The real reason why the ‘West’ always ends up worse than the ‘East’

It’s a little deeper than you presupposed.

It is temptingly easy to look at reality through binary narratives, even from the standpoint of those of us who are accustomed to reject certain false binary goalpost-moving shenanigans. Those properly seasoned for instance in the detailed machinations of the Russia-Ukraine War will understand that the presence of Nazis in Ukraine does not equate to a blank check endorsement of bad-faith Russian aggression from Putin’s kleptocracy.

And yet, most of humanity refuse to learn the lesson all the way. Fast forward to today (as of typing), and those same intellectual geniuses are now demanding a blank check endorsement for “Iranian resistance against the Zionist-Epstein pedophiles” as if no significant critique of Iran and its proxies can be tolerated whatsoever, treating all major critique of Iran as immediately tantamount to “siding with Zionist pedophiles.”

(yes, I directly address some of ***YOU***—you know who you are!)

And so, each foolish human being backslides into their own echo chamber as they return to their safe space smoking their individually proprietary stockpile of copium of “[X] bad, so [Y] good!” One highly common example is the generic assumption that the “eastern” realm of the planet, a.k.a. the anti-Western nations, comprise the valiant models of human societal progress and moral values in contrast to the bourgeois cultural decadence of the West.

After all, just look at all those championed strong family values, social responsibility, “common good” cultural orientation, nationalistic unity, and bravery of people in Russia, China, Iran et al., in contrast to the globohomo degeneracy of the West! Behold their governments who preserve traditional values and preserve the fabric of human civilization against the floodgates of Western Cultural Marxist degeneracy!

Take a step back, if you will.

‘Eastern’ vs. ‘Western’ synarchy

There is always talk amongst “New World Order” (NWO) exposers about the machinery of politically implemented “Hegelian dialectic,” how “the same cabal controls both sides.” While premised on a kernel of truth, it is simplistically naïveté, much as—say—a child’s imagination of a black hole’s event horizon.

In practice, the dialectical relationship between a dual polar set of manufactured belligerents constitutes not “left vs. right,” but rather “eastern synarchy vs. western synarchy.” The “left vs. right” delusion is for amateur catechumen and brainwashed idiot cattle—the only people running governments are eastern reactionary conservative kleptocrats and western reactionary conservative kleptocrats. All “leftist” movements are lower-level expendable sacrigoats and scapegoats who always wind up in the end thrown under the bus and structurally obliterated into annihilation to prepare for the “New World Order.”

Overview

Human empires comprise human souls in an integrated hierarchical structure and themselves are akin to souls, and therefore conform rigidly to the law of entropy defining all living mortal souls: they age old and perish. No earthly empire ever persists continually unto the end of the ages, and never will.

So how do the ruling kleptocratic conservative elites sustain perpetual power? The answer is: synarchy. Instead of a single chain of hierarchical subordination, multiple factions comprise an interdependent collection of oligarchical classes reliant on one another to anoint a common standard-bearing image as the legitimizing raison d’être keeping empirical control sustained. Each empirical governing faction is tasked their own critical function at the level of preserving the “bread and circuses” façade to the everyday majority of unsuspecting idiot outer masses a.k.a. the “catechumen,” because the synarch is reliant on co-opting and channeling the utility of the outer masses’ expendable mass energies—whose output is corresponded through manual labor a.k.a. “work” at the service of the empire—to sustain its own top-down projected and magnified empirical ruling power.

When the integrated flow of empirical “stability” for the synarch is disrupted, various damage control mechanisms kick in. As for exactly what that entails—well, I’ll try to explain this a tad bit later in the article. Anyhow, let’s just put it this way: when damage control and restorative functions don’t work, the empire implements a “Plan B” clandestine blueprint: prepare to exploit and weaponize the chaos to burn down the present outward-facing empire into ashes, and out of that tumult resurrect a new empire as a phoenix out of those very ashes.

Synarchy originated in the east

It is easy to assume that because the full sinister game of synarchy is outwardly perfected by the west, that therefore synarchy is native and indigenous to western thought. But that is not true—far from it. Synarchy originated in the eastern Tigris and Euphrates, where the Assyro-Babylonian priesthood implemented the blueprint expounded by the Nimrod-Semiramis proto-pagan satanic cult of seeking the creation of a “New World Order,” long before the Hellenistic-Romish “west” applied those tenets into their own structural modes of governance.

