The ‘free’-masonic myth of ‘free’-speech absolutism (hint: Substack isn’t what you think)

Try viewing reality the same way again by the time you finish digesting this article.

Please take a moment to think for yourself before answering these questions:

Spoiler: if your answers leaned mostly towards B, you are possibly seeing past the facade. Read this analysis of mine below to see if my observations match yours. Mostly C? Good on you for choosing honest admission of ignorance over presumptuous arrogance; keep reading to keep learning. Heavily towards A? …you probably need an intake of my breakdown.

This author must admit: I was duped and almost certainly so too were you. The glamorous word “free speech” as perceptually channeled in the mainstream of “anti-establishment dissident” modern mass movements is in actuality distorted into an effective scam securing the exact same ends accomplished by de jure censorship. The choice you are posed between “censorship” and “free speech absolutism” rivals the dichotomous meaninglessness of “Zionist Republican vs. Zionist Democrat,” “Lucifer vs. Satan,” “cyanide vs. arsenic,” “ISIS vs. HTS,” etc. etc. ad infinitum.

Why do you clamor for free speech absolutism? Because mass media platforms elsewhere censor what you have to say to silence your dissident thinking from being broadcasted to inform other fellow human beings. You don’t fight for unfettered free speech for the sake any speech—you fundamentally want your speech, the expression of your independent, critically thinking, intellectually robust human mind to be shared without an arbitrary censor blocking the flow of your meaningfully expressed thoughts and findings exchanged to another human being. Surely you aren’t striving tirelessly for the “rights” of CIA bots to flood state propaganda narratives everywhere?

Because “free speech” isn’t about the freedom of all speech to be treated equally on a flat plane. It is about the freedom of critically thinking, morally pious, independently minded human beings to share their human emotions, experiences, and ingenuity apart from the compulsion of culturally Herodian authoritarians demanding their subservience to a cult obeyed without question. “Free speech” means nothing if:

• everyone in a community is ideologically gatekept into repeating the same empty talk and anyone intellectually deviating from the preset narrative is castigated

• bots are permitted to psychologically alter people’s perceptual frameworks

• mass droves of Zionist/neo-Nazi/liberal/Communist trolls reduce discussions into a mockery of human intelligence

• algorithms selectively elevate the heaviest promulgators of controlled opposition narratives, loudmouthed empty activism, or debased vulgarity while intentionally marginalizing writers of meaningful content into minimally received attention

If your focus is on free speech as an end in of itself a.k.a. as the ultimate end subject to ensure and safeguard, then the logical conclusion you must reach in that trajectory’s destination is the acceptation and protection of practically all speech as meriting an equally granted standing regardless of who sent it out, for what purpose, and what its substance even is. The application of “free speech absolutism” as a cultural norm to all levels of communal exchange, to the extent even individual small publication creators privately running their own project for whatever reason “cannot” safeguard valuable human exchange against mass manipulation psyops, is self-defeating.

On the polar opposite hand, if you view free speech as simply a medium to transfer valuable human exchanges, then the focus and end conclusions change dramatically. You suddenly realize the value of an internet comment is not the textual comprisal in of itself but the fact an independently thinking and thriving human typed it to share with other humans. The realization hits you that when each person proves their merit, those offering no value deserve no additionally granted attention, that unrepentant liars, trolls, and Zionist/neo-Nazi racists do not deserve human-sanctioned tolerance at the level of the local community to preach their cynical pile of co-optation garbage, and that true free speech’s assurance does not arrive at a free price: it requires a critically thinking and morally upright society comprising individually responsible and accountable human beings to preserve.

The end goal of censorship as long imposed by left and right “mainstream” Anglo-American earthly overlords alike—whether War on Terror, neo-“Marxist” media domination and Facebook Jails, or the present wave of Zionist-operated violations against civil liberties—is the confinement of societal thinking patterns into a narrow stream of blind subservience approved by this planet’s integrated hierarchical elites (whether outwardly “left” or “right”): the corporations, the intelligence agencies, the army, the clerical aristocracy, the presidents and governors, the media, the business-government partnerships (what do we call this type of collusion?), and the monarchies, together jointly composing part and parcel of conservatism actively preserving the status quo of artificially preserved inequality.

