The Jesuit-Zionist connection, pt. I: neo-Templarism and confessions from the king of the north

Tucker Carlson and Candace Owens seem so wonderful for criticizing Israel now, eh? Not so fast...

I assume most of you who read this are hard “leftists.”¹ Even though I am personally a “conservative” probably with vastly differing standpoints (as some of you perhaps noticed this mentioning in my notes and comment ramblings at least once), I don’t mind an audience of good-faith readers from the other side of the spectrum—in the face of genocidal brutality, naked discarding of democracy (and instead, funding right-wing death squads who mass-slaughter the Palestinian people), and sycophantic betrayal of human decency by the cults of both senilemongerist Vegetocratic Fascism and mangomongerist Orange Bolshevism, I simply refuse to spend my primary efforts bemoaning trivial nothingburgers by comparison i.e. transgender bathroom feuds, Faucism grievances,² and cancel culture wars.

Why do I begin this post by mentioning my “conservative” background? Because I used to believe the “mainstream” American conservative line, at one point watching Candace Owens’s show at PragerU weekly (along with their “regular” uploads); I believed that the right wing’s agenda would fix American society and restore order; I believed that Trump was sincerely for the better of America; and I used to believe the Zionist propaganda apparatus until I beheld reality. Since I was among their Orange Bolshevist fold for several years, I know their tricks and sleaziness.

Now, we all know that the modern Satanically incarnate excuse of a political party known as the “GOP” are fanatical defenders of Zionazism along with the “Christian conservative”/religious component of the mainstream right. Yet splinters into anti-Israel positions are not exclusive to the “extreme alt-right,” considering the dissenting views of i.e. Candace Owens, Tucker Carlson, and Charlie Kirk. There was also the case of Vivek Ramaswamy, who seemed less Zionazistic. Naturally the question is begged: what underlying reason is there for the hard right’s ideological splinter?

(I will explain the “king of the north” matter at the end)

Exhibit I: Ramaswamy, Jesuit stoogeface

The bizarre presidential campaign of Vivek G. Ramaswamy—a mixture of right-wing populism, Gen. Z antics, and “annoying”³ troll antics bordering between hilarious and obnoxious—is simple to explain if one understands his clandestine background. Namely, his education at a Jesuit-controlled “education” center:⁴

Ramaswamy was known at St. Xavier — a prestigious and private all-male Jesuit high school that requires a rigorous academic entry exam — not for his politics but for his smarts. ‘Being recognized for good grades is nothing new to Vivek Ramaswamy,’ read a 2002 Cincinnati Enquirer article under the headline, ‘Award winners serve the community.’ ‘Kind of the stereotype of the annoying perfect student,’ said Richard Thayer, who took several advanced placement classes with Ramaswamy and recalled visiting his home to tackle a balsa wood bridge project. 

…

Ramaswamy played varsity tennis and competed on the Science Olympiad team at St. X, as alumni call it. Classmates regarded him as friendly, but not particularly outspoken.

Coincidence?

The right picture above is 18-year-old Ramaswamy’s valedictorian⁵ speech at the aforementioned Jesuit institution—note the interesting hand signal he provides at closure.⁶ As a highly prominent alumni, Ramaswamy has also served on the board of trustees of the Jesuit academy.⁷

Ramaswamy also has some fascinating “Jewish” connections:⁸

He was also a member of the Jewish intellectual society Shabtai, which he said he was attracted to because ‘open debate’ was ‘one of the core tenets of what Shabtai stood for.’ He told Jewish Insider, ‘I became one of the most active members during my years at Yale and since then have been one of the biggest backers.’

…

In 2011, Ramaswamy was awarded a post-graduate fellowship by the Paul & Daisy Soros Fellowships for New Americans.

…

He has no foreign policy experience but has visited Israel several times on business trips. ‘The way I think about our commitment to Israel is it’s grounded in the most solid foundation, which is national self-interest,’ he told Jewish Insider. ‘The bedrock of stability in the Middle East starts with Israel.’