When the Assyro-Babylonian priesthood were conquered from the east by Medo-Persia, a fallout erupted between the Persian authorities and the absorbed Babylonian priesthood, sending the latter packing as they fled to Pergamum. From there, the groundwork for the “Pontifex Maximus” doctrine of the Roman Caesars was laid out, and so the power seat of synarchy transferred westward from its eastern Mesopotamian origins unto the Hellenistically syncretized halls of Rome.

Fast forward to the east-west cemented regional split in the Roman Empire, and the pattern was clear: the chief embodiment of synarchy was embodied in the western half which suffered a “death” (476 A.D.), went into a “was not” phase (476-538 A.D.), and then underwent a seemingly miraculous but satanic “resurrection” (538 A.D.) as a masonic phoenix rising out of the ashes. Meanwhile, eastern Rome a.k.a. Byzantium remained standing as a continuous empirical body the whole time.

When the power seat of synarchy transferred from east → west, the eastern half retained the satanic-cabalistic knowledge of synarchic functions, but altered its de jure empirical policy rather than embody the same fully destructive model embraced by its western counterparts. Let’s now come to grasp the differentiation.

Eastern synarchy: bifurcated hypocrisy

The recurring pattern to “eastern” synarchy is that it always exports and cultivates abroad the very chaos it violently suppresses and bans in its own house. Byzantium exploited and cultivated the chaotic strife induced by political Arian factions in western Rome, all while long unequivocally banning propagation of Arian influence in Constantinople. Or, take the case of Russia: the Czars behaved as like their Bolshevik-Soviet successors, who behaved not too different from their Putinist successor—all of them championed (or at least in the USSR case, came to champion especially after Stalin consolidated power) a particularly distinct flavor of “order” and “stability” at home while gleefully viewing erupted strife abroad as wonderful opportunities to stick their own foot in the door as an uninvited guest and manufactured savior.

Or, consider the case of Iran: whether under the Safavid-Pahlavi regime or their Zionist-Masonically installed Khomeinist mullah successors, the Persianist “Iranian government” exported Kurdish separatist insurrection against its Iraqi neighbor while violently suppressing Kurdish autonomous agitation at home.

Even better, consider the case example of Hafez al-Assad: Syria under Hafez cynically played a two-pronged game of schizophrenically cultivating and sponsoring utterly destructive and sectarian influences against its neighbors in Palestine, Lebanon, and Iraq, all while banning those same movements at home. What Hafez deliberately stoked in Lebanon was exactly that which he forbade from magnifying into an iota of potent oppositional influence within Syria. All while the neo-“Ba’athist” Syrian government under Hafez al-Assad geopolitically collaborated with the theocratic Qutbist-Khomeinist mullahs in Iran (who operated as an offshoot of the Muslim Brotherhood) to assist the ayatollahs’ unholy religiously fundamentalist sectarian war against the Iraqi nation, such destructive and mass-murderous sectarian Qutbist “pan-Islamist” fundamentalist fervor was ruthlessly crushed within Syria when Muslim Brotherhood insurgents in Homs and Hama were extirpated after launching a wannabe coup against the Syrian nation. On the Palestinian front, both the Communist-aligned PFLP/PFLP-GC and pan-Islamist Hamas/PIJ nexus were sponsored as terrorist cudgels in the name of “anti-Zionist” “rejectionism” to undercut and sabotage the PLO (which embodied the mainstream reprsentation of the Palestinian resistance cause), all while any Communist left-wing or pan-Islamist right-wing political opposition to Hafez within Syria was smashed.

Western synarchy: burning down one’s own house into ashes

Unlike the bifurcated duplicity of “eastern” synarchy that seeks to maintain their temporal ancien régime government structurally and institutionally, the “western” consolidation of synarchy—a.k.a. the original model whose central seat of power originated from the east but ultimately migrated into the west—doesn’t care about the temporal conditions as worth preserving, and will resort to whatever it takes to achieve maximum power consolidation possible, exhausting through as many “life-death-rebirth” cycles whenever and—importantly—wherever to achieve the ultimate “New World Order.” What this means is that western synarchy is even willing to burn down its own house and green-light a blueprint for manufacturing atrocities against its own citizens in order to deceive them and exploit their inflicted trauma into setting up a phoenix out of the ashes.

