Why the ‘Israel controls the U.S.’ argument is insurmountably absurd

If you believe that “Israel controls the U.S.,” your own standards would necessitate you to believe that the nazijewish regime has also been controlling Iran this whole time.

According to geopolitical staple jeniuses such as Cenk Uygur and John Mearsheimer, the “only” plausible conclusion to arrive at on the issue of unchecked genocidal Zionist impunity is that “Israel controls the U.S.” and that is all there is to it, relying on the simplistic assumption that if an entity is seemingly granted an endless blank check to perpetrate the worst atrocities against humanity on open air, that can only be because that genocidal entity “controls” everyone else.

Such feverishly contrived psyop garbage can be easily debunked in just one single case study: the Zionist war on Iraq and Syria. Mearsheimer claims in his book about the “Israel lobby” that the Iraq War was driven and promoted by the fanatically Zionist Likudniks who agitated for the Bush Administration to invade Iraq. Yes, this itself is indeed a highly well-documented reality: Ariel Sharon definitely encouraged the U.S. invasion of Iraq to overthrow Saddam Hussein.

However, Mearsheimer himself falls for the Zionist propaganda trap of taking Zionist duplicity at face value as if it credulously constitutes a face-blank honest admission of nazijewish modus operandi. Instead of acknowledging the scandalous de facto Israeli-Iranian convergence in the 2003-11 Iraq War, Mearsheimer completely ignored the fact that the U.S.-Zionist empirical hegemony systematically converged and colluded with Iran throughout the Iraq War, and instead assumes—just as Wesley Clark expounded the objectively misleading impression of—that the U.S.-Israeli Zionist octopus was diametrically focused on a single straight path of initiating the war against Iraq that eventually would culminate in a resolutely diametrical regime-change war against Iran. Their reasoning? Just because the U.S.-Zionists outwardly claim to hate Iran and unambiguously oppose it, that must mean that Iran is a genuine enemy of the U.S.-Zionists and has always been!

The great irony of Mearsheimer, Clark, and co. is that they unwittingly and buffoonishly repeat the very same “axis of evil” propaganda used by George W. Bush that falsely conflated Saddam Hussein with Ayatollah Khamenei as if Ba’athist Iraq and Khomeinist Iran were implicitly allies or confederate entities against Western imperialists, which is absurd—the actual reality was that the Anglo-American Zionist interests colluded and conspired with Iranian intelligence to destroy the Iraqi Ba’ath Party and by extension, Iraqi national sovereignty. Before and after the U.S. invasion of Iraq, the CIA coordinated with the Iranian-loyalist Supreme Council for Islamic Revolution in Iraq (SCIRI) and its military wing, the Badr Brigade (renamed the Badr “Organization” in 2003 for PR whitewash purposes)—along with the Da’wa Party—as their chief useful cudgels to hollow out the Iraqi nation and ensure the imperial “stability” of jointly American-Iranian overseen sectarian managers of enforced permanent sectarianism. The U.S.-backed death squads in Iraq were also Iranian-backed death squads—both the CIA and IRGC sponsored death squads operating out of the Baghdad Ministry of Interior (MOI) belonging to the Badr Organization, a.k.a. Iranian Khomeinist mercenaries, who were indisputably responsible for a wide array of torture and mass murder against innocent Iraqi civilians.

And this is where the “Israel controls the U.S.” crowd falls flat on their face: if the U.S. government is literally controlled in unequivocally obvious terms by the Israelis, why then was the newly established “Iraqi” protectorate regime from 2011-onwards permitted by the United States to gravitate towards an Iranian-orbiting “anti-Zionist” stance wherein PMF sub-organizational factions were handed a green light to incrementally consolidate a hardline “resistance” stance against both the Zionist regime and the U.S.-Zionist occupation in Iraq, all while the U.S. continued to collude with the central Badr-Da’wa “Iraqi government” military-intelligence apparatus? If the Israeli Likudniks controlled U.S. foreign policy, it is utterly implausible that they—according to their own genocidally savage impulsive tendencies—would have masterminded the entire violent regime change against Saddam Hussein’s Ba’athist Iraq only to allow the newly manufactured government to drift into Iran’s orbit, especially in the context of the 2010s when the nazijewish Fourth Reich was supplying an endless stream of tactically logistical, financial, and material support to al-Qaeda and ISIS for the very purpose of disrupting and sabotaging the Syrian bridge between Iran/Iraq and Lebanon/Palestine, by reason of the fact that Assad became dependent on Iranian sacrigoating patronage to materially survive. There is also the fact that Iran’s “anti-Zionist” leaders simultaneously boasted their cooperation with the U.S. in Afghanistan and Iraq all while claiming to stringently oppose the Israelis—if the U.S. occupation of Iraq was purely at lopsidedly the “bidding of Israel,” this means that all of Iran’s leaders in the 2000s were directly serving Israel’s bidding also, either all as unknowing dupes who couldn’t realize an “obvious truth” only grasped by unseasoned geopolitical quacks a la Mearsheimer, or that they were all subservient agents consciously and eagerly catering to Tel Aviv’s behest. Either necessitated corollary is completely absurd in the face of objective scrutiny.