Ramaswamy also supported President Donald Trump’s decisions to move the U.S. embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem, recognize Israeli sovereignty over the Golan Heights, negotiate the Abraham Accords, and launch the Peace to Prosperity plan to resolve the Israel-Palestinian conflict.

He told Jewish Insider that he has ‘long-standing respect for what he described as “the shared values of the Jewish tradition,” citing “faith in a true God and the family foundations that come along with that.”’

This is interesting, considering that in the GOP primary debates Ramaswamy portrayed his foreign policy position as less Zionistic (compared especially to NiKKKi Hitler Haley’s) in that he advocated a depletion of U.S. foreign aid to Israel (of course, his argument was actually structured on a “strong independent Israel” pro-Zionazi reasoning).⁹ So in the modern American right-wing spectrum from establishment/mainstream to alt-right/extreme—the former very Zionist and the latter (supposedly) opposed to Israel, Ramaswamy belongs somewhere in the middle to bridge the gap, portraying his fringe-appealing apparatus behind a cloak of slick, mainstreamed appeals. Given his Jesuit-trained credentials, such skills aren’t surprising.

Exhibit II: the ‘converted’ Candace Owens

In the earlier phases of the post-10/7 Zionazi right-wing Holocaust against the Palestinian people, Owens rightfully condemned the Fourth Reich’s perpetration of mass-murder rampages. Of course, there was an obvious caveat: her primary concern is only with Palestinian Christians,¹⁰ because that so-called “All Lives Matter”¹¹ just doesn’t extend to Muslims.

The details are a bit tedious to document in full, so I’ll summarize: at the exact same time Owens started criticizing Israel (enough for Palestinian supporters to be duped into thinking she’s one of them¹²), she increasingly peddled (actual) antisemitic canards.¹³ Why? Consider which side of the ideological battle this benefits… by associating her “anti-Zionism” with antisemitism, this conveniently fuels the Zionist “anti-Zionism is antisemitism” notion, albeit from the “other side.”¹⁴

Oh, and Owens converted to Catholicism a few months ago. Here’s straight out of the horse’s mouth from none other than a Catholic magazine:¹⁵

Candace Owens, the conservative media personality and host of the Candace Owens Podcast, has converted to Catholicism. She made the announcement yesterday on social media, stating that she has ‘made the decision to go home’.

…

In 2019, Owens, previously a reformed Evangelical, married George Farmer, also a convert to Catholicism.

…

It has been noted that in recent years there has been an increasing link between conservative commentators and Catholicism, particularly in the US. Owens now joins her former Daily Wire colleague Michael J. Knowles as a leading conservative commentator who also happens to be Catholic.

Here we have the case example of a hard-right political influencer who abruptly throws strength to the Catholic Church and—by extension—its right-wing theocratic agenda. If any mainstream/prominent Catholic outlet decried the RCC’s baptism of Owens on the grounds that she is a right-wing racist¹⁶ Hitlerite¹⁷¹⁸ apologist, I am not aware of it.

And to more or less continue from an earlier point, the quintessential right-wing token star co-opts criticism of the Zionist apparatus in an interesting fashion:¹⁹

Owens said that while she believes the attack by Hamas was ‘absolutely horrific,’ the U.S. should not be entangling itself in Israeli affairs and that the plight of suffering Christians globally receives relatively little coverage compared to the war in Israel.

…

‘Nobody wants to talk about the Bolsheviks. Nobody wants to talk about the Christian holocaust. I am tired of the media, exhausted of the media not speaking about what is happening to Christians all around the world,’ she continued.

‘And it is especially horrific while at the exact same time that it is happening — the slaughter of Christians in Armenia, the arms being supplied by Israel — that the media turns the other way and says, “Oh, OK, but what about what about what's happening in Israel?”’