The slight catch to western synarchy is this: if you burn down your own house to ashes and deliberately reduce the entire fabric of human civilization into unmitigated anarchy and chaos, then… who is in charge? Obviously not any of the outward-facing institutions seemingly at any high level, because all of those institutions have faced utter obliteration as governing functions suddenly are liquidated.

And this is the real dirty secret to the game of synarchy: the true rulers who preserve power between the Sabbatean-Frankist “life-death-rebirth” cycles are never visible to the public. If they were visible to the public, they too would have faced utter destruction when the ancien régime is toppled and all public institutions collapse, and it is for that VERY reason that they remain invisible the entire time.

That is why, for instance, the Nazi-promoted “Protocols of Zion” thesis of alleged Jewish world control is a diversionary psyop and flat-out hoax. No shadow aristocracy that is capable of such perniciously inter-generational world control ever allows themselves to be palpably exposed before the public in such a way, and therefore the vast majority of outwardly “scapegoated” entities for “world control” are never the actual directives of the global control script. (so please don’t fall for the ridiculous “Jewish world control” nonsense)

Two counterfeit models of the Day of Atonement

I’ve explained before how Sabbatean-Frankists manufacture a counterfeit of the Day of Atonement, satanically impersonating the biblical premise:

Day of Atonement message: by whose plan of redemption are you cleansed and sanctified?

Sabbath study, i: why does God allow evil?

‘Single’-level inversion: eastern synarchy

The eastern model of bifurcated synarchic exploitation is duplicitous, but more “patently” so and naked in its duplicity. Think of Joseph Stalin, Hafez al-Assad, the Iranian mullahs et al.: they would let out Parvusian scandalous tacit admissions in the form of “yes, and your problem is…?”-styled boasts and implied embracing of an image of shrewdly maniacal tyrannical dictatorship, openly signifying that they simply do not care about those moral concerns so long as their policy ensures legitimized and (temporally) sustained state survival as internal national stability is preserved.

In the process of maintaining eastern synarchy, there is of course the manufacturing of counterfeit scapegoats and counterfeit sacrificial goats, but the two roles are kept separate in their counterfeit forms asymmetrically rather than attempting to manufacture a scenario where all outward-facing stooges and dupes are set up from “all sides” and “both sides” as simultaneous scapegoats and sacrigoats.

For instance, Hafez al-Assad deliberately cultivated the conditions that paved the way for the Sabra and Shatila massacre, funding one destabilizing sectarian militia that provoked the ascension of another sectarian rival et al., where the Phalange were early on tolerated to “embark on their own path” as set-up scapegoats who were allowed to massacre the innocent Palestinians and Shi’a in Lebanon, and once the Zionist-funded mass murder campaign was deliberately allowed by Hafez to transpire, then those dead Palestinian and Shi’a lives were instrumentalized as sacrigoats to justify additional Syrian-sponsored intrusion into Lebanon, or whatever along those lines.

Or, consider how Iran helped manipulate the American/CPA occupational conditions in the Iraq War: the Iranian side—via their SCIRI-Badr proxies—deliberately allowed Zarqawi’s AQI to “walk loose on their own path” into organizing materially and structurally into a full-blown terrorist co-optation and integration into the Sunni Arab resistance, and after AQI deliberately bombed innocent Iraqi Shi’a Arabs in sectarian massacres did Iran then instrumentalize the “Shi’a martyrs” as sacrigoats to justify Iranian intervention in the name of “countering Al-Qaeda in Iraq.”

Eastern synarchy, for the very reason it bifurcates between approving exportation of synarchic chaos outward while prohibiting the importation thereof inwards, only implements a halfway impersonation of the Day of Atonement, because it only impersonates the type/shadow observance of Yom Kippur where the earthly counterfeit “scapegoat” and earthly counterfeit “sacrigoat” are defined explicitly as separate entities, rather than attempting to create a condition where singular entities simultaneously function as both a counterfeit scapegoats and as a counterfeit sacrigoat for two different audiences.

