If you condemn Trump for 1/6 but won’t condemn Jewlani for 12/8, you’re a white supremacist, anti-Arab hypocrite
You’d have to be completely Trumptarded to not understand this obvious connection.
Today’s date is January 6, which means all the virtue-signaling liberals and mainstream-gatekept faction of so-called “leftists” are, of course, screeching about the 1/6/21 Orange Bolshevist attempted putsch at Washington, D.C., for the ten-trillionth time. (yes, everyone knows)
Do I have a problem with critiques and denouncements of Donald Trump’s a.k.a. Mango Caesar’s low-IQ tangerine-worshipping Bolshevik cult base who stormed the U.S. capitol? Of course not—they were anarchic loons, plain and simple, and the violent rioters deserved to be assaulted by the Capitol Police and later criminally charged for their unrestrained savage behavior that day. This really shouldn’t be particularly difficult for so-called “conservatives” to grasp (yeesh) if they’re concerned with conserving traditional values such as… oh, maybe respecting stability-oriented authorities who preserve order for law-abiding, quietist, decent civilians against the floodgates of anarchic/fascistic degeneracy?
With that said, this doesn’t mean the majority of the typical TDS “anti-Trump” crowd are any better than the very people they vocally denounce. The reason is very simple: if insurrections against capitols are wrong, then why didn’t they equally denounce the pseudo-“Syrian” al-Qaeda led coup d’etat which overthrew Bashar al-Assad’s Syrian Ba’athist government?
No, the counterargument excuse that “Biden was legitimately elected, Assad rigged the election” is incoherent, so don’t even think about it—the reality was that even if (even if!) the 2020 U.S. election wasn’t overtly “rigged” in the exact alleged Democrat cabal plot as Orange Bolshevist mangotards insist, the reality about mail-in ballot discrepancies and media narrative manipulation over Hunter Biden undoubtedly swung the 2020 U.S. presidential election in Biden’s favor almost-definitely to a pivotal extent—by contrast, in the 2021 Syrian presidential election, the anti-Assad, al-Qaeda jihadist-dominated “opposition” and its sympathizers abroad refused to participate in it at all, and Syrians in anti-Assad countries were barred from voting via consulates. If anything, Bashar al-Assad’s 2021 (re)election only proved to hold greater validity in its determined result than the 2020 American presidential race, especially when comparing turnout rates and the overwhelming margin for the Syrian case.
IOWs, if a far more legitimately contested U.S. election’s results cannot be critiqued and its detractors’ violent offshoots are to be rightfully condemned as treasonous insurrectionists over Jan. 6, should not the Zionist-bankrolled jihadist neofascists who overthrew Assad in Dec. 2024 only receive even greater condemnation for their overt trampling of Syrian sovereignty?
Yet liberals not only were jubilant over the violent overthrow of Bashar al-Assad’s Syrian government in Dec. 8, 2024, but made sure to vilify and mock any decency-respecting dissenter who adamantly defended Assad rightfully as a defender of Syrian civilians against Zionist/Gulf-bankrolled salafi-jihadist, anti-Islamic al-Nusra/ISIS savages. See here for some documentation; I’m too lazy to scour all over the internet to pull up additional examples for the time being.
The question that remains is: why? The answer for the gaping liberal-leftist hypocrisy is very simple: because that politically blinded subset views their utopian vision of “Western democracy” as the only possible herald of human freedom and happiness, and that whoever is designated by their media toilet outlets as “tyrannies” and “regimes” are automatic meanie bad monsters who must be overthrown at whatever cost necessary. In a nutshell: cultural Western white supremacy, believing their own white-privileged liberal-“leftist” complex as superior and more important than the bleeding human lives of Arabs ruthlessly tortured and mass-slaughtered by the very Zionist-Wahhabi terrorists funded with the overt approval of the very politicians voted by the Western populace.
Consider thinking about that the next time you hear a Western liberal-“leftist” preach their version of “democracy” as ambiguously defined by Occupy Democrats, Robert “3rd” Reich, Mehdi Hasan, or the Krassensteins.


An interesting take... I ponder this: "...anarchic loons..." Anarchy has been conflated with pandemonium most deliberately by the moneyed psychopaths in control on Our planet (by virtue of money). It is not that, but They want Us to believe that We cannot function without Their governmafias.
"Anarchy" means "no rulers." NOT "no rules." I am an anarchist. I seek:
Ethical Anarchy (article): https://amaterasusolar.substack.com/p/ethical-anarchy
Western renditions of democracy are rapidly showing their shortcomings.
I'm going to be completely frank here, brother: From an external lense, there are two partys in America:
1. Fascist White Right Ruling Class Party
2. ↗️Its Appeasement Party (necessary to quell the masses and prevent mass revolt)
Both are zio'nists.
The CPC, in cooperation with (I believe nine) other parties, work together and on common ground toward common goals for the people. Direct forms of democracy, largely involving sampling of quality of life and services, with a clear metric, are most heavily relied on.
A similar quality assurance feedback loop-type of mechanism is applied to quality of government/representives.
Coupled with strong safeguards against corruption, well... there are many alternatives to "Western Democracy".
American Democracy isn't even democracy; but it is perhaps, the hijacked child of its bastard child; I'll give it that. Words are semantical in these realms...