Quds Force, and other Iranians to begin production of precision-guided missiles in Syria by retrofitting heavy Syrian SM600 Tishreen rockets.

Mr. Asbar was also working on a solid-fuel plant for missiles and rockets, a safer alternative to liquid fuel.

…

As one of the directors of Syria’s Scientific Studies and Research Center, Mr. Asbar had for years been active in the Assad regime’s chemical-weapons production program, working mainly in Al Safir, outside of Aleppo, and in the city of Masyaf, west of Hama, farther to the south. He was also involved in coordinating Iranian and Hezbollah activities in Syria, according to the intelligence official.

More recently, as leader of Sector 4, Mr. Asbar was primarily engaged in adapting Syria’s arsenal of low-technology rockets to make them capable of striking long-range targets with far greater accuracy — a danger that Israel has devoted enormous energy and resources to countering.

The NY Times notes that in Sep. 2017—the previous year—the Zionist regime destroyed the Masyaf weapons factory where Azbar was one of the senior manager, and that in spite of joint Syrian-Iranian efforts to rebuild it underground, production machines were destroyed in a Jul. 23 missile strike.⁶¹

It is critical to briefly understand for a moment why Azbar was intensely reviled and despised by the Anglo-Zionist-Wahhabi empirical cabal: the demise of the Soviet Union undercut Syria’s once-prestigious airspace patrol as the post-USSR Russian government blocked the sale of newly advanced combat aircraft (particularly the MiG-31 interceptor) that the Syrian Assadist government sought to obtain in order to counter Israeli F-15s⁶²—Azbar rigorously strove to improve Syrian missile precision that would have made his home country government’s military capabilities too strong for the Anglo-Zionist-Masonic hegemony to permit, and so he was liquidated.

What is all the extra intriguing about this case study is that not only did SANA (the Syrian state media outlet, at the time run by the Assadist Ba’ath Party and since Dec. 8, 2024, occupied by the Zionist-installed HTS regime) blame Mossad for the murder (which, as shown above, was corroborated by an anonymous second witness to the NYT), but Syrian state affiliates extensively alleged that the targeted assassination of Azbar entailed Israeli collaboration with the Abu Amara Brigades, one out of many awash Salafi-jihadist splinter offshoots from the FSA/al-Nusra “opposition” umbrella of indisputable terrorists. Al-Watan stated that there were two hitherto instances of Syrian authorities busting local Mossad-recruited cells deployed to spy on Azbar’s whereabouts, and that the Abu Amara Brigades—which reportedly claimed responsibility for the assassination—operated on Zionist behalf.⁶³

Mashregh News reported of the interview testimony of a Syrian field source:⁶⁴

A field source in an interview with the East referred to the details of Dr. Aziz Esber’s martyrdom and added: ‘The car carrying Dr. Saber was on the way to the city of Hama, which was targeted in the “Tar-e-Qarawo” area in the planned terrorist operation.’

Explaining that the scientific position and power of martyr ‘Aziz Asbar’ had become a nightmare for the Zionist regime, he stated: [‘]Dr. Asber was aware and the mahram of the secrets of the missile power of the Resistance Front, and this issue severely bothered the Zionists because they witnessed an increase in power in this sector on a daily basis.[’]

…

He said that the responsibility for coordination between the scientific circle of the Resistance Front had been entrusted to the martyr ‘Azir Asbar’ since the end of 2015, adding, ‘The Zionist regime, with a missile attack on the scientific research center of the media, had intended to assassinate this special scientific and military figure who had failed.’

The field source said that the Zionist regime’s spy service was the main cause of this assassination, saying that the terrorist elements of ‘Sariyah Abu Amara’, who are the mercenaries of the Zionists, carried out this terrorist operation in the region.

He stated that elements of the terrorist group ‘Sariyah Abu Amara’ have received special training by the Zionists in recent years to assassinate important political and military figures of the Resistance Front, and a number of commanders of the Syrian army and the Palestinian Quds Brigade have been martyred in the provinces of Aleppo and Hama.

‘Sariyah Abu Amara, terrorist elements carry out their assassinations by embedding booby traps on the path or predicted places, which are taking place suddenly and surprisingly.[’]

From what can be pieced together of how the Israelis and Abu Amara publicly responded: on the Zionist side, defense minister Avigdor Liberman scoffed at the accusation⁶⁵ while then-intelligence minister Israel Katz cheered the targeted killing without commenting on Mossad responsibility⁶⁶ (since the Fourth Reich doesn’t admit publicly to such operations anyways⁶⁷), while actual responsibility was claimed, apparently solely, by Abu Amara. Given the fact that Syrian state accusations were already validated on the first half, it is not a baseless stretch to assume the second half of their accusation—Zionist/Abu Amara collaboration—was also factual.

According to The Times:⁶⁸

Mr Asber’s death was claimed by the Abu Amara brigade, a rebel group based in the northwest province of Idlib…

However, although the Abu Amara brigade has claimed previous operations behind regime lines, doubt was immediately cast on whether it had a sufficiently sophisticated apparatus to kill Mr Asber. His role meant that he would operate with a close security detail.

Is there any additional evidence to substantiate the alleged relationship between the Zionists and Abu Amara? While direct evidence is lacking within the public sphere of gatekept informational flow, there is at least one additional clue.

