There are tens of thousands of publicly active Jews who are against Zionism to the core and believe it's a blasphemy, including the creation of a state for the Jews, anywhere in the world, let alone Palestine, which is against the core teaching of the Torah.
It was our own Miri Wood, the American investigative journalist and political analyst who writes for Syria News (https://syrianews.cc/author/mary/), who keeps pointing out the struggle of the Jews worldwide being conflated with Zionism, and more so, the crimes of the 'Jewish' state of Israel.
As we have documented numerously on our site and my social media, the massacres and crimes committed by Al Qaeda and its affiliates and offshoots, esp. ISIS in Syria and Ira,q against mainstream Muslims, whether they identify as Shia or Sunni, or any of the other denominations, against all of the Christian,s while in its 4 decades of existence, Al Qaeda has not fired a single bullet or carried out any operation against Israel, isn't that an eye-opener to the blind?
Those who insist on conflating Judaism with the atheist-created Zionism, Islam with the anti-Islamic Wahhabi and Muslim Brotherhood doctrine, are the same ones who believe the KKK is the teaching of Jesus Christ, it's racism, bigotry, and the love of evil humans to the smell of blood like the predators they are.
You took the words right out of my mouth as always, Arabi; I could not concur more with all of your points here.
Oh, yes, I believe I've seen some of Miri's articles over at Syria News! Tremendously respect all fellow pro-humanity independent voices who reject bigoted "ambiguous lumping" heinous tactics.
Agree with you absolutely about the fundamentally anti-Islamic nature of al-Qaeda and "I"-"S"-occupying-IL -- some few months ago when I began diving even at the utmost basic face value into the history of Sunni Ba'athist, Nasserite, and Gaddafist movements, it became apparent to me that in both Sunni and Shi'a Islam, there are authentic pious traditionalists (I assume of Sufi orientation especially?) who have been intentionally drowned out by CIA-MI6-Mossad funded aberrations of their Islamic religious banners into politicized ecclesiasticism, whether it's Qutbist Salafi-Wahhabism co-opting Sunnism or Qutbist Khomeinism co-opting Shi'ism. Note that Wikipedia and "experts" keep obnoxiously referring to DAESH as "IS," absurdly insinuating ISIS as the representation of Islam. I cannot stand all that shameless psyop garbage, and even worse, you have people like Ted Cruz who will "lecture" to Arabs that ISIS and Hezbollah were jointly sponsored by Assad and Iran. I kid you not! http://www.aina.org/news/20140911022600.htm
I'm absolutely sick of sectarian pseudochristian "zion"-ist propaganda from Zio-NAZI outlets like CUFI working overtime to slander Hezbollah when it couldn't be more clear that the Shi'ite-led, actually pluralistic and tolerant, wonderful human beings of Hezbollah led by Hassan Nasrallah saved innocent Syrians from the hands of DAESH-Nusra terrorists, often at the sacrifice of their own lives in the fight against ziosalafism. As far as I'm aware, I stand with the Syrian and Lebanese resistance at heart no matter what religion and sect they belong to, and am in wholehearted solidarity with my fellow beloved Islamic friends against "Christian"-"zion"-ist, salafist-takfiri, and nazijew terrorists alike.
Those exact same extremist Qutbist "jihad"-ist sects who posture themselves under duplicitous banners of "anti-Zionism" by demonizing Jews collectively are the EXACT SAME COLLUDERS WITH ZIONISM WHEN IT SUITS THEM -- when Nasser was trying to build up a strong Arab nationalist unity to counter Zionist criminality, Qutb and his Criminal Brotherhood lackeys were funded by MI6 as internal Anglosubversive fifth columnists to undermine Egypt. When Saddam Hussein built up an Arab nationalist and industrially socialist modernized Iraq, Anglo-American Freemasonic agencies brought back Khomeini from exile to take over Iran and from there spread balkanization to Iraq from the nominally "Shi'ite" side of the coin -- that was precisely why so-called "Israel" sent arms to Khomeini during the Iran-Iraq War. Hafez al-Assad later by 1996-97 must've learned his mistake of alienating Saddam and commenced an overdue rapprochement as Iraq and Syria began throwing each other vital lifelines that sped up under Bashar from 2000-03. (note that Bashar supported Saddam and the Sunni Ba'athists during the Iraqi insurgency, NOT the Tehran-controlled "Iraqi" government that drove Iraqi Sunnis into tragic sectarianism)
It's a very old tradition that Zionists always fund the biggest actual Jew-haters in order to subvert legitimate anti-Zionist movements into emasculated Machiavellian-Faustian controlled opposition -- it was the British Zionist Jew Herbert Samuel who appointed the barely-Islamically-equipped Amin al-Husseini as "Mufti," lest we forget.