Next case example should hopefully clarify matters further…

Exhibit III: Christian Nationalism, Zionist antisemitism, and the convergent bigotries of Charlie Kirk

Similar to Owens, reactionary stooge Charlie Kirk has limited his criticisms of Israel only to concern over Christians specifically-exclusively.²⁰ And… that’s it, because otherwise the darling Orange Bolshevist doughface is a hardline Zionist mouthpiece who completely sides with the Fourth Reich and makes no bones about his disdain for Arabs/Muslims. IOWs, “us” “Judeo-Christians” vs. “them” “Islamists”:²¹

It wasn't that hard for me to grasp because people that still live in the 1300s, as a vast majority of Muslims do, they don't hold western values. No, this is civilization aka western values versus barbarism, also known as medieval worldview.

Kirk’s TPUSA project isn’t just a laissez-faires “free market” apologetics economic endeavor: it has recently shifted to blatant “Christian Nationalism.”²² Concurrent to this theocratic swing is Kirk’s own decibel propagation of the notion that modern Christians under the Bible can only be blessed if they bless the ethnic “Jewish” people (I will address this in a separate post soon).²³ There is—on top of that—an endless slew of Kirk “owning” Palestinian human rights activists in a vomitrociously, unbearably long pile of right-wing fallacious “gotchas” and whataboutisms.

Whatever professed philosemitic sympathies Kirk spouts, it doesn’t quite succeed in masking his antisemitic undertrappings—neo-Nazis and various “alt-right” figures gloated when Kirk accused “Jewish dollars” of funding “Cultural Marxist ideas.”²⁴²⁵

Exhibit IV: the duplicitous Tucker Carlson

When slick-haired Orange Bolshevist suitcase Tucker Swanson McNear Carlson invited Palestinian Christian pastor Munther Isaac to his show, the right-wing establishment²⁶²⁷²⁸ and Zionazi²⁹³⁰ backlash was ferocious—the (liberal) Poynter Institute approvingly quoted a reactionary right-wing diatribe by GOP congressman Dan Crenshaw to discredit Carlson’s and Isaac’s critiques of Israel.³¹ Because the bulk of American right-wing Christians are taken for granted as unconditional Fourth Reich backers, any “internal” threat to this “unity” is seen as detrimental to the expected, unwavering apparatus.

Unfortunately, some sincere Palestinian human rights activists were duped by the right-wing lip service.³² When Carlson interviewed Thomas Massie last month to discuss their mutual “skepticism of Israel,” plenty of attention was narrowed into Massie’s bombshell exposé that (nearly) every U.S. representative as an “AIPAC person” serving as a proxy on behalf of the Judeo-Nazi lobbying group to influence congressional votes.³³ Does this mean that either of them oppose the right-wing Naziopolist Holocaust? Take a gander for yourself:³⁴

MASSIE: Last month, we voted, like, 15 or 16 times on issues related to Israel, and, you know, I’ve been hit, because I’ve voted no on all of them.

CARLSON: Why do you- because you hate Israel, or is there anothe reason?

MASSIE: NO, because I'm against, uh, sending our money overseas. I'm against starting another proxy war. I'm against sanctions because it's going to weaken the dollar. Uh, I'm for free speech. Like, all of these resolutions run afoul of those things, and that's why I can't vote for them.

…

MASSIE: And by the way, let me just put a little footnote here, I'm not against Israel. I've never voted to sanction Israel, I've never said anything particularly, you know, critical of Israel. You know, other than, for instance, right now they're bombing, they've killed 1% of the civilian population in Gaza, that's concerning to me.

…

MASSIE: [AIPAC] pay(s) for trips for congressmen and their spouses to go to Israel. I may be… I mean, I don't I'm not the only Republican who hasn't taken the AIPAC trip to Israel, but I'm probably one of a dozen that hasn't taken that trip, and the other ones just haven't got around to it.

CARLSON: What’s the trip like, do you know?

MASSIE: It's kind of like, I think vacation-y. You go see the wall, you go, see the, you know, the sights, uh, things like that.

CARLSON: It's such a great—I must say—it's such a great country, Jerusalem, especially, it’s just such a wonderful place that, that's got to have a big effect.