Abu Amara: al-Qaeda ally of al-Nusra 2.0 a.k.a. ‘Jabhat Fateh al-Sham’ (2016)

According to that same article from The Times, Abu Amara Brigade’s members flocked to the Idlib-based HTS merger organization after its Jan. 2017 formation.⁶⁹ (reportedly in May of that year⁷⁰) Previously in 2016—prior to the formation of HTS, and when Jabhat al-Nusra had already renamed itself “Jabhat Fateh al-Sham”—reports implicated Abu Amara as a collaborator of Fateh al-Sham in their jointly perpetrated war crimes against the Syrian residents of Aleppo: as tens of thousands of people departed from terrorist-controlled regions as the SAA advanced, Fateh al-Sham and Abu Amara (which are nothing less than al-Qaeda offshoots, mind you) kidnapped and murdered civilians who asked them to leave (even recruiting snitches to report civilians attempting to leave, along with anti-Nusra ideological dissenters in general⁷¹), using them (Zionist-style) as human shields, admitted by none other than the Salafi-jihadists’ longtime American backer John Kerry.⁷²

For additional context: around Oct.-Nov. 2016, as joint Russian-Syrian restoration of Aleppo into Assad’s control commenced, Abu Amara was aligned with Jabhat Fateh al-Sham a.k.a. al-Nusra in an intra-jihadist rivalry with FSA factions until the Syrian government entered to counter them; amidst an SAA siege on east Aleppo, the Assadist government offered both the Salafi-jihadist militants and residential civilians a safe exit out of the city into other jihadist-controlled territory or resettle in government-controlled ones, an offer rejected by the Turkish-backed al-Nusra/al-Qaeda terrorist umbrella.⁷³

V: precedents—a study of al-Jewlani’s mentors Zarqawi and Zawahiri

AQI roots

Abu Mohammed “Ahmed al-Sharaa” al-Jewlani began his Salafi-jihadist terrorism career in Iraq, participating in Abu Musab al-Zarqawi’s Al-Qaeda in Iraq (AQI) which hijacked and co-opted the Sunni Arab insurgency against the American-Iranian occupation. What is known of Zarqawi, other than the fact that he led a civilian-massacring mob of headch*pping savages and that the Bush Administration, Qasem Soleimani, and the Badr Organization intentionally amplified him into the artificially manufactured face of the Sunni insurgency? Let’s see!⁷⁴

Absolutely original (except it isn’t) and staple-jenius behavior right there.

(cf. this also)

Qutbist logic 101: “before we are ready for the long-term final Armageddon war against the Zionist Jews, first we must in the short term help the Israelis destroy their actual enemies until there is no other movement left in the long term to fight Israel except us!”

The case of Zawahiri—what’s new?

Ayman al-Zawahiri, the deputy and successor of Osama bin Laden as the second general emir of al-Qaeda, is a man of contradictions so insurmountably laughable if his notorious life as a Qutbist terrorist didn’t persist so long. He notably could not stand any accusation that Nazisrael was behind 9/11, angrily denying—as fanatical Zionists do—any Israeli involvement, insisting it was a pure al-Qaeda operation:⁷⁵

You are free to decide for yourself if there is any substantially meaningful difference between AQ and the ADL—I won’t comment any further on this comparison:⁷⁶⁷⁷

Anyhow: considering that al-Qaeda/ISIS as Zionist-inspired Qutbist offshoots are nothing more than Nazi-Fascist syncretic movements to co-opt the Arab-Islamic world, it is no surprise of course that Zawahiri is wont for third positionist duplicity, repeating the age-old “Safavid-Crusader” argument as did his predecessors in order to present al-Qaeda as a third position fighting the American-Iranian alliance… yes, the very American-Iranian a.k.a. “Safavid-Crusader” conspiracy that amplified al-Qaeda’s magnification in Iraq and from there into Syria.⁷⁸ You cannot make this up.

Zawahiri’s fraudulent ‘anti-Western’ credentials: rules for thee, not for meEe3e33eE!1!!11!

Despite all those loudmouthed verbal threats against the West and Nazi-Israel, did Zawahiri ever order any materially notable military action against them? Let’s check quickly for the case of the Israelis—wow! Near-zilch at best:⁷⁹

Zawahiri also on numerous instances threatened al-Qaeda terrorism against the West. Although Salafi-jihadist, anti-Islamic takfiri coreligionists are responsible for various terrorism and mass murder sprees especially in Europe, they are not necessarily directly part of al-Qaeda itself and instead are neo-Nazi-aligned stooges of domestic Western intelligence agencies used for internal national security state expansionism raison d’être motives. Al-Qaeda, in terms of its literal organizational existence, decided in Syria NOT to attack the Western Zionist-Crusader occupational forces⁸⁰—this is from 2015, by the way:⁸¹

The leader of al-Nusra Front — the al Qaeda-affiliate group in Syria — insisted on Wednesday that he is under orders from the organization's central leadership not to attack Western interests in Syria, but rather focus on toppling President Bashar al-Assad.

‘The orders from Dr. Ayman al-Zawahiri are we should not attack the West from Syria, because it won't help us, and it may complicate the situation,’ Abu Mohammad al-Golani said, speaking in a rare television interview with the Al Jazeera Arabic-language network.