So long as your beloved “free speech platform” fosters an atmosphere where endless torrents of bots, trolls, and unthinking zealots (whether they are specifically Ku Klux Kamala/Democrat shills, Trumpist bootlickers, white nationalists, neo-Nazis, Zionists, Communists, it doesn’t quite matter) permeate every “community” of political contrarians without substantial opposition and subvert them into echo chambers of hogwash and linguistic filth, “total free speech” has become another route towards the exact same final destination of collective groupthink as a censorship-governed platform where everyday “conservatives” were long banned for expressing dissident sentiment the so-called “Cultural Marxists” deemed unworthy of public visibility. All the supreme masters of our world’s global order need to do is flood a “free speech platform” with a preplanned wave of intelligence-operated entryists conditioning easily beguiled masses into believing whatever their controlled opposition narrative is that has been cloaked under duplicitous guises “opposite” to its true ulterior motives.

Compare and contrast: on a censorship-ridden platform, you are not allowed to make “overly” pro-Palestine statements “excessively” condemnatory against Zionism; on a “free speech absolutist” platform, a flood of controlled opposition self-serving egoheads post hollow “pro-Palestine” “calls to action” that degrade whatever noble intents of the pro-Palestine movement into cyclical dead ends accomplishing nothing—both routes lead to the exact same end destination of Palestinian humanity voices reduced to est.-contained lack of meaningful institutional counters against Zionism.

When you are:

• subscribing overwhelmingly to “bestsellers” who don’t care about your presence and existence as an individual human being and who could care less if you ceased throwing your support to them one day

• reposting content already mass-liked and mass-restacked (what, you thought all that puffed-up hot-air-balloon vanity from Robert Reich, Joe Mayall, Ariana Jasmine, Aalia Mauro, or Dean Obeidallah ever carried any value ever?) that is nothing but empty horse-excrement screeching and which offers no meaningful answer to edify people at the individual level towards a humility-filled earnest desire for moral and intellectual clarity against collectivist groupthink

• maintaining silence as genuine dissidents are targeted by algorithmic suppression

• selectively blind as the very mechanisms of repression you decry were long weaponized against those you refused to stand up for simply because they disagreed with you and therefore were “unworthy” of those privileges you boast the ability to utilize at your disposal in the present time

• ignoring comments and replies by people politely urging you to reconsider your ways into a zoomed-out perspective comprehending the full workings of two-headed controlled opposition duplicity

• posing yourself as a voice for the “common people” while disproportionately “recommending” from your own Substack the est. narrative-propagating controlled opposition publications of those who already command tens of thousands of subscribers instead of elevating smaller voices

…you are a de facto collaborationist bootlicker for the integrated reactionary hierarchy no better informed or “liberated” than the epistemologically lobotomized average idiot whose makes the censorship-laden corners of Cultural Herodian ordinary mass media their mental abode. Whether you yield to the empire’s end goals in open support or unconsciously while believing you are in opposition—from one side of the coin or the other—is a matter of trivially meaningless difference to them: the two sides of the coin are two sides of the exact same coin.

An analogy can almost certainly be drawn here to the “contrast” between Jesuitism and Freemasonry: the global order’s arm of overt censorship, the symbolic context of a two-headed Janus complex described here, operates as the “Jesuit” head on one side while the global order’s arm of “free speech absolutism” operates as the “Masonic” head on the other side. The one head preaches outright prohibition of unapproved speech and the other head extols the virtues of absolutely unrestrained speech bound by no barriers whatsoever; the two outwardly appear to clash in diametrically irreconcilable opposition yet are heads of the same creature serving one long-term objective merely from “opposite” sides which converge in their fullest culminations.