Yes, exactly, the same people who blame Judaism for Zionism and who blame Islam for Qutbist-Wahhabi-Criminal Brotherhood-ISIS terrorism have always been the exact same pathological liars who would falsely equivocate Christianity to the KKK.
I'd agree with everything you're saying except the Saddam part, he was a CIA agent and was doing their bidding until he was fooled in invading Kuwait by the US who he thought gave him a green light, the Kuwaitis were the culprits giving him the excuse as they were siphoning the oil from the shared borders fields against the agreements in place.
Saddam took over the Ba'ath in Iraq and that caused the schism between the party ranks, most of the Ba'ath branches in different countries like Yemen, Lebanon, and others followed the Syrian leadership of the party, the Iraqi branch was only running Iraq, and Saddam used to fund Muslim Brotherhood terrorists and gave them camps to train and they will carry out their terrorist attacks inside Syria, Turkey at that time was extreme in its secularism and they were not providing these mobs any access, unlike Iraq and Jordan, even parties in Lebanon helped as well.
That era was as difficult as the current one. Syria was still holding on because late Hafez Al Assad was not giving the MB any amnesty, unlike Bashar, under the extreme pressure from Putin and Iran, both were betting on the Turkish madman Erdogan, and his fake promises.
The MB morphed into Al Qaeda, then ISIS and the hundreds of their affiliate groups. They were present in the first FSA, which was supposed to be secular, but they couldn't hide their sectarianism, and that caused the FSA to be replaced by the terrorist groups we see.
Appreciate your insightfully nuanced clarification here, Arabi -- so if I'm correctly piecing the larger picture taking into account your analytical summary here, Saddam was a brainwashed dupe who made the egregious decision of agreeing to a Faustian bargain with the Anglo-Western-Salafist empire and only split when he overstepped and it was proven too late to reverse the sealed fate of Iraq?
Yeah, I did read up a bit on the sectarian depravity shaking the heart of the Middle East during the 1980s, and by all indications that must've been a fraught era where genuine anti-Zionists were thrown at each other's throats as the West and Soviets were sitting in the background using intel manipulation to leverage sectarian division hoping to balkanize the whole region ASAP to their liking? Since you summarize that time frame as one that was "as difficult as the current one," I'm getting the impression naturally that nothing new is under the sun. (do correct me if I'm still mistaken about anything, since you naturally are magnitudes more familiar with Middle East geopolitical context than I am)
The more I study older generations of empirical ascension and demise, the motif strikes deep that the sharpest and most pronounced dissidents in positions of prestige almost every time were at one point Machiavellian-Faustian bargainers serving the empire as ego-tripped stooges, and that those who break away when it's too late to save their nations, as they scramble to stave off collapse for as long as possible, are part of the lesser-common exception and not the norm. Maybe it's just my inability to "let things go" as I ponder too much over societally-forced-amnesia-forgotten conflicts of old swept under the rug by the Western architects of misery who rewrite history over and over, but it just strikes a harrowingly deep chord within me to wonder what Syria and Iraq would've looked like if the West was deterred from invading Iraq, even by just a few additional years. Namely, would Saddam and Bashar have demonstrated utmost consistent mutual loyalty and not throw one another under the bus as the Saddam-Hafez relationship was so easily fractured?