MASSIE: You go, like, swim in the Dead Sea…

CARLSON: Yeah, yeah, I’ve done that! …

Getting the gist of it now? So American Zionists are bad not because they’re financing a Holocaustic genocide against the Palestinian people, but because of impediments to isolationism and the dollar, etc. etc. The freezepeach repression concern is valid, though at the same time—at least for anyone with a functional mind—is less of a crime against humanity than i.e. the indiscriminate murder and torture of thousands of Palestinians civilians.

I didn’t include it in this segmented, quoted transcript, though one major point of criticism invoked by Massie was the IHRA “antisemitism bill” branding as antisemitic quotations of New Testament passages which condemn “the Jews [Judeans]” for the crucifixion of Jesus Christ of Nazareth. Once again, this demonstrates the duplicitous moral hypocrisy of a valid point being invoked yet harped on as if of greater concern and priority than the chief crisis of an ongoing genocide.

Piecing the puzzling enigma together

In each case example provided here, there is a right-wing figure who either appears to be critical of Israel or co-opts anti-Zionism to push a Christian-exclusive persecution complex. Now, let’s bear in mind the right-wing “spectrum” from mainstream to fringe as it pertains to Zionism: the mainstream end is as hardline Zionazistic as it gets, while towards the fringe end there is an increasing anti-Zionist trend.

Now, since all these hard-right personalities are (supposedly) “anti-Israel” to some extent, right off the bat we know that their placement belongs more towards the fringe side. As I said earlier, Ramaswamy belongs somewhere in the middle, leaning more towards the “mainstream” end: he is purportedly skeptical of the Fourth Reich in outward appearance, yet cloak such “criticisms” behind Jesuitic-duplicitous concoctions. Kirk likewise: he only lambasted Israel on the alleged basis of “anti-Christian” terrorism, though is otherwise more than trigger-happy to tout the Fourth Reich as a citadel of “Western values” against “evil Islamic barbarism” or whatever. Carlson belongs further along the fringe end, though budging slightly towards the center: he is much more critical of Israel than the other two, though his “opposition” explicitly is grounded in cherry-picked harping over the plight of Palestinian Christians and not the Palestinian people as a whole. (they sure think we’re too mentally daft to recognize their Islamophobia, eh?) And Candace Owens belongs much further on the “fringe” end.

This “spectrum” is crucial to understand for the time being if one is to grasp the simplest picture of what the right-wing, theocratic agenda is pertaining to the Middle East. The Anglo-Masonic stoogeheads (i.e. Lord Palmerston)—on behalf of the Jesuit/Knights of Malta agenda—propagated Zionism at the political level to enact the (secret) Vatican goal of “establishing a Jewish homeland.” Johnny Cirucci explains it well:

Now, there is the spurious “Pike-Mazzini Letter,” (said to be) dated Aug. 15, 1871, which purportedly outlines a sinister plot for a Third World War:³⁵

The Third World War must be fomented by taking advantage of the differences caused by the ‘agentur’ of the ‘Illuminati’ between the political Zionists and the leaders of Islamic World. The war must be conducted in such a way that Islam (the Moslem Arabic World) and political Zionism (the State of Israel) mutually destroy each other.

Notwithstanding whether the “letter” contents themselves are directly authentic, the fact of the matter is that this described sinister conspiracy is exactly what is observed today: Zionism has been raised as an “antithesis” to endlessly (seemingly so) war with the Arab nations. What is the end goal of this? Well, in the Cirucci YouTube video linked above, it is explained that the Romish papal insiders, as part of the Knights Templars’ occult (Johannite) tradition, ultimately seek the acquisition of Jerusalem for themselves. And what is observed at the present time is a neverending war between psuedo-“Judaic” Zionists and “Islamist” Arabs to mutually liquidate one another, paving the way for a (pseudo-)“Christian” “solution” preplanned all along for Vatican/Jesuit/Maltese supremacist aims.