“Free” speech, as conditioned into the controlled-opposition de facto mainstream narrative of modern perception, is no more a failsafe arbiter of “free”-ing human liberation than “free”-masonry, “free”-market capitalism, “free” trade,” “free” elections, “free”-range chicken, “free” healthcare, “free press,” “free” country, “free”-lance,” and [sigh] yes, even “free” Palestine by this point in time (I’m incredibly sorry to say), would nominally correspond in transpired reality to authentic markers of freeing liberation. The affixing of “free” into controlled discourse serves as a sugarcoating quasi-prefix placeholder loaded word for the duped catechumen to believe they are achieving liberation while only “freely” exercising within a confined boundary set by the elites they imagine themselves in ferocious adversity against. No different is its core ulterior purpose than that of Auschwitz’s notorious slogan arbeit macht frei (“work makes [you] free”) which—by the way!—was recycled back into prominent implementation by the Judeonazis’ Hamas-elevating work permit policy to financially enslave and manipulate the Palestinian people.¹² (whoops, did you conveniently forget it was the Zionist savages from Tel Aviv who through Doha financially propped up Hamas in the first place? And you consider yourself a “free” thinker?)

And as [Jesus] sat upon the mount of Olives, the disciples came unto him privately, saying, Tell us, when shall these things be? And what shall be the sign of thy coming, and of the end of the world? And Jesus answered and said unto them, Take heed that no man deceive you. —Matthew 24:3-4

Let no man deceive you with vain words: for because of these things cometh the wrath of God upon the children of disobedience. —Ephesians 5:6

Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world, and not after Christ. —Colossians 2:8

While they promise them liberty, they themselves are the servants of corruption: for of whom a man is overcome, of the same is he brought in bondage. —II Peter 2:19

These are murmurers, complainers, walking after their own lusts; and their mouth speaketh great swelling words, having men’s persons in admiration because of advantage. —Jude 16

This passage from Behind the Facade of the Masonic Temple (1989) sums up the Western two-headed “free”-masonic game with succinct clarity:³

With the ‘Masonic guarantee,’ power seems to change hands but the propertied classes — the rich, the capitalists (after the fall of feudalism) — always remain on top. This ability to manipulate politics and public opinion is very convenient for the ruling circles as a means of coordinating their actions domestically and on the world scene. Masonry has a ‘liking’ for political pluralism, the flexible parliamentary system and the varied mass media, which are just outward trappings. In this way it can relieve social tensions by surrendering the unimportant. But when the conventional mechanism starts to conk, the trappings of democracy are cast aside and the way is cleared for the direct dictatorship of the bourgeoisie, exercised in one form or another by the ultra-right sectors of society.

Masonry in fact runs, ‘remotely controls’ bourgeois society, which its ideologists and politicians are fond of praising as open, free and democratic. The world bourgeoisie finds the organization with its clandestine, arcane ways very convenient in secretly shaping the more covert aspects of its domestic and foreign policies.

The following is therefore concluded upon by this author:

1. “absolute free speech,” as an unconditionally granted right, only serves net constructive purposes if treated as a mechanism allowing each person to prove their merit and not extending beyond that to the point smaller individual communities treat every voice on a flat plane regardless of value

2. “absolute free speech,” as a protector of all speech granted the benefit of the doubt towards the individual person to broadcast their viewpoints in full public visibility at the level of the small grassroots ecosystem, should only be granted towards people at a purely individual (and never collective) basis premised upon an evaluation of their intellectual and moral merit

3. “free speech” ought to be treated as a supplementary and serving (rather than a means itself to be served) mechanism for securing an exchange of intellectually and morally coherent human thinking, the latter and not the former treated as the priority “end” goal

4. individual, privately run, independent political systems whose goal is the advancement of human freedom and liberation from the chains of establishment narratives hold a fundamental moral responsibility to protect and keep clean their overseen communities of public discussion from infiltration by fifth columnist infiltrators who plaster controlled-opposition psyop garbage, be they liberal BlueAnon stans, Zionist savagery apologists, Orange Bolshevist/Trumpist cultists, neo-Nazi Hitler worshipers, gnostically “enlightened” Communist yokels, etc.

5. no person should ever be treated as beyond criticism or “fundamentally incapable” of becoming duped into serving controlled opposition interests

1. Tal Schneider (Oct. 8, 2023), “For years, Netanyahu propped up Hamas. Now it’s blown up in our faces,” The Times of Israel.

2. Maha Hussaini (Apr. 25, 2022), “Why Israel is suddenly granting Gaza thousands of work permits,” Middle East Eye.

3. Lelliĭ P. Zamoĭskiĭ (1989), “Behind the Facade of the Masonic Temple,” p. 9.