In fact, reading recent news reporting from just a few months ago, currently the Khomeinist dominated Tehran-proxy "Iraqi" government after the coup of Dec. 8, 2024, has in this post-Assad era of balkanized depravity suddenly taken an interest in forging a kinship with the ISIS-HTS dominated "Syrian" government, and that this same post-Saddam "Iraqi government" was cold towards the prospect of a robust alliance with Bashar. We hear so often in the Janus-faced reporting by both Western and Iranian narratives of an Iranian alliance with Assad wherein Shi'ite dominated Khomeinist militias of Iraq were allies of Ba'athist Syria, and yet it appears that, all along, Saddam in his final years was the true Iraqi friend of Syria while the Iranian-controlled Khomeinist outwardly (nominally?) "Shi'a majority" "democratic" Iraqi government has not been a sincere ally of Bashar al-Assad the entire time. https://archive.is/dkdDj
Since your assessment of Ba'athist Iraq looks to be a highly balanced and well-informed perspective (do pardon if in any wise I come off slow to understand, as I'm still trapped partially in my own partial presuppositions I'm ever trying my best to sift through and often times past with utmost self-abased humility I try to impose on myself), the sheer contrast between Saddam's regionally pronounced Machiavellian brutality prior to the crippling of Iraq and his incredibly generous, brotherly-loyal lending of assistance to Syria from 2000-03 is only ever more stark in light of the brutal consequences that spanned almost two decades from the animosity between Saddam and Hafez that spilled over into proxy bloodshed.
I just cannot help but think that somewhere in the background, the Western and Soviet highest controllers were sitting at the same table agreeing in advance explicitly to engineer the intra-Ba'athist split between Saddam and Hafez -- a united pan-Arab nationalist coalition was the most formidable obstacle hateful to Anglo-Zionist destructive goals, and the egos on at least one side of the Ba'athist equation were channeled and co-opted into overstepping the line sowing a mutual seed of distrust that boiled over into the fractured, consequential deadliness that grievously emerged.
Obviously that's not to say Saddam's actions that served empirical divide-and-conquer interests were themselves justified or excusable by any means, particularly his funding of Muslim Brotherhood terrorists, just rather some retrospective pondering as to whether there are important lessons to learn for the sake of edifying consciences in our present generation to evade falling into the pits that people like Saddam, Gaddafi and/or Hafez were duped into in the earlier halves of their heydays.
By the way, speaking of the Muslim Brotherhood in Syria, randomly curious, what is your own personal perspective on the Palestinian Islamic Jihad in light of their interestingly consistent loyalty to Assad against the main comprisal of the Muslim Brotherhood that universally sided with the ziosalafist terrorist coup plotters against Syria?
Appreciated as always, Amaterasu -- ditto, the root of the evil is the love of money, which always translates to greedy selfish lust for empirical power. When people place love for temporal splendor over respect for conscientious human consideration, that's where the slippery slope towards elite pedophile networks begin.
Yes, I recall you mentioning that before, and completely agree based off what I currently am likewise aware of: the Black Nobility and/or the Venetians are at the highest echelons, with the SMOM as their primary neo-Templar emissary politico-governmental managerial umbrella organization and the Jesuits as clerical priestly adjutants. I probably need to catch up on Matthew Schanche's videos over at YouTube for additional specifics.
Nothing we see through the lens of the "media" is real. We are living in an Edward Bernays fourth estate wasteland.
"There is something way bigger going on when you can divide everyone in the entire world into an 'us vs them' mentality on almost every single subject." —Prevensilk
Julius Nyerere sums this all up thusly: "The United States is a one-party state, but, with typical American extravagance, they have two of them."
The largest PSYOP in history is unfolding right before our eyes, armed with incalculable amounts of human behavior data harvested from internet social media and smart phone usage geared toward manipulating us to walk in lock-step into the incinerator of our own destruction.
We're dealing with a captured media and the transparently obvious military grade psychological operations they are relentlessly employing, the millions of people that believe their every obvious lie and preach it as gospel, and their near total obliviousness to the self-evident fact that these contrived, breaking-the-Richter-scale political earthquares are the predicate to the ruination of our Republic and the twilight of freedom.
I think I can agree with most of what you're getting at, TriTorch (and broadly concur). Not sure how I'm exactly an "unwitting participant" in it? Feel more than welcome to expand on your points.