In a nutshell, “eastern” synarchy” is one-sided: because it knows how inherently destructive the synarchic process of empirical “life-death-rebirth” is upon the society it impacts, it always seeks to allay and stave off the blowback against their own home country through a relatively consistent policy framework endlessly exporting the machinery of chaos abroad to milk the utility of, thereby kicking the can down the road to sustain its own temporal institutional prestige. It thereby won’t diametrically interfere with the goals of western synarchy and instead will help cultivate those conditions in convergent unity of policy, at least so long as the western synarchists doesn’t (yet) magnify into exporting those chaos into the home countries and accompanying institutional governance of the eastern regimes themselves.

‘Double’-level inversion: western synarchy

In the heavenly-ordained Day of Atonement to solve the problem of sin, the two goats in the typifying observance of Yom Kippur were fulfilled in one substance: Jesus Christ fulfilled the role of the scapegoat to fulfill mercy representing the expiation of sin away from God’s covenant people, and simultaneously fulfilled the role of the sacrificial goat to fulfill the role of justice, vindicating the authority of God to punish the practitioners of sin.

There is a difference therefore between:

• the type/shadow, which points towards the substantive fulfillment…

• …and the substance, which was typified by the type/shadow

Since the satanic Sabbatean-Frankist neo-Templar class are impersonating copycats, their earthly version of “atonement” of course encompasses a diabolical scheme to impersonate the substance, a.k.a. setting up a fake Day of Atonement where the same entity is expended and “destroyed” as both a “scapegoat” for those who revile it, and also as a “sacrigoat” for those who “support” a.k.a. instrumentalize it under the auspices of “supporting” it.

Because the eastern model of synarchy is one-sided, it only ever manufactures counterfeit scapegoats and sacrigoats in one direction at a time, specifically defining one faction of useful idiots to be set up as [X] scapegoat to blame, and [Y] sacrigoat to be attacked by the [Y] sacrigoat faction so their deaths can be instrumentalized to justify [Z] pretext for the eastern regime in the name of avenging [Y] sacrigoat and crushing the [X] scapegoat faction.

In this sense, the eastern model of synarchy simply doesn’t care to complete a fully satanic counterfeit of the Day of Atonement to set up a full New World Order scenario, because resorting to that full blueprint of universal of chaos would require manufacturing the scapegoat/sacrigoat assignment of roles from the reverse angle as well, which would encompass—as a corollary—the magnification of synarchic chaos against their own home countries very quickly, thereby destroying their own temporally prestigious and prized institutional governance which they primarily and principally seek to preserve for as long as possible.

The western version of synarchy simply meanwhile doesn’t care about the cost of achieving the NWO, because it takes the “end justifies the means” motto to its brutally maximalist extents possible. In western synarchy, the ruling class are fully consolidated into the fewest and most unscrupulously depraved hands possible who are invisible to anyone in the outer world, and who entirely function outside the very “system” they engineer to be set up for destruction unto ashes.

(so in a nutshell: if you thought the “Epstein class” is as bad is it gets—oh boy! have I got some incredibly discomforting news for you that I’m sure you don’t want to hear)

In this sense, the western “full” synarchic model will always engineer chaos and accompanying duplicitous manipulation from every plausible angle possible so long as they serve the utility of hastening the penultimate conditions to pave the ascension of the “phoenix out of the ashes” a.k.a. the final world order. And so, every “collective” entity becomes both an earthly “opposed” scapegoat faction and as an earthly “supported” sacrigoat faction:

• Jews (at least the Zionist Jews) are “scapegoated” by antijewish (a.k.a. “antisemitic”) activists and “sacrigoated”/instrumentalized by Zionists

• whites are “scapegoated” by woke DEI supremacists and “sacrigoated”/instrumentalized by white supremacists/neo-Nazis

• blacks are “scapegoated” by white supremacists/neo-Nazis and “sacrigoated”/instrumentalized by woke DEI supremacists

• “undocumented immigrants” a.k.a. illegal aliens are “scapegoated” by right-wingers and “sacrigoated”/instrumentalized by left-wingers

• LGBTQers are “scapegoated” by the western right and “sacrigoated”/instrumentalized by the western left

• anti-LGBTQer activism is “scapegoated” by the western left and “sacrigoated”/instrumentalized by the western right

• unborn children are “scapegoated” by pro-aborts and “sacrigoated”/instrumentalized by anti-abortion activists

• women who abort their unborn children are “scapegoated” by anti-abortion activists and “sacrigoated”/instrumentalized by pro-aborts

• Arab-Islamic victims of genocidal Zionists are “scapegoated” by genocidal Zionists and “sacrigoated”/instrumentalized by pan-Islamists

• genocidal Zionist “victims” of Arab-Islamic counterreaction are “scapegoated” by pan-Islamists and “sacrigoated”/instrumentalized by genocidal Zionists

Notice a pattern?

