Good piece, despite the bit of ai spew. LOL! indeed, I ponder if this was not all...helps along to happen as it did by the moneyed psychopaths in control on Our planet.
Thanks as always, Amaterasu! And yeah, I tend to use AI a bit too much, to my honest admission. Moving forward, I'll try to incrementally refrain from the habit.
While Arabi Souri may or may not differ with my analysis here (if you're curious to understand Syria better, I definitely recommend consulting him for extensive insights, as I'm more of a rookie whereas he's a longtime expert), there appears to be a theme picked up semi-consistently that the Druze are a cynically instrumentalized target of co-optation for Anglo-Zionist divide-and-conquer purposes, probably just not to the same consistently longstanding grotesque extent as the Kurds. In all fairness, it's more of a tragedy that the Druze allowed themselves to be this palpably hoodwinked.
The moneyed psychopaths' geopolitical trick is this: they fund both the "left-wing" freedom-fighting separatists/"revolutionaries" and "right-wing" neofascists to destroy a common hated enemy (i.e. Saddam's Iraq and Assad's Syria), and then when the "left" and "right" flanks of that synarchist coup are vying inching accomplishment their goal of destroying the common enemy and begin to confront each other head-on, the moneyed psychopaths selectively "champion" the cause of the left flank (i.e. Kurdish separatists) to justify additional operations against the Ancien Regime, claiming falsely that the Ancien Regime is secretly colluding with the right-wing neofascists (i.e. the false State Department/CIA claims that "Saddam harbored al-Qaeda" or the MSM/Zionist claim that "Assad colluded with ISIS"). Then when the final overthrow of the Ancien Regime is complete, the naivete "left" is allowed to be swallowed up by or co-opted into the right wing of synarchy, i.e. the post-Assad abandonment of the Kurds by their Anglo-Zionist/American sponsors.
Good piece, despite the bit of ai spew. LOL! indeed, I ponder if this was not all...helps along to happen as it did by the moneyed psychopaths in control on Our planet.
Could be.
Thanks as always, Amaterasu! And yeah, I tend to use AI a bit too much, to my honest admission. Moving forward, I'll try to incrementally refrain from the habit.
While Arabi Souri may or may not differ with my analysis here (if you're curious to understand Syria better, I definitely recommend consulting him for extensive insights, as I'm more of a rookie whereas he's a longtime expert), there appears to be a theme picked up semi-consistently that the Druze are a cynically instrumentalized target of co-optation for Anglo-Zionist divide-and-conquer purposes, probably just not to the same consistently longstanding grotesque extent as the Kurds. In all fairness, it's more of a tragedy that the Druze allowed themselves to be this palpably hoodwinked.
The moneyed psychopaths' geopolitical trick is this: they fund both the "left-wing" freedom-fighting separatists/"revolutionaries" and "right-wing" neofascists to destroy a common hated enemy (i.e. Saddam's Iraq and Assad's Syria), and then when the "left" and "right" flanks of that synarchist coup are vying inching accomplishment their goal of destroying the common enemy and begin to confront each other head-on, the moneyed psychopaths selectively "champion" the cause of the left flank (i.e. Kurdish separatists) to justify additional operations against the Ancien Regime, claiming falsely that the Ancien Regime is secretly colluding with the right-wing neofascists (i.e. the false State Department/CIA claims that "Saddam harbored al-Qaeda" or the MSM/Zionist claim that "Assad colluded with ISIS"). Then when the final overthrow of the Ancien Regime is complete, the naivete "left" is allowed to be swallowed up by or co-opted into the right wing of synarchy, i.e. the post-Assad abandonment of the Kurds by their Anglo-Zionist/American sponsors.
Agree 100%!