Do you know what's really going on Emmanuel Goldstein? Where do you get your information and how can you be sure that it's not tailored directly to your confirmation biases? With the tech today, that black mirror in your hand and on your desktop can corroborate any fiction you decide to indulge in six ways from Sunday with on demand fake answers to every question your mind cares to investigate and, hey, it can be reinforced with an narrative your mind seeks in that moment and at the moment.
Fair challenge, TriTorch. While I cannot prophesy of the future with 100% certainty, what I can say for right now, speaking for myself at least, is that I have some very strong instinctive mental precautionary red alerts about the rough schematic idea of the near future.
It's all about being able to properly dissect how dialectical manipulation works and recognizing that "there is nothing new under the sun" -- the tactics used today are recycled repetitions of ancient Nimrodist/Assyro-Babylonian empirical control rites.
More specifically, the world becomes a whole lot easier to dissect past the smokescreens of when you realize that the entire final culmination of the world order necessitates a penultimate faked "sacrificial goat burning up" which will be the false miracle of Rev. 13:13-14. The False Prophet is a false Elijah -- the real Elijah in I Kings 18 set up a real sacrificial bullock burnt offering which fire from God out of Heaven burned, which led the children of Israel to turn back to the living God, and so is this counterfeited by neo-Templar Johannite Satanic architects of Zionist Freemasonry: the False Prophet (a.k.a. the dispensationalist "Christian Zionist" Freemasonic evangelical power centered in the U.S.) creates a false sacrificial bullock (a.k.a. the Zionist Jews) and claims that "a future two-thirds annihilation of the Jews in Palestine will bring about the coming of Christ," when in actuality the entire ruse is faked and the Zionist Jews are set up to being herded to Occupied Palestine to be nuked in what will be passed off to idiot masses as "divine prophetic fulfillment." Then the so-called "Jesus" that "returns" to set up an earthly kingdom will actually be Satan dressed up as Jesus, but it'll be such a lying sign and wonder that the entire planet will be deceived.
Every single major geopolitical action by the world elites in at least the past century has all been to work towards accomplishing this fake "sacrificial goat" Sabbatean-Frankist Freemasonic "revelation of the method." Bolshevism was created by the Anglo-Jesuits (a.k.a. MI6 and Vatican-Germanic aristocrats with Jesuit help) to justify Nazi-Fascism, and Nazi-Fascists would in turn with arms and dollars from Rothschild-Warburg Zionists slaughter enough anti-Zionist Jews in Europe so the surviving traumatized reminder would be brainwashed into Zionist ethnonationalism in the long run. See the picture?
First flaw of your argument: Assuming hypothetical Problem A has to be exactly like Problem B to be a problem.
If there is a “Jewish Problem”, it doesn’t have to be exactly like the “Islamic Problem”. There are many variables of difference between the Judaism of the past 2,000 years and mainstream Islam. One of them being a profound Westernization of Jews at least 200 years old, which in turn entailed a profound participation in the secularist Zeitgeist that throughout the West has replaced the vacuum left by the dissolution of Christendom. This entailment further entailed a development of the Gnostic disease called “Communism” and its associated pathogens (including Leftism). So it’s not so surprising that Max Blumenthal et al. become anti-”Zionist” insofar as they can associate “Zionism” with the evil parts of the West that continue to impede the Revolution. The irony of the Blumenthalian Jews—ironic if they aren’t controlled ops—is that the “Zionism” (and “Capitalism”) they oppose may actually be deeper form of the Revolution they espouse. They’re just too small-minded in an Angela-Davis Che-Guevarian starry-eyed way to see the bigger picture.
There are tens of thousands of publicly active Jews who are against Zionism to the core and believe it's a blasphemy, including the creation of a state for the Jews, anywhere in the world, let alone Palestine, which is against the core teaching of the Torah.
It was our own Miri Wood, the American investigative journalist and political analyst who writes for Syria News (https://syrianews.cc/author/mary/), who keeps pointing out the struggle of the Jews worldwide being conflated with Zionism, and more so, the crimes of the 'Jewish' state of Israel.
