Is neo-Nazi Nick Fuentes a Jesuit-Zionist agent provocateur?

Connect the dots and decide for yourself.

Aug 03, 2024

When degenerate “alt-right” figurehead Nicholas Joseph “Nick” Fuentes dined at Mar-a-Lago1 with de facto Orange Bolshevist emperor D. John Trump, Sr.,2 the plentiful media attention portrayed him as a fringe right-wing lunatic who arose from nowhere into the coincidentally—and eerily—prominent leader of an extremist “Groyper” movement for unexplained reasons. As much as the neo-Marxist propaganda apparatus desperately works to portray the “far right” as organically spontaneous movements, the prevailing historical record and implications beg to differ. This analysis will show the bits and pieces indicating that “Nazi Nick” Fuentes is almost certainly an operative of controlled stooge of a larger agenda.

Exhibit I: ultramontanist/Jesuit antisemitism

None of Fuentes’s violent anti-Jewish rhetoric is anything new. Rudolf Mikus, the Nazi-era Jesuit Provincial of Slovakia, said in Feb. 1939:3

The Church has always insisted the Jews should not dwell together with [Catholics] that every city should have a ghetto, and that the Jews should have to wear identifying badges. The [Catholic] Church advocates the elimination of the Jews.

Fuentes, an openly revolutionary fanatic, has advocated a “holy war” against Jews45 and outright advocated a mass murder of who he deems “perfidious Jews.”6 The former in particular is blatant neo-Templarism, the historical core of the Jesuit Order probably preserved via the Rosicrucians—remember, the Crusaders were just as antisemitic as they were Islamophobic, burning Jews alive in a synagogue in 1099.7 As to the “perfidy” charge, one must not forget that the Jesuit Order’s antisemitism was nastily manifested in France’s infamous Dreyfus Affair, where practically the entire Catholic Church united behind its right-wing theocratic camp in falsely accusing Jewish soldier Alfred Dreyfus of treason in a conspiracy to drive a wedge through the French Republic8—the antisemitic rabble-rousers in the Affair “were products of Jesuit schools or had Jesuit confessors.”9

Fuentes’s violence-inciting rhetoric against Judaism is nothing new. He is repeating the reactionary anti-Jewish invective of the Jesuits who seek a return to the Dark Ages.10 Anyways, don’t be naively fooled by the modern “progressive”/“left-wing” garb of the Jesuit mainstream11—their secret agent provocateurs are and have always been all over the political spectrum if you look closely.12

Exhibit II: celibacy and inceldom

It’s no surprise that Fuentes is openly an involuntary celibate (“incel”).1314 Note the lengths he takes to undermine traditional monogamy:1516

Gay people do date girls all the time. … All these gay people are coming out and saying, ‘I’ve had more girlfriends than Nick. I’ve had sex with more girls than Nick.’ That actually makes me really more heterosexual than anyone.
…
If we’re really being honest, never having a girlfriend, never having sex with a woman really makes you more heterosexual, because honestly, dating women is gay, having sex with women is gay. And having sex with men is gay. Really it’s all gay. The only really straight heterosexual position is to be an asexual incel. That’s it. That’s all there is.
…
Having sex in itself is gay, I think. I think that it’s really a gay act. Think about it this way: What’s gayer than being like ‘I need cuddles. I need kisses … I need to spend time with a woman.’ That’s a little sus. I think, really, I’m like the straightest guy.

At face-glance, the sheer contradictory stupidity here is one of the most downright laughably stupid statements made in the 21st century. However, let’s not prelude the possibility of a “signal language” here: remember, Catholicism requires its initiated priests and bishops to be celibate. Since Fuentes serves as a de facto “high priest” of a an ultramontanist/Papal-Caesarist Catholic front, of course he will be propagating Catholic doctrine—he simply masks glorification of celibacy as promoting “incel” culture. Making sense? Speaking of Catholic totalitarianism…

Exhibit III: papal supremacism

In Fuentes’s own words:17

I want this country to have Catholic media, Catholic Hollywood, Catholic government. I want this to be a Catholic-occupied government, not a Jewish-occupied government.

Here’s a summary of some of his openly propagated beliefs:18

Fuentes has been very open about his agenda. He wants to see a “supreme leader totalitarian Christian dictator” who jails his opponents, takes a child bride, imposes Christian law on the nation, bans non-Christians from holding office, creates a “Catholic Taliban” that forces everyone to convert to Catholicism through Inquisitions, sends the military into Black neighborhoods, orders security force to gun down citizens in the streets, and requires women to wear burkas.

A “Catholic Taliban”19 forcing conversion to Catholicism via “Inquisitions”? Let’s hear the confession out of the horse’s mouth:20

I’m a 12th century man.
…
You know what democracy has given us? Obesity. Low rates of literacy. It’s given us divorce, abortion, gay marriage, liberalism, pornography. That’s what democracy has given us. Ghettos and crime and political correctness. Diversity. Yeah, the track record of democracy? Not so good. Catholic autocracy? Pretty strong. Pretty strong record. Catholic monarchy? Catholic monarchy, and just war, and crusades, and inquisitions? Pretty good stuff.