Yes, you read that right. In 2015—right as al-Nusra terrorists were colluding with the Israelis and receiving IDF field hospital aid in the Golan Heights—none other than al-Qaeda head Ayman al-Zawahiri sent an order to Jewlani demanding no al-Qaeda attacks on the West in order to make sure all of them can erode Syria faster and rid the country of its president, Bashar al-Assad. Zawahiri evidently could not be bothered to curtail his al-Nusra lackeys from colluding with the nazijewish state.

After pedophile Mango Caesar’s 2019 recognition of Israeli occupation over the Golan Heights, a furious Zawahiri on the 18th anniversary of 9/11 agitated for global Islamic terrorism against Western, Israeli, and Russian targets, including a call for Palestinian suicide bombings against Israelis,⁸² a.k.a. the very “brave and noble self-sacrificing jihad against Zionist-Crusader military presence” (/s)… that Zawahiri ordered Al-Qaeda in Syria NOT to preoccupy themselves with at the height of dirty war in Syria. You cannot make up this level of brazenly naked chutzpah (unless you’re a nazijew).

Epilogue: ziosalafists tear off their masks (Sep. 27–Dec. 8 2024)

Zarqawi, bin Laden, Baghdadi, and Zawahiri—at least if their death reports were true—came onto the Anglo-Zionist-Masonic geopolitical stage for their utility and passed into forgotten obscurity after they completed their utility for Anglo-Zionist-Masonic geopolitics. But Jewlani—along with his neofascistic Idlib ilk of Zionist-backed al-Qaeda/ISIS sex-trafficking⁸³⁸⁴ savages—not only remain to this day (as of typing), but were astroturfed into the halls of power in Damascus they never belonged in.

Despite all the lofty talk of so-called Islamic victory and a setback to Zionism from those supposedly “pro-Palestine” mouthpieces (including even many Palestinians) in fervent support of the Dec. 8 coup against Bashar al-Assad, senior “rebel” leader Fahd Masri sent his gushing adoration for the genocidal nazijewish pedophile syndicate in a correspondence with the Arab affairs commentator of the Israeli i24News:⁸⁵

‘Without the blows you inflicted on Hezbollah and Iran, we could not free Syria,’ Masri said. ‘Thank you, Israel. This is an Israeli victory, our brothers and neighbors.’

The Times of Israel noted in its article nearing the eve of the toppling, on Dec. 2:⁸⁶

‘Nobody knows if Iran and the regime would have been weakened without the recent Israeli attacks in Syria, which have allowed us to return and free the lands and the country,’ a man described as an opposition activist from the Aleppo area told Israel’s Kan public broadcaster in comments aired Sunday. Israel has for a long time carried out periodic strikes against Iranian targets and weapons transfers in Syria.

Another rebel figure from the Idlib area who spoke to the network thanked Jerusalem and said the opposition was ‘very satisfied’ with Israel’s actions against Hezbollah and other Iran-backed players. Hezbollah is avowedly committed to destroying Israel.

‘They accuse us of cooperating with you because we were quite happy when you attacked Hezbollah, really happy, and we’re glad that you won,’ the source said.

Both said the rebels had no issue with Israel. ‘We love Israel and we were never its enemies,’ the man from the Idlib area said. ‘[Israel] isn’t hostile to those who are not hostile toward it. We don’t hate you, we love you very much.’

Yes, you read that right: the anti-Assad “rebels,” who cheered Salafi-jihadist al-Qaeda occupation of Damascus since Dec. 8, 2024, consider the sadistically genocidal nazijews—who flaunt their grotesque credentials openly in support of mass-murdering innocent Palestinian human beings in Gaza—as their “brothers and neighbors.” Never mind that ongoing Zionist Holocaust against Gaza!

Where is the “pro-Palestine” movement condemning such nakedly quisling Zionist bootlickers? As my beloved friend Carina Malatesta succinctly inquired last year:

Isn’t that strange.

One must never forget that Bashar al-Assad’s untimely demise was only made possible because of the preceding turn of events for the worst in Lebanon: an Israeli strike assassinated Hassan Nasrallah on Sep. 27, 2024, followed quickly by a lopsided “ceasefire” between Hezbollah (under its new Secretary-General Naim Qassem, who also just so happened to later in Dec. 2024 abandon Syria and quickly urge conciliation with the new al-Qaeda HTS regime) where Hezbollah ceased firing as Zionist bombs against Lebanon would not cease.

When the nazijews—yes, the same nazijews committing an unrelenting and sadistically unprecedented genocide against Gaza—assassinated Nasrallah, the towering legend was revered by pious advocates of human decency in the heart of the Near East and throughout the world, of various ethnic⁸⁷ and religious⁸⁸ backgrounds who understood the price of standing firm in solidarity with humanity’s oppressed and disenfranchised victims of empirical criminality⁸⁹: the Syrian people under Assad-secured government territory mourned his loss as a revered hero, as did residents in Lebanon, Jordan, Iraq, Iran, Yemen, Morocco, and occupied Jerusalem (a.k.a. the West Bank).⁹⁰⁹¹ (Palestinian sentiments in Gaza were noted to be far less uniform, a large bulk selectively grateful for Nasrallah’s defense of their own liberation cause while bitterly angry towards his concurrent defense of the Syrian nation against al-Qaeda extremists⁹²)

Just as in Iraq,⁹³ President Bashar al-Assad at the time declared three days of national mourning in Syria—per Reuters:

In Damascus, residents expressed disbelief over Israel’s killing of Nasrallah.