As we have documented numerously on our site and my social media, the massacres and crimes committed by Al Qaeda and its affiliates and offshoots, esp. ISIS in Syria and Ira,q against mainstream Muslims, whether they identify as Shia or Sunni, or any of the other denominations, against all of the Christian,s while in its 4 decades of existence, Al Qaeda has not fired a single bullet or carried out any operation against Israel, isn't that an eye-opener to the blind?
Those who insist on conflating Judaism with the atheist-created Zionism, Islam with the anti-Islamic Wahhabi and Muslim Brotherhood doctrine, are the same ones who believe the KKK is the teaching of Jesus Christ, it's racism, bigotry, and the love of evil humans to the smell of blood like the predators they are.
You took the words right out of my mouth as always, Arabi; I could not concur more with all of your points here.
Oh, yes, I believe I've seen some of Miri's articles over at Syria News! Tremendously respect all fellow pro-humanity independent voices who reject bigoted "ambiguous lumping" heinous tactics.
Agree with you absolutely about the fundamentally anti-Islamic nature of al-Qaeda and "I"-"S"-occupying-IL -- some few months ago when I began diving even at the utmost basic face value into the history of Sunni Ba'athist, Nasserite, and Gaddafist movements, it became apparent to me that in both Sunni and Shi'a Islam, there are authentic pious traditionalists (I assume of Sufi orientation especially?) who have been intentionally drowned out by CIA-MI6-Mossad funded aberrations of their Islamic religious banners into politicized ecclesiasticism, whether it's Qutbist Salafi-Wahhabism co-opting Sunnism or Qutbist Khomeinism co-opting Shi'ism. Note that Wikipedia and "experts" keep obnoxiously referring to DAESH as "IS," absurdly insinuating ISIS as the representation of Islam. I cannot stand all that shameless psyop garbage, and even worse, you have people like Ted Cruz who will "lecture" to Arabs that ISIS and Hezbollah were jointly sponsored by Assad and Iran. I kid you not! http://www.aina.org/news/20140911022600.htm
I'm absolutely sick of sectarian pseudochristian "zion"-ist propaganda from Zio-NAZI outlets like CUFI working overtime to slander Hezbollah when it couldn't be more clear that the Shi'ite-led, actually pluralistic and tolerant, wonderful human beings of Hezbollah led by Hassan Nasrallah saved innocent Syrians from the hands of DAESH-Nusra terrorists, often at the sacrifice of their own lives in the fight against ziosalafism. As far as I'm aware, I stand with the Syrian and Lebanese resistance at heart no matter what religion and sect they belong to, and am in wholehearted solidarity with my fellow beloved Islamic friends against "Christian"-"zion"-ist, salafist-takfiri, and nazijew terrorists alike.
Those exact same extremist Qutbist "jihad"-ist sects who posture themselves under duplicitous banners of "anti-Zionism" by demonizing Jews collectively are the EXACT SAME COLLUDERS WITH ZIONISM WHEN IT SUITS THEM -- when Nasser was trying to build up a strong Arab nationalist unity to counter Zionist criminality, Qutb and his Criminal Brotherhood lackeys were funded by MI6 as internal Anglosubversive fifth columnists to undermine Egypt. When Saddam Hussein built up an Arab nationalist and industrially socialist modernized Iraq, Anglo-American Freemasonic agencies brought back Khomeini from exile to take over Iran and from there spread balkanization to Iraq from the nominally "Shi'ite" side of the coin -- that was precisely why so-called "Israel" sent arms to Khomeini during the Iran-Iraq War. Hafez al-Assad later by 1996-97 must've learned his mistake of alienating Saddam and commenced an overdue rapprochement as Iraq and Syria began throwing each other vital lifelines that sped up under Bashar from 2000-03. (note that Bashar supported Saddam and the Sunni Ba'athists during the Iraqi insurgency, NOT the Tehran-controlled "Iraqi" government that drove Iraqi Sunnis into tragic sectarianism)
It's a very old tradition that Zionists always fund the biggest actual Jew-haters in order to subvert legitimate anti-Zionist movements into emasculated Machiavellian-Faustian controlled opposition -- it was the British Zionist Jew Herbert Samuel who appointed the barely-Islamically-equipped Amin al-Husseini as "Mufti," lest we forget.