This was the exact rhetoric of the Jesuit ultramontanists for centuries.

Exhibit IV: prominent right-wing Catholics bolster Fuentes

The American political right, I’m sorry to say, is a cancerous sewer no matter where you head to. The “mainstream” wing is dominated by Zionazi subservience, and most of its “anti-Zionist” factions veer into alt-right neo-Nazi efforts to cynically co-opt the Palestinian human rights movement and dialectically push the Zionist “anti-Zionism is antisemitism” canard from the antisemitic side.

Whenever Fuentes is rightly opposed by the more “mainstream” faction of the right for being a neo-Nazi, a prominent far-rightist comes to his defense, and often times it is a Catholic. Let’s take a look at just a few case examples.

Candace Owens

Candace Owens—a convert to Catholicism21—sanitized Fuentes’s extremist credentials against Jordan Peterson’s criticism.22 The Groyper leader returned the favor with such fervent ecstasy:23

Candace Owens has just been on a tear lately. She has been in a full-fledged war against the Jews, and specifically some of these Zionist rabbis and I've been watching her evolution. It's been remarkable to witness.

Michelle Malkin

Her vile credentials just never end, I’m sorry to say. She confessed that she would be “proud” if the mother of Fuentes,24 and like Owens, went on an apologist spree:25

Another YAF speaker, Ben Shapiro, repeatedly denigrated an entire movement of young men who watch a YouTuber named Nick Fuentes, and are seeking answers to tough questions about where America is headed as masturbating losers in their basements who share memes. As a mom with brilliant right-thinking kids who, yes, live in my basement—and, yes, share memes—I found these obsessive references to young people’s dating lives and habits, by prominent conservative media personalities much older than their targets, to be tellingly defensive and touchy. Also: creepy. I will not be using my platform and my position to insult you [Fuentes], marginalize you, and shout you down.

Let’s hear what Malkin says of her religious fabric:26

I absolutely consider myself Catholic. Catholicism has had a profound influence on my work choices and it drives what I decide to do every morning.

“Drives what I decide to do every morning”? So Catholicism drove Malkin’s extolling gush for neo-Nazi Fuentes and Groyper degenerates? Very interesting indeed.

Michael Voris

Long story short, he was the owner of the ultra-rightist Catholic website Church Militant which in recent times was shut down.27 He’s also a self-hating homosexual,28 apparently,29 which makes his apologetics for Nazis all the more intriguing.30 Not to mention a defender of political violence as well.31

As you’d expect, yes, Voris has promoted Fuentes’s cause—Salon noted:32

Voris took note when Fuentes held AFPAC III, praising the conference as ‘where all the youthful (read: future) energy is’ in the ‘real struggle for the heart and soul of the [conservative] movement’—a struggle, Voris said, echoing Fuentes' framing, which ‘will dictate the future of the [Republican] party and, to a large extent, the nation.’

Exhibit V: Fuentes defends Pope Francis

Sounds odd at face value, considering Francis’s highly “left-wing” reputation, yet verifiably true. Once again, the horse’s mouth is speaking:33

Here’s a classic example, the Pope.
…
That’s Pope Francis to you, b**** [addressing sedevacantists]! He’s the vicar of Christ on earth! If there’s any monarch on earth that’s legitimate, it’s the Pope.
…
I understand the Pope isn’t going to, you know, I don’t agree with the Pope on everything, but he’s the king; he’s the king of the Catholic Church standing in for Jesus. You better respect that!

Yet another example:34

I prefer Nova Sordo because… I support the Catholic Church. All this ‘trad’ ‘schismatic’ stuff I’m not with it, okay? I support the Pope.

And remember: Francis I is the first (openly) Jesuit Pope.35 So whatever Francis’s agenda is, which Fuentes defends, it’s a Jesuitic one.

Exhibit VI: slick connections

One would normally expect such obvious neo-Nazi degenerates to be complete rejects from mainstream society. Not the case with Fuentes—the far right faction of the modern Republican Party continuously adores him, from an Arizona college student group36 to a million-dollar right-wing consulting firm3738 to countless lawmakers39 40and to—as mentioned earlier—Trump at Mar-a-Lago.

How does just any random basement degenerate mainstream blatant neo-Nazi extremism into a political party?41 Hint: the demagogue is specially trained by higher powers at hand here. Is it really a i.e. “fringe conspiracy theory” to surmise that he is a stooge of the very Jesuit Order whose doctrines he perfectly propagates?