The trail of evidence simply does not prove that “Israel controls the U.S.,” but rather that it is the U.S. regime which dictates the policy of the Israelis. Once the war on Iraq officially magnified into Syria from 2011-onwards, the Iranian-Khomeinist calculus concluded that their Iraqi Sunni Ba’athist “near enemy” was finished, and that their “far enemy” (the nazijewish regime in Tel Aviv) was therefore drawing incrementally near; the Fourth Reich recognized likewise. In that selfsame year, Bashar al-Assad ended his hitherto eleven years of cold war with Iran (due to Bashar’s steadfastly ironclad alignment with Iraq’s very Saddamist-Ba’athist secular Arab nationalists targeted by the U.S.-Iranian occupation for en masse liquidation) out of pragmatic necessity, and accepted patronage from both Iran and the SCIRI-Badr-Da’wa Maliki regime in Iraq—which he previously quarreled with just a few years prior over de-Ba’athification—to stave off Zionist-Masonically manufactured “Arab Spring” insurrections within his home country of Syria.

There can be no doubt that the Zionist-Nazi regime in Tel Aviv wanted to destroy Assad’s Syria just as Saddam’s Iraq was brutally holocausted from 2003-11. Because Iranian-Khomeinist supply lines running through Iraq—passing through Syria onto Lebanese Hezbollah—were materially ensuring the temporal survival of Assad’s government, the Zionists relentlessly bombed Syria from the south while tacitly facilitating and turning a convenient blind eye to ISIS incursions in the northeast which—in conjunction with the anti-Assad efforts of pro-Zionist Kurdish separatists from Iraq’s “Kurdistan Region” (KRI)—crippled and undercut the Syrian nation’s fight for survival in the face of foreign-backed Salafi-jihadist terrorists.

Concurrent to the U.S.’s creation of the “Syrian Democratic Forces” (SDF) in eastern Syria manufactured out of an imperial co-optation and hollowing-out of the hitherto pro-Assad PKK-YPG authorities in the northeast, the U.S. outwardly claimed to be fighting the very ISIS problem they allowed to thrive in both Syria and Iraq for over a year. As Iraq’s jointly American-Iranian installed sectarian protectorate manager Nouri al-Maliki blundered any effective response to the rapid ISIS incursion, the U.S. and Iran’s PMF proxies in Iraq agreed to a temporary détente of non-aggression for the sake of countering the very ISIS that both of them allowed in the first place to magnify into an existential threat justifying their “security” apparatuses.

The U.S. was therefore—cir. 2015—playing all sides in schizophrenic conjunction: it continued its geopolitical kinship with the genocidal Nazisraeli regime by turning an intentional blind eye to the exposed-albeit-shamelessly-continued Mossad/IDF support for al-Nusra and ISIS terrorists in Quneitra, but also entered temporary negotiations with the very entities that the nazijews opposed—the U.S. cajoled and co-opted hitherto anti-Zionist PKK-YPG Kurds in northeastern Syria order to create the imperial SDF cutout in the name of fighting the very ISIS that functioned as a Zionist cudgel against Assad, in addition to establishing a mutually understood temporary phase of non-aggression with Iran’s integrated PMF factions within the Maliki regime to materially destroy the very ISIS that the U.S. had—alongside the Israelis—undoubtedly allowed to thrive in the first place.

It is important to note now that Iran’s “Wilayet al-Faqeh” “Shi’a Crescent” bridge never sufficiently supplied Bashar al-Assad with enough arms and logistical support to fully recover Syrian territory from Zionist-backed al-Nusra/FSA/ISIS jihadists. This wasn’t as if Soleimani and the IRGC were “incapable” of fully helping Assad, but because they chose deliberately not to.

Remember that the “Iraqi” government—back then the Maliki regime—is a shared protectorate under the joint custodianship of the U.S. and Iran. However far the PMF was permitted to operate in the name of the Iranian-sponsored “Axis of Resistance,” all of it was gatekept under secretive U.S.-Iranian “deconfliction” mechanisms running through the Switzerland proxy backchannel (either that or the shared Iraqi protectorate intelligence channel) bridging D.C. to Tehran. The U.S. had no interest of allowing Iran to unilaterally magnifying its Axis of Resistance boundlessly, and therefore brokered with Qassem Soleimani (or some other high-level IRGC commander within the Iranian MOIS deep state) an agreement whereby Iran would instrumentalize and sacrigoat Assad as a permanently weakened and manufactured asset dependent on (intentionally limited) Iranian support through a chain of jointly American-Iranian approved Iraqi PMF proxy sub-units whose provided material support to Assad was designed by intention to ensure that the Syrian nation would be given short-term “alleviation” but never the true cure that restored Assad’s governmental prowess towards a permanent destruction of the Zionist-backed Wahhabi terror problem within its borders. Whereas Assad sought to unify all Syrians—both the Sunni majority and the diverse array of minorities—against sectarian pseudo-“Sunni” Salafi-jihadists, and to undercut the jihadist class-collaborationist rallying of Syrian Sunnis, Iranian/Maliki-deployed PMF units in eastern Syria only served ostensibly to dialectically help ISIS gain a foothold amongst Sunni Arabs by reason of the fact that PMF death squads attacked innocent Sunnis in eastern Syria as they did within Iraq.

Anyone who wishes to believe that all this was manufactured and controlled entirely by “Israel” must therefore prove that it was the Israeli regime which coordinated these geopolitical machinations with Iran to such well-cloaked secretive extents. There is of course no evidence of such overtly direct Israeli-Iranian collusion within specifically the 2011-onwards time frame, but there is—by contrast—indicative evidence of scandalously Machiavellian U.S. collusion with and/or instrumentalization of both the Israeli/al-Nusra/ISIS and Iranian/PMF sides in the Syria proxy war.

So if you still believe that “Israel controls the U.S.,” please consider fixing your head by smashing it against a brick wall some few hundred times.