Yes, exactly, the same people who blame Judaism for Zionism and who blame Islam for Qutbist-Wahhabi-Criminal Brotherhood-ISIS terrorism have always been the exact same pathological liars who would falsely equivocate Christianity to the KKK.
I'd agree with everything you're saying except the Saddam part, he was a CIA agent and was doing their bidding until he was fooled in invading Kuwait by the US who he thought gave him a green light, the Kuwaitis were the culprits giving him the excuse as they were siphoning the oil from the shared borders fields against the agreements in place.
Saddam took over the Ba'ath in Iraq and that caused the schism between the party ranks, most of the Ba'ath branches in different countries like Yemen, Lebanon, and others followed the Syrian leadership of the party, the Iraqi branch was only running Iraq, and Saddam used to fund Muslim Brotherhood terrorists and gave them camps to train and they will carry out their terrorist attacks inside Syria, Turkey at that time was extreme in its secularism and they were not providing these mobs any access, unlike Iraq and Jordan, even parties in Lebanon helped as well.
That era was as difficult as the current one. Syria was still holding on because late Hafez Al Assad was not giving the MB any amnesty, unlike Bashar, under the extreme pressure from Putin and Iran, both were betting on the Turkish madman Erdogan, and his fake promises.
The MB morphed into Al Qaeda, then ISIS and the hundreds of their affiliate groups. They were present in the first FSA, which was supposed to be secular, but they couldn't hide their sectarianism, and that caused the FSA to be replaced by the terrorist groups we see.
Appreciate your insightfully nuanced clarification here, Arabi -- so if I'm correctly piecing the larger picture taking into account your analytical summary here, Saddam was a brainwashed dupe who made the egregious decision of agreeing to a Faustian bargain with the Anglo-Western-Salafist empire and only split when he overstepped and it was proven too late to reverse the sealed fate of Iraq?
Yeah, I did read up a bit on the sectarian depravity shaking the heart of the Middle East during the 1980s, and by all indications that must've been a fraught era where genuine anti-Zionists were thrown at each other's throats as the West and Soviets were sitting in the background using intel manipulation to leverage sectarian division hoping to balkanize the whole region ASAP to their liking? Since you summarize that time frame as one that was "as difficult as the current one," I'm getting the impression naturally that nothing new is under the sun. (do correct me if I'm still mistaken about anything, since you naturally are magnitudes more familiar with Middle East geopolitical context than I am)
The more I study older generations of empirical ascension and demise, the motif strikes deep that the sharpest and most pronounced dissidents in positions of prestige almost every time were at one point Machiavellian-Faustian bargainers serving the empire as ego-tripped stooges, and that those who break away when it's too late to save their nations, as they scramble to stave off collapse for as long as possible, are part of the lesser-common exception and not the norm. Maybe it's just my inability to "let things go" as I ponder too much over societally-forced-amnesia-forgotten conflicts of old swept under the rug by the Western architects of misery who rewrite history over and over, but it just strikes a harrowingly deep chord within me to wonder what Syria and Iraq would've looked like if the West was deterred from invading Iraq, even by just a few additional years. Namely, would Saddam and Bashar have demonstrated utmost consistent mutual loyalty and not throw one another under the bus as the Saddam-Hafez relationship was so easily fractured?
In fact, reading recent news reporting from just a few months ago, currently the Khomeinist dominated Tehran-proxy "Iraqi" government after the coup of Dec. 8, 2024, has in this post-Assad era of balkanized depravity suddenly taken an interest in forging a kinship with the ISIS-HTS dominated "Syrian" government, and that this same post-Saddam "Iraqi government" was cold towards the prospect of a robust alliance with Bashar. We hear so often in the Janus-faced reporting by both Western and Iranian narratives of an Iranian alliance with Assad wherein Shi'ite dominated Khomeinist militias of Iraq were allies of Ba'athist Syria, and yet it appears that, all along, Saddam in his final years was the true Iraqi friend of Syria while the Iranian-controlled Khomeinist outwardly (nominally?) "Shi'a majority" "democratic" Iraqi government has not been a sincere ally of Bashar al-Assad the entire time. https://archive.is/dkdDj
Since your assessment of Ba'athist Iraq looks to be a highly balanced and well-informed perspective (do pardon if in any wise I come off slow to understand, as I'm still trapped partially in my own partial presuppositions I'm ever trying my best to sift through and often times past with utmost self-abased humility I try to impose on myself), the sheer contrast between Saddam's regionally pronounced Machiavellian brutality prior to the crippling of Iraq and his incredibly generous, brotherly-loyal lending of assistance to Syria from 2000-03 is only ever more stark in light of the brutal consequences that spanned almost two decades from the animosity between Saddam and Hafez that spilled over into proxy bloodshed.