‘He can’t die. He always dreamed of martyrdom, and while this is fitting, it’s still so hard to accept,’ said Marwa Barkouka. ‘He remains alive, not just as a martyr but because he lives inside us. We grew up with him here.’

…

‘For us, this man was like an entire nation. We had dignity, and now it’s gone,’ said Ibrahim Al-Ahmad, another resident of Damascus.

…

‘For someone of his stature, the entire Arab nation didn’t defend him; they left him,’ said Baker Haidar Al-Wasiti, another Damascus resident. ‘We grew up hearing his voice. We always looked to him to lift our spirits,’ he said.

And one must absolutely never forget which sadists unmasked themselves once and for all as the nakedly execrable Zionist-Crusader scum excuses for human beings they will be shamefully remembered as unto the end of the ages. Not only did the overtly pro-Zionist Arabophobic racist nazijews⁹⁴ and their Islamophobic supporters (i.e. Iranian exile neo-Safavid bedwetters) celebrate the horrific targeted assassination of Nasrallah, but the anti-Assad, pro-Salafist so-called “Sunnis” in HTS/Jewlani-controlled Idlib⁹⁵⁹⁶ and across the world (alongside their Gulf patrons⁹⁷) couldn’t help but burst into pure glee when they heard that the genocidal Israelis took out their enemy for them. AFP reported:⁹⁸

While Damascus condemned Nasrallah’s killing, in areas outside government control, some were celebrating, including in the Idlib jihadist-run rebel bastion.

Please take note: even though in the present era (early Feb. 2026, as of typing), there is supposedly a “pure” binary tension between the “Sunni” Islamist-aligned faction of the so-called “pro-Palestine” movement and overtly pro-Zionist/Islamophobic sides over i.e. Mossad-funded regime change in Iran at the moment, back then—in Sep.-Oct. 2024—they were all on the same side in jubilant cheering at the Zionist targeted assassination of Hassan Nasrallah.⁹⁹ Take a look for yourself!¹⁰⁰¹⁰¹ (in case the tweets ever disappear, archive links are here, here, here, and here)

Marc Zell@GOPIsrael

That’s not just any Israeli TV. That’s Israel’s only conservative channel: CHANNEL 14, where I am honored to appear regularly,

David/Dovid Bashevkin @DBashIdeas

Omg the reaction on Israeli TV is 😂❤️🙌

5:26 AM · Sep 29, 2024 · 2.37K Views

---

3 Replies · 10 Reposts · 79 Likes

Muslim Daily@muslimdaily_

I'm in idlib right now and the Syrians are out on the streets celebrating rumours of the death of Nasrallah, the leader of Hezbollah, aka Hezboshaytan! Just a few days ago Hezboshaytan bombed a village here, today we buried a 1 year old baby and his mother that were killed.

8:45 PM · Sep 27, 2024 · 991K Views

---

260 Replies · 1.3K Reposts · 6.24K Likes

Emily Schrader - אמילי שריידר امیلی شریدر@emilykschrader

Iranian women inside Iran celebrate the killing of Hassan Nasrallah 👏 👏 👏

8:53 PM · Sep 27, 2024 · 771K Views

---

395 Replies · 2.72K Reposts · 16.6K Likes

SabaKhoi سباخويى@saba_khoi

@netanyahu Iranians gather outside the Israeli embassy in London to thank the Israeli army for taking out Nasrallah 😂 ✌️ #IraniansStandWithIsrael @PahlaviReza #isrealthank #KingRezaPahlavi

5:21 PM · Sep 28, 2024 · 44.9K Views

---

52 Replies · 219 Reposts · 774 Likes

The pure chutzpah of Idlib’s hordes of Zionist-applauding filth is that right amidst their naked support for a military campaign by the genocidal Israelis which took out Nasrallah, they simultaneously pure brazen self-contradiction professed their solidarity with the very Palestinians in Gaza, a.k.a. who were killed by those same genocidal Israelis who launched the Sep. 27 strike against Beirut that Idlib’s anti-Assad filth had no problem with:¹⁰²

In Syria’s northern rebel stronghold of Idlib, devastated by years of bombardment that continues even now by Assad-backed forces, communities that only weeks and months earlier had gathered to protest the bombings in Gaza are now posting videos of people beating drums and singing in the streets, some of them distributing sweets.

(Idlib’s finest Jewlanists are, therefore, a peak example of what my beloved friend Arabi Souri has fittingly coined an official term for: humanitarian bastards)

Anyhow, that NY Times article concludes:

One chant amid the [anti-Nasrallah] celebrations made their underlying wish clear: ‘We wish the same for you, Bashar.’

Hold on. Let’s think this through real quick: what does it mean that Idlib’s anti-Assadists wished President Bashar al-Assad suffer the same fate as Hassan Nasrallah? Remember now who 100% without a doubt assassinated Nasrallah: the genocidal Israelis. What then do you think it means that pro-Salafi jihadist bootlicker Syrians (as well as foreign national so-called “Syrians” in the HTS Idlib cesspool) were stating their utmost fervent wish that Bashar would befall the same martyred ends?