When everyone is set up in such a way that “one man’s scapegoat is another man’s sacrigoat” (← you can quote me on this) and every single collectively defined “identity group” or “sect” in society are being set up to suffer and die to validate someone else’s raison d’être, that’s a surefire sign that everyone is being set up to mutually extirpate each other so that every single controlled opposition side’s “self-fulfilling prophecies” will claim fulfillment as they finish their course burning down the entire house slaughtering each other.

In the end, when the western synarchic model claims to have fulfilled both its counterfeit version of “justice” and its counterfeit version of “mercy” (of course, the roles are inverted and assigned to the opposite “goats,” since naturally it inverts the perceptual plane for raw utility), its end result—the masonic “phoenix out of the ashes” a.k.a. “New World Order”—is always the full culmination of a satanic despotism that ends up violating and desecrating both mercy and justice in the most abhorrently depraved fashion possible.

Notice, as a corollary, that Anglo-Zionist-Nazi-Masonic regimes often love to outwardly emblazon their identifying flags and what-not with the phoenix! I’m sure this is a purely magical coincidence.

How then to resist synarchy? (a video game analogy)

Unfortunately, the western model of full synarchic magnification cannot be indefinitely allayed and prevented, but it can nonetheless be “stalled” in the correct understanding of this contextual term.

The answer might sound shrewdly Machiavellian, but it works: to temporally counter the western hastening of synarchic conditions, the key is to carefully instrumentalize a.k.a. “sacrigoat” some of the functional tenets of eastern synarchy in such a way that overtly and plainly diametrically interferes with the conditions that western synarchy attempts to hasten towards and manufacture.

How does this work? Let’s put it this way—this author (myself) plays plenty of Plants vs. Zombie: Garden Warfare 2. In GW2, I play the Gnome Bomb game mode just as eastern ancien régimes govern in real life, a.k.a. I implement a bifurcated model of divide-and-conquer strategic manipulation. I explained some of this before:

Video game trolling as caricature of Machiavellian-Faustian geopolitical reality?

How To Control The Opposition [For Dummies]

In a nutshell, when I play Gnome Bomb in GW2, my goal is to sustain the match at a 2-2 tie where—out of three starting bases on each team—both team’s two weaker bases are destroyed while the stronger/strongest one remains, and ideally where the game is gridlocked into a lengthy stalemate where the Gnome is transferred in predictable cycles and the overtime lasts as long as possible, a.k.a. neither team fully wins/loses for as long as possible.

Now, in GW2, as any seasoned old-timer knows, there was a jynxzi effect (think “Zarqawi Effect”) from a number of months ago when the popular streamer “jynxzi” once played GW2, effecting a massive influx of degenerate youthful bottomfeeders—whose vulgar decadence is akin to that of monkeys and apes, I’m “grievously sorry” (/s) to say—into the servers, resulting in a horde of low-IQ and individually unskilled youthful idiots clustering into ISIS/Zionist-Nazi-style caliphates in multiplayer servers, constantly outnumbering skilled individual old-time players and reducing whole matches into an analogical equivalent of “western synarchy” where both sides are degenerate mobs mutually annihilating each other in the most vapidly inane fashion possible, kind of like how the “Iraqi Civil War” in the 2010s was just Zionist-elevated sectarian Qutbist-Khomeinist pseudo-“Shi’a” goons dialectically clashing against Zionist-elevated sectarian pseudo-“Sunni” ISIS terrorists.