I just cannot help but think that somewhere in the background, the Western and Soviet highest controllers were sitting at the same table agreeing in advance explicitly to engineer the intra-Ba'athist split between Saddam and Hafez -- a united pan-Arab nationalist coalition was the most formidable obstacle hateful to Anglo-Zionist destructive goals, and the egos on at least one side of the Ba'athist equation were channeled and co-opted into overstepping the line sowing a mutual seed of distrust that boiled over into the fractured, consequential deadliness that grievously emerged.
Obviously that's not to say Saddam's actions that served empirical divide-and-conquer interests were themselves justified or excusable by any means, particularly his funding of Muslim Brotherhood terrorists, just rather some retrospective pondering as to whether there are important lessons to learn for the sake of edifying consciences in our present generation to evade falling into the pits that people like Saddam, Gaddafi and/or Hafez were duped into in the earlier halves of their heydays.
By the way, speaking of the Muslim Brotherhood in Syria, randomly curious, what is your own personal perspective on the Palestinian Islamic Jihad in light of their interestingly consistent loyalty to Assad against the main comprisal of the Muslim Brotherhood that universally sided with the ziosalafist terrorist coup plotters against Syria?
Well presented! I just blame the moneyed psychopaths who, at the very top, I wager are Roman.
Thanks!!!
Appreciated as always, Amaterasu -- ditto, the root of the evil is the love of money, which always translates to greedy selfish lust for empirical power. When people place love for temporal splendor over respect for conscientious human consideration, that's where the slippery slope towards elite pedophile networks begin.
Yes, I recall you mentioning that before, and completely agree based off what I currently am likewise aware of: the Black Nobility and/or the Venetians are at the highest echelons, with the SMOM as their primary neo-Templar emissary politico-governmental managerial umbrella organization and the Jesuits as clerical priestly adjutants. I probably need to catch up on Matthew Schanche's videos over at YouTube for additional specifics.
Money surely does promote the psychopaths. As for greed...
Greed is a Symptom of Energy Accounting (article): https://amaterasusolar.substack.com/p/greed-is-a-symptom-of-energy-accounting
Mr. Goldstein, you're watching a bad movie that you are an unwitting participant in it (unpaid extra). If you doubt this read this:
Counterfeit Continuity in Our Fourth Estate Wasteland: https://tritorch.substack.com/p/counterfeit-continuity-in-our-fourth
Nothing we see through the lens of the "media" is real. We are living in an Edward Bernays fourth estate wasteland.
"There is something way bigger going on when you can divide everyone in the entire world into an 'us vs them' mentality on almost every single subject." —Prevensilk
Julius Nyerere sums this all up thusly: "The United States is a one-party state, but, with typical American extravagance, they have two of them."
The largest PSYOP in history is unfolding right before our eyes, armed with incalculable amounts of human behavior data harvested from internet social media and smart phone usage geared toward manipulating us to walk in lock-step into the incinerator of our own destruction.
We're dealing with a captured media and the transparently obvious military grade psychological operations they are relentlessly employing, the millions of people that believe their every obvious lie and preach it as gospel, and their near total obliviousness to the self-evident fact that these contrived, breaking-the-Richter-scale political earthquares are the predicate to the ruination of our Republic and the twilight of freedom.
Excerpt from: https://tritorch.substack.com/p/there-is-something-way-bigger-going
Until you realize how easy it is for your mind to be manipulated, you will remain a pawn in someone else's game —Evita Ochel
None of this is real. It's "reel".
I think I can agree with most of what you're getting at, TriTorch (and broadly concur). Not sure how I'm exactly an "unwitting participant" in it? Feel more than welcome to expand on your points.