Very simple: it shows that Idlib’s un-Islamic, pseudo-Sunni mobs of takfiri savages never cared about “pro-Palestinian” solidarity against Zionism to begin with, because they would have had absolutely zero qualms with the continuation of genocidal Israeli war crimes so long as it helpfully served their own self-centered, ungodly, power-maximalist short-term goals. If they wished the same fate to seal Bashar al-Assad’s life as Nasrallah was killed, would that not resoundingly indicate they were hoping the Judeo-Holocaustic pedophile syndicate would assassinate Assad, or at the very least that they would express zero gripes whatsoever in such a circumstance?

Jewlani, a true ISIS leader, sells out the very Palestinian Islamists who cheered him on

By the way, if you ever encounter anyone throwing the “bUt s3dNayA!11!!!” argument as a Hail Mary failsafe counterargument against Assad, kindly remind them exactly which side was running human slaughterhouses (hint: they started in Idlib; cf. Dan Cohen’s expose here) and the fact that Jewlani repurposed the old Syrian prisons for new and ever-sinister purposes just as the CPA/Badr occupational invaders in Iraq did with Abu Ghraib:¹⁰³

Anyhow, re. Jewlani’s betrayal of Palestine: it was noted that when HTS took over Damascus (thereby killing the Syrian nation once and for all), Palestinians in Gaza were cheering in overflowing celebration upon the news that Assad was kicked out of Syria.¹⁰⁴ One of them was Motasem A. Dalloul, who posted a schizophrenically absurd, fact-free column claiming that Assad colluded with the Israelis to the detriment of Palestine and that the “new Syria” promised by Jewlani would stand in solidarity with the people of Palestine.¹⁰⁵

So how did that turn out? Oh.¹⁰⁶ Oh:¹⁰⁷

Cf. this article by my friend The Dissident; also:

Alas, some Palestinians in Gaza tragically woke up to realize Jewlani/AQS sold them out only when it was too late¹⁰⁸ and the Syrian victims of the AQS Salafi-jihadists supported by their pro-Hamas ranks¹⁰⁹ were no longer alive to forgive them.

Undeniable ultimate bombshell admission

Still don’t believe me because you binge-watch too much anti-Assad garbage from the likes of Mehdi Hasan,¹¹⁰ Owen Jones (cf. this episode on Decline and Fall), Medea Benjamin (cf. this article by vanessa beeley), C.J. Werle-Manhole (cf. my coverage) et al.? Then kindly behold for yourself what a Moschutzstaffelad insider himself was generous enough to admit for all public ears to hear (I’m kind of surprised that Mehdi Hasan of all people asked enough of a hardball question to drag out this incredibly revealing Fourthreichi response):

MEHDI: “…there have been reports that Israel has been treating wounded Syrian rebel fighters in its hospitals on the border, including fighters from Nusra Front, which is of course the al-Qaeda proxy in Syria. Do those reports worry you, that Israel’s… helping wounded al-Qaeda-aligned fighters?”

HALEVY: “As I said before in a different context, it’s always useful also to deal with your enemies in a humane way, and I think that when you have people who are wounded and you can deal with them in a humane way, the considerations as to whether to take them in are not simply whether it’s politically, uh, useful, or whether it’s politically, it’s-”

MEHDI: “So it’s purely humanitarian, you say? There’s no tactical or political strategic-”

HALEVY: “I didn’t say there’s no tactical. I said the main consideration—the immediate consideration—is humane.”

MEHDI: “But the tactical issues involved… I mean, you know better than me the phrase ‘blowback.’ You don’t think there’s going to be blowback against Israel if you get into bed with a group like Nusra Front?

HALEVY: “No, I don’t think so. I don’t think there’s going to be blowback.”

MEHDI: “Why?”

HALEVY: “Because I think that unfortunately the rules of the game in Syria is such that you can do anything that is not able- is not possible to be done anywhere else.”

MEHDI: “Yeah… I think people said that in Afghanistan too. Would you also treat Hezbollah fighters?”

HALEVY: “No. I would not trea-”

MEHDI: “Have you not just contradicted what you told me sixty seconds ago-”

HALEVY: “No, I have not contradicted you.”

MEHDI: “…about humanely treating your enemies?”

HALEVY: “No, no, no, no. I think that as far as Hezbollah fighters is concerned, with them we have a different account.”

MEHDI: “So let me be clear, you would be happy to treat al-Qaeda fighters, but not Hezbollah fighters?”

HALEVY: “We have a different account with Hezbollah, a totally different account, because Hezbollah has carried out the type of actions against us which will preclude us from going into what the al-Qaeda has done. Al-Qaeda to the best of my recollection has up to now not attacked Israel.

MEHDI (flabbergasted): “But it’s attacked your number-one ally and protector and sponsor, the United States of America. There is a ‘War on Terror’ being going on for fifteen years.”

HALEVY: “First of all, when it comes to fighting al-Qaeda in intelligence and in other areas, yes, we are together with the United States on all these things-”

MEHDI: “Okay.”