Ever notice that Pope Francis is always the “peacemaker”? Not calling for justice and retribution against criminals, but “peace” in nice-sounding liberal-humanist garbs and flip-flops around both sides of the lopsided war.³⁶³⁷³⁸³⁹

Now, let’s consider the “timeline” and the roleplayers: hardline Protestant “dispensationalism” serves as a bolster for the Zionist side of the Middle East wars… which ultimately (just a humble prediction based off careful research and consideration; if I’m ultimately wrong, then I’m wrong) results in mutual annihilation between the “Jewish” Zionists and “Islamist” Arabs… which in the next phase leads to papal-supremacist ascension of some sort as Hegelian “synthesis.” This explains why Kirk and Carlson in particular—as “Protestants”—hold greater inherent sympathies towards Israel compared to Owens, a(n ultramontanist) Catholic: Masonically controlled dispensationalist Protestantism is but an “indirect” tool to ultimately serve Jesuit, papal-supremacist ends. And that final Jesuit agenda is not Zionism, rather it uses Zionism as a necessary catalyst to push towards its true goal. Thus, the Masonic/Futurist/dispensationalist Protestants are set up as the rabidly pro-Zionist camp while the ultramontanist Catholics are technically “anti-Zionist” (at least publicly) because their agenda—the true final NWO agenda—is not Zionism. The public agenda of the Protestant/dispensationalist camp pumps up the political Zionists to drive the Zionist clash between the Arab nations, leading to the mutual annihilation causing enough woe and anguish so the Pope (or the False Prophet) comes in, drafts the “peace deal,” and accomplishes the Catholic ultramontanist agenda of papal-supremacist rule which is neither pro-Zionist or pro-Arab.

Spoiler: the “king of the north” in Daniel 11 is the antitypical king of Babylon, aka the Pope, and “right-wing” theocracism in general.⁴⁰ However, the theological discussion is for another day, because this post is sufficiently lengthy and conspiratorial as it is.

1. Not all, though most nonetheless.

2. Remember the fracas over the Fauci/Daszak gain-of-function scandal? Well, that’s old news.

3. Michelle Goldberg (Aug. 28, 2023), “Vivek Ramaswamy Is Very Annoying. It’s Why He’s Surging in the Polls.” The New York Times.

4. Alex Seitz-Wald, Allan Smith, Henry J. Gomez (Oct. 4, 2023), “How Vivek Ramaswamy turned his elite education into a degree in devil's advocacy,” NBC News.

5. James M. Lindsay (Mar. 8, 2023), “Meet Vivek Ramaswamy, Republican Presidential Candidate,” Council on Foreign Relations.

6. Vivek Desai (Aug. 2, 2023), “18-Year-Old Vivek Ramaswamy Takes Over the Graduation Stage, Demonstrating His Alpha Male Skills,” YouTube.

7. Brian Fraga (Mar. 4, 2024), “Alumni push to remove right-wing Ramaswamy from Jesuit school's board,” National Catholic Reporter.

8. “Vivek Ramaswamy,” Jewish Virtual Library.

9. Andrew Lapin (Aug. 24, 2023), “Vivek Ramaswamy defends call to cut Israel aid at first Republican debate,” The Jerusalem Post.

10. Jon Brown (Oct. 24, 2023), “Candace Owens, Charlie Kirk condemn Israeli airstrike that killed Christians sheltering in Gaza church,” Christian Post.

11. Ken Ruinard (Apr. 4, 2023), “Candace Owens talks "All Lives Matter" during Turning Point USA at Clemson event,” Greenville News.

12. Rachel Dobkin (Nov. 5, 2023), “Candace Owens' Opposition to Genocide Welcomed by Palestinian Supporters,” Newsweek.

13. Jul. 10, 2024, “In order to defend Nick Fuentes from Jordan Peterson, Candace Owens discusses how many Jews are in the Biden administration,” Media Matters.

14. Ever noticed that both Zionists and antisemites peddle this exact narrative? Zionists propagate it from the “philosemitic” end by attacking anti-Zionists as antisemitic, while antisemites push it from the opposite side by portraying their antisemitism as the equivalent of their (supposed) anti-Zionism.

15. Thomas Edwards (Apr. 23, 2024), “US media star Candace Owens converts to Catholicism at the Brompton Oratory,” Catholic Herald.