Best way I can explain it: we're all a slave to the black mirrors in our lives. Here's why:
https://tritorch.substack.com/p/counterfeit-continuity-in-our-fourth
Do you know what's really going on Emmanuel Goldstein? Where do you get your information and how can you be sure that it's not tailored directly to your confirmation biases? With the tech today, that black mirror in your hand and on your desktop can corroborate any fiction you decide to indulge in six ways from Sunday with on demand fake answers to every question your mind cares to investigate and, hey, it can be reinforced with an narrative your mind seeks in that moment and at the moment.
Do you really know what's going on?
Are you sure?
Fair challenge, TriTorch. While I cannot prophesy of the future with 100% certainty, what I can say for right now, speaking for myself at least, is that I have some very strong instinctive mental precautionary red alerts about the rough schematic idea of the near future.
It's all about being able to properly dissect how dialectical manipulation works and recognizing that "there is nothing new under the sun" -- the tactics used today are recycled repetitions of ancient Nimrodist/Assyro-Babylonian empirical control rites.
More specifically, the world becomes a whole lot easier to dissect past the smokescreens of when you realize that the entire final culmination of the world order necessitates a penultimate faked "sacrificial goat burning up" which will be the false miracle of Rev. 13:13-14. The False Prophet is a false Elijah -- the real Elijah in I Kings 18 set up a real sacrificial bullock burnt offering which fire from God out of Heaven burned, which led the children of Israel to turn back to the living God, and so is this counterfeited by neo-Templar Johannite Satanic architects of Zionist Freemasonry: the False Prophet (a.k.a. the dispensationalist "Christian Zionist" Freemasonic evangelical power centered in the U.S.) creates a false sacrificial bullock (a.k.a. the Zionist Jews) and claims that "a future two-thirds annihilation of the Jews in Palestine will bring about the coming of Christ," when in actuality the entire ruse is faked and the Zionist Jews are set up to being herded to Occupied Palestine to be nuked in what will be passed off to idiot masses as "divine prophetic fulfillment." Then the so-called "Jesus" that "returns" to set up an earthly kingdom will actually be Satan dressed up as Jesus, but it'll be such a lying sign and wonder that the entire planet will be deceived.
Every single major geopolitical action by the world elites in at least the past century has all been to work towards accomplishing this fake "sacrificial goat" Sabbatean-Frankist Freemasonic "revelation of the method." Bolshevism was created by the Anglo-Jesuits (a.k.a. MI6 and Vatican-Germanic aristocrats with Jesuit help) to justify Nazi-Fascism, and Nazi-Fascists would in turn with arms and dollars from Rothschild-Warburg Zionists slaughter enough anti-Zionist Jews in Europe so the surviving traumatized reminder would be brainwashed into Zionist ethnonationalism in the long run. See the picture?
"entire final culmination"
you mean 'fulcrum'
Uh, I suppose? Trying to piece together the full picture is a mind-draining doozy, and I still have much more to internalize and process.
READ THE TALMUD.
Is there any argumentative point you wish to express?
go read the talmud. I don't want to express any points. my thread ends here.
First flaw of your argument: Assuming hypothetical Problem A has to be exactly like Problem B to be a problem.
If there is a “Jewish Problem”, it doesn’t have to be exactly like the “Islamic Problem”. There are many variables of difference between the Judaism of the past 2,000 years and mainstream Islam. One of them being a profound Westernization of Jews at least 200 years old, which in turn entailed a profound participation in the secularist Zeitgeist that throughout the West has replaced the vacuum left by the dissolution of Christendom. This entailment further entailed a development of the Gnostic disease called “Communism” and its associated pathogens (including Leftism). So it’s not so surprising that Max Blumenthal et al. become anti-”Zionist” insofar as they can associate “Zionism” with the evil parts of the West that continue to impede the Revolution. The irony of the Blumenthalian Jews—ironic if they aren’t controlled ops—is that the “Zionism” (and “Capitalism”) they oppose may actually be deeper form of the Revolution they espouse. They’re just too small-minded in an Angela-Davis Che-Guevarian starry-eyed way to see the bigger picture.