HALEVY: “…but Israel did not specifically- was not specifically targeted by al-Qaeda and therefore it’s a different kind of account than we have with Hezbollah.”

Could it not be any more patently obvious whose agenda Abu Mohammed al-Jewlani and his DAESH-emblazoned Zionist-Salafist-Crusader lackeys are serving? And yet the “pro-Palestine” cause has decidedly abandoned the Syrian people as if the Alawite, Shi’a, Christian, Druze, and Kurdish martyrs of the Zionist-HTS conspiracy just aren’t worth speaking up for.

Almost inclines to make one wonder what the “pro-Palestine” movement has become.

1. Thomas Joscelyn (May 2, 2014), “Zawahiri makes another attempt at reconciliation in Syria,” Long War Journal.

2. Omar Fahmy (Sep. 9, 2015), “Al Qaeda calls Islamic State illegitimate but suggests cooperation,” Reuters.

3. Jan. 7, 2017, “Who are you calling soft? Zawahiri takes on Baghdadi,” The New Arab.

4. Apr. 10, 2013, “Syria crisis: Al-Nusra pledges allegiance to al-Qaeda,” BBC News.

5. Thomas Joscelyn (May 4, 2014), “Al Nusrah Front says it will comply with Zawahiri’s orders,” Long War Journal.

6. Oct. 23, 2014, “Al-Nusra and Islamic State join forces against Hizballah,” The New Arab.

7. Mar./Apr. 2015, “Syria’s President Speaks: A Conversation With Bashar al-Assad,” Foreign Affairs, vol. XCIV, no. ii, p. 61.

8. Richard Silverstein (Dec. 7, 2014), “Israel Establishes Syrian Rebel Base in Israel, Treats Radical Islamist Wounded,” Tikun Olam.

9. Johnlee Varghese (Dec. 7, 2014), “UN Report: Israel in Regular Contact with Syrian Rebels including ISIS,” International Business Times.

10. Ibid.

11. Ibid.

12. Barak Ravid (Dec. 7, 2014), “UN Reveals Israeli Links With Syrian Rebels,” Ha’aretz.

13. Maya Shwayder (Dec. 7, 2014), “New UN report reveals collaboration between Israel and Syrian rebels,” The Jerusalem Post.

14. Christa Case Bryant (Dec. 7, 2014), “UN reports Israeli support for Syria rebels,” The Christian Science Monitor.

15. Kim Sengupta (Mar. 20, 2015), “Syria civil war: The Israeli hospitals treating wounded soldiers from the violence across the border,” The Independent.

16. Khaled Atallah (Jan. 14, 2015), “Are Israel, Jabhat al-Nusra coordinating on attacks in Syria?” Al-Monitor.

17. Vasudevan Sridharan (May 13, 2013), “Israel Colluding with Iran, Hezbollah and Assad, Say Syrian Rebels,” International Business Times.

18. Ariel Ben Solomon (Feb. 12, 2015), “Syrian rebels call on Israel to bomb Hezbollah-Iran-Syria positions,” The Jerusalem Post.

19. Mar. 16, 2014, “Report: Syrian Opposition Willing to Trade Golan Claims for Israeli Military Support,” Ha’aretz.

20. Mar. 5, 2015, “Photos prove cooperation between Israel and al-Nusra,” Press TV.

21. Asa Winstanley (Jun. 2, 2015), “Israel’s Unlikely Alliance,” Jacobin.

22. William Van Wagenen (Feb. 22, 2018), “Did Assad Deliberately Release Islamist Prisoners to Militarize and Radicalize the Syrian Uprising?” The Libertarian Institute.

23. Ghaith Abdul-Ahad (Jul. 30, 2012), “Al-Qaida turns tide for rebels in battle for eastern Syria,” The Guardian.

24. Mona Mahmood, Ian Black (May 8, 2013), “Free Syrian Army rebels defect to Islamist group Jabhat al-Nusra,” The Guardian.

25. Charles Lister (May 31, 2015), “An Internal Struggle: Al Qaeda’s Syrian Affiliate Is Grappling With Its Identity,” Huffington Post.

26. Jun. 19, 2017, “Israel ‘giving secret aid to Syrian rebels’, report says,” The Independent.

27. Rory Jones, Noam Raydan, Suha Ma’ayeh (Jun. 18, 2017), “Israel Gives Secret Aid to Syrian Rebels,” The Wall Street Journal.

28. Richard Silverstein (Jun. 19, 2017), “Israel Funds Syrian Rebel Weapons Purchases,” Tikun Olam.

29. Nafeez Ahmed (Feb. 13, 2015), “How Islamist rebels engineered Israel’s oil grab in Syria,” Middle East Eye.

30. Richard Silverstein (Aug. 4, 2016), “The Enemy Of My Friend Is My Friend: Israel Accepts Billions From The US, But Maintains Ties With Al-Nusra,” Global Research.

31. Apr. 9, 2017, “Netanyahu says Israel committed to treating Syrian war wounded,” AFP.

32. Apr. 9, 2017, “After Strike, Israel Vows To Keep Caring For Syrian Wounded,” Jewish Telegraphic Agency.

33. Aymenn Jawad al-Tamini (Jul. 3, 2017), “Israel’s Relations with the Syrian Rebels: An Assessment,” Middle East Review of International Affairs.