16. Gino Spocchia (Dec. 17, 2021), “Candace Owens condemned after alleging ‘Black Americans are the most murderous group in America,’” The Independent.

17. Rachel Frazin (Feb. 8, 2019), “Candace Owens: ‘If Hitler just wanted to make Germany great and have things run well — OK, fine,’” The Hill.

18. Feb. 25, 2024, “Candace Owens, attacking 'pedophiles and perverts,' takes aim at 1930s Jewish sexologist,” The Jerusalem Post.

19. Jun. 17, 2024, “Candace Owens claims media is ignoring a global ‘Christian holocaust,’” Christian Post.

20. Nick Mordowanec (Oct. 23, 2023), “Charlie Kirk Demands Answers From Israel on Church Bombing,” Newsweek.

21. Oct. 11, 2023, “Charlie Kirk: The ‘vast majority of Muslims’ live ‘in the 1300s’ and hold a ‘medieval worldview,’” Media Matters for America.

22. Tim Dickinson (May 23, 2023), “Charlie Kirk’s ‘Turning Point’ Pivots to Christian Nationalism,” Rolling Stone.

23. TPUSA Faith (Oct. 23, 2023), “BLESS ISRAEL ft Charlie Kirk,” YouTube.

24. Justin Horowitz (Nov. 8, 2023), “Holocaust denier and other extremists celebrate Charlie Kirk's antisemitic ‘Jewish dollars’ attack,” Media Matters for America.

25. The full, accurate evaluation of neo-Marxism/“Cultural Marxism” is a lengthy matter I don’t have space to divulge into here.

26. Haley Strack (Apr. 11, 2024), “Tucker Carlson’s Apologia for Christian Antisemitism,” National Review.

27. Zack Beauchamp (Apr. 16, 2024), “Tucker Carlson went after Israel — and his fellow conservatives are furious,” Vox News.

28. Leah MarieAnn Klett (Apr. 25, 2024), “Christian leaders criticize Tucker Carlson's interview with Munther Isaac: ‘No mention of Hamas,’” Christian Post.

29. Apr. 11, 2024, “Tucker Carlson says 'You've lost the thread' to US Christian leaders who support Israel,” The Jerusalem Post.

30. Elie Mischel (Apr. 14, 2024), “Tucker Carlson is officially an antisemite,” Jewish News Syndicate.

31. Tom Jones (Apr. 11, 2024), “Republican lawmaker crushes Tucker Carlson with surprisingly legitimate commentary,” Poynter.

32. Apr. 10, 2024, “Palestinian Priest to Tucker Carlson: ‘Washington’s Support for Israel Threatens Palestinian Christians’ – VIDEO,” Palestine Chronicle.

33. Michael Luciano (Jun. 7, 2024), “House Republican Claims Every GOP Colleague Has an ‘AIPAC Babysitter’ Pressuring Them to Cast Pro-Israel Votes,” Mediaite.

34. Tucker Carlson (Jun. 7, 2024), “Rep. Thomas Massie Reveals Deep State Secrets and Teaches You How to Live Off-Grid,” YouTube.

35. Aug, 15, 1871 [allegedly], “Albert Pike Letter to Mazzini: The Illuminati Plan for 3 World Wars,” Internet Archive.

36. Devin Watkins (Oct. 11, 2023), “Pope Francis appeals for peace and restraint in Israel-Hamas war,” Vatican News.

37. Philip Pullella, Alvise Armellini (Oct. 11, 2023), “Pope urges Hamas to free hostages, says Israel has right to self-defence,” Reuters.

38. Devin Watkins (Dec. 17, 2023), “Pope condemns attacks on civilians in Gaza: ‘It is war; it is terrorism,’” Vatican News.

39. Jul. 9, 2024, “Pope begs for new peace efforts after latest attacks in Ukraine, Gaza,” Associated Press.

40. Spoiler, pt. II: Daniel 11’s king of the south in the modern day is “left-wing” political secularism.