Exhibit VII: historical warnings

American physician and historian Emanuel M. Josephson noted:42

Weishaupt’s success in forcing the Vatican to reestablish the abolished Jesuit order, through revival of the Church’s original Nazarene Communism in the form of present-day Communism, led to the conspiracy’s control by the Society of Jesus. This undoubtedly is the significance of the admonition to the Jesuit Order by Pope Paul VI at the time of their assembly, in May, 1965, to elect their new General, Fr. Pedro Arrupe. The situation explains why wherever a totalitarian movement erupts, whether Communist or Nazi, a Jesuit can be found in the role of ‘adviser,’ or leader, in Cuba, Castro’s Fr. Armando Llorente and in Argentina the neo-Nazis are led by Fr. [Meinvielle].

Josephson’s assertion that practically all Nazi/neo-Nazi movements are Jesuit-controlled certainly carries intriguing implications: if that was the pattern in his day, could it be the same today? As King Solomon famously wrote, “there is nothing new under the sun.”43

Catholic-turned-Protestant Jeremiah J. Crowley noted the eerily prophetic cautioning of none other than American Revolution leader Marquis de Lafayette:44

It is my opinion that if the liberties of this country—the United States of America—are destroyed, it will be by the subtlety of the Roman Catholic Jesuit priests, for they are the most crafty, dangerous enemies to civil and religious liberty. They have instigated most of the wars of Europe.

Are the American far-right theocrats at the verge of destroying the liberties of this country? Very obviously so. Given Fuentes’s role as a “bridge” between the mainstream rightists and neo-Nazis and especially his theocratic Catholicism, the conclusion that he is a Jesuit operative/stooge is only logical if one applies the farsighted observations and wisdom of Lafayette and Josephson.

Bonus: Fuentes the Zionist stooge?

As I noted in some previous posts, the neo-Nazi infiltration of pro-Palestine movements only gives fuel to the Zionist propaganda canard to equivocate genuine Palestinian human rights activists with (obviously bad-faith) neo-Nazis. Since this only equates to long-term discrediting of the pro-Palestine movement, the logical assumption here is that the neo-Nazis are—wittingly or not—at the direct service of the very Zionists whose propaganda apparatus they are ostensibly bolstering.

Of course, it should be noted that Fuentes, like most neo-Nazis,45 merely co-opts the pro-Palestine movement like the parasitic infiltrator he is to mask his anti-Jewish hatred as “anti-Zionism,”46 admitting his ends-justify-the-means47 “strategic” ideology of merely temporarily “aligning” with the “enemy of my enemy.”48 Basically, he doesn’t care about Palestinians; given his intense hatred of Muslims,49 would anyone seriously expect a sudden 180? Clearly not.

The plot only thickens—Fuentes at one point streamed homosexual pornography and subsequently blamed it on an Israeli hacking operation.50 Fuentes purported that the alleged “hack” was by “IDF Unit 8200.” Does the neo-Nazi in question here have some odd link to Israeli intelligence? Maybe, maybe not, though the circumstances and words out of the horse’s mouth just happen to be oddly fascinating. Either that or he is a closeted homosexual—God knows.

Conclusion

I of course don’t have direct evidence—as much as I may wish I did—that the neo-Nazi degenerate Nick Fuentes is trained by the Jesuit Order or that he is in secret communication with the Order. All I can say is that these are the facts of the matter, and that they speak for themselves.

Meredith McGraw (Nov. 25, 2022), “Donald Trump dined with white nationalist, Holocaust denier Nick Fuentes,” Politico.

Commonly known as Donald Trump.

1968, “The Jews of Czechoslovakia: Historical Studies and Surveys,” Vol. III, p. 254.

Prem Thakker (Jul. 17, 2023), “White Supremacist Nick Fuentes Calls for “Holy War” Against Jews,” The New Republic.

Jul. 18, 2023, “White supremacist Nick Fuentes: 'We will make Jews die in the holy war',” The Jerusalem Post.

Tim Dickinson (Dec. 12, 2023), “Trump Dinner Guest Says ‘Perfidious Jews’ Should Be Executed,” Rolling Stone.

Richard Gottheil, Joseph Jacobs, “The Crusades,” Jewish Encyclopedia.

Edmond Paris (1983), “The Secret History of the Jesuits,” sec. IV, ch. VIII, p. 103.

Leo H. Lehmann (1942), “Behind the Dictators: A Factual Analysis of the Relationship of Nazi-Fascism and Roman Catholicism,” ch. I, p. 9.

Why is the right-wing ultramontanist wing of Catholicism so virulently antisemitic, you may wonder? Two likely reasons: firstly, because Jews historically very stubbornly resistant to assimilation (at least until they were finally duped by the Anglo-Jesuit pet project known as “Zionism”). And secondly, because the Catholic Church was founded on neo-Marcionite rejection of the Jewish foundation of Christianity when pagan syncretism established itself inside the church’s mainstream during the 4th century.

Michael J. O’Loughlin (Dec. 9, 2022), “Cardinal Gregory says Catholics should be ‘outraged’ by rising antisemitism,” America Magazine.

Emmanuel Goldstein’s Substack

Discussion about this post

Ready for more?