34. Nour Samaha (Jun. 22, 2015), “Trapped Between Assad, Israel, and al Qaeda,” Foreign Policy.

35. Ibid.

36. Ibid.

37. Amos Harel (Jun. 12, 2015), “Wary of Civil War, IDF Won’t Go Into Syria to Help Druze Mortally Threatened by ISIS,” Ha’aretz.

38. Samaha (Jun. 22, 2015), loc cit.

39. Raphael Ahren (Jun. 29, 2015), “Israel acknowledges it is helping Syrian rebel fighters,” The Times of Israel.

40. Dan Williams (Jun. 29, 2015), “Israel says asked Syrian rebels not to harm Druze,” Reuters.

41. Jun. 29, 2015, “Israel’s defense chief: Help for Syrian rebels is exchange for Druze safety,” Jewish Telegraphic Agency.

42. Jun. 23, 2015, “Druze attack Israeli ambulance carrying wounded Syrians,” The New Arab.

43. Ibid.

44. Jun. 23, 2015, “Netanyahu vows crackdown after ‘lynching’ of wounded Syrian,” Gulf Times.

45. Jun. 24, 2015, “Israel arrests several Druze after ‘lynching’ of Syrian,” Al-Arabiya.

46. Nour Samaha (Jun. 15, 2017), “Long Read: Israel’s Quiet Campaign to Gain a Foothold in Southern Syria,” The New Humanitarian.

47. Alexander Rubinstein (Jan. 15, 2019), “Outgoing IDF Chief Says Yes, We Armed Anti-Government Extremists in Syria,” MintPress News.

48. Assaf Uni (Jun. 19, 2015), “Inside Israel’s Secret War in Syria,” Newsweek.

49. May 17, 2017, “Israeli court sentences Syrian ‘spy’ to 14 years in prison,” Middle East Monitor.

50. Richard Silverstein (Apr. 8, 2015), “The ‘Facebook spy’ who exposed Israel’s support for Syria rebels,” Middle East Eye.

51. Nour Samaha (Apr. 27, 2015), “The curious case of Israel, al-Nusra and ‘Facebook Spy,’” Al Jazeera.

52. Nasouh Nazzal (Sep. 15, 2018), “Israel arrests Golan activist for ‘incitement,’” Gulf News.

53. Jan. 12, 2020, “Israeli-Druze Village Welcomes Spy Sudki al-Makt,” TPSIL.

54. Giacomo (Jul. 6, 2015), “Caught In Firing Line, Syrian Druze Reject Israeli Aid In Golan,” Worldcrunch.

55. “Why is Israel not intervening to counter the Islamic state?” Centre for Geopolitics & Security in Realism Studies.

56. Sam Brennan (May 28, 2016), “ISIS and Israel on the Golan Heights,” openDemocracy.

57. Colum Lynch (Jun. 11, 2014), “Exclusive: Israel Is Tending to Wounded Syrian Rebels,” Foreign Policy.

58. Jan. 21, 2015, “Israel, al-Nusra cooperating against Syria: Media,” Press TV.

59. Liz Sly (Aug. 7, 2018), “Syria accuses Israel’s Mossad of assassinating top rocket scientist,” The Washington Post.

60. David M. Halbfinger, Ronen Bergman (Aug. 6, 2018), “A Top Syrian Scientist Is Killed, and Fingers Point at Israel,” The New York Times.

61. Ibid.

62. Aug. 12, 2018, “Leading Syrian Missile Scientist Aziz Asbar Assassinated; Why Damascus’ Ballistic Missile Capabilities Remain a Major Threat to the Western Bloc and Israel,” Military Watch Magazine.

63. Sly (Aug. 7, 2018), loc. cit.

64. “Details of the martyrdom of the long-time companion of Haj Qasem Soleimani / Who was the mastermind of the Syrian missile and how was it assassinated? + Photo and field map,” Mashregh News.

65. Aug. 7, 2018, “Israel’s Mossad seen as responsible for assassination of Syrian rocket scientist,” Jewish Telegraphic Agency.

66. Simon Kent (Aug. 7, 2018), “Israel Welcomes Death of Syrian Chemical Weapons Expert,” Breitbart News.

67. Halfbinger, Bergman (Aug. 6, 2018), loc. cit.

68. Richard Spencer (Aug. 7, 2018), “Mossad accused of killing top Syrian rocket scientist,” The Times.

69. Ibid.

70. Ahmad Majidyar, Gerald M. Feierstein, Charles Lister (Aug. 6, 2018), “Will US sanctions bring Iran back to the negotiating table?”Middle East Institute.

71. Dec. 9, 2016, “Hundreds of men from east Aleppo go ‘missing,’” Al Jazeera.

72. Louisa Loveluck, Karen DeYoung (Dec. 9, 2016), “Hundreds of men vanish as they flee Aleppo, U.N. official says,” The Washington Post.

73. Ellen Francis (Nov. 3, 2016), “Rebel groups clash with each other in Syria’s Aleppo,” Reuters.

74. Kurt Nimmo (Nov. 10, 2005), “Zarqawi Flubs and Kills Israel’s Enemies,” Signs of the Times.

75. Apr. 22, 2008, “Al-Qaeda: Iran must stop crediting Israel for 9/11,” Reuters.

76. Sep. 28, 2011, “Al Qaeda chides Iran over 9/11 ‘conspiracy theories,’” BBC News.

77. Sep. 9, 2021, “Antisemitic Conspiracies About 9/11 Endure 20 Years Later,” Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith.

