The real reason for America’s savagery against Iraq (hint: not oil ‘solely’)

Just a critically evaluated geopolitical analysis, or what CIA/liberals/DAESH/neo-Marxists/Communists/Nazi-Jews would denigrate as “conspiracy theory.”

Yes, I know, I should be talking primarily and directly about the ongoing Nazi-“Israel” Holocausting of Palestinian human beings in Gaza. So why am I redirecting your focus back to Iraq, you might ask? Very simple: you cannot understand the reason for present events and what is planned for the future without grasping the past’s lessons. It is a step-by-step process to properly decode how dialectically conditioned collective manipulation of human beings operates (even I still fall considerably short at this point in time still), so if you are interested in a sound navigation treading the tumultuous waters our present generation is shaken by, I recommend reading this brief article into the end.

The commonplace narrative surrounding the War [Against] Iraq is that the war criminal Bush and his CIA pals were primarily interested in plundering its oil to enrich American capital. While that was undoubtedly a driving motivation, to attribute the one-dimensionally identified de jure “money” dimension as the beating-heart core is a reductionist error. Cf. this previous article of mine for background information I’m not going to entirely repeat in this posting:

Saddam–Assad unity was the *REAL* Axis of Resistance against Anglo-Zionist criminality

To summarize and continue from what was mentioned in that longer article: Iraq throughout the 1990s was crippled by sanctions as a pariah state known for its Anglo-Zionist exacerbated child mortality rates, and after a weak era of conservatively limited diplomatic renewal with Syria in the final years of Hafez al-Assad (who Saddam evidently never did again trust fully), the fresh, young, reformist new Syrian president Bashar expanded the Syria-Iraq inter-Ba’athist entente beyond expectations. His own Syrian conservative old guard circles bound previously to Hafez’s ambitions were internal obstacles to the robust cooperation with Iraq, a mutual lifeline deal Saddam loyally acted on his own part to cultivate. In contrast to the insignificantly puny efforts of chasm-bridging by Hafez, the new Syrian generation heralded by Bashar clearly signaled some renewed hope of a Levantine-Mesopotamian (a.k.a. Syrian-Iraqi) centered pan-Arab revival of the traditional unified anti-Zionist resistance spirit, one Hafez in his reign couldn’t achieve with Saddam as the result of petty egocentric squabbling producing disastrous proxy fighting lasting over one and a half decades and costing countless lives caught in between the catastrophe. Just months into his presidency, Bashar directed Syria to send:¹

…its first plane to Iraq in almost 20 years. It brought doctors, nurses, officials and 10 tons of humanitarian and medical aid. ‘We are Arabs… and we are here to show our support to our brothers in Iraq,’ said Mohammed Mufdhi Sevo, the leader of that delegation.

Remember, Syria’s renewed oil trade with Iraq from 2000-03 at Bashar al-Assad’s directives was technically illegal under international law at the time and well-known to Western Zionist powers who repeatedly pressured and failed to goad Assad into giving up the Syria-Iraq Rapprochement. By daring to defy the internationally accepted status quo that forced Iraqi children into starvation by the thousands and sadistically reduced the resilient indigenous people of Mesopotamia into a dehumanized pariah punished collectively for Saddam Hussein’s invasion of Kuwait, Syria under Bashar al-Assad opened up the possibility of an economically restored Iraq that could re-ascend into prosperity in spite of everything the West did to cripple that country—a prosperity-restored Ba’athist Iraq, this time aligned with Ba’athist Syria (instead of fractured by the disunion perpetuated by Hafez from 1979-96), would not only be able to stick the Saddamist middle finger against all its hateful Zio-Wahhabi enemies as it has its Levantine brother to stand alongside, but as part of a newly cultivated Syria-Iraq Ba’athist unity sponsor a formidably effective Palestinian united front alongside Hassan Nasrallah’s Hezbollah staving off Israeli aggression for years to come and incrementally dismantle Western foreign intrusions.