How then is the skilled ancien régime player supposed to thrive in such a degenerate condition? It’s very simple! Enough old-timer ancien régime players need to play together in the same round—at least 2-3 for starters—and each individually grasp how to navigate the “new normal” synarchy properly. This means that from the standpoint of an old-timer player, one must learn to swallow their pride and navigate the imperfect circumstances of degenerate filthy idiots on their own team, operating on the basis of a bifurcated understanding of instrumentalizing/sacrigoating their own unworthy teammates while reaching out genuinely to help fellow old-timer stalwart friends survive and mutually ascend into the Top Performers highlights together.

Namely in Gnome Bomb, this means that the “eastern synarchy” model must be carefully implemented in such a way so as to exploit and leverage its tenets in order to preserve and ordinate an “ancien régime restoration” framework, where:

1. one must genuinely support one’s own actual friends within one’s team

2. genuine friends on the other team should not be targeted, especially when they are of a lower leaderboard placement and are struggling to rise to the top

3. one’s own degenerate-jynxzi teammates must be “sacrigoated” a.k.a. instrumentalized and exploited as tools to bleed and die for one’s own ascendancy to the top of the leaderboard

4. degenerate-jynxzi players on the opposing team must be “scapegoated” a.k.a. they are allowed in the “early on” phase to run through their own course and stumble into one’s own devised trap so that they can be ambushed and sniped repeatedly as much as possible in a loop where their patterns are understood as a predictable pattern and outsmarted to their own lopsided demise in the gameplay

In practice, this entails corollaries such as this: if I see that my own team is stronger, bound to win, and has already in the early game armed a weaker enemy team base with the Gnome, then I know already that that particular base will certainly be destroyed, at the very least in another Gnome arming even if they defuse the present Gnome bomb that is armed at the base. Therefore, if I am in a position where the enemy team is clearly vulnerable as they are huddled at their base trying to defuse it, I can “scapegoat” them a.k.a. I intentionally hold back my fire and allow them to first defuse it, and then I bombard my fire to vanquish multiple of them easily, knowing that by allowing them to defuse the bomb at their own base, the round as a whole will last longer and give me more time to magnify my own standing in the leaderboard.

Additionally, if a 2-2 tie is achieved and I see my own team attempting to offensively magnify the Gnome to the enemy base for a quick victory, I will NOT help my own team’s offensives, and instead allow them to be “sacrigoated” and bled out and instead intentionally allow the enemy team as “scapegoats” to pick up the Gnome and launch their own predictable offensive front into my own team’s remaining base, at which I would have already been ready from a sniping ledge to bombard them with charged freezing shots to additionally magnify a higher vanquish streak I attempt to attain.

Of course, if my own team is winning 2-1 as the stronger team, a.k.a. my own team has already destroyed the weaker two enemy bases and my own team has a stronger and weaker base remaining, then I will explicitly position myself near the stronger base and intentionally withhold any defense for the weaker base so as to incentivize and encourage the enemy team to attack and destroy the weaker base (i.e. I will not fully disrupt and destroy the enemy team’s transit route for offensively magnifying into the weaker base, so long as they still need to destroy another one of my team’s bases to reach a 2-2 tie), so that once that is accomplished, then I can position myself ostensibly as the chief protector of the remaining base left on my own team in a scenario where a 2-1 lead is brought to a 2-2 tie that ideally persists unto a stalemate.

In doing so, the degenerate-jynxzi objective—of reducing all gameplay from both teams into a pointless cycle of inane mutual annihilation lacking any strategic depth—is diametrically interfered with, as so long as ancien régime-minded loyalists remain and operate as potent threats to their agenda, they become irritated as they must first focus on their “near enemy” of rooting out and undermining (a.k.a. they group up in hordes to target and outnumber, often because those youthful degenerates voice-chat in real time as a group in their own vulgar PlayStation/Discord echo chambers) ancien régime players, and so long as their threat are old guard operators ruining their mob schemes, their hopes are temporarily dashed.

This does not mean outright literal endorsement of the satanic counterfeit model, but rather a sardonic reflection of the idea that the enemy’s own tactics can be cleverly weaponized through a carefully refined scope of restrained discipline to return their recompense upon their own heads.

And that is the basis for true resistance against the Zionist-Masonic empire. It doesn’t last forever, of course, but in the temporal realm for the provisional meantime, it still functions as a quasi-“restraining” pillar nonetheless.

Behold! I do send you forth as sheep in the midst of wolves; be you therefore wise as the serpents, and simple as the doves. —Matthew 10:16