78. Thomas Joscelyn (Sep. 11, 2019), “Ayman al-Zawahiri defends 9/11 hijackings in anniversary address,” Long War Journal.

79. Matthew Levitt (2010), “Al Qaeda Targeting Israel: Between Rhetoric and Reality,” Orbis, vol. LIV, iss. iii, pp. 413-25.

80. May 28, 2015, “Al Qaeda orders Syrian front Al Nusra not to attack West,” Business Standard.

81. James Novogrod (May 27, 2015), “Al-Qaeda in Syria: Our Focus Is Assad, Not West,” NBC News.

82. Sep. 11, 2019, “Al-Qaida chief in 9/11 speech calls for attacks on West,” Associated Press.

83. Feb. 15, 2022, “Sextortion stigma stops Idlib’s women from seeking help in the face of online harassment,” The New Arab.

84. Apr. 23, 2025, “Syrian militants enslaving Alawite women in Idlib governorate: Report,” Press TV.

85. Baruch Yedid (Dec. 8, 2024), “‘Israel’s strikes helped us get free,’ senior Syrian rebel tells i24NEWS,” i24News.

86. Dec. 2, 2024, “Syria rebels appear to credit Israeli strikes on Hezbollah with aiding shock advance,” The Times of Israel.

87. Sep. 28, 2024, “Protesters Mourn Nasrallah’s Death Around the World,” The New York Times.

88. Jason Lemon (Sep. 28, 2024), “Nasrallah’s Death Mourned by Lebanese Christian Leaders: ‘Legend Is Born,’” Newsweek.

89. Matt Nashed (Sep. 28, 2024), “‘He was like a father to us’: Hezbollah supporters mourn Hassan Nasrallah,” Al Jazeera.

90. Sep. 29, 2024, “Protests across the Arab world against killing of Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah,” The New Arab.

91. Hudhaifa Ebrahim (Sep. 30, 2024), “Shiites Mourn ‘Martyred’ Nasrallah While Sunnis Quietly Back Israel,” The Media Line.

92. Sally Ibrahim (Oct. 1, 2024), “‘We hated him for Syria, but loved him for Palestine’: Palestinians in Gaza mourn Nasrallah,” The New Arab.

93. Sep. 28, 2024, “Iraq announces 3 days of mourning for Nasrallah,” Middle East Monitor.

94. Polina Ivanovna (Sep. 28, 2024), “Israelis cheer death of arch-enemy Hassan Nasrallah,” Financial Times.

95. Fared Al Mahool, Sophia Yan (Sep. 28, 2024), “Syrians take to the streets to celebrate Hassan Nasrallah’s death,” The Telegraph.

96. Giorgia Valente (Sep. 29, 2024), “Syrians in rebel-controlled Idlib celebrate Nasrallah’s death,” The Jerusalem Post.

97. Oct. 2, 2024, “Arabs across the Middle East delight in Hassan Nasrallah’s death,” The Jewish Chronicle.

98. Sep. 29, 2024, “Syria condemns ‘despicable’ Israeli killing of Nasrallah,” AFP.

99. Oct. 1, 2024, “Nasrallah’s death celebrated across Middle East and beyond,” Jewish News Syndicate.

100. Rachel Fink (Sep. 29, 2024), “TV Pundits Pouring Shots, Public Singalongs: How Some Israelis Celebrated Nasrallah’s Assassination,” Ha’aretz.

101. Sep. 29, 2024, “Pockets of revelry at Nasrallah killing across Middle East, including in Syria, Iran,” The Times of Israel.

102. Erika Solomon (Sep. 28, 2024), “Hezbollah’s Victims Express Relief at Its Disarray,” The New York Times.

103. Maggie Michael (Dec. 22, 2025), “Syrians emptied Assad’s prisons. They’re filling up again, and abuse is rife,” Reuters.

104. Sally Ibrahim (Dec. 10, 2024), “While facing a genocide, Palestinians celebrate Syria’s liberation from Assad,” The New Arab.

105. Motasem A Dalloul (Dec. 9, 2024), “Is the overthrow of Assad good for the Palestinians?” Middle East Monitor.

106. Robert Inkalesh (May 8, 2025), “While Gaza Starves, Damascus Shifts: Al-Shara’a’s Embrace of Israel – Analysis,” The Palestine Chronicle.

107. Jun. 1, 2025, “Israel normalization? Al-Sharaa tells Jewish media: ‘We have common enemies,’” i24NEWS.

108. Nagham Zbeedat (Jan. 8, 2026), “Palestinians Slam Israel-Syria Security Agreement as an Attempt to Rebrand ‘Normalization,’” Ha’aretz.

109. Feb. 2, 2024, “When Israel and Hamas Fought on the Same Side: How Islamist Insurgency in Syria United Them,” Military Watch Magazine.

110. Stephen Gowans (Apr. 21, 2018), “Mehdi Hasan, beautiful soul, and his diatribe against the consequential Left,” Hands OFF Syria.