That was the real reason why Iraq was promptly targeted for liquidation very quickly in the early 2000s—once it became clear to Anglo-American imperial policymakers that Bashar was no Hafez and that Syria under the new Assad defied Machiavellian-Faustian playbook standards by lending the dying Saddamist Iraq a unique helping hand (one which Saddam by all indications appeared to honor into the end, marking his legacy as a fault-ridden dictator who proved to authentically turn around for the better in his final years in spite of his previous aptitudes for atrocious behavior), CIA-MI6 overlords scrambled from the top down to contrive an excuse for invading Iraq to permanently destroy any hopes of a revived Ba’athist anti-Zionist unity. That was why America refused to invade Iraq in the late 1990s despite Adolf-Bibi Mileikowsky’s stance posed in 1996²³ (the exact same year Turkey and “Israel” signed a free trade agreement and also when Turkish manipulation of the Euphrates sparked the Syria-Iraq Rapprochement’s beginning! what a “coincidence”!)—when Hafez was still Syrian president in the 1990s, the West viewed him as sufficiently contained of a Machiavellian-Faustian bargainer to never help Iraq all the way, and they were right: Hafez never directed the level of entente expansion Bashar brought about.

And the Palestinians, you wonder? Well: as it turns out, the exact same sectarian Qutbist-Khomeinist, nominally Twelver-Shi’ite, Iranian-controlled faux “Iraqi resistance” militias today who lob ineffective missiles against the Fourth Reich in the name of Palestinian solidarity were (or otherwise are ideological descendants of) the exact same Khomeinist death squads who post-2003 in the American-Iranian occupation of Iraq terrorized the (predominantly Sunni, pro-Saddam) Palestinians in Iraq simply for being… Palestinians.⁴ Do we have anyone else in the present day ruthlessly massacring Palestinians for their national identity? Oh, lest you forget, remember that the same Anglo-American regime-changing imperialists who engineered the al-Qaeda problem on the “Sunni” side of the balkanization equation had also coordinated the regional ascendancy of Iran allowing Tehran to swallow up Baghdad into its right-arm tentacle on the “Shi’a” side of the exact same divide-and-conquer scheme:⁵

Yes, you read that right: Amerisraeli Zionists, Iranian Khomeinists, and Muslim Brotherhood/al-Qaeda collaborated in a joint conspiracy against Saddam (and by extension, the Syria-Iraq inter-Ba’athist unity, depriving Assad of an ally) which destroyed Iraq and brutalized millions of innocent lies. This is historical fact.

It turns out history is messier than you expected. Neither fully Foucauldian-organic “things just magically happen spontaneously” nor “all actors are common co-conspirators,” but rather lessons about moral cosmic battles that require a critical evaluation piercing through and past smokescreens to uncover. Siding with human decency against synarchist-Nazi fascism necessitates giving up your support for controlled opposition faces of the Janus dialectical scheme and acknowledging who all along were the true pillars of valiant resistance. (hint: not Iran, Hamas, or tankies)

Will you stand with the righteousness-seeking few looking towards the hope of passing through the narrow gate?

1. Paul Iddon (Nov. 8, 2018), “A history of Iraq-Syria relations,” The New Arab.

2. Adolf Mileikowsky (Jul. 10, 1996), “First Speech to a Joint Session of Congress,” American Rhetoric.

3. Cynthia Chung (Nov. 27, 2023), “The ‘Clean Break’ Doctrine: A Modern-Day Sykes-Picot Waging War and Havoc in the Middle East,” Rising Tide Foundation.

4. Sep. 9, 2006, “Nowhere to Flee: The Perilous Situation of Palestinians in Iraq,” pt. IV, Human Rights Watch.

5. Robert “Bob” Dreyfuss (2005), “Devil’s Game: How the United States Helped Unleash Fundamentalist Islam,” ch. XII, p. 340.